Citations

Body positioning exerts profound physiological effects in critically ill patients, influencing respiratory mechanics, ventilation-perfusion matching, hemodynamics, and overall clinical outcomes. Transitioning from an upright to a recumbent position alters thoracoabdominal pressure relationships, reduces ribcage contribution to tidal ventilation, and shifts ventilatory load to the diaphragm. These changes decrease functional residual capacity and promote airway closure in dependent lung regions, predisposing patients to atelectasis—an effect further amplified by intra-abdominal pathology or diaphragmatic weakness. Positioning also reshapes pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, which impact cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. These physiologic principles translate to important therapeutic applications across disease states. In ARDS, prone positioning improves oxygenation via a number of mechanisms, reduces ventilator-induced lung injury, and confers substantial mortality benefit. Prone position may also improve air flow distribution in COPD and enhance venous return in select cardiac physiologies. Conversely, conditions such as ascites, morbid obesity, and hepatopulmonary syndrome exemplify pathologic interactions between abdominal pressure, lung volumes, and posture, often requiring tailored positioning strategies to optimize respiratory performance. Overall, body positioning represents a potent, underutilized intervention in critical care. Understanding the mechanistic foundations of position-dependent changes in ventilation, perfusion, and pleural pressure can help clinicians strategically leverage positioning to improve patient outcomes across a spectrum of pulmonary and systemic illnesses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric large-volume brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) carry a substantial lifelong hemorrhage risk, neurological symptoms, and treatment morbidity. Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often unsuitable due to constraints on dose-volume toxicity. Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) enables sequential dosing of large nidus volumes, potentially enhancing safety while maintaining efficacy. Evidence in children remains limited. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of VS-SRS for large AVMs in pediatric patients. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort was assembled from 21 centers, including patients aged younger than 21 years treated with VS-SRS for AVMs >10 cm 3 . Clinical and radiological end points included obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (median age 14 years; IQR, 12-17). The median nidus volume at first stage was 18.2 cm 3 (IQR, 12.3-25.6). Median prescription dose per stage was 17 Gy (IQR, 16-18). The median clinical follow-up from the first stage was 57.5 months (IQR, 25-138). Obliteration occurred in 42 of 103 patients (40.8%), with actuarial rates of 6.9% (95% CI: 2.8-14) at 3 years and 29% (95% CI: 20-39) at 5 years. Hemorrhage occurred in 17 of 103 patients (16.5%) during follow-up, and permanent RIC was observed in 9 of 103 patients (8.7%). CONCLUSION: VS-SRS is a reasonably safe, selected option for pediatric large-volume AVMs when microsurgical or endovascular cure is not feasible or prudent. Delivering ≥17 Gy per stage while limiting each treatment volume to <15 cm 3 supports durable nidus control with acceptable toxicity. VS-SRS represents a key modality in multidisciplinary management of this historically difficult-to-treat population.

Abstract Studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the contribution of germline variants or somatic genomic drivers to racial disparities in multiple myeloma. To comprehensively investigate somatic drivers in relation to inherited genetics in multiple myeloma, we combined newly sequenced whole-genome sequencing data with publicly available datasets (total n = 1,286). Overall, we did not identify germline or somatic genomic differences that explain the different risk of developing multiple myeloma between patients with genetic similarity to African (AFR) or European (EUR) reference populations. A difference in the detectability and timing of APOBEC-associated and germinal center mutational activity was observed. Integrating epidemiologic data and mutational signature-based temporal estimates, we challenge the assumption that individuals in the AFR group develop multiple myeloma at a younger age. Finally, we demonstrate that, with equal access to efficacious therapies, patients in the AFR and EUR groups have equivalent clinical outcomes. Significance: Multiple myeloma is reported to occur at higher rates in individuals who self-identify as non-Hispanic Black. In this large dataset, genomic drivers occur at the same rate among ancestry groups, except for APOBEC mutagenesis. With equivalent therapy, clinical outcomes did not differ for patients grouped by genetic ancestry similarity.

Background: Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a severe inflammatory liver condition driven by dysregulated immune responses. CD8 T cells accumulate in the liver during AH, yet their functional role remains poorly defined. Methods: A murine NIAAA chronic-binge model with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge was used. Single-cell RNA sequencing of liver and blood immune cells defined CD8 T cell subsets, followed by pathway analysis and reanalysis of human AH datasets. Spatial relationships were validated by immunohistochemistry of human AH liver tissue with CD8 T RM and liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) co-staining. LSEC–CD8 T cell interactions were examined using in vitro co-culture, and signaling pathways were assessed by bulk RNA sequencing and phospho-protein analyses. IL15 function was evaluated by in vivo neutralization. Results: Single-cell RNA sequencing in the murine AH model revealed a distinct population of CD8 tissue-resident memory T cells (T RM ) with heightened activation and proinflammatory cytokine production. Analysis of human AH liver single-cell RNA sequencing data, along with immunohistochemistry validation, supported CD8 T RM enrichment in diseased tissue. IL15 emerged as a prominent pathway linked to T RM activation, and IL15 blockade reduced T RM abundance and attenuated EtOH/ lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury. Mechanistically, LSECs not only provided a structural niche for T RM retention but also amplified IL15 signalling. In vitro, coculture experiments demonstrated that LSECs intensified activation in pre-stimulated CD8 T cells in a stimulus-dependent manner: under IL15 stimulation, LSECs boosted effector function without inducing cell death, whereas under T-cell receptor stimulation, LSECs drove hyperactivation and activation-induced cell death. Bulk RNA-seq and phospho-protein analysis identified the PI3K-AKT pathway as a shared pathway enhanced by LSEC coculture in activated CD8 T cells. These findings define a context-dependent mechanism in which LSECs promote IL15-driven signaling through AKT pathway amplification, promoting T RM persistence and inflammatory activity in AH. Conclusions: IL15-associated signaling within the hepatic microenvironment, shaped by LSEC-CD8 T-cell interactions, promotes activation and persistence of CD8 T RM cells in AH. Targeting the IL15-LSEC-AKT axis may disrupt pathogenic T RM niches and represent a promising therapeutic strategy for severe AH.