Citations

Background: A pivotal clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib with zanubrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) did not achieve its primary endpoint of complete response or very good partial response. In addition, median progression-free survival was not reached in either treatment arm. In the absence of treatment effectiveness differentiation based on clinical trial evidence, we conducted a real-world study to assess patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with WM who received ibrutinib or zanubrutinib as first-line (1L) therapy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the ConcertAI Database to collect claims data of patients with WM aged ≥18 years who initiated single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/day) or zanubrutinib (320 mg/day) as 1L therapy on or after 9/1/2021 (index date). A 6-month washout period of guideline-recommended WM antineoplastic agents was required to confirm 1L status. Patients were excluded if they were receiving ibrutinib and zanubrutinib concurrently, died within 30 days of the index date, had a record of hematopoietic stem cell transplant, had a record of other ibrutinib indications in the 6 months before index, or were participating in a clinical trial. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, therapy duration (number of days between the first and last day of the medication supply), and HRU (all-cause and WM-specific) per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were assessed. Results: The study included 51 patients (ibrutinib, n=30; zanubrutinib, n=21). In both cohorts, most participants were male (ibrutinib, n=20 [67%]; zanubrutinib, n=16 [76%]), and the mean age at baseline was 73 years and 75 years, respectively. At baseline, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0, and the WM-related and ibrutinib/zanubrutinib-related clinical events were similar between the two cohorts. While the zanubrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of infections (33% vs 3%) and musculoskeletal pain (24% vs 7%) at baseline, the ibrutinib cohort had a higher prevalence of hypertension (20% vs 14%). The baseline prevalence of anemia was similar in both cohorts (ibrutinib, 27%; zanubrutinib, 29%). Mean follow-up was 6.9 months (ibrutinib) and 6.3 months (zanubrutinib). The mean ± SD duration of therapy was 152 ± 112 days (ibrutinib) and 113 ± 99 days (zanubrutinib; p=0.195). The ibrutinib cohort had a significantly lower all-cause HRU PPPM (4.53 ± 3.96 vs 8.53 ± 6.66, p=0.020) and lower WM-specific HRU PPPM (0.11 ± 0.26 vs 0.54 ± 1.14, p=0.104). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, patients with WM treated with 1L ibrutinib had a numerically longer duration of therapy and lower all-cause and WM-specific HRU PPPM, compared to those treated with 1L zanubrutinib. Due to a small sample size and short follow-up, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

BACKGROUND: Recent World Health Organization (WHO) classifications (5 th edition), International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognized TP53-mutated ( TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) as a distinct subcategory, acknowledging their uniformly poor outcomes. However, there are critical differences between the two guidelines in how TP53 allelic status is assigned. Both WHO-5 and ICC acknowledged the poor outcome of multi-hit TP53mut but excluded single-hit TP53mut. These changes are driven by a pivotal study demonstrating favourable outcome of single-hit TP53mut, however this study predominantly included de novo myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) cases (Bernard et al. Nat Med 2020). In contrast, we previously reported poor outcome of TP53mut therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) irrespective of the allelic status of TP53 (Hiwase et al Blood 2022andShah et al BCJ 2023). Finally, the ICC removed the subcategory of “therapy-related,” substituting it with diagnostic qualifiers instead. The WHO has grouped t-MN with secondary MN and renamed it as “myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy,” with the assertion that only multi-hit T P53mut MDS occurring post-cytotoxic therapy have poor outcome compared with single-hit. METHODS: We analyzed one of the largest international cohorts of TP53mut MN (n=544) with full characterization of TP53mut allele status utilizing uniform ICC criteria and similar large numbers of de novo and t-MN cases managed at Mayo Clinic Enterprise (USA) and South Australian MDS Registry, Adelaide (Australia) with clinical, integrated genomic profiling, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: In our cohort of TP53mut MN (n=544), 475 (87.3%) MN had TP53mut variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥10% and thus satisfied ICC criteria for TP53mut MN. Majority of TP53mut t-MN presented with MDS (bone marrow (BM) blasts 0-9%) compared de novo MN (62% vs. 48%; P=0.0012). While acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (BM blasts ≥20%) were more prevalent in TP53mutde novo MN compared to t-MN (38% vs. 24%; P= 0.001) and there was no difference in