Citations

Abstract Background Molecular underpinnings and clinical characteristics of ERBB2/HER2-mutated colorectal cancers (CRCs) remain poorly understood. We aimed to comprehensively characterize the genomic landscape and clinical features of ERBB2/HER2-mutated CRC and to compare them with those of ERBB2/HER2-amplified CRC. Patients and methods We analyzed cBioPortal data from 4348 CRC patients with available ERBB2/HER2 profiling. Clinicodemographic features, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden, and alterations in 94 cancer-associated genes were evaluated using chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and hierarchical clustering. Results ERBB2/HER2 putative driver mutations were identified in 95 patients (2.2%), amplifications in 87 (2.0%), and wild-type status in 4166 (95.8%). In the overall cohort, ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors demonstrated significant KRAS enrichment (50.5%) compared to wild-type (37.7%; P = .014) and amplified tumors (18.4%; P < .001), alongside MSI enrichment (37.2% vs 1.6%; P < .001), elevated tumor mutational burden, and right-sided predominance. ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors also showed broad driver co-alterations largely reflecting their MSI background. In contrast, ERBB2/HER2-amplified tumors exhibited left-sided predominance, with microsatellite stable (MSS)-restricted analyses revealing selective mutual exclusivity with KRAS (Log2 OR = −1.58; q = 0.019) and TP53 co-occurrence (Log2 OR = 2.04; q = 0.019). Hierarchical clustering confirmed that mutated and amplified tumors consistently occupy separate clusters across anatomical sites. Conclusion ERBB2/HER2 mutations and amplifications represent molecularly and clinically distinct subgroups. ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors are characterized by an MSI-enriched, hypermutated background with frequent concurrent KRAS alterations, whereas amplified tumors exhibit selective KRAS mutual exclusivity and TP53 co-occurrence. These exploratory findings support alteration-specific therapeutic strategies in CRC.

TPS3686 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA–) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA– (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Accrual is 1,123/1,912 (as of 1/20/2026). *Drs. Dasari and Lieu contributed equally to the development of this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

e16486 Background: Allele-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors have revolutionized lung and colorectal cancer treatment, yet the biology of G12C in other gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies remains undefined. We aimed to elucidate the clinicopathologic and genomic landscape of KRAS G12C-mutated tumors compared to other G12 variants in a large non-colorectal GI cohort. Methods: We queried cBioPortal for pancreatic, esophagogastric, hepatobiliary, ampullary, and appendiceal adenocarcinomas. Following data quality control, the final cohort (n = 6,352) was stratified into KRAS wild-type (n = 3,293), G12C (n = 63), and other G12 variants (n = 2,996). Clinicopathologic features, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability status, and co-alteration in 96 key genes across 11 signaling pathways were compared. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher’s exact or Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: KRAS G12C prevalence was 1.0% overall, with significant heterogeneity across cancer subtypes (p < 0.001). Appendiceal adenocarcinoma demonstrated the highest G12C prevalence at 5.71% (10/175), followed by ampullary (1.44%, 2/139), pancreatic (1.17%, 34/2906), hepatobiliary (0.88%, 12/1360), and esophagogastric cancers (0.28%, 5/1772). G12C patients were significantly older than wild-type patients (64.8±11.2 vs 62.5±12.9 years, mean±SD, p < 0.001) but younger than other G12 variant carriers (65.8±10.4 years). G12C tumors demonstrated intermediate genomic instability, with a TMB of 4.82±6.17 compared to 4.98±10.55 in wild-type tumors and 3.67±10.12 in other G12 variants (p < 0.001). Notably, G12C tumors were universally microsatellite stable (0% MSI-H vs 4.0% wild-type vs 0.9% other G12, p < 0.001). Genomic analysis revealed that AKT1 mutations were significantly enriched in the G12C cohort (6.3% vs 0.4%; q = 0.025) as compared to other G12 variants. A trend of increased mutation frequency in HRAS was observed specifically in pancreatic cancers in G12C tumors as compared to other variants (8.8% vs 0.7%; q = 0.083). In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, G12C tumors were enriched for chromatin modifiers, notably ARID1A (17.6% vs 7.7%, p = 0.045) and SETD2 / SETD26 (8.8% vs 1.1%, p = 0.006), though these did not reach FDR significance. Notably, the immunotherapy-resistance drivers STK11 and KEAP1 were absent (0%) in the whole G12C cohort. Conclusions: KRAS G12C represents a biologically distinct subgroup of exon 2 KRAS mutations compared to other KRAS G12 pathogenic variants. The absence of resistance markers and enrichment of actionable AKT1 and chromatin-modifier mutations suggest distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities in non-colorectal KRAS G12C-mutated GI cancers.

