Citations

Abstract Background At hospice enrollment, patients are asked preferences regarding antibiotic use. Limited evidence on how these medications impact survival makes it difficult for clinicians to offer clear guidance. To support decision-making and antimicrobial stewardship, we assessed the association between antibiotic use and survival in outpatient hospice patients. Methods The association between antibiotic use and survival was evaluated using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and hospice-qualifying conditions (HQCs). The cohort included patients enrolled in a large health system’s outpatient hospice program between June 20, 2017, and January 1, 2023. Results Among 6169 patients with an HQC, 1233 received at least one antimicrobial prescription during the study period. The median time from hospice enrollment to first prescription was 16 days (IQR 3-83). Antimicrobial prescribing patterns varied by HQC category. In time-dependent Cox models, antibiotic use was associated with increased hazard of death (aHR 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.57).Stratified analyses showed the strongest association with increased mortality in patients with cancer HQCs (aHR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.50–1.87) and a survival benefit in those with infectious HQCs (aHR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89). Discussion Physicians, patients, and families often overestimate the benefits of antibiotics near the end of life. The observed increase in mortality shortly after antibiotic initiation suggests that symptoms prompting antibiotic use may reflect the dying process rather than treatable infection. Knowledge of the limited role of antibiotics in prolonging life in hospice settings may improve decision-making and enhance the quality of end-of-life care.

Abstract Background Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) represent a rapidly expanding population with evolving mortality patterns. Despite improved survival, excess mortality persists. Objective To evaluate the incidence, causes, and predictors of mortality in a contemporary ACHD cohort. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) first evaluated at Mayo Clinic from 2002–2023. Baseline clinical, imaging, and electrocardiographic data were analyzed. Vital status was determined using institutional records and the Accurint national mortality database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate mortality and identify independent predictors of mortality Results A total of 7,678 ACHD patients were included, with median age of 36.8 years and median follow-up of 11.4 years. During 78,768 patient-years of follow-up, 1,116 patients died (median age at death 57.2 years), corresponding to an annual mortality rate of 1.4%. The cumulative rate of all-cause mortality at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 6.9%, 12.0%, 19.0%, and 26.2%, respectively. When stratified by CHD complexity, the annual death rate in patients with severe CHD (2.4%/year) was twice that of patients with moderate or mild CHD (both 1.2%/year). Older age and ACHD subtypes, specifically, cyanotic heart disease (HR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9–5.3) and Fontan physiology (HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3–4.4), were strongly associated with increased mortality. Additional independent predictors included male sex, ventricular dysfunction, advanced NYHA class, prior heart failure hospitalization, hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, renal dysfunction, and abnormal hemoglobin levels. Cardiovascular causes accounted for 57.7% of deaths with known etiology, predominantly heart failure (48.9%) and sudden cardiac death (21.9%), while non-cardiovascular causes were driven mainly by infection and malignancy. Conclusions In this large contemporary ACHD cohort, mortality was driven by ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, and systemic end-organ involvement in addition to the underlying congenital anatomy. Both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes contributed significantly to mortality. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive multidisciplinary ACHD care focused on early recognition of cardiac functional decline, management of acquired comorbidities, and end-organ dysfunction.

Importance Current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical treatment for asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation, but the long-term prognosis and optimal treatment of those with moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) remain uncertain. Objective To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of baseline MR severity and the association of surgery with survival outcomes in asymptomatic patients. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective cohort study with extended follow-up among 449 asymptomatic patients with holosystolic degenerative MR enrolled between January 1991 and November 2000 and followed up with through May 2025 (median [IQR] follow-up, 26 [14-29] years; maximum, 34 years) at a single tertiary referral center (the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota). Exposure Baseline MR severity quantified by effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO). Patients were monitored under medical therapy and, when applicable, after subsequent surgical correction. Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality, assessed according to baseline ERO using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Results Among the 449 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 64 (14) years, and 278 participants (62%) were male. At baseline, 127 patients (28%) had ERO <20 mm 2 , 128 (28%) had ERO 20-39 mm 2 , and 194 (43%) had ERO ≥40 mm 2 . During follow-up, 254 patients (57%) underwent mitral valve surgery. Ten-year cumulative incidence of surgery was 18% for ERO <20 mm 2 , 64% for 20-39 mm 2 , and 88% for ≥40 mm 2 . Survival of medically treated patients declined progressively with increasing ERO category (5-year rate: 88% [<20 mm 2 ], 72% [20-39 mm 2 ], and 55% [≥40 mm 2 ]; P = .01), and multivariable analysis confirmed the incremental risk of higher ERO on a continuous scale (adjusted hazard ratio per IQR increase, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.30-4.93; P = .01). When extending the analysis through subsequent surgical follow-up, the survival difference between patients who did vs did not undergo operation widened with ERO (χ 2 3 = 8.4; interaction P = .04), starting at values above 30 mm 2 . Conclusions and Relevance In this 25-year follow-up cohort study, increasing ERO was associated with an increase in risk of mortality under medical therapy. Patients with upper-moderate MR (ERO 30-39 mm 2 ) at baseline demonstrated a significant association between surgical treatment and improved long-term survival.

