Back to Authors

Thompson, Lora M.A.

Mayo Clinic

Moffitt Cancer Center

Citations 2

Bright IDEAS-YA Skills Training and Psychosocial Outcomes of Young Adults With Cancer
Barnett, Marie , Donovan, Kristine A. , Thompson, Lora M.A., Levonyan-Radloff, Kristine, Díaz, Diana B. , Anderson, Isabelle, Li, Shengguo, Ohman‐Strickland, Pamela, Sahler, Olle Jane Z. , Ohman‐Strickland, Pamela , Devine, Katie A. , Thompson, Lora M.A., Manne, Sharon L. , Kearney, Julia A. , Levonyan‐Radloff, Kristine

JAMA Network Open | April 21, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e267997

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.7997 Get It

Importance Young adults (YAs; ages 18-39 years) diagnosed with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges, including high distress and poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are few efficacious interventions tailored to their needs. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Bright IDEAS-YA, a problem-solving skills training intervention tailored for YAs, in reducing distress and improving HRQOL. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 academic medical centers and enrolled participants between February 2021 and March 2024. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 39 years, within 4 months of a first cancer diagnosis, and undergoing systemic therapy. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Intervention Bright IDEAS-YA is a 6-session, one-on-one intervention that teaches a structured approach to problem-solving. Enhanced usual care (EUC) included standard psychosocial care plus a list of adolescent and YA resources. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were depression and anxiety (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms) and HRQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) at 6 months. Problem-solving ability (Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Short Form) was examined as a mediator. Analyses used linear mixed effects models and mediation analysis. Results Of the 1128 YAs screened, 344 YAs (median [IQR] age, 31.27 [25.78-36.38] years; 251 female [62.5%]) enrolled, with 171 allocated to intervention and 173 allocated to control. Overall, 296 YAs (86.0%) and 280 YAs (81.4%) completed 3- and 6-month surveys, respectively. At 6 months, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements than EUC in depression (effect size estimate, −3.23 points; 95% CI, −4.93 to −1.53 points; P < .001), anxiety (effect size estimate,−2.43 points; 95% CI, −4.05 to −0.81 points; P = .003), and HRQOL (effect size estimate, 3.40 points; 95% CI, 0.34 to 6.45 points; P = .03). These changes were clinically meaningful. Mediation analyses showed that improvements in depression and anxiety were partially due to increased problem-solving ability, particularly reductions in negative problem orientation. Sex and education were moderators of treatment effect, with the treatment effect on anxiety being greater for males (effect size estimate, −5.29 points; 95% CI, −7.97 to −2.60 points) and the treatment effect on anxiety (effect size estimate, −6.94 points; 95% CI, −10.50 to −3.43 points) and depression (effect size estimate, −7.47 points; 95% CI, −11.20 to −3.74 points; P < .001) being greater for those with lower education. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of Bright IDEAS-YA, intervention participants had significantly reduced distress and improved HRQOL relative to control. These findings suggest that Bright IDEAS-YA may be offered as supportive care for YAs with cancer to improve psychosocial outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585269
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Distress Management, Version 1.2026
Fann, Jesse R., Vanderlan, Jessica, Brewer, Benjamin W. , Corbett, Cheyenne , Keller, Jennifer A. , Lahijani, Sheila , Niazi, Shehzad K. , Riba, Michelle B., Braun, IIana, Breitbart, William S., Channa, Yamna, Farabelli, Jill P., Fleishman, Stewart B., Garcia, Sofia F. , Greenberg, Donna B., Handzo, George , Horyna, Amy, Hutchinson, Sean Z., Johns, Shelley A. , Cava, Shannon La, Martin, Sara , Mukherjee, Debraj, Pailler, Megan E. , Parnes, Francine, Rocha-Cadman, Xiomara, Scher, Eli D. , Schuster, Jessica, Thompson, Lora M.A., Usher, A., Valentine, Alan , Darlow, Susan, Mukherjee, Debraj , Mukherjee, Debraj , Garcia, Sofia F , Fann, Jesse R. , Andersen, Barbara L. , Atreya, Chloe Evelyn , Breitbart, William S., Greenberg, Donna, Huang, Chao‐Hui , Leeper, Heather , Rao, Vinay P. , Rocha‐Cadman, Xiomara , Thompson, Lora M.A., Montgomery, Sarah E.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0018 Get It

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. They are intended to assist oncology teams to identify patients who require referral to psychosocial resources and to give oncology teams guidance on interventions for patients with significant distress. These guidelines also provide guidance for social workers, certified chaplains, and mental health professionals by describing treatments and interventions for various psychosocial problems as they relate to patients with cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding standards of care for distress management in patients with cancer and implementation of these standards, including application of evidence-based care delivery models, such as the collaborative care model.