O’Reilly, Séamus

Importance Molecular analyses of biospecimens collected from study participants are essential for identifying biomarkers that can tailor treatments to specific subsets of patients who are most likely to benefit. Sharing of data and biospecimens from clinical trials enables personalized, patient-centric use of cancer therapies and accelerates the development of new treatments. Objective To describe obstacles to sharing data and biospecimens and to propose strategies to enhance access and collaboration. Evidence Review This is a Special Communication authored by 53 academic investigators and patient representatives from the breast cancer community with extensive experience in conducting clinical and translational research. The article also evaluates the impact of biomarker research on specifying responsive subpopulations in the 29 registrational clinical trials that have led to approval of a new drug for treatment of breast cancer between 2017 and 2024. Findings Clinical trial participants are increasingly asked to provide tissue and/or body fluid biospecimens for biomarker research that is typically controlled by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company, but published biomarker studies are rare. Among 29 breast cancer registrational studies reported in the past 8 years, none resulted in biomarker research that restricted a drug’s approved indication. Herein, strategies to maximize the value of clinical data and biospecimens contributed by participants are proposed, thereby supporting the shared goals of the pharmaceutical industry and academia to improve patient care. These strategies include (1) establishing coleadership structures involving academia and patients in clinical trial design and conduct, (2) ensuring that informed consent forms state that data and biospecimens will be shared with academia for future research, (3) requiring the sharing of clinical data as a condition for regulatory approval, and (4) enabling access to biospecimens and translational research data for independent studies on biomarkers that may indicate drug efficacy and toxicity. Conclusions and Relevance Data and biospecimen sharing from registrational trials has been suboptimal. Improving clinical data, biospecimens, and biospecimens’ related data sharing requires concrete actions and a multidimensional stakeholder approach to accelerate the impact of clinical cancer research on the quality of patient care.

5515 Background: IGF signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of ovarian cancer (OC). Single agent activity and safety of ganitumab (AMG 479), a fully human monoclonal antibody against IGF-1R that blocks binding of IGF1 and IGF2, were evaluated in asymptomatic patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. Differential expression of IGF-1R pathway genes in OC underscores the potential of developing predictive biomarkers for patient selection. Methods: Pts with CA125 progression (GCIG criteria) and/or measurable disease per RECIST failing primary platinum-based therapy received 18 mg/kg of ganitumab q3w. Objective response rate per RECIST or CA125 criteria was the primary end point (complete response, CR; partial response, PR). Secondary end points included, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Tumor tissue was collected for gene expression profiling (Nanostring) and sequencing. Results: From 02/2009 to 05/2010, 61 pts were accrued from 20 centers. Pt characteristics were: Serous (77%), median platinum-free interval (11 months), measurable disease (74%), and ECOG performance status 0 (67%). According to CA125 criteria median PFS was 6.8 months (95%CI, 2.8-10.8); 2 CR (3.4%) 2 PR (3.4%), and 38 stable disease (SD, 64%) were observed. When using RECIST criteria, median PFS was 2.1 months (95%CI, 2.0-2.8), 2 PR (3.4%) and 22 SD (38%) were observed. Toxicity has been mild; grade 2 hyperglycemia was seen in 5 pts (8.2%). Grade 3 related events included hearing loss (1), nausea (1), asthenia (2), fatigue (1), and hypersensitivity (5). There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Efficacy is being correlated with gene expression profiles and mutational data. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibition with ganitumab was well tolerated and demonstrated modest single-agent activity in unselected patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. However, encouraging activity was seen in a subset of patients. Ongoing predictive biomarker analyses may facilitate patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT00719212.

BACKGROUND Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits angiogenesis, growth, and proliferation, prolongs survival as monotherapy in patients with refractory colorectal cancer. This international, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial assessed the efficacy of regorafenib with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on first‐line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine enrolled at 45 sites in the United States and Ireland. Patients, stratified by prior bevacizumab use, were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib or placebo. The treatment consisted of FOLFIRI on days 1 and 2 and days 15 and 16 with 160 mg of regorafenib or placebo on days 4 to 10 and days 18 to 24 of every 28‐day cycle. Crossover was not allowed. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Under the assumption of a 75% event rate, 180 patients were required for 135 events to achieve 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with a 1‐sided α value of .1. RESULTS One hundred eighty‐one patients were randomized (120 to regorafenib‐FOLFIRI and 61 to placebo‐FOLFIRI) with a median age of 62 years. Among these, 117 (65%) received prior bevacizumab or aflibercept. PFS was longer with regorafenib‐FOLFIRI than placebo‐FOLFIRI (median, 6.1 vs 5.3 months; HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53‐1.01; log‐rank P = .056). The median overall survival was not longer (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71‐1.44). The response rate was higher with regorafenib‐FOLFIRI (34%; 95% CI, 25%‐44%) than placebo‐FOLFIRI (21%; 95% CI, 11%‐33%; P = .07). Grade 3/4 adverse events with a >5% absolute increase from regorafenib included diarrhea, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS The addition of regorafenib to FOLFIRI as second‐line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer only modestly prolonged PFS over FOLFIRI alone. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society .