Citations

Objective: To establish international benchmark values for relevant outcome parameters in robotic Whipple. Summary Background Data: For safe adoption of surgical innovation, robust quality control is essential. Benchmarking is a validated tool for assessing surgical performance. Recent international consensus identified establishing benchmark values for robotic Whipple as top priority. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing robotic Whipple between 2020-2023 with a minimum one-year follow-up. Reference centers were required to perform ≥15 cases/year, be scientifically active in the field, and maintain a prospective database. Benchmark criteria included benign or resectable malignant disease without neoadjuvant therapy, arterial resection, major co-morbidities, or significant previous abdominal surgery. Benchmarks were established for 13 outcome parameters. Result: The benchmark cohort comprised 418 patients from 12 centers across four continents. Benchmark values were: conversion rate ≤4.3%, transfusion rate ≤2.1%, 6-month mortality ≤2.2%, major complications ≤23.2%, and CCI® ≤20.9. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) and hemorrhage (grade B/C) rates were ≤23.6% and ≤12.7%, respectively. For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=123), the benchmark for lymph node yield was ≥20. Higher surgical difficulty was associated with increased overall postoperative morbidity (R 2 =0.38, P =0.019), higher center caseload with reduced pancreas-specific complications (R 2 =0.28, P =0.044). Independent POPF predictors included duct diameter ≤4 mm (OR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.82), anticoagulation (OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.47, 3.99), and indication other than PDAC (OR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.68, 3.27). Conclusions: This study establishes the first international benchmarks for robotic Whipple, demonstrating oncologic outcomes and morbidity comparable to open surgery with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Abstract Background: As with most Sub-Saharan African countries, Nigeria has a rising incidence of cancer, with disproportionate mortality rates. The financial burden of cancer care often results in catastrophic healthcare spending, leading to treatment refusal, disruption, and discontinuation. This is particularly significant in Nigeria, where nearly all patients are uninsured, and out-of-pocket costs often exceed households’ ability to pay. Financial Navigation Programs (FNPs) have been shown to mitigate treatment-related financial toxicity in cancer care and reduce treatment abandonment, but there is a paucity of high-quality data on this intervention in resource-constrained settings. Here, we present a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel FNP in Nigeria. Methods: We designed the COST-FIN trial, a multi-site pragmatic single-blinded randomized controlled trial of newly diagnosed (<6 weeks from diagnosis) adults (≥18 years) with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer at two tertiary cancer centers in Nigeria. Participants (n=200) will be randomized (1:1) to either the intervention (FNP) or the control arm and followed for 12 months. Data on key individual, treatment, and financial parameters will be collected via structured interviews and chart abstraction at baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up. In addition, participants randomized to the FNP will receive a tailored financial literacy assessment, financial planning support, and enhanced access to resources by trained financial navigators. Primary and secondary outcomes are Financial Catastrophe (FC) and Financial Distress (FD), respectively. Exploratory outcomes will include cost-related non-adherence and cost-effectiveness of the program. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the estimated accruals reach 6 months of follow-up, with crossover if compelling evidence of benefit is demonstrated at that time point. All participants will be followed for 12 months from recruitment. Discussion: This first-of-its-kind study will provide evidence on the role of FNP in potentially eliminating financial barriers to cancer care in Nigeria. Given the country’s renewed interest in cancer control through the passage of the National Cancer Control Plan, findings from this study have the potential to influence policy reform and set the stage for further studies to evaluate the scalability and implementation of similar interventions in resource-limited settings. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06630962. Oct 8, 2024 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630962)

Ameloblastomas are locally aggressive odontogenic tumors that most commonly arise in the mandible and maxilla and often harbor BRAF V600E mutations. While rare extragnathic ameloblastomas have been reported, primary pulmonary cases have not been documented. We identified 3 pulmonary neoplasms with features of ameloblastoma that were submitted for consultation between 2022 and 2025 at 3 academic institutions and performed detailed clinicopathologic and molecular analysis. The tumors presented as 5.4 to 7.3 cm peribronchial solitary lung masses. All resected tumors exhibited a predominant stellate reticulum-like component composed of loosely arranged p40-reactive bland squamoid-to-spindled cells with long intercellular bridges, and streaming and swirling architecture, surrounded by palisaded columnar cells with focal reverse nuclear polarity at the interface with myxoid stroma. All tumors were immunoreactive for BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF V600E mutations were confirmed by molecular assays, including broad next-generation sequencing on 2 cases. Florid hyperplasia of entrapped pneumocytes initially suggested a biphasic neoplasm, but the absence of BRAF V600E IHC labeling confirmed pneumocyte entrapment. Occult gnathic primary tumors were excluded by subsequent clinical examination, including negative panoramic dental x-rays. No recurrences or metastases have been observed to date. This first series of primary pulmonary ameloblastomas highlights a distinctive tumor with histologic and molecular features identical to gnathic counterparts. We discuss the potential histogenesis of these unusual tumors.