Abstract Background Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a life-threatening spinal infection with rising incidence and significant morbidity. Despite its growing burden, long-term data on clinical characteristics, management trends, and outcomes remain limited. Methods We conducted a 26-year multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with NVO at Mayo Clinic sites between 1999 and 2024. Demographic, microbiologic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed across five time periods. Predictors of treatment failure were assessed using a multivariable competing risk model. Results Among 1255 patients (median age 67; 66% male), lumbosacral involvement was most common (65%), and 21% had multilevel involvement. Pathogens were identified in 77%, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus (49%; Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus 37%, methicillin-resistant S. aureus 13%). Over time from 1999–2004 to 2020–2024, Gram-negative bacilli increased from 6% to 14% (P = .048). Comorbidities including chronic kidney disease (10% to 21%), active chemotherapy (6% to 11%), and immunosuppression (8% to 17%) increased significantly. Additionally, 1-year treatment failure declined (16% to 10%). In multivariable analysis, diabetes mellitus (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.18–3.13) and multilevel involvement (sHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.17–2.38) were associated with increased incidence of treatment failure, while concurrent infections (sHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.87) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (sHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.90) were associated with lower failure. Conclusions This large multicenter cohort highlights increasing host complexity, shifting microbiology, and predictors of failure, emphasizing the importance of early risk stratification and tailored strategies, such as multidisciplinary evaluation and close follow-up of high-risk patients to improve outcomes.

