Citations

OBJECTIVE Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) often present with associated mild hyperprolactinemia, described in literature as "stalk effect." The presence of preoperative hyperprolactinemia caused by tumor compression of the pituitary stalk and endocrinological outcomes has been noted; however, a detailed investigation on the impact on perioperative endocrinological outcome is lacking. The authors aimed to determine whether elevated preoperative serum prolactin concentrations are associated with increased risk of perioperative pituitary dysfunction in patients with NFPAs undergoing endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (ETS). METHODS The authors conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ETS for NFPAs between January 2013 and April 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative prolactin concentrations: normal or hyperprolactinemic (prolactin values above upper limit of reference range, adjusted for sex). Outcomes included perioperative endocrinological function and surgical outcomes. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with perioperative endocrinological function outcomes. RESULTS Of 244 patients (140 [57%] males; median age 59 years) with a median follow-up of 65 months, 131 (54%) had hyperprolactinemia. Compared with patients with normal preoperative prolactin levels (n = 113), the hyperprolactinemia group had similar tumor size (median diameter 2.5 cm vs 2.3 cm, p = 0.102) but higher rates of cavernous sinus invasion (99% vs 91%, p = 0.035), pituitary stalk deviation (95% vs 74%, p = 0.001), stalk bending (14% vs 1%, p = 0.001), preoperative secondary hypothyroidism (39% vs 22%, p = 0.005), and adrenal insufficiency (AI; 34% vs 22%, p = 0.048). Postoperatively, the hyperprolactinemia group showed higher rates of new secondary hypothyroidism (16% vs 7%, p = 0.048) and new permanent AI (16% vs 6%, p = 0.046). Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative high prolactin as an independent predictor of preoperative secondary hypothyroidism (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.17–3.44; p = 0.046) and its postoperative deterioration (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.02–7.69; p = 0.042). Maximum tumor diameter was also a significant predictor of various endocrinological dysfunctions both pre- and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative hyperprolactinemia in patients with NFPA is associated with higher risks of specific perioperative endocrinological dysfunction and pronounced pituitary stalk deviation. These findings highlight the utility of preoperative prolactin levels as a biomarker for predicting postoperative endocrinological outcomes, potentially enhancing risk assessment and guiding personalized perioperative management.

Background: In younger patients (<60 years) with cryptogenic stroke (CS) presumed to be patent foramen ovale (PFO)-related, the standard approach involves transcatheter PFO closure combined with antithrombotic therapy. However, due to their exclusion from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), no formal recommendations exist for patients ⩾60 years. This study had two objectives (1) to compare the efficacy and safety of PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy alone (ATA) exclusively in older patients (⩾60 years) and (2) to assess the outcomes of PFO closure in patients ⩾ 60 years versus < 60 years. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases to obtain articles in all languages from January 2004 until July 2025. The primary outcome was risk of recurrent stroke during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), all-cause mortality, and in-hospital complications. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD420250652870. Results: Only one RCT (post hoc evaluation of the DEFENSE-PFO trial) and 11 observational studies were included. In patients aged ⩾ 60 years, risk of recurrent stroke was lower when PFO was closed compared with ATA (5.48% vs 10.05%, respectively, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.45–0.80, p < 0.001, I 2 = 45.6%). All-cause mortality was also lower for PFO closure versus ATA (1.73% vs 7.59%, respectively, HR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.19–0.90, p = 0.02; I 2 = 43.8%). There was no difference between PFO closure and ATA in risk of new-onset AF (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.53–2.44, p = 0.74). Compared with patients < 60 years, individuals ⩾ 60 years who underwent PFO closure had a higher risk of recurrent stroke (2.94% vs 1.04%, respectively, HR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.61–7.48; p = 0.001), new-onset AF (4.86% vs 1.01%, respectively, HR = 4.12; 95% CI = 1.90–8.95; p < 0.001), and all-cause mortality during follow-up (8.32% vs 0.39%, respectively, HR = 8.24; 95% CI = 3.49–19.46; p < 0.0001). In-hospital complications after PFO closure were comparable between two age groups. Due to insufficient data, we were not able to perform a subgroup analysis based on anatomic features of PFO, antithrombotic regimen, or occluder devices. Conclusion: Based on available data, which is predominantly derived from observational studies, PFO closure is associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared to ATA in patients over 60 years. However, these findings are subjected to limitations, including the potential for selection bias, unmeasured confounding, and insufficient long-term follow-up. Furthermore, long-term randomized trials are essential to definitively confirm efficacy and establish clinical guidelines for PFO closure in this older population.

