Citations

Compared with two-dimensional MR elastography (MRE), three-dimensional MRE demonstrated better test-retest repeatability, between–field-strength reproducibility, and between-day reproducibility at 3 T for measurement of liver stiffness in adults with severe obesity but failed more frequently.

ABSTRACT Aims To evaluate the real‐world associations between semaglutide 2.4 mg and cardiometabolic comorbidities, biomarkers and cardiovascular risk among adults with overweight or obesity. Methods This retrospective cohort study used US claims data and laboratory measurements from the Komodo Research Database (2016–2024). Adults with obesity or with overweight and ≥ 1 obesity‐related comorbidity were included. Patients on semaglutide 2.4 mg for ≥ 12 months were compared with non‐users (including users of other obesity medications) using propensity score weighting with residual imbalances adjusted in regression model. Outcomes included time to onset of cardiometabolic comorbidities, change in cardiometabolic biomarkers and changes in 10‐year ASCVD risk score at 12 months. Results 25 783 semaglutide 2.4 mg users and 8 948 913 non‐users were identified. Semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with significantly lower risks for incident prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, type 2 diabetes only, hypertension, ASCVD, heart failure and CVD (HRs 0.45–0.75; all p < 0.05), as well as greater improvements in BMI (−4.1 kg/m 2 ), SBP (−6.2 mmHg), HbA1c (−0.4%), LDL cholesterol (−7.7 mg/dL), triglycerides (−28.6 mg/dL) and HDL cholesterol (+1.9 mg/dL; all p < 0.001). At 12 months, semaglutide 2.4 mg users ( N = 161) demonstrated a greater reduction in ASCVD risk score (−0.7% vs. +0.3%; between‐group difference −1.0%, p < 0.001), with a decrease in the proportion at intermediate‐high ASCVD risk (14.9%–9.3% vs. 17.7%–18.7%; OR 0.3 [95% CI: 0.1, 0.6], p < 0.001). Conclusions Semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with lower risk of multiple cardiometabolic comorbidities, favourable changes in biomarkers, and lower estimated ASCVD risk in this population.

Background/Objectives: Characterizing spinal cord multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in MRI is critical for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment evaluation. However, current automated approaches for lesion detection and segmentation are typically designed for specific MRI contrasts or acquisition sites, limiting their generalizability in real-world clinical settings where imaging protocols vary widely. This work proposes a robust multi-site, multi-contrast segmentation framework for spinal cord lesions. Methods: The segmentation model was trained and evaluated on a large-scale dataset comprising 4428 annotated images from 1849 persons with MS across 23 imaging centers, encompassing six MRI contrasts (T1w, T2w, T2*w, PSIR, STIR, and UNIT1) acquired at 1.5 tesla (T), 3 T, and 7 T. Results: Likert-type assessment performed by neuroradiologist ratings demonstrated superior generalization of the model compared to existing contrast-specific pipelines ( p < 0.01). Additional experiments evaluated robustness across spinal levels, acquisition resolutions, binarization thresholds, and quantitative evaluation on external labeled datasets. Conclusions: The proposed model can achieve accurate and reliable spinal cord MS lesion segmentation across heterogeneous MRI data, addressing a key barrier to clinical translation. The model is available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.2 and higher. Code repository: https://github.com/ivadomed/seg-sc-ms-lesion-multicontrast

We previously reported initial results of the pivotal phase II trial of atezolizumab for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03141684 ). Here, we report on three additional years of observation. Fifty-three patients with ASPS received atezolizumab. Median duration of response increased to 37.0 months. Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) remained essentially as previously reported (35.8% [95% CI, 23.1 to 50.2] and 20.8 months [IQR, 7.6-not reached], respectively). ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion type was determined for 47/53 patients; ORR and mPFS were higher among the 41 patients expressing type 1 (43.9% [95% CI, 28.5 to 60.2] and 28.3 months [IQR, 9.2-not reached], respectively) than the six patients expressing type 2 (0% [95% CI, 0 to 45.9] and 7.5 months [IQR, 3.9-not reached], respectively, PFS HR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.01 to 10.2]). Eleven patients chose a per-protocol drug holiday (range, 3.5-26.4 months) after ≥2 years of treatment; two experienced disease progression during the holiday. Nine eligible patients elected to receive bevacizumab plus atezolizumab after progressing on monotherapy; ORR was 0% and mPFS was 18.5 months (IQR, 7.9-21.1) in this small cohort. Long-term results support using atezolizumab to treat ASPS, even for several years; a drug holiday with careful monitoring may be an option for some patients.

