Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1172 citation(s) found for "Ma, Cynthia".

Clinical Evolution in Patients With New‐Onset Inflammatory Back Pain
Wang, Runsheng , Crowson, Cynthia S. , Wright, Kerry , Ward, Michael M.

Arthritis & Rheumatology | February 23, 2018 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1049-1055

10.1002/art.40460 | PMID 29471593 Get It

ObjectiveInflammatory back pain (IBP) is often an early manifestation of spondyloarthritis (SpA), but the prognosis of patients with incident IBP is unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate long‐term outcomes in patients with IBP, and predictors of progression to SpA, in a population‐based cohort.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a longstanding population‐based cohort of residents of Olmsted County, MN. Patients ages 16–35 years with clinical visits for back pain from 1999 to 2003 were identified, and we screened these patients for the presence of new‐onset IBP and performed medical record reviews to collect data on clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of SpA. Outcomes in these patients were followed up until July 2016. We used survival analysis for competing risks to examine progression to either SpA, a non‐SpA diagnosis, or resolution of back pain. Recursive partitioning was used to identify predictors of progression to SpA.ResultsAmong 5,304 patients with back pain, we identified 124 patients with new‐onset IBP. After a median follow‐up of 13.2 years, IBP had progressed to SpA in 39 patients, 15 patients developed a non‐SpA diagnosis, and 58 patients had resolution of IBP. At 10 years, the probability of having SpA was 30%, while the probability of resolution of IBP was 43%. The most important predictors for progression to SpA were uveitis, male sex, and family history of SpA.ConclusionIn a minority of patients, new‐onset IBP progresses to SpA, while IBP resolves in many. That IBP often resolves may explain the difference between the prevalence of IBP (3–6%) and the prevalence of SpA (0.4–1.3%).
Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
Friebel, Tara M. , Friedman, Eitan , Hamann, Ute, Huo, Dezheng , Kwong, Ava , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Solano, Ángela R. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thomassen, Mads , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Chan, TL, Couch, Fergus J., Goldgar, David E., Kruse, Torben A., Palmero, Edenir Inêz , Park, Sue K. , Torres, Diana , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , McGuffog, Lesley, Aalfs, Cora M. , Abugattas, Julio E. , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrews, Lesley , Andrulis, Irene L., Arason, Aðalgeir , Arun, Banu, Asseryanis, Ella, Auerbach, Leo, Azzollini, Jacopo , Balmañà, Judith , Barile, Monica, Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benı́tez, Javier , Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan , Blanco, Amie , Blazer, Kathleen R. , Blok, Marinus J. , Bonadona, Valérie , Bradbury, Angela R. , Brewer, Carole, Buecher, Bruno , Caldés, Trinidad, Caliebe, Almuth , Caligo, Maria A. , Caputo, Sandrine M. , Chiquette, Jocelyne , Claes, Kathleen , Collée, J. Margriet, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hoya, Miguel de la , Leeneer, Kim De , Pauw, Antoine De , Delnatte, Capucine, Ding, Yuan Chun , Ditsch, Nina , Dorfling, Cecilia M., Dworniczak, Bernd , Eason, Jacqueline , Easton, Douglas F. , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ehrencrona, Hans , Ejlertsen, Bent , EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph , Engert, Stefanie, Evans, D. Gareth , Faivre, Laurence, Feliubadaló, Lídia , Ferrer, Sandra Fert, Foretová, Lenka , Fowler, Jeffrey M., Frost, Debra, Galvão, Henrique C.R. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Gauthier‐Villars, Marion , Gehrig, Andrea, Collaborators, GEMO Study, Gerdes, Anne‐Marie , Gesta, Paul , Giannini, Giuseppe , Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K., Greene, Mark H. , Gutierrez‐Barrera, Angelica M. , Hahnen, Eric , Hauke, Jan , HEBON, Henderson, Alex, Hogervorst, Frans B. L., Honisch, Ellen, Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Á. , Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Vijai, Joseph , Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Karlan, Beth Y., Kast, Karin, Investigators, kConFab, Kim, Sung-Won, Konstantopoulou, Irene , Korach, Jacob, Laitman, Yael , Lasset, Christine, Lázaro, Conxi , Lee, Annette, Lee, Min Hyuk , Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne , Liljegren, Annelie, Lindor, Noralane M. , Longy, Michel, Loud, Jennifer T. , Lu, Karen H. , Lubiński, Jan , Macháčková, Eva , Manoukian, Siranoush , Mari, Véronique , Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Mátrai, Zoltán , Mebirouk, Noura, Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Meindl, Alfons , Mensenkamp, Arjen R. , Mickys, Ugnius, Montagna, Marco , Moysich, Kirsten B., Mulligan, Anna Marie , Musinsky, Jacob, Ngeow, Joanne , Niederacher, Dieter , Nielsen, Henriette Roed, Nielsen, Finn C., Offit, Kenneth, Öfverholm, Anna , Ong, Kai‐Ren , Osório, Ana , Papp, J., Pasini, Barbara , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peixoto, Ana , Peruga, Nina, Peterlongo, Paolo , Pohl, Esther, Pradhan, Nisha , Prajzendanc, Karolina , Prieur, Fabienne, Radice, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J. , Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rhiem, Kerstin, Rodriguez, Gustavo C. , Rogers, Mark T., Rudaitis, Vilius , Schmidt, Ane Yde , Schmutzler, Rita K., Senter, Leigha , Shah, Payal D. , Side, Lucy, Simard, Jacques , Skytte, Anne‐Bine , Slavin, Thomas P. , Snape, Katie , Sobol, Hagay, Southey, Melissa C. , Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Teulé, Àlex , Thomas, Abigail, Thull, Darcy L. , Tognazzo, Silvia , Toland, Amanda Ewart, Topka, Sabine , Trainer, Alison H. , Hout, Annemieke H. van der, Kolk, Lizet E. van der, Luijt, Rob B. van der , Heetvelde, Mattias Van , Varesco, Liliana, Varon‐Mateeva, Raymonda, Vega, Ana , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Wachenfeldt, Anna von , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Yoon, Sook-Yee, Zanzottera, Cristina, Zidan, Jamal, Zorn, Kristin K. , Selkirk, Christina G. , Hulick, Peter J. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Durocher, Francine , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Faivre, Laurence , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Caligo, Maria A , Hulick, Peter J , James, Paul , Lesueur, Fabienne , Peterlongo, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J , Teixeira, Manuel R , Teo, Soo H , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Moysich, Kirsten , Vega, Ana , de la Hoya, Miguel , Radice, Paolo , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Azzollini, Jacopo , Eeles, Rosalind A , Ehrencrona, Hans , Evans, D Gareth , Joseph, Vijai , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Southey, Melissa C , van der Luijt, Rob B , Jakubowska, Anna , Palmero, Edenir I , Torres, Diana , Nathanson, Katherine L , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Engel, Christoph , Izquierdo, Angel , Lazaro, Conxi , Montagna, Marco , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Senter, Leigha , Topka, Sabine , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Couch, Fergus J. , Parsons, Michael T. , Leslie, Goska , Adlard, Julian , Agata, Simona , Arnold, Norbert , Bonanni, Bernardo , Buys, Saundra S. , Campbell, Ian , Chung, Wendy K. , Cook, Jackie A , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Velázquez, Carolina , EMBRACE, Garber, Judy E. , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Gronwald, Jacek , HEBON, Hentschel, Julia , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Isaacs, Claudine , John, Esther M. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lasa, Adriana , Lasset, Christine , Liljegren, Annelie , Meindl, Alfons , Miller, Austin , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen, Huu Phuc , Nussbaum, Robert L. , Papi, Laura , Pujol, Pascal , Rhiem, Kerstin , Robson, Mark E. , Sharma, Priyanka , Singer, Christian F. , Sobol, Hagay , Steele, Linda Roslyn , Steinemann, Doris , Szabo, Csilla I. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tung, Nadine , Asperen, Christi J. van , Varesco, Liliana , Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Weber, Bernhard H. F. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Faivre, Laurence , Rashid, Muhammad U , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hauke, Jan , Pasini, Barbara , Ngeow, Joanne , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Terry, Mary Beth , Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia , Balmaña, Judith , Kwong, Ava

