Aniskevich, Stephen

ABSTRACT During normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), lactate is the most commonly used liver viability marker. Lactate production from pyruvate breakdown in erythrocytes is not suspended during pRBC storage. By transfusing blood at a variety of stored ages, variable amounts of lactate are added to the NRP circuit and may influence serial lactate measurements. Sixteen DCD donors undergoing NRP were enrolled in a prospective study. Samples were drawn from pRBC bags prior to use in the NRP circuit and were tested for lactate values. Lactate values of the NRP circuit perfusate were also assessed Q15 min. Lactate values of the pRBCs varied from 4.4 mmol/L to >20 mmol/L and were strongly correlated with the age of the stored blood ( r 2 = 0.74). Donors in which the pRBCs were > = 20‐days from expiration (Newer Blood group) had a significantly lower lactate at 60 min of NRP compared to donors in which pRBCs were <20 day from expiration (Older Blood group) (4.0±2.0 mg/dL vs. 6.3±2.3 mg/dL; p = 0.048). If the lactate is not decreasing as anticipated, transfusion of older pRBC should be entertained as one possible explanation. In cases where the liver seems acceptable for transplantation, additional lactate testing with longer time on NRP or sequential NRP/NMP should be considered in lieu of declining the liver outright.

Background: Intracardiac thrombosis (ICT) during liver transplantation (LT) is a rare but life-threatening complication with limited data regarding its risk factors, management, and outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with ICT development, define predictors of intraoperative outcomes, and propose a novel classification and management algorithm for ICT. Methods: A multicenter, international retrospective case-control study was conducted on liver transplant recipients from seven centers between January 2005 and December 2023. ICT cases were identified through transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or autopsy and matched 1:1 with controls. Results: Among 11 077 liver transplant recipients screened, 133 patients (1.2%) developed ICT. ICT occurred predominantly after reperfusion (58%). Compared to controls, ICT cases exhibited higher preoperative international normalized ratio ( P = 0.001) and fibrinogen levels ( P = 0.014). Post-reperfusion syndrome ( P < 0.001), disseminated intravascular coagulation ( P < 0.001), and primary graft failure ( P = 0.002) were also more common in the ICT group. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration during surgery (odds ratio [OR] 8.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09–38.1; P = 0.004) was associated with ICT development. ICT was associated with markedly higher rates of cardiac arrest ( P < 0.001) and intraoperative mortality ( P < 0.001), with thrombus location in the left heart chambers representing a significant predictor of mortality (OR 20.7, 95% CI: 6.25–81.3; P < 0.001). ICT grades 2 and 3 were associated with a markedly increased risk of intraoperative cardiac arrest ( P < 0.05). Importantly, delayed use of TEE was strongly associated with intraoperative death (OR 6.27, 95% CI: 1.45–27.1; P = 0.014). The 90-day mortality was 43% in ICT cases compared to 4.5% in controls, while 1-year mortality was 46% versus 10.5%, respectively. Conclusions: ICT during LT is a rare but severe complication associated with intraoperative mortality and poor short-term survival. Coagulation profile and intraoperative management play critical roles in ICT development. The early use of TEE enables timely diagnosis and intervention, improving patient outcomes. We propose a novel ICT classification offering a systematic framework for risk stratification and management to mitigate progression and mortality.

AbstractIntroductionFor patients with catecholamine‐resistant vasoplegic syndrome (VS) during liver transplantation (LT), treatment with methylene blue (MB) and/or hydroxocobalamin (B12) has been an acceptable therapy. However, data on the effectiveness of B12 is limited to case reports and case series.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records of patients undergoing LT from January 2016 through March 2022. We identified patients with VS treated with vasopressors and MB, and abstracted hemodynamic parameters, vasopressor requirements, and B12 administration from the records. The primary aim was to describe the treatment efficacy of B12 for VS refractory to vasopressors and MB, measured as no vasopressor requirement at the conclusion of the surgery.ResultsOne hundred one patients received intraoperative VS treatment. For the 35 (34.7%) patients with successful VS treatment, 14 received MB only and 21 received both MB and B12. Of the 21 patients with VS resolution after receiving both MB and B12, 17 (89.5%) showed immediate, but transient, hemodynamic improvements at the time of MB administration and later showed sustained response to B12.ConclusionImmediate but transient hemodynamic response to MB in VS patients during LT supports the diagnosis of VS and should prompt B12 administration for sustained treatment response.

Portopulmonary hypertension is a relatively common pathologic condition in patients with end-stage liver disease. Traditionally, severe pulmonary hypertension is regarded as a contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) due to a high perioperative mortality rate. Recently, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized for intraoperative management of LT. As venoarterial (VA) ECMO may benefit certain high-risk LT patients by reducing the ventricular workload by the equivalent of the programmed flow rate, its usage requires multidisciplinary planning with considerations of the associated complications. We highlighted two cases at our single-center institution as examples of high-risk pulmonary hypertension patients undergoing LT on planned VA ECMO. These patients both survived the intraoperative period; however, they had drastically different postoperative outcomes, generating discussions on the importance of judicious patient selection. Since ECMO has removed the barrier of intraoperative survivability, the patient selection process may need to put weight on the patient’s potential for postoperative recovery and rehabilitation. Considerations on LT recipients undergoing preemptive ECMO need to expand from the ability of the patients to withstand the demands of the surgery during the immediate perioperative period to the long-term postoperative recovery course.

