Munir, Bilal

Introduction: There is a lack of data on the impact of sex on the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that outcomes of patients with HF undergoing AF ablation differ between males and females and tested this hypothesis using data from a nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients were then divided into two cohorts based on their sex. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 21,439 patients with HF underwent AF ablation between 2016-2019, of which 8,103 had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [64.8% were females], and 13,336 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [38.4% were females]. Crude outcomes are shown in Figure 1. After multivariate adjustment, among patients with HFrEF, females had a longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference (aMD): 0.55 (0.16-0.93) days longer, p<0.01) along with lower odds of routine home discharge (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.55-0.70; p<0.01). Females had similar odds of in-hospital mortality, procedural complications, and 30-day/ 180-day all-cause, heart failure, and arrhythmia-related readmissions as compared to males. Among patients with HFpEF, females had higher odds of 30-day (aOR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.24-2.93; p<0.01) and 180-day heart failure readmissions (aOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.04-2.28; p=0.03) along with lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.67; 95% CI: 0.57-0.78; p<0.01), as compared to males. Conclusion: In conclusion, our results show that females with HFrEF undergoing AF ablation have similar odds of in-hospital/30-day/180-day outcomes whereas females with HFpEF have higher odds of 30-day/180-day HF readmissions, as compared to males.

Introduction: There is a lack of data on procedural safety and outcomes in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of RMVD may affect the outcomes of patients undergoing AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using data from a large, nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients with RMVD were then identified by using ICD-10 CM codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,728 weighted AF ablation procedures, of which 3,500 (6.9%) patients had RMVD. Patients with RMVD were older at the time of catheter ablation, with a significantly higher percentage of females, less likely to have paroxysmal AF, and had a higher burden of comorbidities including congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. On multivariable analysis, the presence of RMVD was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.47; p<0.01) with no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality or other periprocedural outcomes. Also, RMVD was associated with longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference: +1.06; 95% CI: +0.67 - +1.45; p<0.01) days and lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87; p<0.01). There was no difference in the odds of 30-day or 180-day all-cause, AF-related, or atrial flutter-related readmissions in patients with RMVD vs. no RMVD (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with RMVD undergoing AF ablation have higher odds of periprocedural cardiovascular complications with similar odds of 30-day and 180-day all-cause and AF-related readmissions

Introduction: There is limited data on how psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) affect the outcomes of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of PSRFs affects the outcomes of AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using a nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of ≥1 PSRF. PSRFs were divided into 5 domains including limited cognitive understanding, substance use, psychiatric disease, low socioeconomic status, and uninsured status. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,623 AF ablation procedures, of which 21,363 (42.2%) had ≥ 1 PSRF. On multivariable analysis, the presence of ≥ 1 PSRF was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.22; p=0.02), peripheral vascular complications (aOR:1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.38; p=0.04), pulmonary complications (aOR:1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.29; p<0.01) and neurological complications (aOR:1.42; 95% CI: 1.12-1.78; p<0.01), along with higher odds of 30-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.19-1.43; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50; p<0.01), 90-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.20-1.40; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.41; p<0.01), and 180-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.35; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; p<0.01) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, our data suggest an association between PSRFs and worse in-hospital outcomes along with increased all-cause and arrhythmia-related readmissions in patients undergoing AF ablation.