Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

481 citation(s) found for "L, De Luca".

Five-Year Outcomes from Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for Parkinson Disease
Starr, Philip A. , Shivacharan, Rajat S. , Goldberg, E. Matilda, Tröster, Alexander I. , House, P.A. , Giroux, Monique, Hebb, Adam O. , Whiting, Donald, Leichliter, Timothy, Ostrem, Jill L. , Metman, Leo Verhagen , Karl, Jessica , Siddiqui, Mustafa , Haq, Ihtsham , Moguel‐Cobos, Guillermo , Ponce, Francisco A. , Pahwa, Rajesh, Lyons, Kelly , Buetefisch, Cathrin M. , Luca, Corneliu , Jagid, Jonathan , Revuelta, Gonzalo J. , Takács, István , Pourfar, Michael , Mandybur, George, Zadikoff, Cindy , Khandhar, Suketu M., Sedrak, Mark , Phibbs, Fenna T., Neimat, Joseph S. , Durphy, Jennifer, Ramirez‐Zamora, Adolfo , Pilitsis, Julie G. , Uitti, Ryan J. , Wharen, Robert E. , Park, Michael C. , Vitek, Jerrold L. , Group, INTREPID Study, Galifianakis, Nicholas B. , Schrock, Lauren E. , Farris, Sierra, Nazzarro, Jules M., Haq, Ihtsham , Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo , Goldberg, Edward, Sani, Sepehr , Tatter, Stephen B. , Machado, André G. , Gostkowski, Michał , Tagliati, Michele , Mamelak, Adam N. , Okun, Michael S. , Foote, Kelly D. , Pahwa, Rajesh , Gross, Robert E. , Takacs, Istvan, Mogilner, Alon Y. , Duker, Andrew , Rosenow, Joshua M. , Group, INTREPID Study, Luciano, Marta San , Cooper, Scott E.

