Citations

ABSTRACT Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma resection remains a challenging complication. Historically, surgeons reopened the prior retrosigmoid incision for transmastoid repair because the safety of creating a separate postauricular incision was uncertain, with concerns regarding wound breakdown and infection. However, limited data support this practice, and a focused mastoid incision may offer improved access and patient tolerance. This study evaluated wound healing outcomes following transmastoid repair using a new postauricular incision for persistent CSF leak after retrosigmoid surgery in patients without serviceable hearing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent transmastoid repair for persistent postoperative CSF leak after retrosigmoid craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma (2000–2025). Demographics, operative details, timing of leak diagnosis and repair, wound complications, readmissions, antibiotic use, and culture results were analyzed. Results Median age was 48 years (IQR 41–56); 67% were male, and mean BMI was 29.0 kg/m 2 . Mastoid obliteration was performed in 96%, with fat grafting in 93%. A new postauricular incision was used in all cases. Median time to leak diagnosis was 13 days (IQR 4–79), and median time to repair was 2 days (IQR 1–5). One patient (3.7%) developed a superficial wound abscess; no dehiscence or flap necrosis occurred. At median follow‐up of 34 months (IQR 2.9–87.7), all wounds were healed. CSF leak recurred in two patients (7.4%) and three (11.1%) required reoperation. Conclusion A separate postauricular incision for transmastoid CSF leak repair was not associated with increased wound morbidity. Durable wound healing was achieved in all patients, with 93% legal control, supporting this anatomy‐driven approach. Level of Evidence 4

Background: Posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs) are frequently observed injuries that alter tibiofemoral biomechanics, yet the long-term outcomes are poorly described. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of operatively managed PMMRTs. Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed with the inclusion criteria of English-language studies, diagnosis of PMMRT on magnetic resonance imaging, and minimum 5-year radiographic or patient-reported outcome (PRO) metrics. Data analysis included management strategy, surgical technique, meniscal extrusion, medial joint space, PROs, and radiographic measurements. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty, subsequent partial medial meniscectomy (PMM) and/or proximal tibial osteotomy, or clinical failure on PROs. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed with a random effects meta-analysis of mean differences. Chi-square meta-analysis was also used to analyze categorical variables. Results: Twelve studies were identified with >5-year follow-up after PMMRT (mean ± SD, 84.1 ± 11.0 months). Five studies performed PMM, 6 performed medial meniscus root repair (MMR), and 1 utilized either meniscectomy or repair. There were 797 total patients (female, n = 667; 83.7%), with mean ages ranging from 47.2 to 65. Both interventions showed significant PRO improvements after surgery: PMM (pre- vs postoperative Lysholm, 56.1 vs 68.2; P < .01) and MMR (Lysholm, 52.1 vs 83.1; International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], 40.0 vs 72.8; P < .01). MMR had significantly lower Kellgren-Lawrence grades (PMM vs MMR, 2.4 vs 1.8; P < .01) and superior IKDC scores (46.5 vs 72.8; P < .01) as compared with PMM. Additionally, PMM had a significantly higher failure rate (23% vs 5.3%) and conversion to knee arthroplasty (20.5% vs 3.5%) as compared with MMR, with odds ratios of 9.8 and 10.2, respectively. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with >5-year minimum follow-up found that PMM was associated with a 10-fold increase in clinical failure and conversion to knee arthroplasty relative to MMR in observational studies. In addition, MMR demonstrated superior Kellgren-Lawrence grades and IKDC scores as compared with PMM. The findings of the current analysis suggest that MMR is associated with superior outcomes as compared with PMM at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and/or other tissues. It is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths from leukemias in the United States. 1 The NCCN Guidelines Panel for AML convenes annually to update recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AML in adults. These recommendations are based on a review of recently published clinical trials that have led to significant improvements in treatment or have yielded new information regarding biologic factors that may have prognostic importance. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding the monitoring and management of measurable (minimal) residual disease.