Importance Novel blood culture diagnostics provide rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for bacteria causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) but have unclear clinical impact. Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of blood culture testing using a rapid AST method compared with standard AST in patients with BSIs caused by gram-negative bacilli in regions with high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Design, Setting, and Participants Open-label randomized clinical trial that enrolled participants from December 2023 to May 2025 (final follow-up, June 18, 2025) at 7 medical centers in Greece (n = 2), India (n = 1), Israel (n = 3), and Spain (n = 1). Hospitalized patients (adults and children) with BSIs caused by gram-negative bacilli were eligible. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 2025 to January 2026. Intervention Patients were randomized to undergo blood culture evaluation using rapid, phenotypic AST directly from positive blood cultures plus standard susceptibility testing (n = 413) vs standard susceptibility testing alone (n = 437). Local antimicrobial stewardship teams reviewed all patients and provided treatment recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30, with 3 categories (alive without deleterious events, alive with deleterious events, and death). The difference between rapid and standard testing was summarized as the probability that the DOOR outcomes were more desirable in the rapid testing group. Superiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI exceeded 50%. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, acquisition of hospital-acquired infections, time to effective antibiotic therapy within 3 days, and time to antibiotic escalation or deescalation within 3 days. Results Of the 899 patients randomized, 850 were included in the primary outcome analysis (median [IQR] age, 72 [21] years; 43% female). The probability that DOOR outcomes were more favorable in the rapid testing group was 48.8% (95% CI, 45.3%-52.4%). Median time to effective antibiotic therapy was not different between the groups in the as-randomized population. Median time to antibiotic escalation or deescalation was faster in the rapid testing group by 14 hours (95% CI, 6-22) in the as-randomized population. There were no differences between the groups in other secondary outcomes. In the prespecified subgroup with carbapenem-resistant infections, median time to effective therapy was 9.5 hours in the rapid testing group vs 28 hours in the standard testing group (difference, −18 hours [95% CI, −42 to 6]). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with gram-negative bacilli BSIs, rapid blood culture AST was not superior to standard testing by DOOR. When considered with other efficacy and safety outcomes, these findings may help inform the use of rapid susceptibility testing in clinical practice. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06174649

Abstract Background: [212Pb]VMT-a-NET is a novel, next generation alpha therapy agent for advanced somatostatin receptor 2 positive (SSTR2+) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Here, we present safety and efficacy update from the dose-finding phase 1/2a clinical trial (NCT05636618). Methods: Adults with well-differentiated unresectable or metastatic NETs, who were peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-naïve, showed progressive disease after at least one prior line of systemic therapy and demonstrated SSTR2-expression on PET images were treated with up to four cycles of study therapy at the assigned dose level. Participants were followed for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation up to 42 days after the first dose. Efficacy was evaluated by investigators according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Results: As of 10-Dec-2025 (data cut-off [DCO]) a total of 56 participants were enrolled into Cohorts 1, 2 and 3, and received at least 1 dose of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=2 in Cohort 1, n=46 in Cohort 2, and n=8 in Cohort 3 at a dose level of 2.5 mCi, 5 mCi, and 6 mCi, respectively). For data analysis purposes, participants were categorized into two different groups: a safety group and an efficacy group. The safety group included all participants treated by the DCO (n=56), while the efficacy group included only the Cohort 1 participants (n=2) and the first half of participants treated in Cohort 2 (n=23). Among all participants treated with at least 1 dose of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=56), no DLTs, no grade 5 adverse events (AEs), no treatment-related discontinuations, no serious renal complications, no dysphagia and no clinically significant treatment-related myelosuppression were observed. Median follow-up time for all patients treated was 40 weeks (range: 6-97). Among the 25 participants followed for efficacy (n=2 in Cohort 1 and n=23 in Cohort 2), 19 out of 25 were with no progression as of the DCO. Median follow-up time for participants included in the efficacy group was 49 weeks (range: 6-97). Investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1 objective responses were observed in 9 out of 23 participants (39%) enrolled in the first half of Cohort 2 (8 confirmed). The 2 patients enrolled in Cohort 1 at 2.5 mCi still have stable disease after 2 years of follow up. Updated safety outcomes for all participants along with updated efficacy findings for participants in Cohorts 1 and 2 with sufficient maturity will be presented during the congress. Conclusions: Treatment with [212Pb]VMT-α-NET continues to be well-tolerated among all patients treated (n=56), and to show promising efficacy at the dose levels of 2.5 mCi and 5 mCi. The study is ongoing with Cohort 3 (6 mCi) currently open for enrollment. Citation Format: Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Richard L. Wahl, Vineeth Sukrithan, Brandon R. Mancini, Seyed A. Mosallaie, Savitha Balaraman, Gregory S. Sibley, Jason Starr, Lowell B. Anthony, Chih Y. Liao, Samuel H. Mehr, Jared Weiss, Robert A. Ramirez, Lucia Baratto, Wenjing Yang, Alaa Hanna, Stephen M. Keefe, Markus Puhlmann, Vikas Prasad. [212Pb]VMT-a-NET in advanced SSTR2+ neuroendocrine tumors: safety and preliminary efficacy results from dose-finding cohorts 1,2 and 3 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT088.