JAMA Neurology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1181

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3373 | PMID 40952750 Get It

Importance The Implantable Neurostimulator for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease (INTREPID) trial was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). Objective To evaluate the long-term (5-year) outcomes and safety of STN-DBS for PD. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, randomized (3:1), 12-week double-blind sham-controlled study at 23 movement disorder centers across the US with an open-label 5-year follow-up. Patients were implanted and followed up with the Vercise DBS system from May 2013 to December 2022. Eligibility required diagnosis of bilateral idiopathic PD with more than 5 years of motor symptoms, more than 6 hours per day of poor motor function, modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale scores higher than 2, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) score of 30 or higher (medication-off state), and 33% or higher improvement in UPDRS-III medication-on score. Intervention Bilateral STN-DBS for moderate to advanced PD. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included changes in UPDRS and dyskinesia scores, quality-of-life measures, and safety assessments. Exploratory analyses included medication reduction and DBS association with motor signs. Results A total of 313 patients were enrolled with 191 receiving the DBS system, and 137 participants (72%) completed the study. The study population had a mean (SD) age of 60 (7.9) years, with 139 (73%) male participants. Motor function without medication as measured by UPDRS-III improved from a mean (SD) of 42.8 (9.4) to 21.1 (10.6) at year 1 (51%; 95% CI, 49%-53%; P < .001) and 27.6 (11.6) at year 5 (36%; 95% CI, 33%-38%; P < .001). Activities of daily living without medication as measured by UPDRS-II improved from a mean (SD) of 20.6 (6.0) to 12.4 (6.1) at year 1 (41%; 95% CI, 38%-42%; P < .001) and 16.4 (6.5) at year 5 (22%; 95% CI, 18%-23%; P < .001). Dyskinesia scores decreased from 4.0 (5.1) to 1.0 (2.1) at year 1 (75%; 95% CI, 73%-75%; P < .001) and to 1.2 (2.1) at year 5 (70%; 95% CI, 63%-75%; P < .001). The levodopa equivalent dose was reduced by 28% at year 1, remaining stable at year 5 (28%; 95% CI, 26%-31%; P < .001). The most common serious adverse event was infection (9 participants). Ten deaths were reported, none related to the study. Conclusions and Relevance Although STN-DBS outcomes declined slightly, possibly due to the progressive nature of the disease, patients with PD sustained significant improvement in motor and activities of daily living scores, along with a stable reduction in anti-parkinsonian medication over the 5-year follow-up period.
Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Ng, Alexander , Asif, Aqua , Gómez‐Gómez, Enrique , Budäus, Lars, Barrett, Tristan , Radtke, Jan Philipp , Kesch, Claudia, Pham, Tho, Tewari, Ash , Cabello, M.A. Rodríguez , Mynderse, Lance A. , Borghi, Marcelo, Boesen, Lars , Singh, Paras B. , Renard‐Penna, Raphaële , Leow, Jeffrey J. , Pecoraro, Martina , Giannarini, Gianluca , Perlis, Nathan , López-Ruiz, Daniel, Rossiter, Marimo , Khetrapal, Pramit , Chan, Vinson Wai‐Shun , Haider, Aiman , Clarke, Caroline S. , Dickinson, Louise , Mitra, Anita, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Takwoingi, Yemisi , Emberton, Mark , Allen, Clare, Moore, Caroline M. , Kasivisvanathan, Veeru , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Briganti, Alberto , Evangelista, Alex, Freeman, Alex , Kirkham, Alex, Zlotta, Alexandre R. , Grey, Alistair, Ryan, Andrew, Borrelli, Antonella , Andrews, Antonette, Finelli, Antonio , Sancho, Arturo Platas, Baring, Ashley, Roy, Ashoke, Issa, Balqiisa, Israël, Bas , González, Carolina Aulló, English, Caroline, Zuiani, Chiara , Amate, Cristina, Yong, Daniel , Rozze, Davide, Lomas, Derek J. , Cannoletta, Donato , Chang, Eileen Wang, Chun, Felix, Zussino, Gaia , Antoch, Gerald , Gandaglia, Giorgio, Sauter, Guido , Thevarajah, Harini, Sorrell, Harriet, McBain, Hazel, Reis, Henning , Pita, Hernando Ríos , Potyka, Ingrid , Collavino, Jeanlou, Koshy, Jincy, Weng, Jing Yi , Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Piper, Jon, O’Brien, Jonathan , Rosa, José Valero, Sanz, Juan Luis , Quesada, Juan Mesa, Jannusch, Kai , Corr, Kateri , Haines, Kenneth, Umutlu, Lale , Quarta, Leonardo, Casarotto, Letizia, Gimeno, Linda , Moretti, Lucas, Laschena, Ludovica , Drewes, Lukas, Ostos, Manuel Sanchez, Peris, M., Volpacchio, Mariano , Prentice, Mark, Graefen, Markus , Soligo, Matteo, Boschheidgen, Matthias , Singhera, M., Wenzel, Mike, Fatterpekar, Monali, Al‐Nader, Mulham , Kachanov, Mykyta , Shaida, Nadeem , Muirhead, Nicola , Vasdev, Nikhil , Sanmugalingam, Nimalan , Nørgaard, Nis , Vicente, Pete, Incze, Peter , Ryan, Philip, Rouvier, Philippe , Mead, Phoebe, Mozer, Pierre, Viana, Públio César Cavalcante , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Novotta, Réka, Huang, Richard, O’Sullivan, Richard, Jepsen, Rikke Karlin , Frese, Robert, Clow, Rosemary, Al‐Monajjed, Rouvier , Lewis, Sara , Cashman, Sophia, Pizzolitto, Stefano, Lelie, S., Lindner, Sydney, Al‐Hammouri, Tarek , Sánchez, Teresa González, Reid, Thomas, McClure, Timothy, Maurer, Tobias , Peruzzi, Valeria, Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Chong, Yew Lam, Agarwal, Ridhi , Panebianco, Valeria , Girometti, Rossano , Ghai, Sangeet , COBELLI, Francesco DE , Pham, Tho, Taneja, Samir S. , Hu, Jim C. , Dias, Adriano Basso , Falkenbach, Fabian , Kastner, Christof , Schimmöller, Lars , Nathan, Arjun , Punwani, Shonit , Brew‐Graves, Chris , Brembilla, Giorgio , Margolis, Daniel , Giganti, Francesco , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Crestani, Alessandro , Sciarra, Alessandro , Evangelista, Alex, Kirkham, Alex P. S. , Grey, Alistair, Blanca, Ana , Bjartell, Anders , Tong, Angela , Warren, Anne Y. , Ciardi, Antonio , Rannikko, Antti , Stabile, Armando , Villers, Arnauld A. , Issa, Balqiisa, Hadaschik, Boris Alexander , English, Caroline L, Lee, Chau Hung , Caris, Christien T.M. , Stempel, Conrad von , Rozze, Davide, Messina, Emanuele , Chun, Felix, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Robert, G. , Caglič, Iztok , Theysohn, Jens Matthias , Grummet, Jeremy , Koshy, Jincy, Wilkinson, John, Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Deeks, Jonathan J , O'Brien, Jonathan, Quesada, Juan Mesa, Quarta, Leonardo , Orecchia, Luca , Moretti, Lucas, Rooij, Maarten de , Bicchetti, Marco , Gatti, Marco , Peris, María de los Desamparados Esteban, Roethke, Matthias Claudius , Monte, Maurizio Del, Wenzel, Mike, Takahashi, Naoki , Fleshner, Neil , Albers, Peter , Mead, Phoebe, Visschere, Pieter De , Huang, Richard, Shah, Syed Ahmar , Sanchez, Teresa González, Bathala, Tharakeswara K , Kwast, Theodorus van der , Reid, Thomas, Løgager, Vibeke , Prabhu, Vinay , Wagaskar, Vinayak Gorakhnath , Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Witjes, Wim P.J. , Chong, Yew Lam

