Citations

Abstract Background Automated phlebotomy has the potential to improve patient outcomes and address phlebotomist workforce challenges. The Autonomous Blood Drawing Optimization and Performance Testing trial (ADOPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05878483) assesses performance, safety, and patient experience of an autonomous robotic phlebotomy device (ARPD) that utilizes multimodal imaging. Methods Patients were recruited from outpatient phlebotomy departments in the Netherlands. In cohort 1, analytical equivalence was assessed by comparing within-subject test results from ARPD-collected and manually collected samples using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. In cohort 2, the ARPD was assessed in routine use. The primary performance endpoint was first-stick success rate; the primary safety endpoint was the rate of adverse events. Exploratory endpoints assessed pain and patient preference. Results One hundred fifty-three patients were enrolled in cohort 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, or platelet count, indicating analytical equivalence. A total of 1633 patients were enrolled in cohort 2. The overall first-stick success rate, in patients where the ARPD could identify a suitable vein, was 94.5% (95% CI, 93.3–95.5) and remained high in patients with difficult venous access (92.7%), obesity (97.4%), and age ≥65 years (93.4%). Adverse events, all mild, occurred at a rate of 0.6%. Ninety percent of patients reported far less (19%), less (32%), or similar pain (39%) compared with manual phlebotomy. Eighty-two percent indicated they would strongly prefer (16%) or prefer (31%) use of the ARPD in the future or had no preference (35%). Conclusions Automated phlebotomy using the ARPD shows a favorable performance and safety profile and may improve patient experience. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05878483

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, heterogeneous neoplasms associated with prolonged survival and substantial symptom burden. However, patient-reported outcomes across NET subtypes remain poorly characterized, particularly in real-world settings. This study describes baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and care experiences among patients with gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs, examining differences by tumor site and time since diagnosis. Methods The Neuroendocrine Tumors–Patient Reported Outcomes study is a prospective, multi-institutional US cohort of adults (aged 18 years and older) with incident small intestinal, pancreatic, gastroenteropancreatic, or lung NETs diagnosed from January 2018 through September 2024, identified via a validated electronic medical record–based computable phenotype. Baseline surveys assessed HRQoL, symptoms, care experiences, and clinical characteristics using validated instruments. Descriptive statistics and standardized mean differences compared responses by NET site and time since diagnosis. Results Among 2367 participants (mean age = 57.8 years; 57.3% female), 1974 had gastroenteropancreatic NETs (659 small intestinal NET, 555 pancreatic NET) and 393 had lung NETs. Fatigue (mean = 33.0), insomnia (mean = 32.5), and diarrhea (mean = 25.7) were the most burdensome symptoms. Lung NET patients reported worse dyspnea (standardized mean difference = 0.58, P < .001) and lower physical, role, and global QoL scores than those with gastroenteropancreatic NETs, while pancreatic NET patients reported better functioning. Diarrhea worsened over time, especially in small intestinal NETs. Most rated care highly (75.3%) but cited concerns about treatment side effects (80.4%), costs (60.7%), and travel burden (58.8%). Conclusions This large US cohort reveals persistent symptom burden and HRQoL variation by tumor site and disease duration, underscoring the need for longitudinal HRQoL assessment in NET care.