Prior to the 1990s, prolonged postoperative intubation and admission to the intensive care unit was considered the standard of care following liver transplantation. Advocates of this practice speculated that this time allowed patients to recover from the stress of major surgery and allowed their clinicians to optimize the recipients’ hemodynamics. As evidence in the cardiac surgical literature on the feasibility of early extubation grew, clinicians began applying these principles to liver transplant recipients. Further, some centers also began challenging the dogma that patients need to be cared for in the intensive care unit following liver transplantation and instead transferred patients to the floor or stepdown units immediately following surgery, a technique known as “fast-track” liver transplantation. This article aims to provide a history of early extubation for liver transplant recipients and offer practical advice on how to select patients that may be able to bypass the intensive care unit and be recovered in a non-traditional manner.

AbstractBackgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) presents with a hypertrophied left ventricle (LV). It is often associated with LV outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and a risk for sudden death. This study aimed to describe outcomes of patients with HCM who underwent liver transplant (LT).MethodsA retrospective review was conducted for patients diagnosed with HCM undergoing LT. Patient characteristics, preoperative echocardiography results, HCM risk of sudden cardiac death prediction model score, and 5‐year mortality were examined. A univariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between risk factors and 5‐year mortality. All tests were two‐sided with the alpha level set at .05.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients were included in the analysis. Six patients (21%) had a perioperative cardiopulmonary complication. The 5‐year survival rate was 61% (95% CI, 45–82). The analyzed risk factors showed that 5‐year post‐LT survival was significantly predicted by maximal LV outflow tract gradient at rest > 60 mmHg (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01‐1.06]).ConclusionsPreoperative LV outflow tract resting gradient > 60 mmHg was associated with 5‐year post‐LT mortality. The results suggest the severity of LVOTO identified by echocardiography is a prognostic tool for patients with HCM after LT.

AbstractIntroductionLiver transplant anesthesiology is an evolving and expanding subspecialty, and programs have, in the past, exhibited significant variations of practice at transplant centers across the United States. In order to explore current practice patterns, the Quality & Standards Committee from the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) undertook a survey of liver transplant anesthesiology program directors.MethodsProgram directors were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. A total of 110 program directors were identified from the 2018 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. Replies were received from 65 programs (response rate of 59%).ResultsOur results indicate an increase in transplant anesthesia fellowship training and advanced training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We also find that the use of intraoperative TEE and viscoelastic testing is more common. However, there has been a reduction in the use of veno‐venous bypass, routine placement of pulmonary artery catheters and the intraoperative use of anti‐fibrinolytics when compared to prior surveys.ConclusionThe results show considerable heterogeneity in practice patterns across the country that continues to evolve. However, there appears to be a movement towards the adoption of specific structural and clinical practices.

The field of abdominal organ transplantation is multifaceted, with the clinician balancing recipient comorbidities, risks of the surgical procedure, and the pathophysiology of immunosuppression to ensure optimal outcomes. An underappreciated element throughout this process is acute pain management related to the surgical procedure. As the opioid epidemic continues to grow with increasing numbers of transplant candidates on opioids as well the increase in the development of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, there is a need for greater focus on optimal postoperative pain control to minimize opioid use and improve outcomes. This review will summarize the physiology of acute pain in transplant recipients, assess the impact of opioid use on post-transplant outcomes, present evidence supporting nonopioid analgesia in transplant surgery, and briefly address the perioperative approach to the pretransplant recipient on opioids.

Liver grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) are a source of organs to decrease wait‐list mortality. While there have been lower rates of graft loss, there are concerns of an increased incidence of intraoperative events in recipients of DCD grafts. We aim to look at the incidence of intraoperative events between recipients of livers from DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) donors. We collected data for 235 DCD liver recipients between 2006 and 2017. We performed a 1:1 propensity match between these patients and patients with DBD donors. Variables included recipient age, liver disease etiology, biological Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, allocation MELD score, diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, and year of transplantation. DCD and DBD groups had no significant differences in incidence of postreperfusion syndrome (P = 0.75), arrhythmia requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = 0.66), and treatments for hyperkalemia (P = 0.84). In the DCD group, there was a significant increase in amount of total intraoperative and postreperfusion blood products (with exception of postreperfusion packed red blood cells) utilized (P < 0.05 for all products), significant differences in postreperfusion thromboelastography parameters, as well as inotropes and vasopressors used (P < 0.05 for all infusions). There was no difference in patient (P = 0.49) and graft survival (P = 0.10) at 1, 3, and 5 years. In conclusion, DCD grafts compared with a cohort of DBD grafts have a similar low incidence of major intraoperative events, but increased incidence of transient vasopressor/inotropic usage and increased blood transfusion requirements. This does not result in differences in longterm outcomes. While centers should continue to look at DCD liver donors, they should be cognizant regarding intraoperative care to prevent adverse outcomes.