Citations

Abstract Background Rare pediatric and young adult brain tumors pose major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to limited evidence and scattered expertise. The International Rare Brain Tumor Board was established to enable multidisciplinary case review, shared learning, and collaborative decision support. Methods Launched in February 2025, the Rare Brain Tumor Board is a monthly collaborative initiative led by Children’s National Hospital and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Close partnership with the European Pediatric Rare CNS Tumor Board enhances transatlantic exchange and alignment of diagnostic and treatment recommendations. De-identified cases are presented with clinical history, neuroimaging, histopathology, and molecular profiling, including DNA methylation classification, available for the majority of cases. Sessions are structured to support integrated diagnosis and evidence-informed management recommendations through multidisciplinary discussion (neuropathology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and pediatric as well as adult neuro-oncology). Findings Since its inception, 12 sessions have been held averaging 138 participants per session, reviewing a total of 32 cases (mean 3 cases/session; range 1–4) from 7 different countries and 3 different continents. Entities reviewed include DICER1-intracranial sarcoma (n = 5), astroblastoma (n = 4), FOXR2-activated neuroblastoma (n = 4), CNS tumors with BCOR internal tandem duplication (n = 3) and, BCOR-fused tumors (n = 3), CIC-rearranged-sarcoma (n = 3), intracranial mesenchymal tumor FET::CREB fusion positive (n = 3), MN1::PATZ1 fusion tumors (n = 2), undifferentiated sarcoma (n = 2), PLAG1-fusion tumor (n = 1), medullomyoblastoma (n = 1), and EZHIP-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) (n = 1). Multidisciplinary review has supported diagnostic clarification, strengthened familiarity with ultra-rare entities, and informed real-world treatment discussions in settings where prospective data are limited. Discussions have also increased awareness of rare brain tumor registries and opportunities for systematic case capture. Conclusion An international multidisciplinary rare brain tumor board is a feasible, scalable model to advance integrated diagnosis and collaborative management of ultra-rare pediatric and young adult brain tumors, while building a shared knowledge base across institutions.

Pediatric central nervous system tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade glioma in children is less than 20%. The development of new treatments is dependent upon multi-institutional collaborative clinical trials requiring reproducible and accurate centralized response assessment. We present the results of the BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, the first Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors. This challenge utilized data acquired from multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. BraTS-PEDs 2023 aimed to evaluate volumetric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain gliomas from magnetic resonance imaging using standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics employed across the BraTS 2023 challenges. The top-performing AI approaches for pediatric tumor analysis included ensembles of nnU-Net and Swin UNETR, Auto3DSeg, or nnU-Net with a self-supervised framework. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge fostered collaboration between clinicians (neuro-oncologists, neuroradiologists) and AI/imaging scientists, promoting faster data sharing and the development of automated volumetric analysis techniques. These advancements could significantly benefit clinical trials and improve the care of children with brain tumors.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.

