Citations

Background: In spite of aggressive preventive therapy, patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) remain at high risk for major cardiovascular events and death. Understanding the pathophysiologic determinants of that residual risk could help identify effective preventive therapies. Methods and Results: In this Ancillary Study of the BARI 2D trial, we examined the predictive value of biomarkers from 6 distinct pathophysiologic pathways in 2285 men and women with T2D and SIHD who were followed for a median (IQR) of 5.0 (4.1-6.0) years. The endpoint for this Ancillary Study was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or all-cause mortality. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier event rate was 31%. The pathophysiologic processes evaluated included dysglycemia (HbA1c), dyslipidemia (LDL-C), myocardial strain (NT-proBNP), myocardial injury (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hsTnT]), subclinical inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]), and nephropathy (presence/absence of macroalbuminuria). In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline risk factors, angiographic severity of disease, and ejection fraction, each marker except LDL-C was a significant predictor of outcome (Figure) in this population with 74% baseline statin use. After mutual adjustment for all 6 markers and baseline risk factors, the hazard ratio (95% CI) per 1-SD of natural logarithm transformed concentration was largest for NT-proBNP [1.29 (1.17, 1.42)], followed by hsTnT [1.16 (1.07, 1.26)], HbA1c [1.12 (1.03, 1.21)], and hsCRP [1.11 (1.03, 1.20). Macroalbuminuria was not a significant predictor after adjustment for the other markers (Figure). Conclusions: In this high-risk population of patients with type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease, strategies to target myocardial strain, myocardial injury, and subclinical inflammation may lead to improvements in cardiovascular outcome.

Introduction: Cardiac veins serve as substrate for arrhythmogenesis, and are especially involved as foci in atrial fibrillation. Understanding cardiac vein anatomy along with myocardial extension into these structures can improve electrophysiological mapping and electrical isolation of arrhythmogenic substrate. Accurately defining cardiac vein anatomy is critical in improving success of ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. Methods: We performed measurements on 620 formalin-fixed autopsy hearts explanted from October 1998 to July 2003. The integrity of the thoracic veins and their cardiac connections were examined and systematic measurements of the superior and inferior vena cavae, azygous vein, vein of Marshall, coronary sinus, and pulmonary veins were performed and data were analyzed using univariate statistics. Results: We found that muscular extensions into the pulmonary veins were visible in 99% of the examined hearts, and were circumferential around the vein ostia (99.6%). Muscle extension into the SVC was found in 78% of examined hearts. These extensions were largely circumferential around the ostium (39%), but were also found to be asymmetric in a majority of hearts. Asymmetry was found in hearts with longer muscle extensions; no symmetry was observed in extensions greater than 0.8cm. Muscle extensions into the IVC were not seen. Occasionally, macroscopic muscle extensions into the azygous vein were visible (6%). The vein of Marshall was found to be patent to probing in the majority of hearts examined (72%) and was almost always overlying the lateral left atrial endocardial ridge. Conclusions: Our data suggest that all pulmonary veins need to be electrically isolated during atrial fibrillation ablation because of the almost universal presence of myocardial tissue extending into the veins. Mapping of the SVC should be done circumferentially and if potentials are noted isolation should also be performed. The IVC did not have muscle extensions and is unlikely to be a site of arrhythmogenesis. The azygous vein occasionally had muscle extensions and thus requires mapping and possible isolation. The vein of Marshall can be a substrate for arrhythmogenesis and is accessible for ablation by targeting the lateral left atrial endocardial ridge.

Abstract Background and Aims Perianal fistuliing Crohn’s disease [PFCD] is an aggressive phenotype of Crohn’s disease defined by frequent relapses and disabling symptoms. A novel consensus classification system was recently outlined by the TOpCLASS consortium, which seeks to unify disease severity with patient-centred goals but has not yet been validated. We aimed to apply this to a real-world cohort and to identify factors that predict transition between classes over time. Methods We identified all patients with PFCD and at least one baseline and one follow-up pelvic MRI [pMRI]. TOpCLASS classification, disease characteristics, and imaging indices were collected retrospectively at time periods corresponding with respective MRIs. Results We identified 100 patients with PFCD, of whom 96 were assigned TOpCLASS Classes 1–2c at baseline. Most patients [78.1%] started in Class 2b, but changes in classification were observed in 52.1% of all patients. Male sex [72.0%, 46.6%, 40.0%, p = 0.03] and prior perianal surgery [52.0% vs 44.6% vs 40.0%, p = 0.02] were more frequently observed in those with improved class compared to unchanged and worsened class. Baseline pMRI indices were not associated with changes in classification; however, greater improvements in mVAI, MODIFI-CD, and PEMPAC were seen among those who improved. Linear mixed effect modelling identified only male sex [-0.31, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.02] with improvement in class. Conclusion The TOpCLASS classification highlights the dynamic nature of PFCD over time. However, our ability to predict transitions between classes remains limited and requires prospective assessment. Improvement in MRI index scores over time was associated with a transition to lower TOpCLASS classification.