JAMA | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1170

10.1001/jama.2025.13722 | PMID 40928788 Get It

Importance Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without prostate biopsy, has become the standard of care for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Resource capacity limits widespread adoption. Biparametric MRI, which omits the gadolinium contrast sequence, is a shorter and cheaper alternative offering time-saving capacity gains for health systems globally. Objective To assess whether biparametric MRI is noninferior to multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, within-patient, noninferiority trial of biopsy-naive men from 22 centers (12 countries) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings) from April 2022 to September 2023, with the last follow-up conducted on December 3, 2024. Interventions Participants underwent multiparametric MRI, comprising T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiologists reported abbreviated biparametric MRI first (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted), blinded to the DCE sequence. After unblinding, radiologists reported the full multiparametric MRI. Patients underwent a targeted biopsy with or without systematic biopsy if either biparametric MRI or multiparametric MRI was suggestive of clinically significant prostate cancer. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer. The noninferiority margin was 5%. Results Of 555 men recruited, 490 were included for primary outcome analysis. Median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years and median PSA level was 5.6 (IQR, 4.4-8.0) ng/mL. The proportion of patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings was 12.7%. Biparametric MRI was noninferior to multiparametric MRI, detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in 143 of 490 men (29.2%), compared with 145 of 490 men (29.6%) (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points; P = .50). Biparametric MRI detected clinically insignificant cancer in 45 of 490 men (9.2%), compared with 47 of 490 men (9.6%) with the use of multiparametric MRI (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points). Central quality control demonstrated that 99% of scans were of adequate diagnostic quality. Conclusion and relevance In men with suspected prostate cancer, provided image quality is adequate, an abbreviated biparametric MRI scan, with or without targeted biopsy, could become the new standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis. With approximately 4 million prostate MRIs performed globally annually, adopting biparametric MRI could substantially increase scanner throughput and reduce costs worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571840
Radiotherapy for Growing Vestibular Schwannomas
Sethi, Mantegh , Gowrishankar, Shravan , Mannion, Richard , Guilfoyle, Mathew R., Buttimore, Juliette , Gamazo, Nicola, Duke, Simon, Jena, Raj, Burton, Katherine , Fornezza, Umberto, Perini, Zeno, Mari, Cristina , Gazzola, Luca, Schouten, Sammy M , Kunst, Henricus P. M. , Bassi, Rohan, MacKeith, Samuel , Whitfield, Gillian , McBain, Catherine , Hotchkies, A , Lloyd, Simon , Obholzer, Rupert , Cheang, Ya Fang Amanda, Thomas, Nick, Barazi, Sinan, Maratos, Eleni, Hassan, Sheila, Tancu, Cornel, Kitchen, Neil , Marinelli, John P. , Carlson, Matthew L., Link, Michael J. , Tysome, James Russell , Donnelly, Neil P. , Axon, Patrick , Bance, Manohar , Jena, Raj, Burton, Katherine, Jefferies, Sarah , Mari, Cristina, Gazzola, Luca , Compter, Inge , Eekers, Daniëlle B. P. , Jeyaretna, Deva Sanjeeva , Colaco, Rovel J. , Shapey, Jonathan , Carlson, Matthew L. , Borsetto, Daniele