ABSTRACT Background Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are emerging as an essential part of the standard of care for proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease. To date, no study has specifically evaluated the effects of body mass index (BMI) on the antiproteinuric efficacy of SGLT2is. Here we report the impact of BMI on the antiproteinuric efficacy of SGLT2is in non-diabetic patients with glomerular diseases. Methods This is a retrospective, multicentre, international observational cohort study that included non-diabetic patients with biopsy-proven glomerular disease and proteinuria &gt;0.5 g/24 h who received SGLT2is between 2016 and 2023. Laboratory values, including proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were obtained at baseline and after 3–6 months. Changes in laboratory values over time were analysed using the paired signed-rank test. Results A total of 300 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 51.82 years [interquartile range (IQR) 41–62.65], 64.7% were male and 92.7% were white. The most common glomerular disease was immunoglobulin A nephropathy (40.3%). The median eGFR was 52.26 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 36.41–74.01), the median proteinuria was 1.60 g/24 h (IQR 1.15–2.91) and the median serum albumin was 4.08 g/dl (IQR 3.80–4.30). Proteinuria reduction after SGLT2i initiation was significant only in overweight and obese patients (P &lt; .001 versus 0.18). Patients with normal BMI did not experience the expected early decrease in eGFR (P = .16). Conclusions SGLT2is are ineffective in proteinuria reduction in patients with a BMI &lt;25 kg/m2, which contrasts with the significant proteinuria reduction in overweight and obese patients with glomerulopathies.

This cross-sectional study evaluates US state regulation of clinician decisions about life-sustaining treatment for adults, including justifications and regulatory requirements.

Abstract Molecular characterization of high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBCL-NOS), is hindered by its rarity, evolving definition, and poor diagnostic reproducibility. To address this challenge, we analyzed 92 HGBCL-NOS tumors collected across Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project sites. Leveraging comparison cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS (DLBCL-NOS) and Burkitt lymphoma (BL), and molecular frameworks described in these entities, our analysis revealed a heterogenous molecular landscape, reminiscent of DLBCL-NOS but with an enrichment of BL features. By cell-of-origin classification, 59% were germinal center B-cell–like (GCB), and 25% were activated B-cell–like (ABC). LymphGen, a genetic classifier for DLBCL-NOS, assigned a genetic subtype to 34% of HGBCL-NOS. Although classification rate was lower than in DLBCL-NOS (66%), assigned subtypes spanned the spectrum of LymphGen classes, including 31% of ABCs classified as MCD. Features differentiating HGBCL-NOS from DLBCL-NOS included MYC rearrangement (47% vs 6%); dark zone signature (DZsig) expression (45% vs 7%); and more frequent mutation of ID3, MYC, CCND3, and TP53, all common to BL. A genetic classifier that differentiates DLBCL-NOS from BL classified 53% of DZsig+ tumors as BL-like, and those classified as DLBCL-like were frequently BCL2-rearranged. Among DZsig− GCB tumors, 95% were DLBCL-like. Centralized pathology review reclassified almost half of tumors as DLBCL-NOS but did not identify a more homogenous HGBCL-NOS population, with no difference in features between confirmed and reclassified tumors. In conclusion, molecular testing enables a subset of HGBCL-NOS to be assigned to established categories. Based on rarity and diagnostic challenges, broader inclusion of HGBCL-NOS should be considered in biomarker-driven DLBCL trials.

ImportanceIdentifying factors associated with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation for groups disproportionately affected by systemic inequities.ObjectiveTo examine factors associated with self-reported resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in racially and ethnically diverse, community-dwelling US adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) study, which assessed the associations of the pandemic with self-reported resilience of participants from 14 established US prospective cohorts since January 2021. This report includes participants who responded to the self-reported resilience question on C4R questionnaires. Data was initially analyzed from October 2023 to May 2024, with updated analyses performed from August 2024 to April 2025.ExposureRace and ethnicity, behavior factors, health conditions, and social determinants of health measurements accessed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through cohort visits and C4R questionnaires.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported resilience was collected via 1 question (from the Brief Resilience Scale) in C4R questionnaires, “I tend to bounce back quickly after hard times.” Participants who answered agree or strongly agree were classified as resilient, and those who reported neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree were classified as not resilient. Modified Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and access multivariable-adjusted associations with resilience.ResultsOf 31 045 participants (18 672 [60%] women; 10 746 [34.6%] aged &amp;lt;65 years), 1185 (3.8%) identified as American Indian, 6728 (21.7%) as Black, 293 (0.9%) as East Asian, 6311 (20.3%) as Hispanic, 565 (1.8%) as South Asian, and 15 961 (51.3%) as White; a total of 23 103 participants (74.4%) self-identified as resilient. Compared with White participants, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence of self-reported resilience (adjusted PR [aPR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; aPR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11; respectively) and American Indian and East Asian participants had lower prevalence (aPR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; aPR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; respectively). Higher education, being married or living as married, higher income, and overweight were also associated with higher prevalence of resilience. Being female, having diabetes, and being unemployed were associated with lower prevalence of self-reported resilience. Compared with participants with public insurance only, participants with private insurance had higher prevalence of resilience (aPR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10). COVID-19 vaccination and infection statuses were not significantly associated with resilience. Modification analyses showed important racial and ethnic differences in how factors such as hypertension, marital status, and insurance status were associated with resilience.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 31 045 adults, self-reported resilience varied by race, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual and social factors in shaping the perception of resilience.