Human Mutation | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 593-620

10.1002/humu.23406 | PMID 29446198 Get It

Review article: the evidence that vancomycin is a therapeutic option for primary sclerosing cholangitis
Damman, Jennifer, Rodríguez, Eduardo A. , Ali, Ahmad H. , Buness, Cynthia W. , Cox, Kenneth L. , Carey, Elizabeth J. , Lindor, Keith D. , Rodriguez, E A , Lindor, K D

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | February 7, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 886-895

10.1111/apt.14540 | PMID 29411404 Get It

SummaryBackground and AimsPSC is an autoimmune biliary inflammatory disorder that is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with 50%‐75% of patients with PSC having coexisting IBD, most commonly ulcerative colitis. Currently, no medical therapies have been shown to improve the disease course or slow its progression. However, ongoing research has resulted in a growing interest in the use of antibiotics for treatment of PSC, of which vancomycin is the most studied. In this review, we summarise the current evidence on the use of vancomycin in PSC and comment on future research areas of interest.MethodsA comprehensive PUBMED and EMBASE literature search for articles on vancomycin, PSC, therapeutic options and microbiome was performed.ResultsTwo randomised clinical trials, three case series and two case reports were included in the study. These include uncontrolled data from at least 98 patients that include promising improvements in biochemistry and imaging. Optimal dosing regimens are unclear.ConclusionVancomycin is one of the most studied antibiotics used in the treatment of PSC with promising results. There is not currently sufficient evidence to support treatment recommendations. Further research is needed to establish if vancomycin is a PSC treatment.
Letting the Patient Decide: A Case Report of Self-Administered Sedation During Mechanical Ventilation
Hetland, Breanna , Hayes, Sarah , Skaar, Debra J. , Tracy, Mary Fran , Weinert, Craig , Hayes, Sarah Maryon, Skaar, Debra, Weinert, Craig R, CHLAN, LINDA, Chlan, Linda L.

Critical Care Nurse | February 1, 2018 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 17-23

10.4037/ccn2018676 | PMID 29437074 Get It

It is common for critical care nurses to administer sedative medications to patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Although patient-controlled analgesia is frequently used in practice to promote effective self-management of pain by patients, it is not known if patient-controlled sedation can be used to promote effective self-management of distressing symptoms associated with mechanical ventilation. A randomized pilot trial was conducted to evaluate whether patient self-administered sedation with dexmedetomidine is safe and acceptable for self-management of anxiety during ventilator support. This case report details the experiences of one patient enrolled in the pilot trial who was randomly assigned to the experimental dexmedetomidine intervention, completed the study protocol, and provided feedback. In a poststudy survey, the patient responded positively to the use of self-administered sedation with dexmedetomidine during ventilator support.
Multicenter Evaluation of the Accelerate PhenoTest BC Kit for Rapid Identification and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Morphokinetic Cellular Analysis
Pancholi, Preeti , Dhiman, Neelam , Ford, Bradley , Granato, Paul A. , Harrington, Amanda, Hernandez, Diana R. , Humphries, Romney M. , Jindra, Matthew R., Ledeboer, Nathan A., Miller, Shelley A. , Mochon, A. Brian, Morgan, Margie, Patel, Robin , Schreckenberger, Paul C., Stamper, Paul D. , Simner, Patricia J. , Tucci, Nancy E., Zimmerman, Cynthia, Wolk, Donna M. , Buchan, Blake W , Granato, Paul A , Hernandez, Diana R , Wolk, Donna M , Patel, Robin , Humphries, Romney , Carroll, Karen C. , Chan, Raymond C.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | January 8, 2018 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.01329-17 | PMID 29305546 Get It