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | September 4, 2025 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 931

10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1953 | PMID 40906473 Get It

Importance In the literature, there is a lack of data reporting tumor control rates after radiotherapy in actively growing vestibular schwannomas (VS). Data for this rarely studied population are needed. Objective To estimate tumor control rates in radiologically growing VS treated with first-line radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter cohort study used prospectively collected data from patients with growing unilateral VS treated first-line with radiotherapy between January 2000 and December 2023 from 8 tertiary referral skull base units. The data were analyzed in June 2025. Exposures Radiotherapy as an initial treatment for VS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was treatment failure, ie VS growth postradiotherapy, which was predefined as an increase in maximum intracranial tumor diameter (ICTD) of 3 mm or greater within the first 2 years after radiotherapy or 2 mm or greater thereafter. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure based on different definitions of VS growth: (1) an increase in ICTD of 2 mm or greater, (2) an increase in ICTD of 3 mm or greater, and (3) conversion to surgery. Results A total of 1883 patients (975 female individuals [51.8%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 years [IQR, 53-71 years]) were included in the study. Using the primary definition of treatment failure (an increase in ICTD of ≥3 mm within the first 2 years postradiotherapy or ≥2 mm thereafter), the Kaplan-Meier estimate yielded a 10-year tumor control rate of 76.1% (95% CI, 72.7%-79.2%). For secondary outcome definitions, 10-year tumor control rates were 60.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-64.3%) for an ICTD increase of 2 mm or greater, 78.3% (95% CI, 75.0%-81.2%) for an increase of 3 mm or greater, and 92.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-94.3%) for conversion to surgery. Neither pretreatment tumor size nor tumor location (intracanalicular vs extracanalicular) were significantly associated with treatment failure. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study provide tumor control outcomes for radiologically growing VS treated with radiotherapy using several clinically relevant definitions of growth. By focusing exclusively on this rarely isolated subgroup, the findings offer targeted data to potentially inform treatment expectations and future research.
Chronotropic incompetence during exercise or pharmacological stress is associated with reduced survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes
Cortigiani, Lauro , Zagatina, A , Padang, Ratnasari , Kane, Garvan C. , Villarraga, Hector R. , Arruda‐Olson, Adelaide M. , Gaibazzi, Nicola , Wierzbowska‐Drabik, Karina , Boshchenko, A , Журавлева, О. А. , Sviazova, Natalia , Amor, Miguel , Kasprzak, Jarosław D. , Merli, Elisa , Vazquez, Jesus Peteiro , Rigo, Fausto , Djordjevic‐Dikic, Ana , Haber, Diego M. Lowenstein, Bovenzi, Francesco, Bartolacelli, Ylenia , Tripepi, Giovanni Luigi, Picano, Eugenio , Zagatina, Angela , Padang, Ratnasari , Gaibazzi, Nicola , Donelli, Davide , Rodriguez-Zanella, Hugo , Pepi, Mauro , Wierzbowska-Drabik, Karina , Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D , Boshchenko, Alla , Ciampi, Quirino , Kalinina, Elena , Arbucci, Rosina , Čelutkienė, Jelena , Haberka, Maciej , Rodríguez‐Zanella, Hugo , Varga, Albert , Saad, Ariel K. , Lowenstein, Jorge , Carerj, Scipione , Pellikka, Patricia A.

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology | September 3, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf492 | PMID 40908497 Get It