This guideline has been updated. This ASCO Living Guideline is reviewed on an eight-week cycle. Please see the online dynamic version for the latest updates. Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information ( Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 ). Updates are published regularly and can be found at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines .

Humility is one of the most powerful and sometimes least understood virtues we can possess. It is often misinterpreted as a sign of weakness, especially today, where self-promotion is encouraged and celebrated. Many people view humility as “thinking less of ourselves.” In truth, humility is not thinking less of oneself; rather it is appropriately thinking less about oneself. Our ability as caregivers in putting the needs of the patient at the center of all we do is enhanced through our humility. A steady focus on the needs of the patient helps us gain an honest assessment of both our strengths and limitations. Studies have shown that patient outcomes and experiences are strongly associated with provider humility. This article aims to shine a light on the power of humility and its impact on patient experience, psychological and cultural safety, and the provider-patient relationship.

Abstract Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an increasingly prevalent manifestation of acquired resistance to next generation AR signaling inhibitors (ARSI), that arises via transformation from advanced prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) through a mechanism called lineage plasticity. Through characterization of isogenic PRAD and NEPC mouse tumoroid models generated using human-relevant driver mutations (Pten-/-;Rb1-/-;Trp53-/-), we revealed an extensive epigenetic reprogramming in NEPC versus PRAD, particular at enhancers. CRISPR screens focused on TFs and coactivators revealed a NEPC lineage TF survival network comprised of ASCL1, NFIB, SOX1/11, FOXA1/2 and MYCL with exquisite dependency on the TIP60 acetyltransferase complex. During the PRAD-to-NEPC transition, FOXA1, NFIB and TIP60 chromatin binding redistributes to NEPC specific enhancers, resulting in expression of NEPC target genes in a coordinate fashion with ASCL1 functioning as master regulator, culminating in activation of MYCL. MYCL then directly recruits the TIP60 complex to target sites, where it acts as a requisite MYCL coactivator for target gene activation for NEPC growth/survival. The acetyltransferase activity of TIP60 and acetylation of its substrate H2A.Z are both required for NEPC survival, as well as two chromatin reader subunits of the TIP60 complex, BRD8 and YEATS4. Targeted chemical degradation of TIP60 revealed &gt;500-fold dependency in NEPC relative to normal prostate, credentialing the TIP60 complex as a potential therapeutic target in NEPC. Citation Format: Zhen Sun, Jimmy L. Zhao, Wazim M. Ismail, Zahra F. Khan, Teng Han, Subhiksha Nandakumar, Serina Young, Matthew Lange, Richard Koche, Alexandre Gaspar-Maia, Charles L. Sawyers. The TIP60 acetyltransferase complex is a critical dependency in neuroendocrine prostate cancer through its role as a critical coactivator of MYCL downstream of ASCL1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Innovations in Prostate Cancer Research and Treatment; 2026 Jan 20-22; Philadelphia PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(2_Suppl):Abstract nr PR036.

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprising diverse cell types within the tumor microenvironment that support cancer cell survival. Using single cell and spatial transcriptomics, we previously identified subpopulations of treatment-persistent cancer cells exhibiting regenerative properties and a distinct molecular signature. Herein, we aimed to characterize the locked ‘Persist’ signature (PS) and its association with outcomes in a large cohort of non-metastatic prostate cancer tumors. Methods Patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer that underwent Decipher prostate genomic classifier and whole-transcriptome profiling on biopsy (BX, n=146,941) and radical prostatectomy (RP, n=55,329) specimens between October 2016 and February 2024 were included (Veracyte Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Baseline clinical and pathological data from deidentified patients as well as signature scores were retrieved from the Decipher Genomic Resource for Intelligent Discovery (GRID) registry (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT02609269). The PS score based on the expression of 17 genes was calculated for all samples. Results PS was significantly associated with adverse clinical and pathological variables. In biopsy sample, PS was higher in cases with worse T3/4 clinical stage, Grade group (GG4-5), and high/very high NCCN risk (p&lt;0.001 for all). In RP sample, PS was significantly higher in patients with GG4-5, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement (p&lt;0.001 for all). PS was also higher in patients with very high Decipher (&gt;0.85) in both BX and RP (p&lt;0.001 for both). When evaluating the prognosis of PS in multiple retrospective cohorts, PS in biopsy was prognostic of adverse pathology features at RP. PS was also prognostic of distance metastasis (DM) in multiple RP cohorts with long-term follow up (META855). In the ARNEO trial testing apalutamide in addition to ADT as neo-adjuvant treatment prior RP, PS was prognostic of early recurrence. In the Stampede trial, PS was prognostic of progression free survival, PCSM and OS in both non-metastatic and metastatic disease. When associating PS with other GRID signatures, PS was higher in samples with homologous recombination deficiency, TP53 mutations, Luminal B and luminal proliferating subtypes. On the other hand, PS was lower in samples with low androgen receptor-activity, RB-loss and neuroendocrine-like tumors. Finally, PS was positively correlated with radiation sensitivity signatures. Conclusions Persist is a novel molecular signature associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics. Future studies aim to further examine beyond this signature potential to identify patients at risk of aggressive prostate cancer, and understand what the optimal treatments for those with treatment-persistent prostate cancer cells are. Citation Format: Francesco Ballesio, Sinja Taavitsainen, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Antti Kiviaho, Mazlina Ismail, Reetta Nätkin, Alexander Giesen, Thomas Munro, James A. Proudfoot, Hyunnam Ryu, Elai Davicioni, Matthew C. Cooperberg, R. Jeffrey. Karnes, Ruochen Jiang, Steven Joniau, Gerhardt Attard, Frank Claessens, Matti Nykter, Alfonso Urbanucci. Persist: a molecular signature for prostate cancer patients with preexisting treatment-persistent cells associated with aggressive disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Innovations in Prostate Cancer Research and Treatment; 2026 Jan 20-22; Philadelphia PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B079.