ABSTRACT We describe results from a multicenter study evaluating the Accelerate Pheno system, a first of its kind diagnostic system that rapidly identifies common bloodstream pathogens from positive blood cultures within 90 min and determines bacterial phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results within ∼7 h. A combination of fresh clinical and seeded blood cultures were tested, and results from the Accelerate Pheno system were compared to Vitek 2 results for identification (ID) and broth microdilution or disk diffusion for AST. The Accelerate Pheno system accurately identified 14 common bacterial pathogens and two Candida spp. with sensitivities ranging from 94.6 to 100%. Of fresh positive blood cultures, 89% received a monomicrobial call with a positive predictive value of 97.3%. Six common Gram-positive cocci were evaluated for ID. Five were tested against eight antibiotics, two resistance phenotypes (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus spp. [MRSA/MRS]), and inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSb). From the 4,142 AST results, the overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) were 97.6% and 97.9%, respectively. Overall very major error (VME), major error (ME), and minor error (mE) rates were 1.0%, 0.7%, and 1.3%, respectively. Eight species of Gram-negative rods were evaluated against 15 antibiotics. From the 6,331 AST results, overall EA and CA were 95.4% and 94.3%, respectively. Overall VME, ME, and mE rates were 0.5%, 0.9%, and 4.8%, respectively. The Accelerate Pheno system has the unique ability to identify and provide phenotypic MIC and categorical AST results in a few hours directly from positive blood culture bottles and support accurate antimicrobial adjustment.
Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience
Fossey, Robyn, Kochan, David C., Winkler, Erin, Pacyna, Joel E. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Connolly, John J. , Harr, Margaret , Behr, Meckenzie, Prows, Cynthia A. , Cobb, Beth L., Myers, Melanie F. , Leslie, Nancy, Namjou‐Khales, Bahram, Rasouly, Hila Milo , Wynn, Julia , Fedotov, Alexander , Gharavi, Ali G. , Williams, Janet L. , Pais, Lynn , Holm, Ingrid A. , Aufox, Sharon , Smith, Maureen E. , Scrol, Aaron, Leppig, Kathleen A. , Jarvik, Gail P. , Wiesner, Georgia L. , Li, Rongling, Stroud, Mary , Sharp, Richard R. , Kochan, David, Thibodeau, Stephen, Myers, Melanie F , Holm, Ingrid A , Sharp, Richard R , Milo Rasouly, Hila , Jarvik, Gail P , Connolly, John J , Olson, Janet E. , Chung, Wendy K. , Smoller, Jordan W. , Kullo, Iftikhar J.

Journal of Personalized Medicine | January 3, 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 2

10.3390/jpm8010002 | PMID 29301385 Get It

We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, for proposed electronic health record-based genomic medicine studies, to identify common questions and concerns. Sequencing of 109 disease related genes and genotyping of 14 actionable variants is being performed in ~28,100 participants from the 9 sites. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in actionable genes are being returned to study participants. We examined each site’s research protocols, informed-consent materials, and interactions with IRB staff. Research staff at each site completed questionnaires regarding their IRB interactions. The time to prepare protocols for IRB submission, number of revisions and time to approval ranged from 10–261 days, 0–11, and 11–90 days, respectively. IRB recommendations related to the readability of informed consent materials, specifying the full range of potential risks, providing options for receiving limited results or withdrawal, sharing of information with family members, and establishing the mechanisms to answer participant questions. IRBs reviewing studies that involve the return of results from genomic sequencing have a diverse array of concerns, and anticipating these concerns can help investigators to more effectively engage IRBs.
Enteral nutrients promote postnatal maturation of intestinal motor activity in preterm infants
Berseth, Carol Lynn, Nordyke, Cynthia K.

American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | December 23, 2017 | Volume: 264 | Issue: 6 | Pages: G1046-G1051