TPS256 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-4-2025): 967/1,912. Drs. Lieu and Dasari contributed equally to the development of this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

210 Background: ERBB2/HER2 amplification defines a rare but clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC), associated with favorable responses to HER2-targeted therapies. In contrast, ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs show limited therapeutic benefit, and their clinical and molecular features remain poorly defined. This study investigated the molecular and clinical features of ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs to provide insight into the molecular basis of their differential therapeutic vulnerabilities compared to amplified CRC. Methods: CRC cases were identified from cBioPortal studies with available clinical and ERBB2/HER2 genomic data. After quality control and deduplication, the cohort included 4407 unique cases: 97 with driver mutation(s) only (2.2%), 86 with amplification only (2%), and 4224 wild-type (95.9%). Demographic, clinical, and molecular features, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and alterations in 94 oncogenic pathway genes, were compared across groups. Statistical analyses used chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data, Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables, and the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Odds ratios and FDR-adjusted p-values were calculated to assess associations. Results: Across groups, the distributions of gender, race, and primary cancer site (colon or rectal cancer) were comparable. However, significant differences were observed in age (mean 58.7 ± 15.0 years for ERBB2/HER2 -mutant, 55 ± 13.9 for amplified, and 59 ± 14.8 for wild-type; p = 0.035) and tumor sidedness (among ERBB2/HER2 -mutant cases: right-colon 30.8%, left-colon 15.2%; among ERBB2/HER2 -amplified: right-colon 12.1%, left-colon 37.9%, p = 0.011). KRAS alterations were significantly more common in ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs (50.5%) compared with both amplified (19.8%) and wild-type (37.6%). MSI-H was detected in 34.5% of ERBB2/HER2 -mutant cases, whereas no MSI-H was observed among amplified tumors (p < 0.001). Expectedly, ERBB2/HER2 -mutant tumors exhibited a hypermutated phenotype, with significantly higher TMB (30.3 ± 45.5) and total mutation count (232.8 ± 926.0), compared to amplified (6.1 ± 9.7 and 15.3 ± 28.4) and wild-type (10.5 ± 20.3 and 126.3 ± 424.5; both p < 0.001). Conversely, ERBB2/HER2 -amplified tumors had the highest fraction of overall genomic alterations including chromosomal changes (0.24 ± 0.17 in amplified vs 0.14 ± 0.17 in mutants and 0.20 ± 0.16 in wild-type; p < 0.001). Hierarchical clustering demonstrated that ERBB2/HER2 -mutant tumors form a distinct molecular cluster, whereas amplified tumors cluster closely with wild-type CRC. Conclusions: ERBB2/HER2 - mutant and amplified CRCs show highly distinct genomic and clinical features, supporting the need for tailored treatment approaches.

