Citations

Abstract Purpose: VV1 is designed to induce selective oncolysis of tumor cells and amplify cellular antitumor immune responses. This open-label, phase I, multicenter clinical trial assessed the safety and tolerability of VV1 monotherapy administered intratumorally or intravenously or administered intravenously in combination with avelumab. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received intratumoral (n = 27) or intravenous VV1 monotherapy (n = 33) or intravenous VV1 plus avelumab (n = 16). Infusion durations (15–180 minutes) and viral dose (1.7 × 1010 or 1 × 1011 TCID50) were also evaluated. Study objectives included VV1 safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, preliminary efficacy, and immune responses. Results: Intratumoral and intravenous VV1 were well tolerated, and injection reactions were infrequent. The most common adverse events of any grade related to VV1 were cytokine release syndrome (58%), fatigue (33%), and decreased lymphocyte count (32%). Virus infection of tumors was confirmed by NIS imaging and increases in serum levels of virally encoded interferon-β (IFNβ). Histologic tumor analysis at 28 days after intratumoral VV1 administration indicated increases in tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Two durable partial responses were recorded: a patient with pheochromocytoma after one intravenous dose of VV1 and a patient with thymic cancer in the combination arm. Stable disease was observed in 17 of 49 patients (34.7%) who received intravenous VV1. Conclusions: This first-in-human study demonstrates that intratumoral or intravenous VV1 administration had an acceptable safety profile as monotherapy and intravenously in combination with avelumab. There is preliminary antitumor activity. Intratumoral VV1 plus cemiplimab is now showing promise in the neoadjuvant setting. Significance: VV1 is a tumor-selective oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express IFNβ and the thyroidal NIS reporter gene. In this phase I study, we have demonstrated that a single administration of VV1, as a monotherapy or with an immune checkpoint inhibitor is safe, infects tumor lesions resulting in intratumoral infiltration of immune cells, and exhibits early signs of antitumor activity in patients with advanced unresectable and metastatic solid tumors.

e18026 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is part of standard of care first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. However, less than 20% of patients (CPS ≥1) have an objective response to ICI monotherapy, and most tumors progress within ~3 months. We sought to improve the proportion of patients who benefit from a chemotherapy-free regimen by combining intratumoral (IT) VV1 oncolytic virus (VSV-IFNβ-NIS) injections with the anti-PD-1 antibody, cemiplimab. We report a pre-planned analysis of Simon's stage 1 results. Methods: We activated a phase 2 study testing the efficacy of first line IT VV1 plus cemiplimab in 1 st line patients with R/M HNSCC. A Simon's two-stage design was employed whereby 10 patients would be accrued in stage 1, and if 3 or more responses were observed, 12 additional patients would be accrued for stage 2. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator (RECIST 1.1). Eligible patients had untreated R/M HNSCC from primary oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, or larynx sites with CPS ≥1. Patients had to have at least one measurable lesion amenable to IT injection. Treatment comprised of IT injections to 1-5 lesions of oncolytic VV-1 virus and IV cemiplimab 350 mg on day 1, repeated every 21 days. Each lesion could be injected 3 times; a 4th injection was allowed if a partial response (PR) was achieved after 3 injections. Cemiplimab could be continued for up to 2 years until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Patient and tumor characteristics, as well as efficacy and toxicity are summarized in the table below. Ten patients were treated at the time of Stage 1 analysis, with 3 showing a confirmed PR for ORR of 30%. Responder CPS scores were 45, 12 and 20%. Two of the responders subsequently showed progression after 6.2 and 9.9 months, the third has maintained PR at 7.7 months to date. Eight of 10 patients showed decrease in the sum of target lesion size (mean decrease of 16%; range -57 to 77%). One grade 2 event of ICI nephritis resolved with corticosteroid treatment. Conclusions: Three patients showed confirmed PR by RECIST 1.1 in Simon's stage 1, meeting criteria to proceed to Simon's stage 2. A total of 22 patients in the HNSCC will be enrolled. VV1 plus cemiplimab shows promise in first line R/M HNSCC based on these initial results. Clinical trial information: NCT04291105 . Patient demographics. N (treated) 10 Sex 20% female Median age (y) 60 (54 – 76) Oropharynx 7 HPV+ 7 Oral cavity 3 PD-L1 CPS median (range) 7.5 (1-45%) Locoregional injection 3 Distant injection 6 Local and distant injection 1 Best response (RECIST 1.1) PR 3 SD 5 PD 2 Adverse Events #pts any VV1/cemiplimab-related G3 AE 4 Lymphopenia 3 Elevated ALK 1

