Back to Authors

Lake, Stephen

Mayo Clinic

Quantitative Sciences, Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA

Citations 2

Efficacy and Safety of Anselamimab in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Results From the Randomized CARES Trials
Wechalekar, Ashutosh , Sanchorawala, Vaishali , Zepeda, Victor H. Jimenez-, Suzuki, Kenshi, Lentzsch, Suzanne , Huart, Antoine , Carpinteiro, Alexander , Swenson, Eugene , Khan, Zilehuma, Catini, Julia, Kulkarni, Hrishikesh, Meltzer, Brian, Lake, Stephen, Liedtke, Michaela , Investigators, for the CARES, Ting, Stephen Bek Ngie, Mollee, Peter Norman, Meuleman, Nathalie, Delforge, Michel, Zepeda, Victor Jimenez, Zhang, Shuyang, Du, Xin, Wang, Jianan, Qian, Honglan, Sun, Chunyan, Belhadj, Karim , Arnulf, Bertrand, Karlin, Lionel, Macro, Margaret, Colella, Jean-Marc Schiano De, Stoppa, Anne-Marie, Viallard, Jean-Francois, Fenk, Roland, Hansen, Timon, Girke, Vera, Nogai, Axel, Gatt, Moshe, Lavi, Noa, Magen, Hila , Palladini, Giovanni, Pane, Fabrizio, Buda, Gabriele , Ishida, Tadao, Iida, Shinsuke, Jamroziak, Krzysztof, Byun, Jamin, Koh, Youngil, Kim, Kihyun, Villamediana, Ramón Lecumberri, Lopez, Maria Teresa Cibeira, Martínez, Irene Romera, Duarte, Rafael , Castello, Isabel Angela Krsnik, Garcia, Maria Esther Gonzalez , Chacon, Eusebio Narciso Martin, Martínez, Javier Alberto Rojas , Valent, Jason , Rosenzweig, Michael A., Chung, Alfred, Wong, Sandy, Bumma, Naresh , Comenzo, Raymond, Gaballa, Mahmoud, Lee, Hans C., Kaufman, Gregory P., Passero, Frank, Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith, Waxman, Adam, D'Souza, Anita, Cowan, Andrew, Lee, Sarah, Libby, Edward, Godara, Amandeep , Kovacsovics, Tibor, Sengsayadeth, Salyka, Goodman, Stacey , Chaulagain, Chakra, Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Sanchorawala, Vaishali , Kastritis, Efstathios , Lentzsch, Suzanne , Meltzer, Brian , Liedtke, Michaela , Dispenzieri, Angela , Kastritis, Efstathios , Bhutani, Divaya , Bianchi, Giada , Suzuki, Kenshi , Khan, Zilehuma, Kulkarni, Hrishikesh, Lake, Stephen, Ting, Stephen B. , Mollee, Peter , Agis, Hermine , Straßl, Irene , Meuleman, Nathalie , Delforge, Michel , Sedlák, František , Jaccard, Arnaud , Arnulf, Bertrand , Karlin, Lionel , Macro, Margaret , Stoppa, Anne‐Marie, Bridoux, Frank , Chalopin, Thomas , Viallard, Jean‐François , Fenk, Roland , Symeonidis, Argiris , Annibali, Ombretta , Iida, Shinsuke, Ikezoe, Takayuki , Jamroziak, Krzysztof , Koh, Youngil, López, Maria Teresa Cibeira, Rios, Rafael, Garcia, Maria Esther Gonzalez, Chacón, Eusebio Martín, Valent, Jason Neil , Rosenzweig, Michael, Comenzo, Raymond L. , Gaballa, Mahmoud , Kaufman, Gregory P., Medvedova, Eva , Passero, Frank Charles , Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith , Chaulagain, Chakra P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 29, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 1899-1910

