Citations

Introduction: There is a lack of data on procedural safety and outcomes in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of RMVD may affect the outcomes of patients undergoing AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using data from a large, nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients with RMVD were then identified by using ICD-10 CM codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,728 weighted AF ablation procedures, of which 3,500 (6.9%) patients had RMVD. Patients with RMVD were older at the time of catheter ablation, with a significantly higher percentage of females, less likely to have paroxysmal AF, and had a higher burden of comorbidities including congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. On multivariable analysis, the presence of RMVD was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.47; p<0.01) with no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality or other periprocedural outcomes. Also, RMVD was associated with longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference: +1.06; 95% CI: +0.67 - +1.45; p<0.01) days and lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87; p<0.01). There was no difference in the odds of 30-day or 180-day all-cause, AF-related, or atrial flutter-related readmissions in patients with RMVD vs. no RMVD (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with RMVD undergoing AF ablation have higher odds of periprocedural cardiovascular complications with similar odds of 30-day and 180-day all-cause and AF-related readmissions

Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a rare, progressive, and often fatal protein misfolding disease. AL is caused by aberrant clonal plasma cell proliferation, where excess amounts of amyloidogenic monoclonal Free Light Chain (FLC) are produced, secreted into the circulation, misfolded and deposted as amyloid fibrils in various vital organs, such as the heart, kidney, liver, and nerves. The involed lambda (λ) FLC accounts for ~75% of all AL cases. Amyloidogenic FLCs (aFLCs) are believed to be the toxic species contributing to AL disease pathology. Specific quantification of aFLCs can provide critical guidance in clinical practice but has been hampered by the LCs sequence diversity as well as the lack of tests that are able to differentiate between circulating normal polyclonal FLCs and aFLCs. Contrary to non-amyloidogenic, aFLCs are kinetically and oftentimes thermodynamically unstable. aFLCs are prone to misfolding and formation of pathogenic conformations such as non-native structures, proteolytic fragments, soluble aggregates, and amyloid fibrils. We exploited such characteristics of aFLCs by applying limited proteolysis using Proteinase K, where less stable λ aFLC proteins readily yield a 23KDa fragment composed of the homodimeric LC constant domain (dLCCD) linked by a disulfide bond. Formation of the dLCCD fragment reveals a highly conserved, novel, cryptic epitope at the N-terminus of the fragment. We have generated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that explicitly bind to such novel epitope and developed immunoassays for the specific detection and sensitive quantification of λ aFLCs in biological samples. Western blot or Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) analyses were employed to detect and quantify dLCCD signal using the dLCCD mAbs on plasma samples from randomly selected, treatment naïve and λ-restricted cases with biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis before and after exposure to optimized proteolytic conditions. Tissue amyloid deposits of λ-type were confirmed in most AL cases. Informed consent for data and plasma sample collections were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Multiple myeloma (MM) plasma samples of unknown LC restriction type, treatment or amyloid deposits status and normal volunteer control samples were purchased from BioIVT (USA). A set of representative results based on three runs are shown in Fig. 1. As little as 2 µL of biofluid was used for each assay. Upon limited proteolysis, dLCCD signal was detected in 32 of 35 AL plasmas, including two samples from patients with AL-associated IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). Of the three dLCCD negative AL samples, one presented with monoclonal IgAλ, and two cases were bi-clonal on serum immunofixation electrophoresis. dLCCD signal was not detected in 18 of 19 MM plasma samples. Similarly, dLCCD signal was undetectable in 23 normal plasmas. Overall, the dLCCD signals detected in AL plasmas were 10x-200x above that of normal control and most MM samples (Fig. 1). The low limit of quantification of the MSD assay was ~0.4 ng/dL (1.4 pM), with &gt;500x dynamic range, enabling sensitive and robust quantification of λ aFLCs in biosamples. Analysis of Proteinase K recognition potential of the cleavage site of 389 λ LC sequences from the AL-Base, a database of amyloidogenic LC sequences (https://wwwapp.bumc.bu.edu/BEDAC_ALBase/) predicted that the dLCCD assay can detect λ aFLCs in up to 99% of λ AL patients, irrespective of the FLC sequences. This was confirmed with the 100% detection rate of the dLCCD signal in a validation cohort of 35 additional monoclonal λ-restricted AL samples. In summary, we have developed a quantitative blood-based immunoassay that is sensitive and highly specific for λ aFLC irrespective of the protein sequences. The preliminary data demonstrates the potential of our assay for AL diagnostics. Additional clinical applications for future exploration will include (i) monitoring and early detection of AL amyloidosis in plasma cell dyscrasias (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, MM, and smoldering MM) and lymphoproliferative disorders, including LPL; and (ii) clinical management of patients with AL amyloidosis via the assessment and monitoring of minimal residual disease and therapeutic responses. The utility of the dLCCD assay in the quantification of λ aFLCs in bi-clonal AL cases warrants further investigation.