Abstract Aims Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to assess the risk stratification value of CI during exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study, we enrolled 13 445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echocardiography in 19 clinical sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n = 2594), dobutamine (n = 2440), or dipyridamole (n = 8411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echocardiography monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) ≤ 1.22 (≤1.17 if in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole stress. The primary outcome was all-cause death. CI was observed in 5045 patients (38%) and stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities in 1648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.6–9.1 years), there were 2426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (P < 0.0001). CI was associated with a significant increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from ≤54 years to ≥75 years (P < 0.0001). In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (P < 0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use. Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was an independent predictor of mortality (HR: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–1.74; P < 0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during exercise or pharmacological stress is a simple and objective predictor of survival.
Intracardiac thrombosis and its management during liver transplantation: international, multicenter, case-control study
Prete, Luca Del , Cazzaniga, Beatrice , Aniskevich, Stephen , Agopian, Vatche G. , Smith, Natalie , Cacioppo, Brian J, Nuti, Anna Maria, Wang, Ryan , Gamboa, Bs Sophia, Groose, Molly K. , Sheth, Mansi, Cywiński, Jacek B. , Wray, Christopher , Hashimoto, Koji , Liu, Qiang , Quintini, Cristiano , Del Prete, Luca , Agopian, Vatche G , Smith, Natalie K , Tu, Chao , Groose, Molly K , Cywinski, Jacek B , Nguyen-Buckley, Christine , Florman, Sander S , Liu, Qiang , Ekser, Burcin , Aniskevich, Stephen , Cacioppo, Brian J., Watson, Christopher, Pai, Sher‐Lu , Nguyen, Christine , Florman, Sander , Croome, Kristopher P. , Ekser, Burcin

International Journal of Surgery | August 22, 2025 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 8793-8805

10.1097/js9.0000000000002896 | PMID 40844270 Get It

Background: Intracardiac thrombosis (ICT) during liver transplantation (LT) is a rare but life-threatening complication with limited data regarding its risk factors, management, and outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with ICT development, define predictors of intraoperative outcomes, and propose a novel classification and management algorithm for ICT. Methods: A multicenter, international retrospective case-control study was conducted on liver transplant recipients from seven centers between January 2005 and December 2023. ICT cases were identified through transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or autopsy and matched 1:1 with controls. Results: Among 11 077 liver transplant recipients screened, 133 patients (1.2%) developed ICT. ICT occurred predominantly after reperfusion (58%). Compared to controls, ICT cases exhibited higher preoperative international normalized ratio ( P = 0.001) and fibrinogen levels ( P = 0.014). Post-reperfusion syndrome ( P < 0.001), disseminated intravascular coagulation ( P < 0.001), and primary graft failure ( P = 0.002) were also more common in the ICT group. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration during surgery (odds ratio [OR] 8.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09–38.1; P = 0.004) was associated with ICT development. ICT was associated with markedly higher rates of cardiac arrest ( P < 0.001) and intraoperative mortality ( P < 0.001), with thrombus location in the left heart chambers representing a significant predictor of mortality (OR 20.7, 95% CI: 6.25–81.3; P < 0.001). ICT grades 2 and 3 were associated with a markedly increased risk of intraoperative cardiac arrest ( P < 0.05). Importantly, delayed use of TEE was strongly associated with intraoperative death (OR 6.27, 95% CI: 1.45–27.1; P = 0.014). The 90-day mortality was 43% in ICT cases compared to 4.5% in controls, while 1-year mortality was 46% versus 10.5%, respectively. Conclusions: ICT during LT is a rare but severe complication associated with intraoperative mortality and poor short-term survival. Coagulation profile and intraoperative management play critical roles in ICT development. The early use of TEE enables timely diagnosis and intervention, improving patient outcomes. We propose a novel ICT classification offering a systematic framework for risk stratification and management to mitigate progression and mortality.
Standardized Clinical Terms and Definitions for Interstitial Lung Disease: A Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society
Ryerson, Christopher J. , Bankier, Alexander A. , Beasley, Mary Beth , Brown, Kevin M. , Colby, Thomas V. , Cottin, Vincent , Galvin, Jeffrey R. , Hariri, Lida P. , Johkoh, Takeshi , Lee, Ho Yun , Leung, Ann N. , Lynch, David A. , Müller, Néstor L. , Raoof, Suhail, Remy-Jardin, Martine , Ryu, Jay H. , Sholl, Lynette M. , Sverzellati, Nicola , Walsh, Simon , Wells, Athol U. , Bankier, Alexander , Colby, Thomas , Haramati, Linda B , Hariri, Lida P , Inoue, Yoshikazu , Lee, Ho Yun , Leung, Ann , Muller, Nestor , Nicholson, Andrew , Revel, Marie-Pierre , Remy-Jardin, Martine , Richeldi, Luca , Ryu, Jay H , Schiebler, Mark , Sholl, Lynette , White, Charles S , Johannson, Kerri A , Desai, Sujal R. , Haramati, Linda B. , Nicholson, Andrew G. , Richeldi, Luca , Travis, William D.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | August 4, 2025 | Volume: 211 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1756-1774

