Citations

Platelets are central to hemostasis and thrombosis. Excessive platelet activation contributes to arterial thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and complications of peripheral artery disease, whereas excessive platelet inhibition increases bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone of secondary prevention in atherosclerotic and thrombotic cardiovascular diseases, yet current treatment paradigms do not fully account for biological heterogeneity in platelet function, including differences related to sex, age, hormonal status, and disease context. This state-of-the-art review examines current antiplatelet strategies, fundamental mechanisms of signal transduction, clinical indications, and limitations of preclinical and clinical studies, with a focus on sex-specific considerations and opportunities for personalized antiplatelet therapy. Aspirin and P2Y 12 receptor antagonists are widely used for secondary prevention. However, women have been underrepresented in many pivotal clinical trials, limiting the precision of sex-specific estimates of efficacy and bleeding risk. In parallel, commonly used preclinical models often fail to recapitulate the physiological conditions in which platelets interact with the vasculature, leukocytes, and soluble factors. Emerging therapeutic approaches seek to refine platelet inhibition by targeting pathways that reduce thrombotic risk while preserving hemostasis. Advancing antiplatelet therapy will require integration of mechanistic platelet biology with diverse clinical trial populations, standardized platelet phenotyping, and disease-specific approaches that account for how platelet function is altered across health and vascular disease.

OBJECTIVE Dysphagia has been shown to have an adverse effect on patient quality of life following cervical spine surgery, but its impact on patients’ ability to return to work (RTW) and return to physical activities (RTA) has never been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative dysphagia on patients’ ability to RTW and RTA after surgery. METHODS A prospectively maintained multi-institutional spine registry of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery between 2016 and 2023 was retrospectively reviewed. An Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) score ≥ 3 was used to quantify preoperative and 12-month postoperative dysphagia. Prolonged dysphagia was defined as new dysphagia present at 12 months among patients without baseline dysphagia. RTW and RTA were assessed at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects logistic regressions were used to evaluate the effect of dysphagia on RTW and RTA. RESULTS Of the 1208 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 240 (20%) experienced prolonged dysphagia, of whom 208 (87%) underwent anterior surgery. Preoperatively, 709 (59%) patients were fully employed or on short-term leave, 307 (25%) were retired, and 191 (16%) were otherwise unemployed. At the 12-month follow-up, RTW and RTA status were collected for 629 (95%) of the 664 employed patients who planned to RTW after surgery and 1127 (93%) of the total cohort, respectively. Significantly lower rates of RTW (86% vs 96%, p < 0.001) and RTA (62% vs 79%, p < 0.001) were observed in patients with prolonged dysphagia. Multivariable analysis identified dysphagia as being independently associated with lower odds of RTW (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.86; p = 0.022) and RTA (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31–0.63; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prolonged postoperative dysphagia—defined as a new EAT-10 score ≥ 3 at 12 months—was associated with substantially lower odds of returning to work and physical activities after cervical spine surgery, underscoring the importance of dysphagia prevention and management in postoperative care.