frequency of MDS/AML (BM blasts 10-19%) between the two cohorts (14% vs. 14%; P=0.8) ( Figure 1A). Majority of TP53mut were observed in the DNA-binding domain in t-MN and de novo MN (95% vs. 96.2%; P=0.48). However, mutations in Tetramer Domain were more frequent in t-MN (4.3% vs. 0.3%; P=0.002), whereas those in the TAD2 domain were more frequent in de novo TP53mut MN (2.4 vs. 0%; P =0.006). Integrating the mutation, conventional G-banding cytogenetic, copy number variation (CNV), FISH, and SNP array analysis, TP53mut MDS (BM blast 0-9%; n=260) were classified as multi-hit (n=179, 68.9%) or multi-equivalent (n=35, 13.5%) and single-hit (n=46, 17.7%) (Arber et al. Blood 2022). Striking enrichment of multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent was observed in TP53mut t-MDS compared to de novo MDS (91% vs. 72%; P<0.0001). While single-hit TP53mut were prevalent in de novo MDS compared to t-MDS (28% vs. 9%; P<0.0001). Importantly, median overall survival (OS) of single-hit was significantly longer than multi-hit de novo MDS (25.4 vs. 7.2 months; P=0.0002). In contrast to this we did not observe OS difference between single-hit and multi-hit TP53mut t-MDS (11.6 vs. 10.9 months; P =0.73) ( Figure 1B). CONCLUSION: Our study based on a large international cohort of T53mut MN provides compelling evidence that in contrast to de novo MDS, single hit TP53mut t-MDS is associated with poor outcome. Our data supports the consideration of single hit t-MDS as a multi-hit equivalent.

Background: In patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), continuous once-daily ibrutinib-based therapy has been associated with long-term progression-free survival. In addition, patients who continued ibrutinib-based treatment had better survival outcomes than those who discontinued treatment within the first few years. Evidence based on a single-center retrospective study suggests that dose reduction (DR) can be used to effectively manage ibrutinib-related adverse events (AEs) and avoid early treatment discontinuation. However, real-world data on outcomes in patients with WM after ibrutinib DR are limited. In this real-world study, we analyzed short-term (1-year follow-up) dosing patterns and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in patients with WM, with and without DR, who were receiving first-line (1L) ibrutinib. Methods: Medicare Fee-for-Service closed-claim medical or pharmacy records were used to identify patients diagnosed with WM who initiated 1L single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/day) from January 2014 to December 2020. Observed patients were enrolled in Medicare ≥12 months before and after ibrutinib initiation and had post-initiation AEs (both prevalent and incident AEs with DR recommendation from the US Prescribing Information), as identified via ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. Ibrutinib DR was defined as a reduction of the starting dose following the first AE within the 1-year follow-up period. Patients without a DR were defined as those who had received ibrutinib 420 mg per day during the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with a DR in the absence of AEs and patients with a DR prior to any AE were excluded from the analysis. Demographics, clinical characteristics, time to first AE, and TTD were analyzed among cohorts with and without DR. TTD was defined and evaluated as the time from first observed AE after ibrutinib initiation to the earliest occurrence of (1) a gap of >120 days between the end of 1L therapy and the follow-up period, (2) initiation of a next line of therapy, or (3) death. TTD was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology, log rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates. Results: We identified 404 patients (DR, n = 58 [14%]; no DR, 346 [86%]). Overall, 249 patients (62%) were men, 267 patients (66%) had hypertension, 55 patients (14%) had atrial fibrillation, and 114 patients (28%) had other cardiovascular conditions at baseline. The mean ± SD age at baseline was 77 ± 8 years. In both cohorts, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.0. Among the 404 patients, mean ± SD time from ibrutinib initiation to first AE was 28 ± 44 days. Mean ± SD time between first AE and DR was 137 ± 102 days. Mean TTD was 8.3 months (DR) and 6.2 (no DR) ( P = 0.018; Figure). At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, fewer patients with DR discontinued treatment compared with patients without DR (6 months: 24% vs 46%, P = 0.002; 12 months: 36% vs 50%, P = 0.064). After controlling for baseline and time-varying demographic and clinical characteristics, patients with DR were not significantly more likely to discontinue treatment compared with patients without DR (hazard ratio [95% CI], DR vs no DR: 1.24 [0.86-1.78]). Conclusion: These short-term (1-year follow-up) findings suggest TTD was not impacted by DR of ibrutinib following AEs. Thus, ibrutinib DR can be an effective strategy to manage AEs while maintaining clinical efficacy. Of note, causal association between AE and subsequent DR cannot be inferred from the claims database due to the cross-sectional nature of this study.