Abstract Background Craniopharyngioma is a histologically benign tumor of the suprasellar region for which survival is excellent but quality of life is often poor secondary to functional deficits from tumor and treatment. Standard therapy consists of maximal safe resection with or without radiation therapy. Few prospective trials have been performed, and response assessment has not been standardized. Methods The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee devised consensus guidelines to assess craniopharyngioma response prospectively. Results Magnetic resonance imaging is the recommended radiologic modality for baseline and follow-up assessments. Radiologic response is defined by 2-dimensional measurements of both solid and cystic tumor components. In certain clinical contexts, response to solid and cystic disease may be differentially considered based on their unique natural histories and responses to treatment. Importantly, the committee incorporated functional endpoints related to neuro-endocrine and visual assessments into craniopharyngioma response definitions. In most circumstances, the cystic disease should be considered progressive only if growth is associated with acute, new-onset or progressive functional impairment. Conclusions Craniopharyngioma is a common pediatric central nervous system tumor for which standardized response parameters have not been defined. A RAPNO committee devised guidelines for craniopharyngioma assessment to uniformly define response in future prospective trials.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Craniopharyngioma (CP) is a histologically benign tumor of the pituitary stalk that accounts for 4% of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Given its location, CP often causes neuro-endocrine, hypothalamic, and vision dysfunction. Standard therapy consists of maximally safe resection +/- radiation therapy (RT). Medical management, including intra-cystic therapy, may have utility in certain contexts. Survival after CP is excellent, but quality of life is often poor secondary to functional deficits from the tumor and/or treatment. Few prospective CP trials have been performed, and response assessment has not been standardized. METHODS: The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee, formed of international experts in relevant subspecialties, devised consensus guidelines from published literature and/or expert opinion to assess CP response in prospective clinical trials. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the recommended radiological modality for baseline and follow-up CP assessment. Computed tomography can be useful for identification of calcification in the initial diagnostic work-up. The committee defined specific standard MRI-based sequences focused on comprehensive evaluation of the suprasellar space. Radiologic CP response is defined by two-dimensional measurements of both solid and cystic tumor components. Three-dimensional measurements are also encouraged in prospective trials. In certain clinical contexts, response of solid and cystic disease may be differentially considered based on their unique natural histories and responses to treatment (including transient cyst growth during or after RT). Importantly, the committee incorporated functional endpoints related to neuro-endocrine and visual assessments into CP response definitions. In most circumstances, cystic disease should be considered progressive only if growth is associated with acute, new-onset or progressive functional impairment. CONCLUSION: CP is a common pediatric CNS tumor for which standardized response parameters have not been defined. A RAPNO committee devised guidelines for baseline and longitudinal assessments of CP to uniformly define response in future prospective trials.

AbstractBackgroundSurvival rates for children with medulloblastoma have risen over the past decade, in part due to the addition of cisplatin‐containing adjuvant chemotherapy. Total dose of cisplatin required for optimal treatment is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes based on cumulative cisplatin doses (CCD) in children with newly diagnosed average‐risk medulloblastoma.ProcedureCCD data were reviewed for 363 patients in a prospective study evaluating patients between 3 and 21 years with a newly diagnosed average‐risk medulloblastoma and treated with craniospinal radiation and post‐radiation cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsEight‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were 78.2 ± 2.6% and 83.9 ± 2.4%, respectively. Only 73 patients received the protocol specified CCD of 600 mg/m2, primarily due to mandated cisplatin toxicity‐related dose reductions. The median CCD given to those without relapse or death on treatment was 487.5 mg/m2. CCD, as a time‐dependent covariate, was not associated with EFS (P = 0.54) or OS (P = 0.11). The 343 patients who completed chemotherapy failure‐free were categorized into four groups according to CCD (n = 10; 75–150 mg/m2), (n = 26; 151–300 mg/m2), (n = 113; 301–450 mg/m2), and (n = 194; 451–600 mg/m2). There were no statistically significant differences in distributions of EFS (P = 0.53) or OS (P = 0.49) among these four groups.ConclusionCCD is not associated with EFS or OS suggesting that lower doses of cisplatin may be incorporated into future medulloblastoma trials, thereby limiting its toxicity profile without affecting survival. If ototoxicity is encountered, more stringent cisplatin dose modification/cessation rules seem warranted. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:102–106. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Purpose: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder associated primarily with bilateral schwannomas seen on the superior vestibular branches of the eighth cranial nerves. Significant morbidity can result from surgical treatment of these tumors. Meningiomas, ependymomas, and other benign central nervous system tumors are also common in NF2. The lack of effective treatments for NF2 marks an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: Here, we provide recommendations from a workshop, cochaired by Drs. D. Gareth Evans and Marco Giovannini, of 36 international researchers, physicians, representatives of the biotechnology industry, and patient advocates on how to accelerate progress toward NF2 clinical trials. Results: Workshop participants reached a consensus that, based on current knowledge, the time is right to plan and implement NF2 clinical trials. Obstacles impeding NF2 clinical trials and how to address them were discussed, as well as the candidate therapeutic pipeline for NF2. Conclusions: Both phase 0 and phase II NF2 trials are near-term options for NF2 clinical trials. The number of NF2 patients in the population remains limited, and successful recruitment will require ongoing collaboration efforts between NF2 clinics. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5032–9)