Abstract Background Cardiomegaly is a clinically significant incidental finding on chest computed tomography (CT) associated with heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Qualitative radiologist assessment is variable, and automated AI tools may enable objective opportunistic cardiac volumetry. Purpose To evaluate whether AI-enabled total cardiac volume (TCVAI) derived from non-ECG-gated, non-contrast chest CT can identify cardiomegaly as defined by echocardiography. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 307 consecutive patients (median age, 67 years; 56% male) who underwent non-contrast chest CT at a single center on 7 scanner types (4 vendors) and clinically indicated echocardiography within 31 days. A commercially available AI tool (AI-Rad Companion, Siemens Healthineers) automatically quantified TCVAI, indexed to body surface area (TCVAI/BSA). Echocardiography reports were reviewed for chamber dilation and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), collectively defined as cardiomegaly. Associations between TCVAI/BSA and echocardiographic findings were assessed using correlation, ordinal regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Interscan repeatability was evaluated in 248 patients with 544 repeat CT examinations. Prespecified sex-specific thresholds were tested in a temporally independent validation cohort of 50 patients. Results Median TCVAI was higher in patients with cardiomegaly than those without (1061.9 vs 798.4 mL; P < .001). TCVAI/BSA was associated with chamber dilation and LVH severity on univariate analysis and remained associated in multivariable ordinal models, except for right ventricular dilation. Discriminatory performance was fair to good, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75-0.87) in men and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.85) in women. Interscan repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.93). In independent validation, performance ranged from sensitivity 89.3%/specificity 27.3% at a high-sensitivity threshold to sensitivity 28.6%/specificity 100% at a high-specificity threshold. Conclusion AI-derived cardiac volume from routine chest CT shows fair to good performance for identifying echocardiography-defined cardiomegaly with high measurement repeatability, supporting a potential role for automated cardiac volumetry as an objective, opportunistic biomarker.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Guidelines recommend non-surgical biopsy for indeterminate pulmonary lesions > 8 mm. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) is growing in use to biopsy small pulmonary nodules; however current literature is limited to single center studies with limited follow-up. This study, PRECIsE, assessed safety and performance of the first ssRAB iteration across multiple sites and nascent users. METHODS Prospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating ssRAB without cone-beam CT guidance in patients with nodules 10–30 mm located in or beyond the sub-segmental airways. Patients were followed for 2 years; the primary endpoint was sensitivity for malignancy with diagnostic yield, and safety as secondary endpoints. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to control for factors associated with sensitivity and diagnostic yield. RESULTS A total of 305 procedures were performed across 6 centers. Median nodule size was 17.0 mm (IQR: 14.0–23.0) with bronchus sign present in 37% of cases. Sensitivity for malignancy through 2 years was 81.3% (95% CI: 75.7, 86.1). Multi-level modelling demonstrated female sex, smaller nodule size, lower lobe location, semi-solid density, and higher body-mass-index were associated with lower sensitivity. Diagnostic yield was 74.1% (95% CI: 68.8, 78.9) according to the ATS/ACCP criteria and 77.5% [95% CI: 72.4, 81.8] according to the intermediate criteria. Multi-level modeling demonstrated a non-significant site/center level effect on ATS/ACCP diagnostic yield (P = .36). Pneumothorax requiring intervention was 1.6% (5/305); bleeding was 1.0% (3/305) with two (2) Nashville grade 2 and one (1) Nashville grade 3 events. CONCLUSIONS The first iteration of ssRAB demonstrated encouraging performance and a strong safety profile among nascent users for the biopsy of small peripheral nodules.

Background Uncontrolled hypertension is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Electro-hydraulic acoustic therapy (eHAT) is a non-invasive treatment that may lower blood pressure (BP), but its safety and efficacy in CKD remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate eHAT's feasibility and safety in this population. Methods In this single-arm, prospective, single-center proof-of-concept study, CKD patients received six eHAT treatments over three weeks. BP was assessed in-office (attended and unattended) at baseline and at 4-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks post-treatment. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at baseline, 12, and 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in systolic office BP (OBP) from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included additional BP measurements, kidney function, and safety. Results Fifteen patients completed all follow-ups. At 12 weeks, mean systolic OBP decreased by 9.73 mmHg (SD 14.77; p = 0.0032) and remained significantly lower at 24 weeks (−7.67 mmHg; p = 0.0335) and 48 weeks (−19.40 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Diastolic OBP reductions were significant at 12 ( p = 0.0413) and 48 weeks ( p = 0.0022). By 12 weeks, 26% of participants reduced the number or dose of antihypertensive medications. Kidney function remained stable throughout. No safety signals were detected. Conclusion Our study highlights the feasibility and tolerability of eHAT in patients with CKD and HTN. Nonetheless, due to the small sample size and lack of a control group, these findings should be considered preliminary.

