Abstract Problem The Association of American Medical Colleges has urged actions to promote inclusivity in medical education for historically underrepresented groups. Studies suggest that underrepresentation may be addressed through structured mentorship and workshops at the premedical level and generate interest in less familiar specialties including physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). Approach The authors implemented a novel half-day multi-institutional workshop in spring 2024 featuring physicians and medical students from New York City medical centers. The workshop included structured mentorship and pertinent PM&R-related topics, including disability health and adaptive sports, to which premedical students often have limited exposure. Participants were invited to complete pre- and postworkshop surveys to evaluate the workshop’s impact. The authors collaborated with prehealth chapters of organizations such as the American Medical Women’s Association and the Minority Association of Pre-Medical Students to distribute surveys. Outcomes The preworkshop survey was completed by 147 premedical students, and 81 registered for the workshop. Ultimately, 55 attended the workshop, with 71% completing the postworkshop survey. Most participants had no previous exposure to PM&R (n = 77, 53.5%) and to adaptive sports (n = 116, 80.6%). Furthermore, although 76 (52.8%) had shadowed a physician, only 6 (4.2%) had experience shadowing a PM&R physician. The authors gathered a diverse representation of responses, including those identifying as female (n = 119, 81.0%) and underrepresented in medicine (n = 84, 57.1%). Pre–post comparative analysis showed a statistically significant rise in students’ motivation to apply to medical school (P = .018), along with a statistically significant increase in the interest and understanding of PM&R and adaptive sports (P < .001). Next Steps Future work will focus on developing longitudinal mentorship, improving accessibility through hybrid formats, and expanding the curriculum through interspecialty collaborations to support broader implementation and evaluation.
Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke
Background and Purpose― We aimed to determine whether low-frequency electric field navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation avoiding motor cortex could improve arm motor function in hemiplegic stroke patients when combined with motor training. Methods― Twelve outpatient US rehabilitation centers enrolled participants between May 2014 and December 2015. We delivered 1 Hz active or sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex before each of eighteen 60-minute therapy sessions over a 6-week period, with outcomes measured at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after end of treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of participants improving ≥5 points on upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score 6 months after end of treatment. Secondary analyses assessed changes on the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer and Action Research Arm Test and Wolf Motor Function Test and safety. Results― Of 199 participants, 167 completed treatment and follow-up because of early discontinuation of data collection. Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer gains were significant for experimental ( P <0.001) and sham groups ( P <0.001). Sixty-seven percent of the experimental group (95% CI, 58%–75%) and 65% of sham group (95% CI, 52%–76%) improved ≥5 points on 6-month upper extremity Fugl-Meyer ( P =0.76). There was also no difference between experimental and sham groups in the Action Research Arm Test ( P =0.80) or the Wolf Motor Function Test ( P =0.55). A total of 26 serious adverse events occurred in 18 participants, with none related to the study or device, and with no difference between groups. Conclusions― Among patients 3 to 12 months poststroke, goal-oriented motor rehabilitation improved motor function 6 months after end of treatment. There was no difference between the active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation trial arms. Clinical Trial Registration― URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02089464.