Krauss, John C.

Abstract Background Molecular underpinnings and clinical characteristics of ERBB2/HER2-mutated colorectal cancers (CRCs) remain poorly understood. We aimed to comprehensively characterize the genomic landscape and clinical features of ERBB2/HER2-mutated CRC and to compare them with those of ERBB2/HER2-amplified CRC. Patients and methods We analyzed cBioPortal data from 4348 CRC patients with available ERBB2/HER2 profiling. Clinicodemographic features, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden, and alterations in 94 cancer-associated genes were evaluated using chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and hierarchical clustering. Results ERBB2/HER2 putative driver mutations were identified in 95 patients (2.2%), amplifications in 87 (2.0%), and wild-type status in 4166 (95.8%). In the overall cohort, ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors demonstrated significant KRAS enrichment (50.5%) compared to wild-type (37.7%; P = .014) and amplified tumors (18.4%; P < .001), alongside MSI enrichment (37.2% vs 1.6%; P < .001), elevated tumor mutational burden, and right-sided predominance. ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors also showed broad driver co-alterations largely reflecting their MSI background. In contrast, ERBB2/HER2-amplified tumors exhibited left-sided predominance, with microsatellite stable (MSS)-restricted analyses revealing selective mutual exclusivity with KRAS (Log2 OR = −1.58; q = 0.019) and TP53 co-occurrence (Log2 OR = 2.04; q = 0.019). Hierarchical clustering confirmed that mutated and amplified tumors consistently occupy separate clusters across anatomical sites. Conclusion ERBB2/HER2 mutations and amplifications represent molecularly and clinically distinct subgroups. ERBB2/HER2-mutated tumors are characterized by an MSI-enriched, hypermutated background with frequent concurrent KRAS alterations, whereas amplified tumors exhibit selective KRAS mutual exclusivity and TP53 co-occurrence. These exploratory findings support alteration-specific therapeutic strategies in CRC.

SummaryThe rituximab extended schedule or retreatment trial (RESORT; E4402) was a phase 3 randomized prospective trial comparing maintenance rituximab (MR) versus a retreatment (RR) dosing strategy in asymptomatic, low tumour burden indolent lymphoma. A planned exploratory sub‐study compared the two strategies for small lymphocytic (SLL) and marginal zone lymphomas (MZL). Patients responding to rituximab weekly × 4 were randomized to MR (single dose rituximab every 3 months until treatment failure) or RR (rituximab weekly × 4) at the time of each progression until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTTF). Patients with SLL (n = 57), MZL (n = 71) and unclassifiable small B‐cell lymphoma (n = 3) received induction rituximab. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31–49%; SLL ORR 22·8%; MZL ORR 52·1%]; all 52 responders were randomized. At a median of 4·3 years from randomization, treatment failure occurred in 18/23 RR and 15/29 MR. The median TTTF was 1·4 years for RR and 4·8 years for MR (P = 0·012); median time to first cytotoxic therapy was 6·3 years for RR and not reached for MR (P = 0·0002). Survival did not differ (P = 0·72). In low tumour burden SLL and MZL patients responding to rituximab induction, MR significantly improved TTTF as compared with RR.