e14594 Background: Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express interferon beta (IFNβ) to boost cellular antitumor immunity and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). A phase 1 trial investigating a single infusion of VV1 in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and T-cell lymphoma (TCL) showed promising and durable clinical activity, primarily in patients with TCL. VV1 infects tumor cells and macrophages in the lymph nodes and spleen, resulting in release of tumor antigens and IFNβ that activates and boost cellular antitumor immunity. We present the preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis in patients given one intravenous (IV) dose of VV1. Methods: Patients received 5e9 to 1.7e11 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose) of VV1 given over 30 minutes. We also explored the impact of infusion duration (0.25, 0.5,1 and 3 hours) in 17 patients with solid tumors. The objectives were to determine the impact of viral dose on pharmacokinetics (PK) of VSV and IFNβ. For VSV and IFNβ PK, whole blood was collected in 30 patients on days 1, 2, 3, and 8. Dose levels were 1.7E10, 5E10, and 1.7E11 TCID50. The plasma concentration-time data were estimated with non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin 8.3. Results: The half-life of VV1 is comparable (10-12h) between dose levels of 1.7e10, 5e10 and 1.7e11. Ideal infusion rate was found to be 30 minutes and provides the highest Cmax and AUC. Most peak concentrations for viremia and IFNβ were achieved between ‘end of infusion’ and 2.5 hours, 4.5 and 24 hours, respectively. Following infusion, a second concentration peak is found in over half the patients leading to highly variable terminal elimination half-life, specifically where the second peak is at 24 hours. There was no second peak for IFNβ levels. Peak plasma concentration and systemic exposure increased in proportion to increased dose, consistent with linear clearance. Conclusions: The 30 minute infusion rate was considered the best as its PK provides the highest Cmax and AUC with no significant CRS differences among other groups. IL-6 and IFNα markers at hour 4 indicate a likely CRS and hour 24 provides a possible prediction of the grade. Cmax and AUC were also highest at 1.7e11 TCID50. This is the recommended dose that will be used in the expansion arm in patients with TCL. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 , NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]

TPS9595 Background: There is a need for novel immunotherapies to address the patient population that never or no longer responds to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). VV1 is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human interferon beta (IFNβ) to enhance cellular anti-tumor immune responses and tumor selectivity. Phase 1 studies demonstrated VV1 anti-tumor activity in several malignancies with or without a CPI. We are exploring ways to optimize VV1 efficacy in combination with cemiplimab, an anti-PD1 antibody approved for lung, basal and squamous cell skin cancers. Recent clinical data support a 5-fold higher dose of VV1 than was previously explored, and pre-clinical data show synergy between the oncolytic and an anti-CTLA4 antibody, in addition to cemiplimab, supporting exploration of a triplet. What was originally a five-arm study of intravenous (IV) VV1 in combination with IV cemiplimab has been amended to focus on 2 means of optimizing efficacy: use of a higher dose of VV1 and triplet combination in proof-of-concept populations. Methods: We are now enrolling pts with advanced melanoma (after progression on anti-PD1) and plan to include 1 st -line NSCLC pts with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. The study is first exploring the preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, and immunogenic activity of the combination of IV VV1 at a dose of 1.0 x 10 11 TCID 50 once on D1 followed by IV cemiplimab Q3W starting on D8, or the same regimen with an additional intratumoral injection of VV1 1.0 x 10 9 TCID 50 once on D1 for pts with accessible lesions. Pts receive IV cemiplimab Q3W until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Once at least 6 pts have been treated with acceptable safety across the 2 melanoma doublet cohorts using this higher dose of VV1, a 3 rd melanoma cohort will open to add a single dose of ipilimumab 50 mg on D1 (all IV triplet). Once 6 melanoma pts have received the triplet safely, the 1 st -line NSCLC cohort will open. All cohort decisions are guided by a Data Review Committee. Cohorts will be expanded based on a Simon 2-stage design using a type I error rate of 0.05 and power of 85%. Null ORR is 10% with a target of 35% for 2 nd line melanoma and null ORR is 40% in 1 st line NSCLC with a target of 70%. Each melanoma cohort will require a response in ≥2 of 10 pts in the 1 st stage to add 11 more in the 2 nd stage, while NSCLC will first need 5/9 evaluable pts to respond, then an additional 13 to complete the design. Response is assessed at week 7 then Q9W per RECIST v1.1. The study includes serial biopsies in ≥3/10 pts in Stage 1 of each of the IV melanoma cohorts (doublet and triplet therapy), all pts in Stage 2 of these IV melanoma cohorts, and all pts in both Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the IV/IT melanoma cohort, to permit a thorough investigation of the impact of the 3 immunotherapies under investigation. The study is currently ongoing in the USA. Clinical trial information: NCT04291105.