Objectives Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance. Methods Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components. Results HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years. Conclusion In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE. Trial registration number NCT02092467.

Abstract Background Pivotal trials have shown that ustekinumab is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the population included in these trials do not represent the cohort of patients treated in the real world. In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a clinical cohort of patients with UC. Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study and included patients with active UC starting ustekinumab. Variables collected included demographics, clinical data, and disease activity (measured using partial Mayo score [PMS] and endoscopic Mayo score) at follow-up. The primary outcomes were cumulative rates of steroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (SFCBR), defined as a PMS <2 while off steroids and a normal C-reactive protein and/or fecal calprotectin. Results A total of 245 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time of follow-up was 33 (interquartile range, 17-53) weeks, and 214 (87.3%) had previous exposure to a biologic and/or tofacitinib. Rates of SFCBR, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission at 6 and 12 months were 12.0% (n = 16 of 139), 29.0% (n = 71 of 175), and 18.0% (n = 7 of 39), and 23.8% (n = 15 of 63), 54.3% (n = 57 of 105), and 31.0% (n = 9 of 29), respectively. Non-Hispanic White race, higher baseline PMS, and the use of concomitant corticosteroids were independently associated with failure to achieve SFCBR. Of the 73 that were dose escalated, 28.4% did not respond, 49.3% experienced a benefit, and 21.6% achieved remission. Conclusions In a population enriched with refractory UC, ustekinumab was well tolerated and induced remission in a significant number of patients. Larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted.

Objective The ORAL Surveillance trial found a dose‐dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We aimed to assess VTE incidence over time and explore risk factors of VTE, including disease activity, in ORAL Surveillance. Methods Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or TNFi. Post hoc, cumulative probabilities and incidence rates (patients with first events/100 patient‐years) by 6‐month intervals were estimated for adjudicated VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and PE. Cox regression models identified risk factors. Clinical Disease Activity Index leading up to the event was explored in patients with VTE. Results Cumulative probabilities for VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib 10 mg BID, but not 5 mg BID, versus TNFi. Incidence rates were consistent across 6‐month intervals within treatments. Across treatments, risk factors for VTE included prior VTE, body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m 2 , older age, and history of chronic lung disease. At the time of the event, most patients with VTE had active disease as defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index. Conclusion Incidences of VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib (10 > 5 mg BID) versus TNFi and were generally consistent over time. Across treatments, VTE risk factors were aligned with previous studies in the general RA population. These data highlight the importance of assessing VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, and VTE history, when considering initiation of tofacitinib or TNFi in patients with active RA.

385 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immuno-oncology (IO) agents alone or in combination have revolutionized the landscape of management for untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Baseline quality of life (QOL) outside of interventional clinical trials and rationale for management decisions in mRCC are poorly understood. Methods: In this prospective observational study of 800 mRCC pts in the US, pts must: have a diagnosis of mRCC (any histology) with no prior systemic therapy (ST) for mRCC; be age ≥19 at informed consent; be able to comply with completion of PROs. Exclusion criteria include being treated for active malignancy other than mRCC or not intending to follow up at a study site within PCORnet. Pts undergo consent and baseline assessments by the study site team, with subsequent follow up by the central coordinating center. The primary objective is to determine distinct patterns of change in QOL and symptom burden of mRCC pts. A key secondary objective is to identify patterns of clinical management in the real world setting of mRCC across treatment regimens. Minimally important differences are defined as 3- and 7-points for FKSI-19 and FACT-G respectively. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04919122. Results: As of 9/1/2023, 173 pts have been enrolled (126 ST, 47 no ST [NST]): 75% male, 87% white, 73% clear cell, 52% intermediate risk and 47% poor risk. 47% had radical nephrectomy and 22% another solid tumor. ST pts as compared to NST pts were more likely to be poor risk (52% vs 16%); but differences in baseline pain were not significant. Of ST pts, 44 were treated with IO-IO (ipilimumab + nivolumab), 50 with IO-TKI (cabozantinib + nivolumab 38%, axitinib + pembrolizumab 38%, lenvatinib + pembrolizumab 24%) and 32 other (IO alone 34%, TKI alone 31%, investigational drug 25%). Reasons for NST included active surveillance (AS, 50%), other (21%), local therapy (13%). Mean differences between ST and NST for baseline FKSI-19 and FACT-G were 5.7 (95% CI: 1.2 – 10.2) and 3.3 (-2.6 – 9.3). There were no differences in pain or PROs between IO-IO and IO-TKI pts. Mean differences in FKSI-19 and FACT-G between AS vs IO-IO were 10.6 (4.8 – 16.4) and 8.6 (1.1 – 16.0); and vs IO-TKI were 11.0 (4.9 – 17.0) and 10.3 (3.5 – 17.1). On physician surveys, primary reasons for treatment selection were (in order of % selected): complete response (CR), prolonged survival (OS), prognostic factors (Px), treatment-free interval for IO-IO; versus delaying progression (PFS), OS, CR, Px for IO-TKI. Conclusions: Our data suggest differences in baseline QoL in pts treated with ST vs NST, as well as AS vs IO-IO or IO-TKI, in the real world. Reasons for selection of ST regimen differed among combination regimen classes. Completion of ODYSSEY will clarify baseline and longitudinal differences in pain and PROs among management strategies and give novel insights into the rationale for real world management of untreated pts with mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04919122 .