OBJECTIVE This study examines the recovery rates of patients who experience postoperative dysphagia within 1 month following cervical spine surgery. METHODS Data from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional quality registry were retrospectively analyzed. Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaire scores were collected at baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively, with total scores ≥ 3 indicating dysphagia. Patients were grouped by whether they reported baseline dysphagia to assess the impact of baseline dysphagia on recovery. Recovery was defined as resolution of postoperative dysphagia and not reporting the condition at any follow-up time point. Patients were excluded from the recovery model if they did not report dysphagia within 1 month of surgery. Recovery to baseline was defined as reporting a postoperative EAT-10 score equal to or less than the baseline score at subsequent time points. Patients were excluded from the recovery-to-baseline model if they did not report EAT-10 scores within 1 month of surgery that were worse than their baseline score. Survival curves were generated for both models. RESULTS Of the 2003 patients in the registry, 627 met inclusion criteria for the recovery curve and 714 for the recovery-to-baseline curve. Of the patients without baseline dysphagia, 498 developed new postoperative dysphagia within 1 month, with cumulative recovery probabilities of 39.5% by 3 months and 59.1% by 12 months after cervical spine surgery. Furthermore, of the patients without baseline dysphagia, 73.5% (175/238) who reported no dysphagia at 3 months and 32.5% (68/209) who reported no dysphagia at 12 months experienced long-term recovery. Eighty patients with baseline dysphagia reported worse EAT-10 scores within 1 month, with cumulative probabilities of improvement to baseline or below of 37.7% by 3 months and 54.1% by 12 months. Patients with baseline dysphagia were significantly less likely to recover than patients without baseline dysphagia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.26–0.53; p < 0.001) but significantly more likely to recover to baseline (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–2.00; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Patients who develop postoperative dysphagia within 1 month of cervical spine surgery generally see symptomatic improvement over time. This analysis may aid in clinical decision-making when informing patients about the risk of developing postoperative dysphagia and the recovery rate of this surgical complication.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study proposes and assesses the validity of postoperative dysphagia severity categories based on patients' Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) scores and quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected before and after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry including 2003 patients was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on EAT-10 score severities, with thresholds determined by existing literature and significant differences in PROMs: none (0-2), mild (3-4), moderate (5-15), and severe (16-40). Correlations between EAT-10 severity and established PROMs were assessed at baseline, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. The Dunn test using Bonferroni adjustment was used to identify differences in PROMs between EAT-10 severities. Multivariate linear regression assessed how EAT-10 severity affects PROMs at baseline, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Among 1659 patients with 3-month EAT-10 data, there were 1183 no, 149 mild, 245 moderate, and 82 severe dysphagia patients. Neck Disability Index and EuroQol 5-Dimension scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P < .001; P = .001), mild vs moderate ( P < .001; P < .001), and moderate vs severe ( P = .035; P = .024) at 3 months. Among 1405 patients with 12-month EAT-10 data, there were 1044 no, 100 mild, 194 moderate, and 67 severe dysphagia patients. Neck Disability Index scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P < .001) and moderate vs severe ( P = .004) but not for mild vs moderate ( P > .9) at 12 months. EuroQol 5-Dimension scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P = .004) and mild vs moderate ( P = .005) but not for moderate vs severe ( P = .08). In multivariate regression, EAT-10 severity categories independently predicted worse PROMs at all time points. CONCLUSION: We propose none (0-2), mild (3-4), moderate (5-15), and severe (16-40) dysphagia categories based on EAT-10 scores. Evidence from univariate and multivariate analyses strengthens the validity of our proposed EAT-10 severity categories, providing statistical justification for their incorporation into clinical practice.

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.

PURPOSE In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils cause organ dysfunction. Anselamimab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to amyloid fibrils, accelerating their clearance. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo 2004 stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomly assigned to receive anselamimab or placebo with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab). The primary end point was a hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVHs), analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win ratio estimation. RESULTS Among 406 randomly assigned patients, the primary end point win ratio for anselamimab versus placebo was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83, 1.50; P = .332) and the hazard ratio (HR) for ACM was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 1.13; P = .290). CVH rates in the anselamimab and placebo groups were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.83) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.43), respectively ( P = .145). Among patients with kappa isotype (n = 72), the win ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.31; P = .100) and anselamimab reduced ACM by 62% versus placebo (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86; nominal P = .012), and CVH by 71% (IRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.87; nominal P = .028) with improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score. There was no clinical benefit observed in the lambda population. Anselamimab was generally well-tolerated; safety data were comparable between treatment arms overall. CONCLUSION Treatment with anselamimab, an antifibril antibody used alongside antiplasma cell dyscrasia therapy, while not meeting the primary end point in the overall population, significantly improved ACM and CVH in patients with kappa AL, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this isotype.

Compared with two-dimensional MR elastography (MRE), three-dimensional MRE demonstrated better test-retest repeatability, between–field-strength reproducibility, and between-day reproducibility at 3 T for measurement of liver stiffness in adults with severe obesity but failed more frequently.