Abstract Rationale Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the defining morphology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Guidelines for IPF diagnosis conditionally recommend surgical lung biopsy for histopathology diagnosis of UIP when radiology and clinical context are not definitive. A “molecular diagnosis of UIP” in transbronchial lung biopsy, the Envisia Genomic Classifier, accurately predicted histopathologic UIP. Objectives We evaluated the combined accuracy of the Envisia Genomic Classifier and local radiology in the detection of UIP pattern. Methods Ninety-six patients who had diagnostic lung pathology as well as a transbronchial lung biopsy for molecular testing with Envisia Genomic Classifier were included in this analysis. The classifier results were scored against reference pathology. UIP identified on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) as documented by features in local radiologists’ reports was compared with histopathology. Measurements and Main Results In 96 patients, the Envisia Classifier achieved a specificity of 92.1% (confidence interval [CI],78.6–98.3%) and a sensitivity of 60.3% (CI, 46.6–73.0%) for histology-proven UIP pattern. Local radiologists identified UIP in 18 of 53 patients with UIP histopathology, with a sensitivity of 34.0% (CI, 21.5–48.3%) and a specificity of 96.9% (CI, 83.8–100%). In conjunction with HRCT patterns of UIP, the Envisia Classifier results identified 24 additional patients with UIP (sensitivity 79.2%; specificity 90.6%). Conclusions In 96 patients with suspected interstitial lung disease, the Envisia Genomic Classifier identified UIP regardless of HRCT pattern. These results suggest that recognition of a UIP pattern by the Envisia Genomic Classifier combined with HRCT and clinical factors in a multidisciplinary discussion may assist clinicians in making an interstitial lung disease (especially IPF) diagnosis without the need for a surgical lung biopsy.

TPS3161 Background: VV1 is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human IFNβ to enhance cellular anti-tumor immune responses and tumor selectivity, and the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) for virus tracking by SPECT imaging. Cancer cells are often hyporesponsive to IFNβ, enabling the efficient spread of VV1 and resulting in increased oncolysis. Differently from other oncolytic viruses, VV1 is suitable for both intra-tumoral (IT) and/or intra-venous (IV) administration. Despite considerable anti-tumor activity with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) among some malignancies, long term survival and overall cures remain elusive. Prior Ph 1 studies have shown significant anti-tumor activity among several malignancies when VV1 was administered either as monotherapy or in combination with a CPI, despite progression on prior CPI monotherapy. Furthermore, pre- and post-treatment biopsy evaluations after VV1 treatment have demonstrated T cell infiltration and inflammation in both IT injected and non-injected lesions. Among IV treated patients (pts), IFNβ was detectable in the serum correlating with viral replication, making it an effective biomarker. C is a high-affinity potent human IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Though approved for use in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, C has shown anti-tumor activity, similar to other CPI, in several other indications. Therefore, VV1 and C could be an attractive combination for the immunotherapy for several solid tumors. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of VV1 in combination with C in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The Ph 2 Simon 2 stage five-arm study of IV administration VV1 in combination with IV C will enroll pts with advanced NSCLC, HCC, melanoma & endometrial cancer. Enrolled pts with NSCLC & melanoma will be recent CPI-progressors, whereas enrolled HCC & endometrial cancer will be CPI-naïve. The study’s objectives include assessment of preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, & immuno-regulatory activity of the combination. Pts will receive IV VV1 once on D1 and IV C once every 3 weeks until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Pts enrolled in one melanoma cohort will also receive IT VV1 administered to palpable lesions. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. The null hypothesis of each cohort’s ORR will be tested versus a one-sided alternative yielding a Type I error rate of 5% and power of 80%. Cohorts will be expanded based on signal of activity. Clinical trial information: NCT .

