Citations

The prevalence, clinicopathologic correlates, and outcomes of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with IGH‐BCL2 and IGH‐BCL3 translocations are not well known. Using the Mayo Clinic CLL database, we identified patients seen between March 1, 2002 and September 30, 2016 who had FISH testing performed within 3 years of CLL diagnosis. The prognostic profile, time to first therapy (TTT), and overall survival (OS) of patients with IGH‐BCL2 and IGH‐BCL3 translocation were compared to patients without these abnormalities (non‐IGH group). Of 1684 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 38 (2.2%) had IGH‐BCL2, and 16 (0.9%) had IGH‐BCL3 translocation at diagnosis. Patients with IGH‐BCL3 translocation were more likely to have high and very‐high CLL‐International Prognostic Index, compared to patients with IGH‐BCL2 translocation and the non‐IGH group. The 5‐year probability of requiring therapy was significantly higher for IGH‐BCL3 compared to IGH‐BCL2 and non‐IGH groups (84% vs 33% vs 29%, respectively, P < 0.0001). The 5‐year OS was significantly shorter for IGH‐BCL3 compared to IGH‐BCL2 and non‐IGH groups (45% vs 89% vs 86%, respectively, P < 0.0001). On multivariable analyses, IGH‐BCL3 translocation was associated with a shorter TTT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7; P = 0.005) and shorter OS (HR = 5.5; P < 0.0001); IGH‐BCL2 translocation did not impact TTT and OS. In conclusion, approximately 3% of all newly diagnosed CLL patients have either an IGH‐BCL2 or IGH‐BCL3 translocation. Patients with IGH‐BCL3 translocations have a distinct prognostic profile and outcome. These results support the inclusion of an IGH probe during the routine evaluation of FISH abnormalities in newly diagnosed CLL.

Abstract Background: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most frequent pediatric retinal tumor. In the present study, to elucidate chemoresistance mechanisms and identify potential biomarkers in RB, we utilized RNA sequencing (RNAseq) technological platforms to reveal transcriptome profiles and identify any differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between an etoposide drug-resistant subline (Y79/EDR) and parental Y79 cells. Methods: To test whether Y79/EDR cells showed resistance to antineoplastic agents for RB, we treated the cells with etoposide, carboplatin and vincristine and analyzed them with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). Y79/EDR and parental Y79 cells were used for RNAseq and bioinformatics analysis to enable a genome-wide review of DEGs between the two lines using the DESeq R package (1.10.1). Then, DEG enrichment in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways was analyzed with KOBAS software. Next, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) and cytotoxicity assays were performed to experimentally and functionally validate the identified candidate biomarkers. Results: Y79/EDR cells showed resistance to etoposide, carboplatin and vincristine at different concentrations. In total, 524 transcripts were differentially expressed in Y79/EDR cells based on analysis of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM); among these, 57 genes were downregulated and 467 genes were upregulated in Y79/EDR cells compared to parental Y79 cells. We selected candidate DEGs, including ARHGAP9, HIST1H4H, RELN, DDIT4, HK2, STC1 and PFKFB4, for mRNA expression validation with QRT-PCR assays and found that the expression levels determined by QRT-PCR were consistent with the RNAseq data. Further studies involving downregulation of ARHGAP9 with a specific siRNA pool showed that ARHGAP9 altered the cellular sensitivity of Y79 cells to etoposide and carboplatin. Conclusion: Our initial findings provided a genomic view of the transcription profiles of etoposide-induced acquired resistance in RB. Follow-up studies indicated that ARHGAP9 might be a chemoresistance biomarker in RB, providing insight into potential therapeutic targets for overcoming acquired chemoresistance in RB. These findings can aid in understanding and overcoming chemoresistance during treatment of RB in the clinic.

AbstractThe RUNX1 transcription factor has recently been shown to be obligatory for normal development. RUNX1 controls the expression of genes essential for proper development in many cell lineages and tissues including blood, bone, cartilage, hair follicles, and mammary glands. Compromised RUNX1 regulation is associated with many cancers. In this review, we highlight evidence for RUNX1 control in both invertebrate and mammalian development and recent novel findings of perturbed RUNX1 control in breast cancer that has implications for other solid tumors. As RUNX1 is essential for definitive hematopoiesis, RUNX1 mutations in hematopoietic lineage cells have been implicated in the etiology of several leukemias. Studies of solid tumors have revealed a context‐dependent function for RUNX1 either as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor. These RUNX1 functions have been reported for breast, prostate, lung, and skin cancers that are related to cancer subtypes and different stages of tumor development. Growing evidence suggests that RUNX1 suppresses aggressiveness in most breast cancer subtypes particularly in the early stage of tumorigenesis. Several studies have identified RUNX1 suppression of the breast cancer epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition. Most recently, RUNX1 repression of cancer stem cells and tumorsphere formation was reported for breast cancer. It is anticipated that these new discoveries of the context‐dependent diversity of RUNX1 functions will lead to innovative therapeutic strategies for the intervention of cancer and other abnormalities of normal tissues.