10.1164/rccm.202505-1142so | PMID 40758555 Get It

Abstract Background Despite advances in diagnosis and management, the interstitial lung disease (ILD) lexicon is plagued by ambiguous and inconsistent terminology that complicates communication and impedes knowledge generation. The objective of this Fleischner Society Consensus Statement was to produce standardized terminology for ILD multidisciplinary diagnoses and major phenotypes. Methods Interviews with 10 experts were used to identify ILD clinical diagnoses and major phenotypes. The preferred terms for each entity and potential alternatives were identified, alongside the rationale for the preferred term. Entities with more than one potential term were the subject of an online modified Delphi survey posed to the 29 committee members, aiming to achieve consensus. Committee members rated their agreement with the initially preferred term—5 (strongly agree), 4 (agree), 3 (neutral/unsure), 2 (disagree), and 1 (strongly disagree)—with the option to provide additional comments. Median score ≥4 and interquartile range ≤1 were considered consensus agreement. Terms not reaching agreement were discussed by video conference, followed by an additional survey that incorporated feedback. Results From the 60 initial terms, there were two root terms that required upfront consensus before survey initiation (ILD and interstitial pneumonia) and another eight terms that had no alternative suggested by the committee or in the literature. Agreement was met by 47/50 terms (94%) in Round 1 of the survey. The three terms (6%) that did not reach agreement met agreement in Round 2. Conclusions This document provides standardized recommended terms for ILD multidisciplinary diagnoses and major phenotypes that will facilitate communication among clinicians, researchers, patients, and other stakeholders.
Comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and open ileal pouch–anal anastomosis outcomes: retrospective cohort study
Violante, Tommaso , Broccard, Sacha P. , Novelli, Marco , Stocchi, Luca , Colibaseanu, Dorin , DeLeon, Michelle , Behm, Kevin T. , Mishra, Nitin , Larson, David W. , Merchea, Amit , Colibaseanu, Dorin T , DeLeon, Michelle F, Violante, Tommaso , Broccard, Sacha , Larson, David W

BJS Open | July 31, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/bjsopen/zraf084 | PMID 40742352 Get It