3090 Background: VV1 (Voyager V1) is derived from VSV, an RNA virus with low human seroprevalence, engineered to replicate selectively in and kill human cancer cells. In Part 1 of this study, we demonstrated the safety of intratumoral VV1 and dose-response, using serum IFNβ as a biomarker; we observed viral replication in tumor and concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking (SITC 2018). 2 other studies suggested greater efficacy and higher IFNβ levels with IV administration. Longer infusion durations were reported to mitigate infusion reactions (IRRs) for another oncolytic. Methods: We studied 3 different infusion durations of VV1 monotherapy at the recommended phase 2 IV dose (1.7 x 1010 TCID50) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Endpoints included safety, preliminary anti-tumor activity, viral titers, IFNβ PD and shedding. Patients received IV VV1 once on D1 and were monitored for DLT over 21 days with efficacy assessments every 6 weeks. IRRs were classified using Lee 2014 criteria for CRS as either constitutional symptoms only (G1) or involving hypotension (G2). Results: 18 patients were treated at 30, 60 and 180-minute durations (n = 7, 5 and 6, respectively). No DLTs, deaths or G3-4 related IRR AEs were observed. Most pts were female (67%), white (100%), with ECOG PS 0 (61%) and median 4 lines of prior systemic therapy (range 1-14) for colorectal (CRC; 56%), squamous cell carcinoma (11%), pheochromocytoma (11%), sarcoma (11%) or other (11%) cancers. The table shows results (number of patients) by infusion duration. Conclusions: There was no difference in safety between the 3 infusion durations, while efficacy and PD markers suggested better anti-tumor effect with 30-minute infusion. VV1 is safe for caregivers, with no viral shedding. Part 3 of this study will now treat CRC patients with VV1 in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (avelumab). A 5-arm phase 2 basket study in combination with cemiplimab is proceeding with 30-minute infusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: Oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (oHSV) represent a promising therapy for glioblastoma (GBM), but their clinical success has been limited. Early innate immune responses to viral infection reduce oHSV replication, tumor destruction, and efficacy. Here, we characterized the antiviral effects of macrophages and microglia on viral therapy for GBM. Experimental Design: Quantitative flow cytometry of mice with intracranial gliomas (±oHSV) was used to examine macrophage/microglia infiltration and activation. In vitro coculture assays of infected glioma cells with microglia/macrophages were used to test their impact on oHSV replication. Macrophages from TNFα-knockout mice and blocking antibodies were used to evaluate the biologic effects of TNFα on virus replication. TNFα blocking antibodies were used to evaluate the impact of TNFα on oHSV therapy in vivo. Results: Flow-cytometry analysis revealed a 7.9-fold increase in macrophage infiltration after virus treatment. Tumor-infiltrating macrophages/microglia were polarized toward a M1, proinflammatory phenotype, and they expressed high levels of CD86, MHCII, and Ly6C. Macrophages/microglia produced significant amounts of TNFα in response to infected glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Using TNFα-blocking antibodies and macrophages derived from TNFα-knockout mice, we discovered TNFα-induced apoptosis in infected tumor cells and inhibited virus replication. Finally, we demonstrated the transient blockade of TNFα from the tumor microenvironment with TNFα-blocking antibodies significantly enhanced virus replication and survival in GBM intracranial tumors. Conclusions: The results of these studies suggest that FDA approved TNFα inhibitors may significantly improve the efficacy of oncolytic virus therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3274–85. ©2015 AACR.

ABSTRACT VSV-FH is a hybrid vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) with a deletion of its G glycoprotein and encoding the measles virus (MV) fusion (F) and hemagglutinin (H) envelope glycoproteins. VSV-FH infects cells expressing MV receptors and is fusogenic and effective against myeloma xenografts in mice. We evaluated the fusogenic activities of MV and VSV-FH in relationship to the density of receptor on the target cell surface and the kinetics of F and H expression in infected cells. Using a panel of cells expressing increasing numbers of the MV receptor CD46, we evaluated syncytium size in MV- or VSV-FH-infected cells. VSV-FH is not fusogenic at low CD46 density but requires less CD46 for syncytium formation than MV. The size of each syncytium is larger in VSV-FH-infected cells at a specific CD46 density. While syncytium size reached a plateau and did not increase further in MV-infected CHO cells expressing ≥4,620 CD46 copies/cell, there was a corresponding increase in syncytium size with increases in CD46 levels in VSV-FH-infected CD46-expressing CHO (CHO-CD46) cells. Further analysis in VSV-FH-infected cell lines shows earlier and higher expression of F and H mRNAs and protein. However, VSV-FH cytotoxic activity was reduced by pretreatment of the cells with type I interferon. In contrast, the cytopathic effects are not affected in MV-infected cells. In summary, VSV-FH has significant advantages over MV as an oncolytic virus due to its higher viral yield, faster replication kinetics, and larger fusogenic capabilities but should be used in cancer types with defective interferon signaling pathways. IMPORTANCE We studied the cytotoxic activity of a vesicular stomatitis/measles hybrid virus (VSV-FH), which is superior to that of measles virus (MV), in different cancer cell lines. We determined that viral RNA and protein were produced faster and in higher quantities in VSV-FH-infected cells. This resulted in the formation of larger syncytia, higher production of infectious particles, and a more potent cytopathic effect in permissive cells. Importantly, VSV-FH, similar to MV, can discriminate between low- and high-expressing CD46 cells, a phenotype important for cancer therapy as the virus will be able to preferentially infect cancer cells that overexpress CD46 over low-CD46-expressing normal cells.