Pietzak, Eugene J

TPS909 Background: BCG-Exposed NMIBC (a high grade recurrence within 24 months of prior BCG, but not meeting “unresponsive” criteria) is a large patient population with a critical need for more effective treatment strategies that prevent the development of BCG unresponsive disease/progression. The current standard of care is re-treatment with BCG alone, but only ~50% of patients derive clinical benefit. While intravesical gemcitabine (with or without docetaxel) is sometimes used, multiple retrospective studies have found that GemDoce is no better than re-treatment with BCG alone for patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC. A chemoimmunotherapy strategy of intravesical Gemcitabine with BCG (GemBCG) combines the two most effective, inexpensive, and commonly used treatments for NMIBC. Based on compelling biologic rationale and preclinical data, a phase I/II (n=52) trial was initiated of GemBCG in BCG-exposed NMIBC (NCT04179162). GemBCG has minimal side effects (3.8% [2/52] with Grade 3 TRAEs (no grade 4/5 seen) with similar side effects and tolerability to BCG alone. GemBCG has a outstanding early efficacy signal (6-month complete response of 97% [28/29] in patients with CIS, compared to ~50% 6-month complete response w/ BCG alone for BCG exposed CIS). GemBCG has promising preliminary longer term efficacy (18-month HG-RFS of 76% compared to ~45-55% reported with BCG alone, GemDoce, and recombinant BCG in BCG exposed NMIBC). Correlative studies support the hypothesis that the addition of gemcitabine to BCG can favorably modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Methods: Based on the above rationale, we initiated the “GAIN” trial (A032303/ NCT07000084), a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase III study for patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC randomized to either: re-treatment with BCG only (Arm A, SOC) or Gemcitabine + BCG (GemBCG, Arm B). BCG-exposed NMIBC is defined as a high grade NMIBC (Ta, T1, Tis/CIS) that has recurred within 24 months of prior BCG, but NOT otherwise currently meeting BCG unresponsive NMIBC. The primary objective is to compare high grade recurrence-free survival (HG-RFS) between the two treatment arms. Notable aspects of the trial include: (1) the reduced burden on investigators and research teams due to the NCI’s new streamlined data initiative, (2) liberal inclusion/exclusion criteria and pragmatic design to improve generalizability of results, and (3) Cystoscopic biopsies/TURBT at week 13/month 3 for all participants (both CIS and “papillary only”) for multiple reasons including to allow for earlier detection of BCG unresponsive disease for patient safety, increased rigor of the trial, and objectively evaluate urinary biomarkers/urinary tumor DNA. Clinical trial information: NCT04179162 .

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of NAC with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) for patients with high-risk UTUC before extirpative surgery to evaluate response, survival, and tolerability. METHODS Eligible patients with defined criteria for high-risk localized UTUC received four cycles of split-dose GC before surgical resection and lymph node dissection. The primary study end point was rate of pathologic response (defined as < ypT2N0). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. RESULTS Among 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response (95% CI, 49 to 76). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in 11 patients (19%). Fifty-one patients (89%) tolerated at least three complete cycles of split-dose GC, 27 patients (47%) tolerated four complete cycles, and all patients proceeded to surgery. With a median follow up of 3.1 years, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 89% (95% CI, 81 to 98) and 72% (95% CI, 59 to 87), while 2- and 5-year OS rates were 93% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 79% (95% CI, 67 to 94), respectively. Pathologic complete and partial responses were associated with improved PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (≥ ypT2N any; 2-year PFS 100% and 95% v 76%, P < .001; 2-year OS 100% and 100% v 80%, P < .001). CONCLUSION NAC with split-dose GC for high-risk UTUC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy demonstrating evidence of pathologic response that is associated with favorable survival outcomes. Given that these survival outcomes are superior to historical series, these data support the use of NAC as a standard of care for high-risk UTUC, and split-dose GC is a viable option for NAC.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are an important therapeutic option for urothelial carcinoma, but durable responses are achieved in a minority of patients. Identifying pre-treatment biomarkers that may predict response to these therapies or who exhibit intrinsic resistance, is of paramount importance. OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of PD-L1 copy number alteration in urothelial carcinoma and correlate with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 1050 carcinomas of the bladder and upper urinary tract that underwent targeted next generation sequencing, prospectively. We assessed PD-L1 protein expression, copy number status (next generation sequencing/FISH), and detailed treatment response. RESULTS: We identified 9 tumors with PD-L1 amplification and 9 tumors with PD-L1 deletion. PD-L1 protein expression was the highest in PD-L1 amplified tumors. Of the 9 patients whose tumors harbored PD-L1 amplification, 6 received immunotherapy with 4 deriving clinical benefit, and 2 achieving durable response. Of the 9 patients whose tumors had PD-L1 copy number losses, 4 received immunotherapy with 3 experiencing disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 copy number alterations may serve as potential biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma patients, if validated in larger cohorts.