Abstract Introduction Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a common surgical procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. This study compared the outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open IPAA techniques, with a focus on surgical complications and pouch failure rates. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent IPAA at three Mayo Clinic locations between 2015 and 2020. Data on patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared across the three surgical approaches. Pouch failure was defined as the need for pouch excision or a diverting loop ileostomy. Results In all, 401 patients underwent IPAA with either an open (149, 37.2%), robotic (145, 36.2%), or laparoscopic (107, 26.7%) technique. The overall rate of pouch failure was 6.5% and did not differ significantly between the three surgical approaches. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic IPAA was associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery (1.4 versus 17.8%; P &lt; 0.0001) and fewer 30-day readmissions (15.9% versus 28.0%; P = 0.02). However, robotic and laparoscopic IPAA approaches had higher rates of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism and readmission than the open approach. Pouchitis was the most common cause of pouch failure across all surgical techniques. Conclusion Robotic IPAA had lower conversion and reduced 30-day admission rates compared with a laparoscopic approach. However, open surgery had lower rates of 30-day readmission and rates thromboembolism than robotic IPAA. The surgical approach itself does not appear to significantly impact long-term pouch failure rates.
Baseline predictors of poor clinical outcome despite recanalization of distal middle cerebral artery occlusions
Chafai, Imene , Salim, Hamza , Musmar, Basel , Adeeb, Nimer , Yedavalli, Vivek , Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Henninger, Nils , Nedelcu, Simona , Sundararajan, Sri Hari , Kühn, Anna Luisa , Khalife, Jane , Tan, Benjamin Yong‐Qiang , Heit, Jeremy J. , Regenhardt, Robert W. , Puri, Ajit S , Dyzmann, Christian , Filipe, João Pedro , Marotta, Thomas R. , Spears, Julian , Biswas, Arundhati , Clarençon, Frédéric , Varela, Ricardo , Baker, Amanda , Altschul, David , Gonzalez, Nestor R. , Möhlenbruch, Markus , Costalat, Vincent , Stracke, Christian Paul , Shaikh, Hamza , Liebeskind, David S. , Alexandre, Andrea , Tancredi, Illario , Faizy, Tobias D. , Kalsoum, Erwah , Patel, Aman B. , Wang, Maud , Lubicz, Boris , Guenego, Adrien , ##, On behalf of the MAD MT Investigators, Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Ghozy, Sherief , Scarcia, Luca , Tan, Benjamin Yq , Heit, Jeremy J , Regenhardt, Robert W , Cancelliere, Nicole M , Bernstock, Joshua D , Rouchaud, Aymeric , Fiehler, Jens , Sheth, Sunil A , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Colasurdo, Marco , Marnat, Gaultier , Renieri, Leonardo , Filipe, João Pedro , Harker, Pablo , Alexandru Radu, Răzvan , Marotta, Thomas R , Spears, Julian , Ota, Takahiro , Mowla, Ashkan , Jabbour, Pascal , Clarençon, Frédéric , Nguyen, Thanh N , Varela, Ricardo , Altschul, David J , Gonzalez, Nestor R , Möhlenbruch, Markus A , Gory, Benjamin , Stracke, Paul , Hecker, Constantin , Shaikh, Hamza A , Liebeskind, David S. , Pedicelli, Alessandro , Alexandre, Andrea M , Tancredi, Illario , Faizy, Tobias D , Kalsoum, Erwah , Fahed, Robert , Wang, Maud , Mendes Pereira, Vitor , Lubicz, Boris , Dmytriw, Adam A , Guenego, Adrien , Kühn, Anna Luisa , Musmar, Basel , Salim, Hamza , Yedavalli, Vivek S , Henninger, Nils , Nedelcu, Simona , Ghozy, Sherief , Cancelliere, Nicole M , Bernstock, Joshua D. , Rouchaud, Aymeric , Fiehler, Jens , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Colasurdo, Marco , Renieri, Leonardo , Harker, Pablo , Radu, Răzvan Alexandru , Mowla, Ashkan , Jabbour, Pascal , Nguyen, Thanh N. , Baker, Amanda, Aziz‐Sultan, Mohammad Ali , Hecker, Constantin , Fahed, Robert , Dmytriw, Adam A. , ##, On behalf of the MAD MT Investigators

Interventional Neuroradiology | July 16, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/15910199251342841 | PMID 40665742 Get It

Objective Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is well-established for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from large vessel occlusion (LVO), with growing data supporting the expansion to distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVO). Despite successful recanalization in DMVO, certain patients still experience poor long-term clinical outcomes, prompting our study to comprehensively explore pre-MT factors influencing outcome despite excellent recanalization (final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score ≥2c). Methods We retrospectively examined data from patients who consecutively underwent MT for a primary middle cerebral artery (MCA) DMVO across 37 centers in North America, Asia, and Europe. We identified baseline clinical and imaging factors associated with poor clinical outcome (defined as a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 3–6) at 3 months, despite excellent recanalization using a multivariable model. Results Between September 2017 and July 2021, 623 patients achieved mTICI > 2b and they were included in our study. Among them, 198 (32%) experienced a poor clinical outcome (mRS 3–6). Predictors of poor clinical outcome included higher age (OR 1.05 [1.03–1.07], p < 0.001), higher NIHSS at admission (OR 1.12 [1.08–1.15], p < 0.001), higher baseline mRS (OR 1.77 [0.96–3.26], p = 0.067), and diabetes (OR 1.59 [1.01–2.48], p = 0.044). Higher ASPECTS was associated with a decreased risk of poor clinical outcome (OR 0.82 [0.71–0.94], p = 0.006). Conclusion Older age, diabetes, higher baseline mRS, and NIHSS were associated with poor clinical outcome in MCA DMVO despite excellent recanalization. Conversely, a higher ASPECTS decreased the probability of such an outcome.
Association of Incident Dialysis Modality With Patient Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Zubidat, Dalia , Sikharulidze, Anna, Cicero, Elisa, Podestà, Manuel Alfredo , Castellano, Giuseppe, Nardelli, Luca , Passerini, Matteo , Sikharulidze, Anna, Alfieri, Carlo , Castellano, Giuseppe , Murad, M. Hassan