TPS909 Background: BCG-Exposed NMIBC (a high grade recurrence within 24 months of prior BCG, but not meeting “unresponsive” criteria) is a large patient population with a critical need for more effective treatment strategies that prevent the development of BCG unresponsive disease/progression. The current standard of care is re-treatment with BCG alone, but only ~50% of patients derive clinical benefit. While intravesical gemcitabine (with or without docetaxel) is sometimes used, multiple retrospective studies have found that GemDoce is no better than re-treatment with BCG alone for patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC. A chemoimmunotherapy strategy of intravesical Gemcitabine with BCG (GemBCG) combines the two most effective, inexpensive, and commonly used treatments for NMIBC. Based on compelling biologic rationale and preclinical data, a phase I/II (n=52) trial was initiated of GemBCG in BCG-exposed NMIBC (NCT04179162). GemBCG has minimal side effects (3.8% [2/52] with Grade 3 TRAEs (no grade 4/5 seen) with similar side effects and tolerability to BCG alone. GemBCG has a outstanding early efficacy signal (6-month complete response of 97% [28/29] in patients with CIS, compared to ~50% 6-month complete response w/ BCG alone for BCG exposed CIS). GemBCG has promising preliminary longer term efficacy (18-month HG-RFS of 76% compared to ~45-55% reported with BCG alone, GemDoce, and recombinant BCG in BCG exposed NMIBC). Correlative studies support the hypothesis that the addition of gemcitabine to BCG can favorably modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Methods: Based on the above rationale, we initiated the “GAIN” trial (A032303/ NCT07000084), a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase III study for patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC randomized to either: re-treatment with BCG only (Arm A, SOC) or Gemcitabine + BCG (GemBCG, Arm B). BCG-exposed NMIBC is defined as a high grade NMIBC (Ta, T1, Tis/CIS) that has recurred within 24 months of prior BCG, but NOT otherwise currently meeting BCG unresponsive NMIBC. The primary objective is to compare high grade recurrence-free survival (HG-RFS) between the two treatment arms. Notable aspects of the trial include: (1) the reduced burden on investigators and research teams due to the NCI’s new streamlined data initiative, (2) liberal inclusion/exclusion criteria and pragmatic design to improve generalizability of results, and (3) Cystoscopic biopsies/TURBT at week 13/month 3 for all participants (both CIS and “papillary only”) for multiple reasons including to allow for earlier detection of BCG unresponsive disease for patient safety, increased rigor of the trial, and objectively evaluate urinary biomarkers/urinary tumor DNA. Clinical trial information: NCT04179162 .