10.1200/jco-26-00755 Get It

PURPOSE In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils cause organ dysfunction. Anselamimab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to amyloid fibrils, accelerating their clearance. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo 2004 stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomly assigned to receive anselamimab or placebo with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab). The primary end point was a hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVHs), analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win ratio estimation. RESULTS Among 406 randomly assigned patients, the primary end point win ratio for anselamimab versus placebo was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83, 1.50; P = .332) and the hazard ratio (HR) for ACM was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 1.13; P = .290). CVH rates in the anselamimab and placebo groups were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.83) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.43), respectively ( P = .145). Among patients with kappa isotype (n = 72), the win ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.31; P = .100) and anselamimab reduced ACM by 62% versus placebo (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86; nominal P = .012), and CVH by 71% (IRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.87; nominal P = .028) with improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score. There was no clinical benefit observed in the lambda population. Anselamimab was generally well-tolerated; safety data were comparable between treatment arms overall. CONCLUSION Treatment with anselamimab, an antifibril antibody used alongside antiplasma cell dyscrasia therapy, while not meeting the primary end point in the overall population, significantly improved ACM and CVH in patients with kappa AL, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this isotype.
Phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate the impact of anselamimab on all-cause mortality in κ light-chain amyloidosis.
Wechalekar, Ashutosh D., Dispenzieri, Angela, Sanchorawala, Vaishali, Kastritis, E K, Zepeda, Victor H. Jimenez-, Suzuki, Kenshi, Lentzsch, Suzanne , Huart, Antoine , Carpinteiro, Alexander , Swenson, Eugene , Khan, Zilehuma, Catini, Julia, Kulkarni, Hrishikesh, Meltzer, Brian Adam, Mercuri, Michele, Lake, Stephen, Liedtke, Michaela , Investigators, On Behalf of the Pittsburgh Post Cardiac Arrest Service, Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Sanchorawala, Vaishali , Bhutani, Divaya , Bianchi, Giada , Suzuki, Kenshi , Khan, Zilehuma, Kulkarni, Hrishikesh, Lake, Stephen

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 7501-7501

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.7501 Get It

7501 Background: AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD) characterized by κ or λ Ig light chain amyloid fibrils that deposit in vital organs. Anselamimab is an investigational mAb designed to complement anti-PCD therapy through accelerated removal of amyloid fibrils. Cardiac Amyloid Reaching for Extended Survival (CARES) studies (NCT04512235 and NCT04504825) investigated the efficacy and safety of anselamimab compared with placebo, in addition to anti-PCD therapy. Methods: Alongside anti-PCD therapy with CyBorD (daratumumab was permitted) newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomized 2:1 to receive anselamimab (1000 mg/m 2 ) or placebo (normal saline) IV every 7 days for 4 weeks followed by every 14 days for the remainder of the blinded study (18 months after the last participant enrolled). The primary endpoint was a hierarchical combination of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of adjudicated cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVH) using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win-ratio in the combined study population. Subgroup analysis by involved κ or λ free light chain (iFLC) was prespecified. Results: 271 patients were randomized to receive anselamimab and 135 placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. The median duration of treatment was 21.4 months and 21.1 in the anselamimab and placebo arms, respectively. Daratumumab was used in 79.3% and 83.7% of the anselamimab and placebo arms, respectively. Results of the primary efficacy analyses are shown in the table. Anselamimab-treated patients with κ iFLC had a 62% reduction in ACM (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17, 0.86; nominal P = 0.012) and a 71% reduction in risk for CVH (estimated CVH rate ratio = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.87; nominal P = 0.028). Patients with λ iFLC had a 10% reduction in risk for CVH; none in ACM. Safety data were comparable between both treatment arms. In anselamimab-treated patients, safety findings were similar between κ subgroup and full population. Conclusions: Anselamimab, a κ light chain–directed anti-fibril monoclonal antibody used alongside standard of care chemotherapy, offers a first-in-class, new therapeutic option for patients with newly diagnosed κ AL amyloidosis. Clinical trial information: NCT04512235 and NCT04504825 . Summary of primary efficacy endpoints. Endpoint Overall κ Isotype λ Isotype Anselamimab (N=271) Placebo (N=135) P -value Anselamimab (N=48) Placebo (N=24) P -value Anselamimab (N=219) Placebo (N=109) P -value ACM and CVH win ratio (95% CI) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.332 2.06 (0.98, 4.31) 0.100 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.848 ACM n (%) 90 (33.2) 52 (38.5) 15 (31.3) 14 (58.3) 73 (33.3) 37 (33.9) HR (95% CI) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) 0.290 0.38 (0.2, 0.9) 0.012 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) 0.647 CVH Frequency/year (95% CI) 0.6 (0.4, 0.8) 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) 0.145 0.41 (0.2, 0.8) 1.4 (0.6, 3.4) 0.028 0.7 (0.4, 1.0) 0.8 (0.4, 1.3) 0.664 Incidence risk ratio (95% CI) 0.7 (0.4, 1.2) 0.29 (0.1, 0.9) 0.9 (0.5, 1.7)