Abstract Background: Zedoresertib (zedo) and lunresertib (lunre) are oral, highly selective WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors, respectively. Inhibition of these targets leads to premature mitotic entry, and in the presence of high replication stress causes mitotic catastrophe. In preclinical models, the combination of the zedo and lunre is synthetically lethal, supporting this first-in-class trial combination (NCT04855656). Methods: In this Phase 1 trial, patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with CCNE1 amplification (amp), or FBXW7 or PPP2R1A deleterious mutations (mut) were treated with zedo (daily dosing) plus lunre (3 days on/4 days off), guided by preclinical modelling of the pharmacological contributions of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition in achieving tumor regression. Objectives included safety, tolerability, recommended doses (RD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PDy), antitumor activity and molecular response rate (MRR; ≥50% decline in circulating tumor DNA). Results: As of 18 Nov 2025, 54 pts (55.6% female ; prior lines of therapy 1 - 9, main cancer types: ovarian (OC) (35.2%), colorectal (31.5%), pancreatic (7.4%) and breast (5.6%)) were treated at 5 dose levels (DL) from 150 mg to 260 mg of zedo plus 60 mg or 80 mg of lunre. The most common ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (9.3%), neutropenia (7.4%) and Palmar Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (7.4%). There were no G5 TRAEs. 4 (9.3%) of 54 pts had a dose-limiting toxicity (G3 pain in extremity and G1 rash in same pt (zedo 150 mg / lunre 60 mg), G3 rash (200 mg / 80 mg), G3 PPE (260 mg / 60 mg), G3 vomiting (260 mg / 60 mg)). PK/PDy analyses showed dose-dependent exposures for both zedo and lunre and target engagement in most pts, with reductions in pCDK1 Thr14 and Tyr15 and yH2AX induction. 24 (55.5%) of 44 RECIST v1.1 evaluable pts showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 5 uPR, 15 SD and 1 PD). Of 16 evaluable pts with advanced OC (12 platinum resistant , 2 unknown and 2 platinum sensitive) with CCNE1 amp (13 pts) or FBXW7 mut (3 pts), 13 (81.3%) showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 3 uPR and 7 SD); clinical benefit rate (pts with CR, PR or SD) was 93.8%; 7 (43.8%) OC pts were on treatment for at least 16 weeks; 4 (25%) OC pts achieved GCIG CA-125 responses. Of 23 pts with a post baseline ctDNA analysis, a MRR of 39% was seen across all DLs. Conclusion: We report the first disclosure of clinical data of the first-in-field synthetic lethal combination of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors in a molecularly defined pt population. The safety profile of zedo and lunre was expected and manageable. Promising antitumor activity was observed in pts with CCNE1 amp or FBXW7 mut solid tumors, especially pts with OC. Further dose optimization of this combination is ongoing. Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Rahul Aggarwal, Elisa Fontana, Martin Hojgaard, Benedito A. Carneiro, Linda Duska, Patricia LoRusso, Siddhartha Yadav, Stephanie Lheureux, Cara Mathews, Ryan H. Moy, Nehal Lakhani, Mia Weiss, Joan Tymon-Rosario, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Elisabeth K. Lee, Esteban Rodrigo Imedio, Jonathan Wessen, Luke Piggott, Vito Dozio, Noemie Luong, Christophe Mas, Alison M. Schram. First data disclosure of the Phase I trial of the first in class combination of WEE1 inhibitor zedoresertib with PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring CCNE1, FBXW7, or PPP2R1A genomic alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT022.