LBA629 Background: Whether BCG strain influences clinical efficacy is unclear. BCG shortages and a reliance on a single strain may impact disease outcomes. Evidence also suggests that priming with intradermal (ID) BCG vaccination prior to intravesical (IVe) BCG enhances anti-tumor immunity and cancer clearance. Co-primary objectives address these issues. Methods: The trial design calls for 924 eligible patients with BCG naïve non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) (HG Ta/T1 +/- CIS or CIS alone) with negative purified protein derivative (PPD) to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, to IVe TICE (Arm 1), IVe Tokyo-172 (Arm 2), or ID + IVe Tokyo-172 (Arm 3) BCG, stratifying on age group and clinical stage. IVe BCG included 6 weekly instillations (induction) and three weekly instillations (maintenance) at 3 and 6 months (mo), then every 6 mo for 3 years. Objective 1 tests whether Tokyo-172 BCG is non-inferior (NI) to TICE BCG, specifying a NI hazard ratio=1.34 (84% power). Objective 2 tests whether priming with ID prior to IVe Tokyo-172 is superior to IVe Tokyo-172 (HR=0.71, 83% power). The primary endpoint is high-grade recurrence-free survival (HG-RFS) censored at last cystoscopy, using a one-sided α=0.021 for each test. A Cox model adjusting for the stratification factors is used. Secondary endpoints include adverse events, 6-mo biopsy-proven complete response (CR) in patients with CIS +/- Ta, T1, duration of CR, PPD conversion and HG-RFS, progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life. Max follow-up is 5 years. Results: 1000 (984 eligible) patients were enrolled from 2/17-12/20. Median (IQR) follow up is 4.6 (3.6, 5.0) yrs. Median age (range) is 70 yrs (26, 99), 17% are female, 9% are non-white, and 34% had CIS at entry. HG-RFS, CR, duration of CR at 4 yrs, and PFS were similar among arms (Table). PPD conversion occurred in 29% and was not correlated with HG-RFS. Gr 1-2 AE rate was similar (67%, 71%, and 67%) and Gr 3-4 (no Gr 5s) rate was 6%, 11%, and 14% for Arms 1,2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Tokyo-172 is non-inferior to TICE BCG in terms of HG RFS and CIS CR and is similar for PFS. Gr 3-4 AE rate is higher with Tokyo-172. Priming with Tokyo-172 BCG does not improve HG RFS. PPD conversion is not prognostic. Clinical trial information: NCT #03091660 . CIS Component N (eligible) 5-yr HG RFS HG RFSHR (95.8% CI) @ 5-yrPFS PFS HR(95% CI) @ CR %(95% CI) 4 yr CR duration Tice Ive 333 (330) 58% 79% 62%; 71/114(53%, 71%) 80% Tokyo Ive 332 (327) 64% *0.82(0.63, 1.08) 79% *0.99(0.70, 1.39) 60%; 66/110(50%, 69%) 83% Tokyo ID + Ive 335 (327) 63% **1.00(0.76, 1.33) 77% **1.07(0.76, 1.51) 63%; 69/109(54%, 72%) 80% 3 mo. PPD + conversionY vs. N 782 evaluable225 (29%)557 (71%) 69%67% ^HR=0.91(0.68, 1.22) * Tokyo-172 vs. Tice, ** Tokyo Priming vs. Tokyo no priming. ^conversion to PPD + vs. – @ adjusted for 2 strat factors (and arms for PPD model). PFS event = MIBC, metastasis, or death.

57 Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading non-cancer cause of death among men with prostate cancer (PC), particularly during androgen-deprivation therapy. While CVD risk-prediction models are well established in the general population, barriers to integration within oncology workflows remain poorly defined. Guided by the PRISM and RE-AIM frameworks, this study evaluated multilevel determinants influencing adoption, feasibility, and sustainability of CVD risk-assessment tools in PC care. Methods: A national, cross-sectional survey of 45 physicians (medical oncology 49%, urology 38%, radiation oncology 13%) from 18 U.S. states was conducted. Respondents represented early- (27%), mid- (36%), and late-career (38%) clinicians across academic (87%) and community (13%) settings. Quantitative items mapped to PRISM/RE-AIM domains assessed adaptability, cost/resource feasibility, effectiveness, equity, and sustainability; open-ended responses explored contextual barriers and facilitators. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data. Results: Physicians reported moderate-to-high readiness to adopt a CVD risk-assessment tool, emphasizing workflow alignment and EHR integration over algorithmic complexity. Table 1 summarizes domain-specific findings. Ninety-three percent of respondents favored lab-independent models that minimize workflow disruption. Conclusions: Pre-implementation analysis highlighted that structural barriers, rather than algorithmic or statistical limitations, remain the primary obstacles to adopting CVD risk-assessment tools in prostate-cancer care. Physicians emphasized the need for EHR-integrated, non-laboratory-based, and time-efficient tools that align with routine oncology workflows and minimize cross-specialty friction. Addressing these practical and organizational determinants may be pivotal to achieving equitable, scalable, and sustainable cardio-oncology implementation across diverse practice settings. PRISM and RE-AIM constructs evaluation results. Construct Likely/Very Likely (%) Interpretation Perceived Effectiveness 87% Broad confidence in clinical utility Equity in Patient Reach 75% Strong perceived equity in reach Equity in Effectiveness 73% Expected to perform consistently across populations Adaptability to Workflow 71% High compatibility with existing clinic workflows Cost/Resource Feasibility 65% Feasible for resource-constrained settings Likelihood of Adoption 60% Moderate readiness for implementation Equity in Adoption 58% Equitable uptake possible despite resource differences Reach to Target Population 57% Moderate likelihood of reaching most patients Sustainability Over Time 51% Moderate long-term feasibility Consistency of Implementation 42% Need for standardized protocols

369 Background: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) uses MRI to target, monitor, and control thermal ablation of prostate tissue with high intensity directional ultrasound, demonstrating favorable histologic control and preservation of genitourinary function in single-arm studies [1,2]. CAPTAIN (NCT05027477) is a post-market, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of TULSA vs RARP for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and is the first such study to meet its enrolment target. Here we compare baseline patient characteristics, treatment parameters, and periprocedural outcomes. Methods: CAPTAIN enrolled men with treatment-naïve, organ-confined, Grade Group 2 or 3 prostate cancer at 23 centers including academic and private clinics in the USA (20), Canada (2), and Finland (1). Patients were randomized 2:1 to TULSA or RARP, without crossover. Endpoints include pad-free urinary continence (EPIC) and erections sufficient for penetration (IIEF Q2) at 1 year, salvage treatment at 3 years, and survival to 10 years. Periprocedural metrics include length of stay, blood loss, catheter time, and 30-day patient diary (EQ-5D-5L, NRS pain score). Results: 211 patients were treated from Jan 2022 to Aug 2025 (70% TULSA, 30% RARP), surpassing the enrolment target of 201. Arms had similar baseline characteristics: median (IQR) age for TULSA vs. RARP was 63 (58–68) vs 65 (60–69) years (p=0.12), PSA was 6.5 (4.9–9.6) vs 7.2 (5.6–9.7) ng/mL (p=0.63), Grade Group 2/3 proportions were 76%/24% vs 77%/23% (p=0.88). RARP involved bilateral, unilateral, or no nerve sparing in 89%, 5.7%, and 5.7% of cases. TULSA ablation plans included whole-gland (68%) and ≥hemi-ablation (32%). Median (IQR) blood loss was lower during TULSA vs RARP: 0 (0–0) vs 100 (100–200) mL (p<0.001). Hospital stay was shorter for TULSA: 0.29 (0.27–0.32) vs 1.24 (1.12–1.36) days (p<0.001). Catheter duration was longer post-TULSA: 13 (11–15) vs 8 (8–10) days (p<0.001). Patients reported lower NRS pain scores after TULSA to post-operative day 6, and less decline in overall health on the EQ-5D-5L 0-100 visual analog scale over 30 days (p<0.05). Fewer patients reported extreme inability on EQ-5D-5L after TULSA vs RARP over the first month for mobility (0% vs 15%), self-care (1% vs 18%), and usual activities (18% vs 38%) (all p<0.05). Conclusions: CAPTAIN is the first multicenter RCT comparing ablation to radical prostate cancer treatment to meet its enrollment target. Early perioperative results from CAPTAIN demonstrate that TULSA had no blood loss or overnight hospitalization, reduced post-procedural pain, and faster return to baseline activities and overall health. Data collection to 1 and 3 years post-treatment continues to readout of the primary safety and oncological outcomes. [1] Klotz et al 2021, JUrol 205(3):769-779. [2] Eggener et al 2024, UrolOnc 42:S83. Clinical trial information: NCT05027477 .