BACKGROUND: The association between myeloid neoplasm (MN) and autoimmune rheumatological diseases (AIRD) is increasingly recognized. Furthermore, prolonged cytotoxic disease modifying anti-rheumatological drugs (DMARD) for AIRD may potentially induce therapy-related MN (t-MN), a lethal haematological malignancy with dismal outcomes. However, the genetic association and mechanism underpinning immune dysfunction in patients with between MN and AIRD is not fully elucidated. METHODS: In this collaborative study across the two disciplines and continents (Australia and USA), we assessed the burden of well-defined AIRD in a large cohort of MN (n=1702) that included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n=861), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; n=640), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN; n=89) and MDS/MPN overlap (n=112). We characterized the cytogenetic and mutational landscape of MN with AIRD (MN-AIRD) and without AIRD. In order to assess the mechanistic link between AIRD and MN, we investigated the bone marrow microenvironment in MN-AIRD vs. well-curated age matched controls. RESULTS: 132 (7.75%) of MN (n=1702) had concomitant AIRD. Although association of AIRD was observed across all subtypes of MN, enrichment of AIRD was observed in patients with MDS, MDS/MPN and MPN compared to AML (9.5% vs. 9.8% vs 10.1% vs. 4.67%; P <0.001). Inflammatory arthritis (n=65; 49.24%) followed by inflammatory connective tissue diseases (CTD, n=23; 17.42%), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR, n=18; 13.63%) and vasculitis (n=16; 12.12%) were the most prevalent AIRD in the MN cohort. Notably, 87.7% of inflammatory arthritis were rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=57). Striking survival differences were observed between t-MN without AIRD and MN-AIRD (14.0 vs. 33.7 months; P <0.0001) and t-MDS no-AIRD and MDS-AIRD (16.1 vs. 33.4 months, P =0.001). Chromosomal abnormalities including complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, del 5q, del 7q, marker chromosome and TP53 mutations were enriched in t-MN following independent primary cancer (t-MN without AIRD). However striking enrichment of IDH1 and IDH2 (henceforth referred as IDH) mutations in MN with AIRD compared to MN without AIRD (20% vs. 11%, P =0.02), particularly in MDS-AIRD compared to MDS without AIRD (21% vs. 7%; P =0.001). The enrichment of IDH mutations were particularly prevalent in in MN cases with RA compared to other AIRD (34% vs. 11%; P =0.005). While IDH mutations were observed in only 8% and 6% of PMR and inflammatory CTD patients, respectively. Surprisingly higher frequency of IDH mutations was observed in evaluable seronegative compared to seropositive RA patients (62% vs. 0%; P =0.006). We also observed that majority of IDH mutations in seronegative RA were IDH1 (6/8; 75%) while IDH2 mutations were common other AIRD (6/6; 100%) ( P =0.009). We also assessed the impact of DMARDs on genomics of myeloid neoplasm. The majority of MN-AIRD patients treated with methotrexate did not harbor poor risk cytogenetic and mutation features such as complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, del 5q, del 7q and/or TP53 mutation. In contrast, the majority of patients who had cyclophosphamide harbored high risk cytogenetic and molecular features. To assess pathogenic mechanisms linking MN and AIRD, we evaluated bone marrow microenvironment in myeloid neoplasm patients with and without AIRD. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) isolated from MN-AIRD were highly senescent compared to age matched healthy controls, MN without AIRD, with defective proliferating and differentiation capacity of MN-AIRD and secretion of highly proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our key findings include: 7.8% of MN were associated with AIRD with stronger association of AIRD with MDS and MDS/MPN compared to AML and striking enrichment of IDH mutations in MN with inflammatory arthritis compared to MN with other AIRD (29% vs 11%; P =0.02), especially in seronegative RA compared to seropositive RA (62% vs. 0%; P =0.006). In contrast to cyclophosphamide and azathioprine, majority of cases treated with methotrexate did not harbor poor risk cytogenetic and/or TP53 mutation. As methotrexate is widely used as an anchor drug in many rheumatology treatment regimens, this is a highly significant finding of clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Recently proposed World Health Organization (WHO, 5 th