Ivanov, David

Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is performed for various shoulder pathologies. Inadequate tensioning of the deltoid muscle can lead to complications, highlighting the need for optimization. Preoperative quantification of deltoid health may improve operative execution and outcomes. Shear wave elastography (SWE) quantifies stiffness as a marker for muscle health and tensioning. This study establishes normal reference values for the deltoid in healthy individuals. Methods 40 participants were enrolled, 10 in each 18–30, 31–40, 41–55, and 55 + age groups. Two operators performed SWE in 3 deltoid regions, and the intra- and inter-operator agreement was assessed. Results Mean values were 23.2 ± 4.6, 26.4 ± 5.6, and 17.9 ± 5.2 kPa for the anterior, lateral, and posterior regions. The posterior region did not show any age dependency. However, there were significant differences between the age groups of 18–30 and 55 + years in the anterior (19.7 ± 3.7 vs. 26.7 ± 5.3 kPa) and lateral (22.0 ± 5.4 vs. 30.2 ± 8.8 kPa). Intra-operator reliability ranged from 0.45 to 0.60, and inter-reader agreement from 0.57 to 0.85. Conclusion This study provides reference values of deltoid stiffness which could serve as a comparison with clinical measurements for RSA operative planning and execution and prediction of surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three fluoroscopic methods for determining femoral rotation. METHODS: Native femoral version was measured by computed tomography in 20 intact femurs from 10 cadaveric specimens. Two Steinmann pins were placed into each left femur above and below a planned transverse osteotomy which was completed through the diaphysis. Four surgeons utilized the true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques to correct the injured femur's rotation using the intact right femur as reference, yielding 120 measurements. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the angle subtended by the two Steinmann pins before and after manipulation and comparing against version measurements of the right femur. RESULTS: Absolute mean rotational error in the fractured femur compared to its uninjured state was 6.0° (95% CI, 4.6-7.5), 6.6° (95% CI, 5.0-8.2), and 8.5° (95% CI, 6.5-10.6) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference between techniques (p = 0.100). Compared to the right femur, absolute mean rotational error was 6.6° (95% CI, 1.0-12.2), 6.4° (95% CI, 0.1-12.6), and 8.9° (95% CI, 0.8-17.0) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.180). Significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP method compared to the TL and NH methods (20.0% vs 2.5% and 5.0%, p = 0.030). Absolute mean error in estimating femoral rotation of the intact femur using the TL and NH methods compared to CT was 6.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-8.2) and 4.4° (95% CI, 3.4-5.4), respectively, with significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and the lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques performed similarly in correcting rotation of the fractured femur, but significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP technique. This supports preferential use of the TL or NH methods for determining femoral version intraoperatively.

Focus on residents' role in teaching and learning has become a topic of increasing interest underscored by the responsibility that physicians in training are given as facilitators of medical student rotations, supervisors of peers and patient educators. Studies demonstrate that more developed teaching skills are predictive of increased knowledge base and improved clinical skill. As a coveted competency, development of teaching skill has become an established milestone in residency programs and a requirement by regulatory agencies (ACGME, LCME) that training institutions provide more opportunities for formal Resident‐as‐Teacher programs (RAT). In keeping with the authentic learning curriculum, the Student‐as‐Teacher (SAT) program in the Department of Anatomy, Mayo Clinic offers a structured and formal near‐peer teaching opportunity to third year medical students for advancing teaching skills. The program selects an average of 5–6 applicants to participate in teaching a 7‐week Anatomy block for first year medical students in an apprenticeship‐based model that emphasizes (1) Teamwork, (2) Leadership, (3) Lifelong learning, (4) Communication, (5) Core Knowledge, and (6) Teaching Skills/Professional development through individualized mentoring, structured debriefing, and reflective diaries. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the apprenticeship model by measuring changes in the targeted competencies in the context of teaching practice. Teaching assistants (TAs) were asked to reflect and evaluate their pre‐ and post‐teaching experience in SAT program on a visual analog scale (VAS). All 5 TAs voluntarily responded to the survey. De‐identified VAS ratings were converted into numerical data from 1 to 100. Most reported increase in perception was in the area of non‐technical skills development: providing feedback (59.7; P = 0.0009); understanding expectations and teaching skills required in medical education (39.7; P = 0.002); and understanding teamwork in teaching role (33.1; P = 0.025). Additionally, TAs appreciated increased acquisition of technical skills: knowledge in anatomy, embryology and radiology (31.4; P = 007). Thematic analysis of responses generated a list of themes which included “appreciation for learning of non‐technical skills” and “skills in providing feedback”. The role of basic science educators is extended through facilitation of future physician required competencies in early medical education. While improvement of anatomical knowledge is an obvious benefit to medical students, improvement of non‐technical skills is reinforced by opportunity of the near‐peer teaching experience. In a teaching role, non‐technical skills supported through the art of “learning by doing” provides senior medical students with an authentic experience and ability to turn the intangible into the tangible. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Ninety-six wrists (56 right and 40 left) in 96 patients (36 males and 60 females, mean age 38, range 15–77 years) underwent repair of ulnotriquetral ligament split tears between 2007 and 2016. Mayo wrist scores, visual analogue scale pain scores, and objective measures including grip strength and range of motion were obtained. Patients were assessed after a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 6–112 months). Ulnotriquetral split tear repair resulted in substantial improvements in pain and function. The mean Mayo wrist score improved from 57 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively, with 84% of patients achieving a good or excellent outcome. Pain scores decreased from 5.8 to 1.2. Grip improved from 25 kg to 29 kg. There was no significant change in range of motion of the wrist. Complications were noted in eight patients, with three experiencing continued pain, four with dysaesthesia of the dorsal sensory ulnar nerve, and one superficial infection. Arthroscopic ulnotriquetral split tear repair significantly reduced pain and improved Mayo wrist scores. Level of evidence: IV

Objective: To determine whether operating on “major” vertebral fractures leads to premature abortion of surgery and/or other acute cardiopulmonary complications. Design: Retrospective review. Clinical Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants and Intervention: We retrospectively queried our institutional Trauma Rregistry for all cases presenting with concomitant rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures. Main Outcome Measurements: The main outcomes included the surgical outcome (aborted vs. successfully performed), total and Intensive Care Unit length of stay (LOS), adverse discharge, mortality, and functional outcomes. Results: We found 57 cases with concomitant segmental rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures. Seven patients (12%) received a rib fixation, of which 1 received before vertebral fixation and 6 after. Importantly, 4 vertebral fixation cases (7.02%) had to be aborted intraoperatively because of the inability to tolerate prone positioning for surgery. For case–control analysis, we performed propensity score matching to obtain matched controls, that is, cases of vertebral fixation but no rib fractures. On matched case–control analysis, patients with concomitant segmental rib fractures and vertebral fractures were found to have higher Intensive Care Unit LOS [median = 3 days (Inter-Quartile Range = 0–9) versus. 8.4 days, P = 0.003], whereas total LOS, frequency of complete, incomplete or functional spinal cord injury, discharge to rehab, and discharge to nursing home were found to be similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that segmental rib fractures with concomitant vertebral fractures undergoing surgical treatment represent a subset of patients that may be at increased risk of intraoperative cardio-pulmonary complications and rib fixation before prone spine surgery for cases in which the neurological status is stable is reasonable. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.