Abstract Pancreatic cancer disproportionately affects Black individuals in the United States, but they have limited representation in genetic studies of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To address this gap, we performed admixture mapping and genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) in genetically inferred African ancestry individuals (1,030 cases and 889 controls). Admixture mapping identified three regions with a significantly higher proportion of African ancestry in cases compared to controls (5q33.3, 10p1, 22q12.3). GWAS identified a genome-wide significant association at 5p15.33 ( CLPTM1L , rs383009:T>C, T Allele Frequency=0.51, OR:1.45, P value=1.24×10 -8 ), a locus previously associated with PDAC. Known loci at 5p15.33, 7q32.3, 8q24.21 and 7q25.1 also replicated (P value <0.01). Multi-ancestral fine-mapping identified two potential causal SNPs (rs3830069 and rs2735940) at 5p15.33. Collectively these findings identified novel PDAC risk loci and expanded our understanding of this deadly cancer in underrepresented populations, emphasizing the multifactorial nature of PDAC risk including inherited genetic and non-genetic factors. Statement of Significance To understand how genetic variation contributes to PDAC risk in Black people in North American, we studied individuals of genetically-inferred African ancestry. We identified novel risk loci and differences in the contribution of known loci. This demonstrates that ancestry-informed genetic analyses improve our understanding of PDAC risk and enhances discovery.

Emergence of epidemic viruses in new hosts threatens both human and other animal populations, and often involves virus evolution to overcome barriers that normally prevent efficient infection and spread in that host. After transfer the separated viruses will evolve in parallel as they spread within the original and new hosts. Here we examine the details of a virus involved in such a host-jumping event, where we define the natural evolution of feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) over 60 y, clarify the origins of the new pandemic canine parvovirus (CPV) that arose in the 1970s, and compare the separate evolution of those viruses over 47 y in cats or dogs. Several live-attenuated FPV vaccine viruses originated from early-1960s isolates or were a recombinant of an early virus, and many sequences in databases proved to be vaccine-derived. The sequences of wild viruses showed that FPV-like strains evolved at less than one-third the rate observed for CPV in dogs, and the higher rate of CPV evolution has been consistent since 1979, when a genetic variant became widespread. The common ancestor of the CPV lineage was related to FPVs from Europe and contained several unique host-adaptive capsid changes associated with canine transferrin receptor type-1 binding. Although the FPV vaccine strains are around 60 y old, little selection for antigenic variation was observed. The distinct evolutionary patterns of these closely related viruses circulating for decades in different hosts emphasize the complex evolution associated with viral epidemic emergence and spread in endemic and new hosts.

OBJECTIVE This study investigated the relationship between diabetes and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia following cervical spine surgery (CSS). METHODS A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent CSS were categorized on the basis of diabetes status, and correlations with preoperative and postoperative Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) dysphagia questionnaire scores were assessed. Mixed-effects logistic regressions were performed to examine the impact of preoperative diabetes on postoperative dysphagia. RESULTS Of the 2001 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 400 (20%) had diabetes. Baseline dysphagia rates were not significantly different between groups (18% vs 14%, p = 0.08). Patients with diabetes had a significantly higher incidence of dysphagia at 1 month (66% vs 54%, p = 0.002), 3 months (39% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (33% vs 24%, p = 0.004) after surgery compared to patients without diabetes. Including baseline dysphagia as a fixed effect, multivariable analysis indicated that diabetes was a significant predictor of postoperative dysphagia at 1 month (OR 1.46, p = 0.041) and 3 months (OR 1.63, p = 0.001) but not at 12 months (OR 1.21, p = 0.3). In patients with no baseline dysphagia, those with diabetes (329 of 400 [82.3%]) had a significantly higher incidence of new dysphagia than nondiabetics at 1 month (62% vs 50%, p = 0.003), 3 months (34% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (27% vs 18%, p = 0.001). The mean change in EAT-10 scores between baseline and 12 months was significantly worse in patients with preoperative diabetes (2.440 ± 5.013 vs 1.688 ± 4.139, p = 0.025). Multivariable analysis indicated that diabetes was a significant predictor of new postoperative dysphagia at 1 month (OR 1.49, p = 0.040) and 3 months (OR 1.81, p < 0.001) but not at 12 months (OR 1.31, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS Diabetes is a significant risk factor for experiencing postoperative dysphagia following CSS. Diabetes correlated with higher incidence of dysphagia at all postoperative time points and was a strong independent predictor of postoperative dysphagia at 1 and 3 months.