Abstract Study Objectives Narcolepsy is a chronic condition affecting the sleep/wake cycle that is challenging to diagnose. Epidemiological data from large US-focused studies remain limited, with no validated claims-based case selection definitions for narcolepsy. We estimated the prevalence/incidence of diagnosed narcolepsy (type 1 [NT1], type 2 [NT2], overall) in an insured US population using validated, claims-based narcolepsy case definitions. Materials and Methods This observational study used HealthVerity administrative claims-linked electronic medical records to develop case definitions identifying individuals with NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy from diagnosis, medication, and procedure codes. Claims-based case definition performance (NT1, NT2, overall narcolepsy) was assessed using positive predictive values (PPVs). Prevalence (per 100 000 persons, on December 31, 2023) and annual incidence (per 100 000 person-years [PY], 2020 − 2023) were calculated/adjusted using PPVs for each case definition. Results Unadjusted point prevalence among individuals with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment were 15.5/100 000 (NT1), 51.1/100 000 (NT2), and 67.0/100 000 (overall narcolepsy). Unadjusted incidence rates were stable from 2020 − 2023 for NT1 (range, 2.0 − 2.3/100 000 PY) but declined across years for NT2 (9.1 − 7.6/100 000 PY) and overall narcolepsy (11.3 − 9.6/100 000 PY). PPVs (95% confidence interval) of NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy were 0.81 (0.72 − 0.88), 0.84 (0.75 − 0.91), and 0.80 (0.71 − 0.87), contributing to epidemiologic estimates being reduced by ~20% after PPV adjustment. Prevalence and incidence were higher in females than males. Individuals with NT1 were ~ 4 years younger versus NT2. Conclusions Validated definitions for narcolepsy can reduce potential misclassification. Our findings highlight a relatively low NT1 prevalence in the US. In contrast, NT2 prevalence estimates were &gt; 3 times higher than NT1.

Abstract Problem The Association of American Medical Colleges has urged actions to promote inclusivity in medical education for historically underrepresented groups. Studies suggest that underrepresentation may be addressed through structured mentorship and workshops at the premedical level and generate interest in less familiar specialties including physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). Approach The authors implemented a novel half-day multi-institutional workshop in spring 2024 featuring physicians and medical students from New York City medical centers. The workshop included structured mentorship and pertinent PM&R-related topics, including disability health and adaptive sports, to which premedical students often have limited exposure. Participants were invited to complete pre- and postworkshop surveys to evaluate the workshop’s impact. The authors collaborated with prehealth chapters of organizations such as the American Medical Women’s Association and the Minority Association of Pre-Medical Students to distribute surveys. Outcomes The preworkshop survey was completed by 147 premedical students, and 81 registered for the workshop. Ultimately, 55 attended the workshop, with 71% completing the postworkshop survey. Most participants had no previous exposure to PM&R (n = 77, 53.5%) and to adaptive sports (n = 116, 80.6%). Furthermore, although 76 (52.8%) had shadowed a physician, only 6 (4.2%) had experience shadowing a PM&R physician. The authors gathered a diverse representation of responses, including those identifying as female (n = 119, 81.0%) and underrepresented in medicine (n = 84, 57.1%). Pre–post comparative analysis showed a statistically significant rise in students’ motivation to apply to medical school (P = .018), along with a statistically significant increase in the interest and understanding of PM&R and adaptive sports (P &lt; .001). Next Steps Future work will focus on developing longitudinal mentorship, improving accessibility through hybrid formats, and expanding the curriculum through interspecialty collaborations to support broader implementation and evaluation.