TPS3644 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 1-27-2025): 647/1,912. NCT: 05174169. Support: U10 CA180868, -180822; -180888; UG1 CA189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

ImportanceImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for treatment of microsatellite instable (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but factors associated with receipt and efficacy of ICIs in routine clinical practice remain largely unknown.ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with receipt of ICIs and associated survival outcomes among patients with mCRC in routine clinical practice.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cohort study used deidentified data from a nationwide electronic health record–derived database to include 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC between January 2013 and June 2019. Population-based patients were diagnosed with de novo mCRC and had at least 2 documented clinical visits on or after the date of diagnosis. The study analyses were performed between September 2020 and April 2021.ExposurePatients received ICI therapy and/or chemotherapy as part of a systemic treatment for mCRC.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe outcomes were receipt of ICI therapy, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD).ResultsIn this cohort study of 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC (10 537 [55.7%] male; 546 [2.9%] Asian, 2005 [10.6%] Black or African American, 1674 [8.8%] Hispanic, 12 338 [65.2%] White, 4043 [21.4%] unknown race or ethnicity; median [IQR] age at metastatic diagnosis, 64.6 [55.0-73.3] years), patients with MSI-H tumors had a significantly higher probability of receiving ICIs than those with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors (odds ratio [OR], 22.66 [95% CI, 17.30-29.73]; P &amp;lt; .001), whereas patients initially diagnosed with synchronous mCRC had significantly lower odds of receiving ICIs than patients with metachronous mCRC (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.73]; P &amp;lt; .001). Patients with MSI-H tumors who received ICIs as first line of therapy had significantly longer OS than those receiving chemotherapy only (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25-0.56]; P &amp;lt; .001). Among patients with MSS tumors, ICI-based therapy was associated with significantly longer OS for patients with high albumin level (vs low: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.18-0.45]; P &amp;lt; .001) and antibiotic use (vs nonuse: HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]; P &amp;lt; .001), but a significantly shorter OS for patients with synchronous mCRC (vs metachronous: HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.24-2.89]; P = .003). In addition, 29 out of 235 patients with MSS tumors (12.3%) experienced durable responses on ICI-based therapy. Similar patterns of associations with TTD were observed.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of patients with mCRC, clinical characteristics were associated with different survival outcomes in patients treated with ICI-based therapy, with important clinical implications for patients with MSS tumors who are generally unresponsive to immunotherapy.

TPS310 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 500/1,912. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

TPS3641 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vserial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 02-02-2024) is 240/1,912. NCT05174169. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

663 Background: GI malignancies continue to be a major cause of cancer related deaths, despite advances in therapy options. In pancreatic cancer, the presence of homologous recombination mutations (HRM) has been shown to confer increased sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. However, the role of HRM mutations in other GI cancers remains to be determined. The focus of this study is to evaluate the prognostic nature of core and noncore HRM in nonpancreatic GI cancers. Additionally, we aim to understand the predictive nature of these mutations related to platinum exposure. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients at Moffitt Cancer Center with a primary stage IV nonpancreatic GI cancer treated with platinum therapy. All patients had next generation sequencing and were in the Clinical Genomics Action Committee database between 1/1/2013 and 11/1/2020. All patients had either a core HRM (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) or noncore HRM (such as ATM, ATR, BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, and RAD51). Patients were grouped into core HRM vs. noncore HRM. Response was stratified between responders (complete response and partial response) vs. non responders (stable disease and progressive disease), based on RECIST criteria. Progression free survival and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to assess the difference in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by HRM status and type of platinum therapy used. Results: There were 72 patients included in the study: the majority of patients were male (65.3%) and Caucasian (87.5%). Twenty-one (29.2%) patients had a core HRM and 51 (70.8%) had a noncore HRM. There was no significant difference in response rate between patients with core HRM and patients with noncore HRM for evaluable patients (n = 66): 20.0% of patients with core HRM vs. 21.7% of patients with noncore HRM demonstrated a response to platinum therapy (p = 0.41). An improved OS was noted for patients with core HRM vs. those with noncore HRM at 68.9 vs. 24.3 months (p = 0.019). An improved PFS was also seen in patients with core HRM at 10.4 months vs. 6.3 months with noncore HRM (p = 0.027). There was no difference in PFS based on type of platinum therapy used (oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin), while an improved OS was noted for patients treated with oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin at 43.1 vs. 28.2 vs. 16.0 months (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that in stage IV nonpancreatic GI malignancies treated with platinum therapy, patients with core HRM had a greater OS and PFS compared to those with noncore HRM, suggesting a potential prognostic and predictive role of these mutations. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.