Abstract Background Catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are associated with increased resource use, treatment costs, and mortality among patients with cancer. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are the most common cause of central venous catheter (CVC) infection in this population. While CVC removal remains the gold standard, CRBSI with CoNS is sometimes managed with CVC salvage, despite incomplete safety and efficacy data in patients with hematological malignancy.Table 1.Baseline Demographic and Clinical DataTable 2.Baseline Characteristics by Treatment Strategy Methods A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2013 to 2024 diagnosed with hematological malignancy and CRBSI with CoNS. Patients were included in a “CVC removed” group if the line was removed within 5 days of bacteremia onset, and all others were included in a “CVC retained” group. Electronic medical records were evaluated for relevant clinical comorbidities, risk factors, and management. The primary outcomes of interest were 90-day mortality and relapse. To control for baseline differences between groups, we employed a propensity weighted analysis based on inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score.Weighted cumulative event rates for Relapse and Mortality Results A total of 140 cases were included, of whom 95 (67.9%) had undergone BMT and 111 (80.4%) were neutropenic at time of CRBSI. The predominant CoNS identified was Staphylococcus epidermidis (88.6%). 79 (56.4%) patients had the CVC retained and 61 (43.6%) underwent CVC removal. Those in whom the CVC was retained were more likely to be BMT recipients (p=0.007). However, line removal was more common with PICC lines (p< 0.001) and in those hospitalized for management of line-associated bacteremia (p=0.022). Within 90 days, there were 10 patients (cumulative incidence 8.2%) who had microbiological relapse (2 [4.3%] in the CVC removed group and 8 [11.1%] in the CVC retained group). Propensity weighted analysis demonstrated significantly higher rate of microbiologic relapse with CVC retention (p=0.043) but no difference in mortality (p=0.128), as shown by weighted cumulative event rate curves in Figure 1. Conclusion Despite the finding of increased risk of relapse associated with CVC retention, there was no significant difference in mortality between CVC removal and retention among individuals with CoNS CRBSI and hematological malignancy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a life-threatening spinal infection with considerable clinical burden. Although increasing literature has described its features and associated treatment failure, large-scale cohorts with long-term follow-up remain limited. Herein, we evaluated a large cohort of patients with NVO to characterize the clinical manifestations, management, and long-term outcomes, and to further explore factors associated with treatment failure.Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients with native vertebral osteomyelitisTable 2.Treatment, failure rates, and mortality in patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NVO across Mayo Clinic sites between 1999 and 2024. Data on demographics, clinical manifestations, antimicrobial therapy, and surgical intervention were collected. Cumulative incidence of treatment failure was estimated as a function of follow-up accounting for the competing risk of death. Independent predictors of treatment failure were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model with time-dependent covariates.Table 3.Multivariable predictors of treatment failure in patients with native vertebral osteomyelitisFigure 1.Cumulative incidence of death and treatment failure following diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis(A) Short-term (12-month) cumulative incidence of death and treatment failure (magnified view of the first year from panel B).(B) Long-term (up to 7 years) cumulative incidence of death (dotted orange line) and treatment failure (solid blue line). Results Among 1,255 patients included (median age 67 years; 66% male), lumbosacral involvement was most common (65%), with multilevel vertebral involvement ( >2 levels) in 21%. Epidural abscesses were present in 43%, paravertebral abscesses in 42%, and psoas abscesses in 20%. Pathogens were identified in 77%, most commonly S. aureus (50%; MSSA 37%, MRSA 13%), followed by Streptococcus species (22%), and Gram-negative bacilli (11%) (Table 1). The median total antibiotic duration was 59 days (IQR, 42–132). Surgical intervention was performed in 13% after a median of 2 days (IQR, 1-5). Treatment failure occurred in 162 patients during a median follow-up of 2.8 years (6-month and 5-year cumulative incidence were 11% and 14%, respectively), with the median time to failure of 3.1 months. Cumulative mortality was 12% at 6 months and 33% at 5 years (Table 2, Figure 1). Diabetes (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.16–3.12), multilevel vertebral involvement (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22–2.51), and MRSA infection (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.06–4.18) were independently associated with increased risk of treatment failure (Table 3). Conclusion This 25-year study highlights the persistent burden of treatment failure in NVO and associated risk factors, underscoring the importance of early recognition of high-risk features to optimize outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) is a serious musculoskeletal infection requiring timely surgical intervention to prevent long-term morbidity. Although current guidelines recommend early surgical debridement, supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remain scarce. Given this, we evaluated the association between surgical timing and 1-year clinical outcomes using the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) framework, applied for the first time in NJSA.Table 1.Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) ordinal scaleTable 2.Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at one year were assessed using a 9-level DOOR scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery (full vs qualified) (Table 1). Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days.Table 3.Associations between duration and outcomesFigure 1.Association Between Time to Surgery and DOOR Scores in Native Joint Septic Arthritis.A) Distribution of Modified DOOR Scores by Surgical Timing. B) Modeled Probability of DOOR Scores by Time to Surgery. Results Among 268 patients (median age 62 years, 61% male), 30% underwent surgery < 1 day from admission, 47% within 1–2 days, and 24% at ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34% (Table 2). In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; p = 0.026) and with increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; p = 0.019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; p = 0.007). Similar results were obtained when delay was used as a categorical 3-level variable, with the highest risk observed in patients undergoing surgery after ≥3 days. After adjusting for age and Charlson index, only the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained statistically significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; p=0.016) (Table 3, Figure 1). Conclusion Delayed surgical intervention for management of NJSA was independently associated with higher risk of treatment failure at 1 year. These findings reinforce current guideline recommendations for timely operative management and further underscore the potential of the DOOR framework to capture clinically meaningful, multidimensional outcomes in NJSA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Although recent guidance recommends early surgical debridement for native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remains scarce. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed using a 9-level Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery. Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days. Results Among 268 patients, 30% underwent surgery <1 day from admission, 47% in 1–2 days, and 24% in ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34%. In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher (worse) DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; P = .026), increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; P = .019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; P = .007). Even after adjusting for age and Charlson comorbidity index, the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P = .016). Conclusions The finding that delayed surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of treatment failure reinforces current expert recommendations for timely surgical management in NJSA.

Abstract Background The incidence, epidemiology, and clinical characteristics of enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) have not previously been studied on a population-based level in the United States. Methods We utilized the Expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records linkage system to conduct a contemporary 5-year, retrospective, population-based study of monomicrobial enterococcal (ME) BSI among adult residents of 8 counties in southeast Minnesota from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. Results A total of 109 cases of ME-BSI were identified. The overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate was 6.7 per 100 000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 5.4–7.9). Multivariable analysis revealed that male sex (P < .001) and older age (P < .001) were each independently associated with increased incidence, whereas no temporal association was demonstrated (year effect, P = .475). The median age of incident cases was 76.8 years (interquartile range, 65.0–83.3). Urinary tract source was the most common presumed source (42.2%), and Enterococcus faecalis was the predominant (83.5%) pathogen. Overall, 14.4% of patients met modified Duke criteria for definite infective endocarditis. Cumulative mortality was 28.4% at 12 weeks and 43.1% at 1 year. Conclusions In this population-based study, ME-BSI was significantly associated with older age and male sex. There was a high rate of mortality at 12 weeks and 1 year, with ∼1 out of 7 cases complicated by definite infective endocarditis. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing investigation of this syndrome.