Sharma, Vagisha

Background: Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we have observed several cases of PCP in patients receiving rituximab. These observations prompted a systematic review and meta-analysis of our experience to see the efficacy of PCP prophylaxis (TMP-SMX) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. The efficacy of PCP prophylaxis in this population remains a subject of clinical interest. Research Question: To evaluate the effect of PCP prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis on the risk of developing PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis including six retrospective cohort studies that compared the incidence of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab with and without prophylaxis. The cohort studies with incept up to January 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PLOS ONE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction was done using a spreadsheet, and data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 2304 patients, with 571 receiving PCP prophylaxis and 1733 did not receive prophylaxis. Studies reporting results of PCP prophylaxis were included. Enrolled studies were quality assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The incidence of PCP was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (3 out of 571) compared to the no prophylaxis group (67 out of 1733). The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.58], indicating a 77% reduction in the risk of PCP with prophylaxis. Conclusion: The clinical course of cases of PCP in patients treated with rituximab can be quite fulminant, with significant mortality. Primary prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk. PCP prophylaxis significantly decrease the risk of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-based therapies, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.23.

Introduction: There is a lack of data on procedural safety and outcomes in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of RMVD may affect the outcomes of patients undergoing AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using data from a large, nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients with RMVD were then identified by using ICD-10 CM codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,728 weighted AF ablation procedures, of which 3,500 (6.9%) patients had RMVD. Patients with RMVD were older at the time of catheter ablation, with a significantly higher percentage of females, less likely to have paroxysmal AF, and had a higher burden of comorbidities including congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. On multivariable analysis, the presence of RMVD was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.47; p<0.01) with no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality or other periprocedural outcomes. Also, RMVD was associated with longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference: +1.06; 95% CI: +0.67 - +1.45; p<0.01) days and lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87; p<0.01). There was no difference in the odds of 30-day or 180-day all-cause, AF-related, or atrial flutter-related readmissions in patients with RMVD vs. no RMVD (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with RMVD undergoing AF ablation have higher odds of periprocedural cardiovascular complications with similar odds of 30-day and 180-day all-cause and AF-related readmissions

Introduction: There is limited data on how psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) affect the outcomes of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of PSRFs affects the outcomes of AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using a nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of ≥1 PSRF. PSRFs were divided into 5 domains including limited cognitive understanding, substance use, psychiatric disease, low socioeconomic status, and uninsured status. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,623 AF ablation procedures, of which 21,363 (42.2%) had ≥ 1 PSRF. On multivariable analysis, the presence of ≥ 1 PSRF was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.22; p=0.02), peripheral vascular complications (aOR:1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.38; p=0.04), pulmonary complications (aOR:1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.29; p<0.01) and neurological complications (aOR:1.42; 95% CI: 1.12-1.78; p<0.01), along with higher odds of 30-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.19-1.43; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50; p<0.01), 90-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.20-1.40; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.41; p<0.01), and 180-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.35; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; p<0.01) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, our data suggest an association between PSRFs and worse in-hospital outcomes along with increased all-cause and arrhythmia-related readmissions in patients undergoing AF ablation.