The process by which tumor cells mechanically invade through surrounding stroma into peripheral tissues is an essential component of metastatic dissemination. The directed recruitment of the metalloproteinase MT1-MMP to invadopodia plays a critical role in this invasive process. Here, we provide mechanistic insight into MT1-MMP cytoplasmic tail binding protein 1 (MTCBP-1) with respect to invadopodia formation, matrix remodeling, and invasion by pancreatic tumor cells. MTCBP-1 localizes to invadopodia and interacts with MT1-MMP. We find that this interaction displaces MT1-MMP from invadopodia, thereby attenuating their number and function and reducing the capacity of tumor cells to degrade matrix. Further, we observe an inverse correlation between MTCBP-1 and MT1-MMP expression both in cultured cell lines and human pancreatic tumors. Consistently, MTCBP-1–expressing cells show decreased ability to invade in vitro and metastasize in vivo. These findings implicate MTCBP-1 as an inhibitor of the metastatic process.

Abstract Background Unlike enterococcal native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE), enterococcal CIED infections are not well described. Methods Data from the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Collaboration (MEDIC), a prospective, observational, multinational cohort study of CIED infections, were used to provide a descriptive analysis of adult patients with CIED infections due to enterococcal species. Results Of 433 patients, 21 (4.8%) were diagnosed with enterococcal CIED infection. Specific data on enterococcal species and antimicrobial susceptibilities were not recorded. The mean age was 70.8 years. No patient had previous CIED infection. Twelve patients (57%) had permanent pacemakers, 5 (24%) had implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 4 (19%) had biventricular devices. Among the 21 infections, 3 (14%) were categorized as CIED-related bloodstream infections and 18 (86%) as IE; no patient had isolated pocket infection. Of the IE cases, four were valvular IE, eight were lead IE, and six were both. Fourteen cases of IE (78%) were definite by the modified Duke criteria. Median time from last device procedure to infection was 510 days (range 37–2,952 days). The most common presenting symptom was fever (48%); five patients (24%) exhibited local signs of pocket infection. All 21 patients underwent TEE with vegetations demonstrated in 17 (81%). Blood cultures grew enterococci from all patients. The most common antimicrobial regimen was a penicillin plus aminoglycoside (38%); two patients (9.5%) received ampicillin + ceftriaxone. Antibiotics were given for a median of 43 days. Only 14 patients (67%) had complete device removal; the seven patients retaining their device were judged to be at high risk for extraction. There was one death during the index hospital stay with four additional patients dying over the 6 months after therapy (overall mortality 24%); two of the seven patients retaining their CIED died. Conclusion Enterococci caused 4.8% of all CIED infections in our cohort. Most infections appeared to be hematogenous in origin with late onset. IE was the most common infectious syndrome. A penicillin plus aminoglycoside, given for 6 weeks, was the most frequent therapy. Only 67% of patients underwent device removal. At 6 months follow-up, no relapses had occurred but overall mortality was 24%. Disclosures J. E. Peacock Jr., Pfizer, Inc.: Shareholder, Owns common stock in Pfizer which was inherited and held in a trust. M. R. Sohail, TyRx Inc.: Investigator, Research support. Medtronic Inc.: Investigator, Research support. Medtronic Inc.: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Spectranetics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Boston Scientific Corp: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. L. M. Baddour, UpToDate: Collaborator, Royalty payment. J. M. Miro, Abbvie: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Genentech: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Medtronic: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Novartis: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Gilead Sciences: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Pfizer: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. A. J. Greenspon, Medtronic: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Boston Scientific: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. St. Jude: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. R. G. Carrillo, St. Jude Medical Group: Speaker’s Bureau, Research support. Spectranetics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Sorin Group: Speaker’s Bureau, None. Boston Scientific Corp: Speaker’s Bureau, None. D. Z. Uslan, Medtronic: Investigator, Research support. Boston Scientific: Consultant, Speaker honorarium.

Abstract Purpose: This first-in-human, open-label phase I study evaluated AMG 337, an oral, highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of MET in advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled into dose-escalation cohorts received AMG 337 up to 400 mg once daily or up to 250 mg twice daily, following a modified 3+3+3 design. Dose expansion was conducted in MET-amplified patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Primary endpoints included assessment of adverse events (AEs), establishment of the MTD, and pharmacokinetics; clinical response was a secondary endpoint. Results: The safety analysis set included 111 patients who received ≥1 dose of AMG 337. Thirteen patients had ≥1 AE qualifying as dose-limiting toxicity. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg once daily; the MTD for twice-daily dosing was not reached. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were headache (63%) and nausea (31%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 23 patients (21%), most commonly headache (n = 6) and fatigue (n = 5). Maximum plasma concentration occurred at 3.0 hours following 300-mg once-daily dosing, indicating AMG 337 absorption soon after treatment. Objective response rate was 9.9% (11/111; 95% CI, 5.1%–17.0%) in all patients and 29.6% (8/27; 95% CI, 13.8%–50.2%) in MET-amplified patients; median (range) duration of response was 202 (51–1,430+) days in all patients and 197 (64–1,430+) days in MET-amplified patients. Conclusions: Oral AMG 337 was tolerated with manageable toxicities, with an MTD and recommended phase II dose of 300 mg once daily. The promising response rate observed in patients with heavily pretreated MET-amplified tumors warrants further investigation. See related commentary by Ma, p. 2375