PURPOSE Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BRPC) after radical prostatectomy and a short PSA doubling time are at risk for distant metastases. Apalutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist, and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) prolong survival in the metastatic setting. We evaluated whether intensification of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improves outcomes in BRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS PRESTO is a randomized phase III, open-label trial in patients with BRPC and PSA doubling time ≤9 months (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03009981 ). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive a finite 52-week treatment course with ADT control, ADT + apalutamide, or ADT + apalutamide + AAP. The primary end point was PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), defined as serum PSA >0.2 ng/mL after treatment completion. RESULTS Five hundred three patients were enrolled. The median PSA was 1.8 ng/mL (IQR, 1.0-3.6). At the first planned interim analysis, both experimental arms significantly prolonged PSA-PFS compared with the control arm (median, 24.9 months for ADT + apalutamide v 20.3 months for ADT; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.77]; P = .00047; median, 26.0 months for ADT + apalutamide + AAP v 20.0 months for ADT; HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.71]; P = .00008). Median time to testosterone recovery did not differ across treatment arms. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was hypertension (7.5%, 7.4%, and 18% in ADT, ADT + apalutamide, and ADT + apalutamide + AAP arms, respectively). CONCLUSION Intensified AR blockade for a finite duration prolongs PSA-PFS with a manageable safety profile, without adversely affecting time to testosterone recovery. The addition of apalutamide to ADT should be considered in patients with high-risk BRPC.

100 Background: HER2 is overexpressed in various GI tumors. Tucatinib (TUC), which is approved in combination with trastuzumab (Tras) in the US for previously treated RAS WT HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for HER2. Preliminary safety and antitumor activity results of TUC + trastuzumab + FOLFOX in patients (pts) with HER2+ GI cancers are presented. Methods: The phase 1b/2 SGNTUC-024 (NCT04430738) study evaluated TUC + Tras + FOLFOX in pts with HER2+ metastatic GI cancers in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D (pts in Japan), and 2B. For Cohorts 1A, 1B, and 1D (enrolled sequentially), eligible pts had unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GI malignancies, including mCRC. Cohort 2B is still enrolling, and pts with HER2+ mCRC are eligible. Pts received a combination of TUC 150 mg orally twice a day (PO BID; Cohort 1A) or TUC 300 mg PO BID (Cohorts 1B, 1D, and 2B) + Tras + FOLFOX. Pts in Cohort 2B were enrolled to further assess the study regimen. Antidiarrheal prophylaxis was required for Cohort 1D. Results: As of July 10, 2023, 25 pts were treated (5, 11, 7, and 2 in Cohorts 1A, 1B, 1D, and 2B, respectively). In Cohort 1A (TUC 150 mg PO BID), the most common TEAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and proteinuria (each in 60.0% [3/5]). For pts receiving TUC 300 mg PO BID, the most common TEAEs were diarrhea (90.0% [18/20]) and fatigue (65.0% [13/20]). Table 1 presents the overall summary of adverse events. In Cohort 1A, Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to any treatment discontinuation were reported in 40.0% (2/5) pts, with 20.0% (1/5) discontinuing tucatinib. For pts treated with TUC 300 mg, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 35.0% (7/20), with 15.0% (3/20) discontinuing tucatinib. One TEAE leading to death (aspiration) in Cohort 1A was unrelated to study treatment. Grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in 45.5% (5/11) pts in Cohort 1B; most were observed in elderly pts or pts with gastric, gastroesophageal, or esophageal cancer or pts who were generally noncompliant with antidiarrheal treatment. No grade ≥3 diarrhea was observed in Cohort 1D. Among pts receiving TUC 300 mg, confirmed objective response rate was 83.3% (5/6) for mCRC, 40.0% (4/10) for gastroesophageal cancers, and 0% (0/4) for biliary tract cancer. Conclusions: TUC + Tras + FOLFOX showed manageable safety in the enrolled pt population and preliminary antitumor activity in pts with HER2+ mCRC and gastroesophageal cancer. This regimen will be compared with the standard of care (FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab) in the ongoing randomized, phase 3 study (MOUNTAINEER-03; NCT05253651) for pts with HER2+ RAS WT mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04430738 . [Table: see text]