edition) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognized myeloid neoplasms (MN) harboring TP53-mutated ( TP53mut) as a separate entity. However, there are critical differences between the two classifications regarding allelic-status, variance allele frequency (VAF) cut-off and blast categories, that may lead to under- or overestimation of the risk. METHODS: We analyzed MN harboring TP53mut (VAF ≥2%, n=536) managed at Mayo Clinic (USA) and South Australia Health Network (Australia). ICC (Arber et al, Blood 2022) and WHO (Bluebook, Beta v2) definitions were used to stratify MN harboring TP53mut. RESULTS: Of 536 cases, 379 (71%) had myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (<20% blasts) and 157 (29%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using WHO, 160 (42%) of 379 were classified as MDS-bi TP53 as they harbored 2 TP53mut (n=115; 30%) or 1 TP53mut plus confirmed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or copy neutral LOH (cnLOH) of TP53 locus (n=45; 12%). Sixty-two (16%) TP53mut MDS with VAF >49% were classified as presumptive MDS-bi TP53. Of the 157 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, 17 confirmed to have an intact wild-type TP53 copy and were classified as monoallelic. While 140 (89%) cases did not have copy number variation (CNV) analysis. We next evaluated the number of TP53mut cases classified differently by WHO and ICC. As WHO does not recognize TP53mut AML as a separate entity, 157 (29%) TP53mut AML were not classifiable. 46% (174/379) of the TP53mut MDS including 48 (30%), 12 (19%) and 79 (65%) of bi TP53, presumptive bi TP53 and monoallelic TP53mut MDS according to WHO were classified differently by ICC ( Figure 1A). Discordance between the two classifications were predominantly driven by: (i) The difference in VAF cut-off. Sixty patients (11%) with TP53mut VAF <10% were excluded from the ICC classification of TP53mut MN as it mandates TP53mut VAF cut-off ≥10%. 11 (18%) and 41 (68%) of these had bi TP53, monoallelic TP53mut MDS by WHO criteria while 8 (13%) had AML. Importantly, within the VAF <10% cohort, median overall survival (OS) of 2 TP53mut or 1 TP53mut with 17p13.1 (hereafter 17p) deletion or complex karyotype (CK, n=30) was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut VAF <10% (11.6 vs 32.4 months; P =0.002, Figure 1B), suggesting that ICC may underestimate the poor prognosis of multi-hit or multi-hit equivalent TP53mut MN with VAF <10%. (ii) The difference in bone marrow blast cut-off. The underlying assumption by WHO is that prognosis of bi TP53mut MDS is poor irrespective of blast percentage category (0-9% vs 10-19%). In contrast, ICC considers that TP53mut MDS/AML (blasts 10-19%) is associated with poor prognosis irrespective of TP53 allelic status. Median OS of TP53mut MDS with 10-19% blasts was significantly poor compared to blast 0-9% (6.4 vs 11.6 months, P <0.0001). Second, median OS of bi TP53mut was significantly poor than monoallelic TP53mut in MDS- blast 0-9% (10.1 vs 15.9 months; P =0.0001) but not in blasts 10-19% (6.8 vs 6.2 months; P =0.19). Hence, exclusion of monoallelic TP53mut MDS with blast 10-19% as TP53mut MN from the WHO classification may underestimate the poor prognosis. (iii) The difference in the definition of biallelic and multi-hit TP53 loss. 35 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, had 17p deletion but did not have CNV analysis to confirm the loss of TP53 locus and could not be classified further using WHO. ICC classified 18 (50%) of these cases as multi-hit. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, and 17p deletion on karyotype was significantly poor than 1 TP53mut (VAF ≤49%without 17p deletion on karyotype (6.4 vs 14.6 months, P =0.001). (iv) The difference in the definition of multi-hit equivalent. 32% (33/104) WHO defined monoallelic cases without available CNV data, were classified as multi-hit-equivalent by ICC as they harbored CK. However, WHO does not consider CK as presumptive evidence of bi TP53. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% with CK was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut without CK (8.2 vs 26.9 months, P =0.0008). CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that poor prognosis of ‘multi-hit’ TP53 with VAF <10% is underestimated by ICC. On the other hand, poor prognosis of monoallelic TP53 MDS with 10-19% blasts as well as 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% in the presence of CK is underestimated by WHO. These data suggest that both classifications can be further refined.