10.1152/ajpgi.1993.264.6.g1046 | PMID 8333531 Get It

Low-compliance perfusion manometry and clinical outcome were used to assess the chronic effects of feeding on functional maturation of the preterm intestine in 32 infants. During the first postnatal week, 16 infants received a small volume of formula to supplement their routine parenteral nutrition (24 ml.kg-1.day-1), and 16 received an equal volume of water. After 10 days of enteral "feedings," the manometric tracings of those infants who had received nutrient feedings had more migrating activity (P < 0.01) and less clustered phasic activity (P < 0.05) during fasting than did the tracings of those infants who had received nonnutrient feedings containing sterile water. Infants who received nutrient feedings demonstrated a change in motor activity in response to feeding; infants who had received water feedings failed to show a change in motor activity in response to feeding. After water-fed infants were given formula feedings for 2 wk, their motor activity patterns were similar to those who had initially been fed formula, and their motor responses to feeding were restored. Despite normalization of their motor activity patterns by 1 mo of age, these water-fed infants established full enteral nutrition and full nipple feedings later than did infants who had been fed formula (P < 0.01), suggesting that the delay of enteral feedings in preterm infants does not permit optimal intestinal maturation of nonmucosal functions.
Large‐Vessel Dilatation in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Different Subset of Disease?
Muratore, Francesco , Kermani, Tanaz A. , Crowson, Cynthia S. , Matteson, Eric L. , Warrington, Kenneth J. , Warrington, Kenneth J , Koster, Matthew J. , Salvarani, Carlo

Arthritis Care & Research | December 20, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1406-1411

10.1002/acr.23498 | PMID 29266882 Get It

ObjectiveTo compare patients with large‐vessel giant cell arteritis (LV‐GCA) characterized by wall thickening, stenosis, and/or occlusion of subclavian arteries to those with subclavian dilatation.MethodsFor the purposes of the present retrospective study, 2 different subsets of LV‐GCA were identified and compared from an established cohort of patients with radiographic evidence of subclavian artery vasculitis secondary to GCA: LV‐GCA with wall thickening, stenosis, and/or occlusion of subclavian arteries (Group 1), and LV‐GCA with dilatation of subclavian arteries without wall thickening or stenotic changes (Group 2).ResultsThe study included 109 patients in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2. Large‐vessel involvement secondary to GCA was diagnosed significantly later in patients from Group 2 compared to those from Group 1 (median 15.3 versus 0.0 months; P = 0.010). Compared to patients from Group 1, those from Group 2 were more frequently male (17% versus 45%; P = 0.027), ever smokers (42% versus 73%; P = 0.048), and more frequently had a history of coronary artery disease (11% versus 36%; P = 0.018). At LV‐GCA diagnosis, 10 of the 11 patients (91%) from Group 2 had aortic dilatation compared to 13 of 109 patients (12%) from Group 1 (P < 0.001). During the followup period, the prevalence of aortic aneurysm was significantly higher in patients from Group 2 compared with those from Group 1 (64% versus 7% at 5 years; P < 0.001).ConclusionTwo different subsets of LV‐GCA were identified. Given the strong association between subclavian artery dilatation and aortic aneurysm, such patients should be evaluated and monitored carefully for aortic dilatation.
Orthopedic Surgery Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population‐Based Study to Identify Risk Factors, Sex Differences, and Time Trends
Richter, Michael , Crowson, Cynthia S. , Matteson, Eric L. , Makol, Ashima , Richter, Michael D , Makol, Ashima

Arthritis Care & Research | December 20, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1546-1550

10.1002/acr.23499 | PMID 29266862 Get It

ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for large‐joint surgery (LJS) versus small‐joint surgery (SJS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and evaluate trends in surgery rates over time.MethodsA retrospective medical record review of all orthopedic surgeries following first fulfillment of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for adult‐onset RA among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Risk factors were examined using Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and calendar year of RA incidence. Trends in incidence of joint surgeries were examined using Poisson regression models.ResultsA total of 1,077 patients with RA (mean age 56 years, 69% female, 66% seropositive for rheumatoid factor [RF] and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti‐CCP] antibodies) were followed for a median of 10.7 years, during which 112 patients (90 women) underwent at least 1 SJS and 204 (141 women) underwent at least 1 LJS. Risk factors included advanced age, and RF and anti‐CCP antibody positivity for both SJS and LJS, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 for LJS. Risk factors for SJS and LJS at any time during followup included the presence of radiographic erosions, large‐joint swelling, and methotrexate use. SJS rates decreased by calendar year of incidence (hazard ratio 0.53, P = 0.001), with significant decline in the rates of SJS after 1995. The cumulative incidence of SJS was higher in women than men (P = 0.008).ConclusionIn recent years, there has been a significant decline in the rates of SJS but not LJS in patients with RA. The incidence of SJS is higher among women. Traditional RA risk factors are strong predictors for SJS and LJS. Increasing age and obesity are predictive of LJS.