Citations

ABSTRACT Background Visceral myopathy (VSCM) is an ultra‐rare life‐threatening condition characterized by severe impairment of gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, and uterine smooth muscle. This disorder represents a significant clinical challenge due to variable presentation and the lack of standardized diagnostic and therapeutic protocols. Methods To discuss advances in the field, scientists and clinicians with a special interest in VSCM met in Arenzano, Genova, Italy in October 2024 for the second International Forum on Visceral Myopathy 2024 (IFVM2024) ( https://ifvm2024.ge.ibf.cnr.it/ ). Key Results As in the previous edition of the event ( https://poic‐e‐dintorni.org/efvm‐2022/ ), attendees included clinicians and researchers from around the world who study this disease, representatives from support organizations, patients affected by VSCM and their families, and companies that co‐funded the event. The present manuscript aims to summarize knowledge shared during the IFVM2024 conference, thus providing an updated state‐of‐the‐art summary of VSCM biology and disease management. Conclusions Here, we pay particular attention to the epidemiology of the disease, histopathology, genetics, novel treatments, advances in molecular and cell biology, experimental models, and the lived experiences and impact of this disorder on families.

Abstract In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the sensitivity of serum immunofixation (SIFE), urine immunofixation (UIFE), and serum free light chain (sFLC) in detecting plasma cell dyscrasia associated with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. We searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases since inception through March 2024. We included studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of immunofixation and/or sFLC in patients with AL amyloidosis. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) to assess the risk of bias. After deduplication, 29 237 records were screened, and 44 studies (n = 18 071) were included. For the meta-analysis, 28 studies reported sensitivity for SIFE (n = 3390), 24 studies for UIFE (n = 2830), 19 studies for SIFE and UIFE (n = 2819), 21 studies for sFLC ratio (n = 3678), 6 studies for SIFE and sFLC ratio (n = 372), 3 studies for UIFE and sFLC ratio (n = 242), and 10 studies for all 3 tests (n = 1430). Pooled sensitivities were as follows: SIFE, 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.73); UIFE, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81); SIFE and UIFE, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93); and sFLC ratio, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86). When SIFE, UIFE, and sFLC ratio were combined, the sensitivity reached 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00). The high sensitivity of combining SIFE, UIFE, and sFLC ratio supports their use as a reliable initial testing strategy to raise suspicion for AL amyloidosis and guide decisions regarding future diagnostic modalities.

Abstract Lung fibroblasts are key regulators of tissue homeostasis and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and their aberrant activation drives the progressive parenchymal scarring characteristic of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal disease with limited therapeutic options. Despite their central pathogenic role, lung fibroblasts are difficult to isolate due to their embedded position within the ECM, and standard in vitro culture conditions may lead to the loss of their native functional and transcriptional characteristics, hampering the study of fibroblast behavior in disease. The transcriptional heterogeneity of lung fibroblast subtypes and the extent to which culture-induced alterations diverge from native tissue signatures remain poorly understood. Here, we integrated single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics of lung tissue from IPF patients and age-matched healthy donors with transcriptomic profiling of cultured fibroblasts collected at passages 1 and 6 after isolation using three optimized protocols: whole lung cell suspension (WLCS), negative fraction enrichment, and outgrowth. Tissue-based analysis identified six transcriptionally distinct mesenchymal subtypes: alveolar, adventitial, inflammatory, peribronchial, CTHRC1+ and smooth muscle cell (SMC). The fibroblast subtype CTHRC1+ represented the most transcriptionally activated pro-fibrotic subtype, showing the greatest upregulation of ECM biosynthesis genes, a prominent role in intercellular communication, and preferential enrichment within fibroblastic foci in IPF lung tissue. Pseudotime trajectory analysis supported a directional transcriptional continuum from alveolar and inflammatory fibroblasts toward the CTHRC1+ state, driven by coordinated activation of pro-fibrotic transcription factors, including RUNX2, CREB3L1, and SCX. In vitro culture progressively reshaped fibroblast transcriptional identity relative to native tissue, with increased collagen and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression during passaging, loss of distinct CTHRC1+ fibroblasts, and gain of alveolar fibroblasts displaying pro-fibrotic activation across all isolation protocols. These findings provide a high-resolution transcriptional map of lung fibroblast heterogeneity in IPF and highlight critical limitations of standard in vitro culture systems for recapitulating native fibroblast diversity, with important implications for the development and evaluation of fibroblast-targeted therapeutic strategies in IPF.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable biomarkers.

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. They are intended to assist oncology teams to identify patients who require referral to psychosocial resources and to give oncology teams guidance on interventions for patients with significant distress. These guidelines also provide guidance for social workers, certified chaplains, and mental health professionals by describing treatments and interventions for various psychosocial problems as they relate to patients with cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding standards of care for distress management in patients with cancer and implementation of these standards, including application of evidence-based care delivery models, such as the collaborative care model.

Abstract Modern radiation therapy (RT) technologies allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreasing the risk of both acute and long-term toxicities. Existing RT dose constraints for prospective trials within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) were formulated in the context of solid malignancies. As patients with hematologic malignancies are often treated with lower RT doses and are usually younger with more favorable prognoses, customized dose constraints are needed. The NRG Oncology Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (NRG HEME) commissioned a review of existing organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints from published primary literature, the NRG Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology (CIRO), and national guidelines. Customized constraints were developed by iterative review by NRG HEME. Final recommendations were approved by radiation oncology representatives from all the lymphoma NCTN groups (NRG Oncology, Children’s Oncology Group, Alliance, ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, Canadian Cancer Trials Group). For 49 OARs, a strict recommended constraint was determined, of which 20 were not present in CIRO. Of the remaining 29 constraints, 20 were lower, 2 were the same, and 5 used different metrics; 2 were higher than at least 1 CIRO trial constraint. Acceptable variations were determined and unacceptable variations were added for select critical OARs for plan scoring. While doses to OARs without explicit unacceptable variations should not exceed acceptable variations, violations should not be considered for plan quality assessment on trials. This consensus list of standard OAR constraints should be incorporated for all future NCTN trials in hematologic malignancies. Strict dose constraints will minimize long-term toxicities in this patient population.