No container title available | July 8, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-6873929/v1 Get It

Abstract Background Although the choice of dialysis technique is based on several factors, patient survival is undoubtedly one of the most relevant. In a context where randomization to either peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) proved to be extremely challenging, previous meta-analyses were greatly limited due to the inclusion of historical studies. Methods We performed a systematic review by searching multiple databases up to April 22nd, 2022. The primary outcome was the association between dialysis modality (PD vs HD) and mortality assessed via hazard ratios (HR). Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, including sex, age, diabetes, dialysis vintage, geographical location, HD access, and study cohort inclusion period. Results Database search yielded 5317 citations, from which, 27 observational studies met the eligibility criteria, including 1 033 362 incident dialysis patients. The pooled mortality HR for PD versus HD was 1.01 (95% CI 0.93–1.10). Heterogeneity was substantial ( I 2 = 94%) and was largely explained by different baseline features of the included populations. A statistically significant subgroup effect was demonstrated for age (> 65 vs.<65 years; p = 0.01), geographical location of the studies (Oceania vs. Europe vs. Asia vs. North America; p < 0.01), and HD vascular access (central venous catheter vs. arteriovenous fistula; p < 0.01, only one study included). Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that overall PD and incentre HD likely carry equivalent survival benefits. However, differences were detected among subgroups based on age, geographic location, HD access type, but not on sex, diabetes status, dialysis vintage and study cohort inclusion period.
Outcomes of allogeneic HCT in Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of checkpoint inhibitors: a joint CIBMTR and EBMT analysis
Perales, Miguel‐Angel , Awan, Farrukh T. , Patel, Jinalben , Castagna, Luca , Angelucci, Emanuele , Finel, Hervé , Kulagin, Alexander , Glass, Bertram , Herrera, Alex F. , Blaise, Didier , Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A. , Halahleh, Khalid , Jones, Richard J., Lynch, Ryan C. , Sauter, Craig S. , Ahn, Kwang Woo , Sureda, Anna , Boumendil, Ariane , Patel, Jinalben , Castagna, Luca , Angelucci, Emanuele , Finel, Herve , Corradini, Paolo , Herrera, Alex F , Blaise, Didier , Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A , Halahleh, Khalid , Ahmed, Sairah , Martínez, Carmen , Giebel, Sebastian , Montoto, Silvia , Ahmed, Nausheen , de Lima, Marcos , Shadman, Mazyar , Ahn, Kwang W , Hamadani, Mehdi , Sureda, Anna , Perales, Miguel-Angel , Awan, Farrukh T , Boumendil, Ariane , Ahmed, Sairah , Montoto, Silvia , Ahmed, Nausheen , Lima, Marcos de , Shadman, Mazyar , Hamadani, Mehdi , Bazarbachi, Ali

Blood | July 7, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1011-1029

10.1182/blood.2024027197 | PMID 40623049 Get It

Abstract Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have shown remarkable efficacy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and are now used routinely. While allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative option for HL, there are concerns prior CPIs may exacerbate post–allo-HCT complications, particularly graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lead to worse outcomes. Given the relative paucity of data, we performed a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study to examine the impact of prior CPIs in allo-HCT. We included 2186 adult patients aged &gt;18 years who received a first allo-HCT using a matched related, unrelated, or haploidentical donor from 2008 to 2023. Twenty-seven percent of patients received prior CPIs. GVHD prophylaxis was posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 55.8% of patients in the CPI cohort, and 35% in the non-CPI cohort. Median follow-up among survivors was longer for the non-CPI (39 months) than CPI cohort (16.5 months). In multivariate analysis, prior CPI exposure did not affect overall survival (OS) or nonrelapse mortality, but resulted in improved progression-free survival (non-CPI vs CPI hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 0.67-0.98; P = .03) and lower relapse incidence (HR, 0.58; 0.45-0.76; P &lt; 001). While grade 2 to 4 (HR, 1.26; 1.04-1.53; P = .02) and 3 to 4 (HR, 1.41; 1.04-1.92; P = .03) acute GVHD (aGVHD) were increased, differences in chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were not significant. PTCy–based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in improved OS, lower grade 2 to 4 aGVHD, and cGVHD in patients with prior CPI exposure. In summary, allo-HCT should still be considered a curative option for patients with HL in the era of CPIs.