Loberg, Robert D.

5515 Background: IGF signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of ovarian cancer (OC). Single agent activity and safety of ganitumab (AMG 479), a fully human monoclonal antibody against IGF-1R that blocks binding of IGF1 and IGF2, were evaluated in asymptomatic patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. Differential expression of IGF-1R pathway genes in OC underscores the potential of developing predictive biomarkers for patient selection. Methods: Pts with CA125 progression (GCIG criteria) and/or measurable disease per RECIST failing primary platinum-based therapy received 18 mg/kg of ganitumab q3w. Objective response rate per RECIST or CA125 criteria was the primary end point (complete response, CR; partial response, PR). Secondary end points included, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Tumor tissue was collected for gene expression profiling (Nanostring) and sequencing. Results: From 02/2009 to 05/2010, 61 pts were accrued from 20 centers. Pt characteristics were: Serous (77%), median platinum-free interval (11 months), measurable disease (74%), and ECOG performance status 0 (67%). According to CA125 criteria median PFS was 6.8 months (95%CI, 2.8-10.8); 2 CR (3.4%) 2 PR (3.4%), and 38 stable disease (SD, 64%) were observed. When using RECIST criteria, median PFS was 2.1 months (95%CI, 2.0-2.8), 2 PR (3.4%) and 22 SD (38%) were observed. Toxicity has been mild; grade 2 hyperglycemia was seen in 5 pts (8.2%). Grade 3 related events included hearing loss (1), nausea (1), asthenia (2), fatigue (1), and hypersensitivity (5). There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Efficacy is being correlated with gene expression profiles and mutational data. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibition with ganitumab was well tolerated and demonstrated modest single-agent activity in unselected patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. However, encouraging activity was seen in a subset of patients. Ongoing predictive biomarker analyses may facilitate patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT00719212.

Abstract Purpose: This first-in-human, open-label phase I study evaluated AMG 337, an oral, highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of MET in advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled into dose-escalation cohorts received AMG 337 up to 400 mg once daily or up to 250 mg twice daily, following a modified 3+3+3 design. Dose expansion was conducted in MET-amplified patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Primary endpoints included assessment of adverse events (AEs), establishment of the MTD, and pharmacokinetics; clinical response was a secondary endpoint. Results: The safety analysis set included 111 patients who received ≥1 dose of AMG 337. Thirteen patients had ≥1 AE qualifying as dose-limiting toxicity. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg once daily; the MTD for twice-daily dosing was not reached. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were headache (63%) and nausea (31%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 23 patients (21%), most commonly headache (n = 6) and fatigue (n = 5). Maximum plasma concentration occurred at 3.0 hours following 300-mg once-daily dosing, indicating AMG 337 absorption soon after treatment. Objective response rate was 9.9% (11/111; 95% CI, 5.1%–17.0%) in all patients and 29.6% (8/27; 95% CI, 13.8%–50.2%) in MET-amplified patients; median (range) duration of response was 202 (51–1,430+) days in all patients and 197 (64–1,430+) days in MET-amplified patients. Conclusions: Oral AMG 337 was tolerated with manageable toxicities, with an MTD and recommended phase II dose of 300 mg once daily. The promising response rate observed in patients with heavily pretreated MET-amplified tumors warrants further investigation. See related commentary by Ma, p. 2375

Abstract Treatment of myeloma has benefited from the introduction of more effective and better tolerated agents, improvements in supportive care, better understanding of disease biology, revision of diagnostic criteria, and new sensitive and specific tools for disease prognostication and management. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) in response to therapy is one of these tools, as longer progression-free survival (PFS) is seen consistently among patients who have achieved MRD negativity. Current therapies lead to unprecedented frequency and depth of response, and next-generation flow and sequencing methods to measure MRD in bone marrow are in use and being developed with sensitivities in the range of 10−5 to 10−6 cells. These technologies may be combined with functional imaging to detect MRD outside of bone marrow. Moreover, immune profiling methods are being developed to better understand the immune environment in myeloma and response to immunomodulatory agents while methods for molecular profiling of myeloma cells and circulating DNA in blood are also emerging. With the continued development and standardization of these methodologies, MRD has high potential for use in gaining new drug approvals in myeloma. The FDA has outlined two pathways by which MRD could be qualified as a surrogate endpoint for clinical studies directed at obtaining accelerated approval for new myeloma drugs. Most importantly, better understanding of MRD should also contribute to better treatment monitoring. Potentially, MRD status could be used as a prognostic factor for making treatment decisions and for informing timing of therapeutic interventions. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 3980–93. ©2017 AACR.