Caravaca‐Fontán, Fernando

ABSTRACT Background Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are emerging as an essential part of the standard of care for proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease. To date, no study has specifically evaluated the effects of body mass index (BMI) on the antiproteinuric efficacy of SGLT2is. Here we report the impact of BMI on the antiproteinuric efficacy of SGLT2is in non-diabetic patients with glomerular diseases. Methods This is a retrospective, multicentre, international observational cohort study that included non-diabetic patients with biopsy-proven glomerular disease and proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h who received SGLT2is between 2016 and 2023. Laboratory values, including proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were obtained at baseline and after 3–6 months. Changes in laboratory values over time were analysed using the paired signed-rank test. Results A total of 300 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 51.82 years [interquartile range (IQR) 41–62.65], 64.7% were male and 92.7% were white. The most common glomerular disease was immunoglobulin A nephropathy (40.3%). The median eGFR was 52.26 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 36.41–74.01), the median proteinuria was 1.60 g/24 h (IQR 1.15–2.91) and the median serum albumin was 4.08 g/dl (IQR 3.80–4.30). Proteinuria reduction after SGLT2i initiation was significant only in overweight and obese patients (P < .001 versus 0.18). Patients with normal BMI did not experience the expected early decrease in eGFR (P = .16). Conclusions SGLT2is are ineffective in proteinuria reduction in patients with a BMI <25 kg/m2, which contrasts with the significant proteinuria reduction in overweight and obese patients with glomerulopathies.

Key Points In phospholipase A2 receptor-membranous nephropathy, clinical variables and antibody levels over 3 or 6 months of treatment were predictors of remission at 1 year. Prediction models at 3 and 6 months had similar performance predicting remission, with the 3-month model allowing for earlier assessment of response. The 3-month and 6-month prediction models could be applied in those treated with supportive therapy, rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors, or cyclophosphamide. Background In patients with antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody–associated membranous nephropathy, there is currently no accepted method to predict an individual's probability of remission after treatment with immunosuppression or supportive therapy using changes in antibody levels and clinical variables during the first 3–6 months of therapy. Methods Using a cohort of 187 patients from the Glomérulopathie extramembraneuse rituximab, Membranous Nephropathy Trial of Rituximab, and Sequential Treatment with Tacrolimus and Rituximab Versus Alternating Corticosteroids and Cyclophosphamide in primary Membranous Nephropathy clinical trials with antibody levels at baseline ≥14 RU/ml, we derived logistic regression models to predict proteinuria remission at 12 months that can be used at baseline or after 3 or 6 months of treatment. Treatment exposures in the trials included supportive therapy, rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors, and cyclophosphamide. Predictors in the models included male sex and baseline and changes in serum albumin, proteinuria, and antibody levels, with or without changes in eGFR. Results Proteinuria remission at 12 months was achieved in 107 patients. Compared with the model at baseline, the 3-month and 6-month models had better model fit with lower Akaike information criterion (186/158 versus 225) and higher R 2 (52.7%/62.4% versus 25.8%), better discrimination with higher C-statistic (0.87 and 0.91 versus 0.75, P < 0.001), and better calibration with lower integrated calibration index (0.89%/2.22% versus 2.51%). The 3-month and 6-month models had no consistent difference in prediction performance, and decision curve analysis demonstrated similar net benefit for treatment decisions based on either model up to a threshold probability of 31%. Prediction performance was similar after internal validation using optimism correction. Prediction performance was maintained within subgroups of different treatment regimens, including supportive therapy, rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors, and cyclophosphamide. Conclusions Either the 3-month or 6-month models can be used in patients with antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody associated membranous nephropathy after 3 or 6 months of treatment with a variety of immunosuppression or supportive therapy to predict remission status at 12 months.

Purpose of review Pioneering contributions in membranous nephropathy over the last decade have greatly enhanced our comprehension of its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatments, igniting renewed interest in this entity. This review provides an updated perspective on the diagnosis and therapeutic management of membranous nephropathy. Recent findings The identification of antiphospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies in 50–80% of membranous nephropathy patients was a key breakthrough. High or increasing PLA2R antibody levels are linked to persistent nephrotic syndrome and the need for targeted treatment. Given the high specificity of PLA2R antibodies, a kidney biopsy may not be required for pure nephrotic syndrome cases with no comorbidities. Over the years, various target antigens and associated conditions have been identified in membranous nephropathy patients, leading to a reclassification of membranous nephropathy. Treatment approaches vary based on baseline characteristics and changes in proteinuria and PLA2R titers. Rituximab has emerged as the first-line therapy for most patients without severe risk factors, with other emerging therapies under development. Summary Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of membranous nephropathy have moved the management towards a more precision-based approach, though further studies and new therapies are needed for a comprehensive management strategy.

SLE is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease that affects the kidneys in approximately 50% of patients, with the prevalence rising to as high as 70% in certain populations, such as African American and Asian people. Antimalarials—and particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)—are currently considered a mainstay of therapy, together with immunosuppressants. Over the past decades, several studies have extensively investigated the mechanisms of action of antimalarial agents and their potential beneficial properties in patients with SLE in general. However, the evidence for the therapeutic benefit of HCQ in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) derives mainly from observational studies, conducted in an era before the refinement of induction and maintenance protocols for immunosuppressive therapy. Despite the paucity of high-quality evidence on its efficacy in LN, the nephrology community widely supports the universal use of HCQ in patients with LN, and recommendations for its use are firmly entrenched in various clinical practice guidelines. Nonetheless, the use of antimalarials may also carry inherent risks, underscoring the importance of personalized approaches in these patients. Herein, we comprehensively review the available literature on antimalarials in LN, aiming to update the current evidence, limitations, and future perspectives for the use of antimalarials in adults.

ABSTRACT Among all glomerular diseases, membranous nephropathy (MN) is perhaps the one in which major progress has been made in recent decades, in both the understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment. Despite the overall significant response rates to these therapies—particularly rituximab and cyclical regimen based on corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide—cumulative experience over the years has shown, however, that 20%–30% of cases may confront resistant disease. Thus, these unmet challenges in the treatment of resistant forms of MN require newer approaches. Several emerging new agents—developed primarily for the treatment of hematological malignancies or rheumatoid diseases—are currently being evaluated in MN. Herein we conducted a narrative review on future therapeutic strategies in the disease. Among the different novel therapies, newer anti-CD20 agents (e.g. obinutuzumab), anti-CD38 (e.g. daratumumab, felzartamab), immunoadsorption or anti-complement therapies (e.g. iptacopan) have gained special attention. In addition, several technologies and innovations developed primarily for cancer (e.g. chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, sweeping antibodies) seem particularly promising. In summary, the future therapeutic landscape in MN seems encouraging and will definitely move the management of this disease towards a more precision-based approach.