Back to Authors

Chen, Yan

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-3455

Mayo Clinic

Pfizer (United States)

Citations 2

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism With Tofacitinib Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Risk‐Enriched Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Fleischmann, Roy , Mysler, Eduardo , Greenwald, Maria , Ytterberg, Steven R. , Koch, Gary G., Bhatt, Deepak L. , Wang, Cunshan, Mikuls, Ted R. , Chen, All‐shine, Connell, Carol A., Woolcott, John , Menon, Sujatha, Chen, Yan , Lee, Kristen , Fleischmann, Roy , Mikuls, Ted R , Szekanecz, Zoltán , Bhatt, Deepak L , Charles‐Schoeman, Christina

Arthritis & Rheumatology | March 14, 2024 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1218-1229

10.1002/art.42846 Get It

Objective The ORAL Surveillance trial found a dose‐dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We aimed to assess VTE incidence over time and explore risk factors of VTE, including disease activity, in ORAL Surveillance. Methods Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or TNFi. Post hoc, cumulative probabilities and incidence rates (patients with first events/100 patient‐years) by 6‐month intervals were estimated for adjudicated VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and PE. Cox regression models identified risk factors. Clinical Disease Activity Index leading up to the event was explored in patients with VTE. Results Cumulative probabilities for VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib 10 mg BID, but not 5 mg BID, versus TNFi. Incidence rates were consistent across 6‐month intervals within treatments. Across treatments, risk factors for VTE included prior VTE, body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m 2 , older age, and history of chronic lung disease. At the time of the event, most patients with VTE had active disease as defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index. Conclusion Incidences of VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib (10 > 5 mg BID) versus TNFi and were generally consistent over time. Across treatments, VTE risk factors were aligned with previous studies in the general RA population. These data highlight the importance of assessing VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, and VTE history, when considering initiation of tofacitinib or TNFi in patients with active RA.
Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and adverse events in patients receiving tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a post hoc analysis of ORAL Surveillance
Szekanecz, Zoltán, Baecklund, Eva , Bhatt, Deepak L. , Wang, Cunshan, Sawyerr, Gosford, Chen, Yan , Menon, Sujatha, Connell, Carol A., Ytterberg, Steven R. , Mortezavi, Mahta , Mortezavi, Mahta , Bhatt, Deepak L , Karpouzas, George , Mikuls, Ted R.

Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease | November 6, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1759720x231201047 Get It

Background: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), persistent inflammation and increasing disease activity are associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). Objectives: To assess relationships between RA disease activity and AEs of interest in patients treated with tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Design: This was a post hoc analysis of a long-term, postauthorization safety endpoint trial of tofacitinib versus TNFi. Methods: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients aged ⩾50 years with active RA despite methotrexate, and ⩾1 additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, were randomized 1:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi for up to 72 months. Post hoc time-dependent multivariable Cox analysis evaluated the relationships between disease activity [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)], inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP)], and AEs of interest. The AEs included major adverse CV events (MACE), malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infections, herpes zoster (HZ), nonserious infections excluding HZ (NSI), and death. Results: Across treatments, risk for NSI was higher when patients had CDAI-defined active disease versus remission; MACE and VTE risks trended higher, but did not reach significance. Hazard ratios for MACE, malignancies excluding NMSC, VTE, infections, and death rose by 2–9% for each 5-mg/L increment in serum CRP. The interaction terms evaluating the impact of treatment assignment on the relationship between disease activity and AEs were all p > 0.05. Conclusion: In ORAL Surveillance, higher NSI risk was observed in the presence of active RA versus remission. The risk of MACE and VTE directionally increased in active disease versus remission, although statistical power was limited due to small event numbers in these categories. The relationship between active disease and AEs was not impacted by treatment with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Registration: NCT02092467.