Aim: Patients with R/R LBCL after first-line treatment have poor prognosis. Multiple novel therapies have been approved for R/R LBCL in recent years, but CIT regimens are still commonly used. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CIT and novel therapies in 2L+ in patients with R/R LBCL and the association between patient clinical characteristics and real-world outcomes. Methods: This was a multi-site retrospective observational study of patients aged ≥18 years with R/R LBCL in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (patients followed from 1/1/2015 to 2/15/2023) who were treated with CIT or novel therapy in 2L+. CIT regimens included salvage/palliative chemotherapy, lenalidomide, rituximab, or obinutuzumab, used alone or in combination. Novel therapies included polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab or variations thereof (i.e., pola-based regimen), tafasitamab plus lenalidomide or variations thereof (tafa-based regimen), and loncastuximab tesirine (lonca). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed from the first confirmed R/R disease diagnosis and initiation of 2L+ therapy. When multiple lines of therapy (LOTs) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis, one was randomly selected as the index LOT. Real-world outcomes, determined by investigators at each clinical site, including overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were described for all patients in each treatment group and for the subgroup of patients with prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess associations between select patient clinical characteristics and real-world outcomes. Results: The study population included patients treated with CIT (N=653), pola-based regimen (N=116), tafa-based regimen (N=55), and lonca (N=42) ( Figure 1A). The median (m) age at date of index treatment initiation across groups ranged from 63 to 74 years. Across groups, most patients had primary refractory disease-i.e., were refractory to the first LOT (69.5% CIT vs. 73.3% pola vs. 58.2% tafa vs. 71.4% lonca), whereas variable proportions had one prior LOT (65.5% vs. 17.2% vs. 43.6% vs. 7.1%) and prior CAR T-cell therapy (5.1% vs. 43.1% vs. 32.7% vs. 47.6%). In the CIT group, ORR was 33.8%, 15.5% of patients achieved CR, mPFS (95% CI) was 1.9 (1.7, 2.1) months, and mOS was 9.1 (8.1, 10.5) months. In the pola group, ORR was 42.2%, 24.1% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 2.5 (2, 3.2) months and mOS was 7.8 (6.4, 11.8) months. In the tafa group, ORR was 25.5%, 14.5% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 2.7 (2.1, 4.2) months, and mOS was 8 (5.3, 12.7) months. In the lonca group, ORR was 40.5%, 21.4% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 3 (2.1, 5.1) months, and mOS was 4.7 (3.7, 10.8) months. Demographics and outcomes for all patients and those who received prior CAR T-cell therapy are summarized in Figure 1A. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk score ≥3, CIT as the index treatment type, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with time from response to progression/death (P<0.05; Figure 1B). IPI risk score ≥3, CIT as the index treatment type, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with worse PFS. IPI risk ≥3, ≥3 prior LOTs, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with OS. Conclusion: In this large clinical cohort of patients with R/R LBCL with high proportions having primary refractory disease, all common treatments were associated with modest ORR/CR and poor OS. Receiving CIT treatments, higher IPI score, primary refractory status, and higher number of prior LOTs were significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes. A study with larger sample size and longer follow-up may be warranted to further understand the clinical effectiveness of novel treatments. Thus, despite the availability of novel treatments during the study period, these findings highlight the need for more effective treatment alternatives beyond currently available options to improve outcomes.

Abstract Introduction: First pass effect (FPE), achievement of complete recanalization (mTICI 2c/3) with a single pass, is a significant predictor of favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment (EVT) in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO). However, data concerning the impact on functional outcomes and predictors of FPE in medium vessel occlusions (MeVO) are scarce. Patients and Methods: We conducted an international retrospective study on MeVO cases. Multivariable logistic modeling was used to establish independent predictors of FPE. Clinical and safety outcomes were compared between the two study groups (FPE vs non-FPE) using logistic regression models. Good outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 3 months. Results: Eight hundred thirty-six patients with a final mTICI ⩾ 2b were included in this analysis. FPE was observed in 302 patients (36.1%). In multivariable analysis, hypertension (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10–2.20) and lower baseline NIHSS score (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.97) were independently associated with an FPE. Good outcomes were more common in the FPE versus non-FPE group (72.8% vs 52.8%), and FPE was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR 2.20, 95% CI 1.59–3.05). 90-day mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were significantly lower in the FPE group, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.25–0.72) and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39–0.77), respectively. Conclusion: Over 2/3 of patients with MeVOs and FPE in our cohort had a favorable outcome at 90 days. FPE is independently associated with favorable outcomes, it may reduce the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage, and 3-month mortality.