Abstract Background Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA). However, the current data on weight loss interventions show inconsistent results in preventing the recurrence of AF after CA. Methods We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies that reported the outcome of recurrence of AF after CA in obese patients undergoing weight interventions. The subgroup analysis included: (1) Weight loss versus no weight loss, (2) >10% weight loss versus <10% weight loss, (3) <10% weight loss versus no weight loss, (4) Follow‐up <12 months, and (5) Follow‐up >12 months after CA. Mantel–Haenszel risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effects model and for heterogeneity, I 2 statistics were reported. Results A total of 10 studies (one randomized controlled trial and nine observational studies) comprising 1851 patients were included. The recurrence of AF was numerically reduced in the weight loss group (34.5%) versus no weight loss group (58.2%), but no statistically significant difference was observed (risk ratio [RR] = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.49–1.18, p = .22). However, there was a statistically significant reduction in recurrence of AF with weight loss versus no weight loss at follow‐up >12 months after CA (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32–0.68, p < .0001). At follow‐up >12 months after CA, both >10% weight loss versus <10% weight loss (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31–0.80, p = .004) and <10% weight loss versus no weight loss (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.31–0.49, p < .00001) were associated with a statistically significant reduction in recurrent AF. Conclusion In patients with AF undergoing CA, weight loss is associated with reducing recurrent AF at > 12 months after ablation and these benefits are consistently seen with both >10% and <10% weight loss. The benefits of weight loss in preventing recurrent AF after CA should be examined in larger studies with extended follow‐up duration.

Abstract Background and Aims Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that may prevent post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). The effect of this drug has been inconsistently shown in previous clinical trials. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of colchicine vs. placebo to prevent POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods and results A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted from inception till April 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF after any cardiac surgery. The secondary outcome was the rate of drug discontinuation due to adverse events and adverse gastrointestinal events. Risk ratios (RR) were reported using the Mantel Haenszel method. A total of eight RCTs comprising 1885 patients were included. There was a statistically significant lower risk of developing POAF with colchicine vs. placebo (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.82; P &lt; 0.01, I2 = 0%), and this effect persisted across different subgroups. There was a significantly higher risk of adverse gastrointestinal events (RR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.38–3.51; P &lt; 0.01, I2 = 55%) with no difference in the risk of drug discontinuation in patients receiving colchicine vs. placebo (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.93–1.89; P = 0.11, I2 = 0%). Conclusion This meta-analysis of eight RCTs shows that colchicine is effective at preventing POAF, with a significantly higher risk of adverse gastrointestinal events but no difference in the rate of drug discontinuation. Future studies are required to define the optimal duration and dose of colchicine for the prevention of POAF.

AbstractBackgroundKnown risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer–related cell types.ResultsWe identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P &lt; .001) were identified for rare CNVs. Risk-associated CNVs were enriched (P &lt; .05) at known EOC risk loci identified by genome-wide association study. Noncoding CNVs were enriched in active promoters and insulators in EOC-related cell types.ConclusionsCNVs in BRCA1 have been previously reported in smaller studies, but their observed frequency in this large population-based cohort, along with the CNVs observed at BRCA2 and RAD51C gene loci in EOC cases, suggests that these CNVs are potentially pathogenic and may contribute to the spectrum of disease-causing mutations in these genes. CNVs are likely to occur in a wider set of susceptibility regions, with potential implications for clinical genetic testing and disease prevention.