Abstract Introduction: Underlying tumor biology in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is highly complex and heterogeneous. To date, mCRPC state biomarker-enriched clinical trial designs incorporating either prognostic or predictive biomarkers are limited to alterations in homologous recombination repair pathway genes. In this study, we use an integrated clinico-molecular prognostic score in mCRPC that combines plasma prognostic proteins with a plasma-based copy number alteration (CNA) risk algorithm (PMID: 40036789; PMID: 36230636) to simulate a biomarker-enriched clinical trial design. Methods: A plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) prognostic risk algorithm from eight CNAs (gains in AR, MYC, PIK3CA, PIK3CB; deletions in NKX3-1, TMPRSS2, TP53, ZBTB16) is combined with clinical prognostic proteins (alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase) to generate a prognostic risk-score (RS) in three independent treatment-naïve mCRPC cohorts. Using the RS classifier, we estimate the number of high-RS patients (pts) required to be screened from an unselected mCRPC population and the number needed for enrollment to achieve adequate statistical power in a randomized trial for a predefined effect size (Hazard Ratio- 0.70; 80% power). The trial design aims to enrich High-RS pts for targeting lethal mCRPC. Trade-offs are evaluated between number of pts screened and enrolled under varying RS enrichment thresholds and degrees of enrichment. Results: The range of RS distribution in 561 mCRPC pts from three pooled datasets was 0.362-11.737. The median overall survival (OS) (months; 95% Confidence Intervals) based on risk stratification for Low-RS (≤0.8) is 46.2 (38.8-55.4); “Intermediate-risk” (RS: 0.8-2.6) is 27.1(24.3-31.5); High-Risk (RS: &gt;2.6) is 14.9 (11.9-17.6). For a 2-year OS mCRPC endpoint, a biomarker-enriched trial restricted to pts with RS ≥2, which corresponds to the 65th percentile of the RS distribution, would require enrollment of 398 pts, after screening 1,101 mCRPC pts to achieve 80% power to detect a 0.7 treatment vs. control hazard ratio (HR). In contrast, a traditional non-enrichment clinical trial (no molecular classifier) would require 574 pts to achieve to achieve 80% power and still not achieve adequate power to detect strong treatment by risk interactions. As a pragmatic alternative, we evaluated a hybrid enrichment strategy enrolling 50% of pts from the general mCRPC population and 50% of pts with RS ≥1 (41st percentile). This biomarker enriched design which takes 50% pts with a RS of 1.0 (or more) in a trial with 24-month follow-up will require a sample size 525 patients for which 676 pts will be screened to achieve an 80% power to detect a 0.7 treatment vs. control hazard ratio. Conclusion: A plasma-based molecular classifier can be used to design an enrichment trial in biologically defined lethal mCRPC, incorporating 50% of pts with High-RS and yet balance the required sample size and number of pts to be screened enabling an adequately powered molecular classifier-based biomarker-enriched clinical trial. Citation Format: Manish Kohli, Liang Wang, Aik C. Tan, Muhammad Zaki Fadlullah, Anushka Shankar, Sumithra Mandrekar, Benjamin Haaland. Clinico-Genomic Risk Score-Based Biomarker Enrichment Clinical Trial Designs in Poor Prognosis Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Innovations in Prostate Cancer Research and Treatment; 2026 Jan 20-22; Philadelphia PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B039.