Citations

AbstractBackgroundAlthough the rate of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in African‐ancestry (AA) Americans is higher than that of persons from European‐ancestry (EA) populations, AA participants have been underrepresented in AD neuropathological studies.MethodUtilizing the AD Research Centers (ADRC) infrastructure, we obtained AA donor pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) tissue from brain repositories of 12 ADRC and generated bulk RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) data for 179 samples that met QC and inclusion criteria. Previously generated PFC RNAseq data were obtained for 28 additional AA donors from the Columbia University ADRC. Differential gene expression was evaluated among 125 donors with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD (NIA‐Reagan intermediate or high likelihood) and 82 neuropathologically confirmed controls using regression models including covariates for age at death, sex, cell‐type frequencies, and RNA integrity number (RIN) calculated with Limma. FDR‐corrected p‐values (padj) were calculated to control for the 33,611 genes examined.ResultA total of 482 genes surpassed the multiple‐testing threshold. The most significant, ADAMTS2 (p = 2.96 × 10‐8, padj = 0.001), showed increased expression in AD cases (see Table/Figure). We note that ADAMTS2 was differentially expressed in a prior EA study of neuropathologically confirmed AD cases and controls (Panitch et al. Molecular Psychiatry 2021). Additionally, a recent analysis of cognitive resilience in EA neuropathological AD cases identified a strong association with ADAMTS2 (See Li et al. AAIC2024 abstract). Of the differentially expressed genes observed in the Panitch et al. EA study, 385 (35%) were nominally significant,65 (5.8%) were corrected significant, and most (89%) of these genes had the same effect direction in the AA cohort. Some of the observed associations appear to be AA specific (e.g., EFR3B, IRS4, and CA12; see Table). Additionally, we found nominally significant (p<0.05) associations with expression of APOE (Log2 fold change [L2FC = ‐0.20, p = 0.012) and several other established AD genes including SORL1 (L2FC = ‐0.10, p = 0.014) and IGF1R(L2FC = 0.11, p = 0.0013).ConclusionThis largest‐ever (to our knowledge) gene expression study of AD in postmortem brain tissue from AA donors implicates many more genes as having a role in AD in this population than previously identified in genome‐wide association studies and provides insight into trans‐ancestry differences risk for AD.

AbstractBackgroundTau aggregation is the major cause of several neurodegenerative tauopathies. Tau interaction with other proteins affects the formation of tau aggregates with seeding activity but less is known about its effects on tau‐seed properties. Our previous study revealed that Bassoon (BSN), a presynaptic protein, interacts with tau‐seed, exacerbating its toxicity in vivo. Bsndownregulation reduced tau spreading and overall pathology. Intriguingly, a parallel study associated missense mutations in BSN with tau aggregation in patients, prompting an investigation into the influence of genetic mutations in BSN on tau pathology for potential therapeutic insights.MethodWe generated a knock‐in mouse model (BSNKI) harboring the disease‐associated p.Pro3866Ala mutation in endogenous Bsn. Cognitive and motor abilities were assessed in aged heterozygous and homozygous BSNKI mice, followed by analyses of BSN and tau patterns, gliosis, and gene expression changes in their brains. Additionally, we validated our findings in a human BSN mutation carrier.ResultAt 10 months, BSNKI mice displayed motor impairments on the rotarod, and grip strength assays compared to WT mice. Their brains displayed somatic BSN and pathological tau accumulation, with the gene expression changes indicating alterations in microglia activation, protein degradation pathways, complement activation, and synapse pruning. We also observed an accumulation of pathological tau at the synapses and synapse engulfment by microglia. Histopathological analyses revealed robust microglia activation and co‐deposition of proteasomal subunits with BSN. The human BSN mutation carrier displayed inclusions of BSN and tau pathology similar to observations in the BSNKI model.ConclusionOur BSNKI mouse model, reflecting a disease‐associated BSN mutation, revealed motor impairments and pathological tau and BSN deposits, mirroring observations in BSN mutation carriers. Notably, BSN seems to play a dual role, promoting tau aggregation and sequestering protein degradation molecules, leading to tau and protein accumulation at the soma and synapse, triggering microgliosis and neuroinflammation. These findings propose BSN as a promising therapeutic target for tauopathies, underscoring the need for further exploration to elucidate underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

AbstractBackgroundPosttranslational modifications of tau occurs throughout disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and non‐AD tauopathies. Phosphorylation of tau (p‐tau) in the proline‐rich region is a common target of immunohistochemical and fluid biomarker evaluation. P‐tau217 has emerged as a highly accurate fluid biomarker in AD, however elevated levels are not observed in non‐AD tauopathies.MethodA neuropathologic overview of tau lesions immunopositive for phosphorylation at threonine 217 (pT217) in AD and non‐AD tauopathies will be provided in a didactic format with an emphasis on disease spectrum. The relevant biomarker literature with neuropathologic validation will be highlighted.ResultImmunohistochemical evaluation of pT217 in AD demonstrates immunostaining in pretangles and mature tangles, but rarely observed in ghost tangles. Neuritic pathology in AD with pT217 immunopositivity include both neuropil threads and dystrophic neurites that cluster in neuritic plaques. Lesions in non‐AD tauopathies are also immunopositive for pT217, as exampled by immunolabelling of argyrophilic grains and tufted astrocytes. Digital pathology measures of pT217 and amyloid‐β will be compared with plasma p‐tau217 levels to contextualize the relationship. Additionally, the relationship between neurotransmitter hub vulnerability will be explored to consider upstream factors that may influence soluble tau release into plasma.ConclusionNeuropathologic insights discussed through visual and quantitative comparison of insoluble phospho‐tau accumulation and soluble levels of p‐tau217 may provide neurobiologic insights into the intersection between amyloid‐β and tau in the human brain.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is neuropathologically characterized by amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles often quantified by Thal phase and Braak stage, respectively. Aβ also frequently deposits in the cerebrovasculature with severity categorized by a cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) score. These and related measures often show high variability within AD suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. We hypothesize that, within the AD brain, neuropathology and levels of core AD‐related proteins are influenced by variations in DNA methylation (DNAm). To test this, we performed epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) using DNAm measures from the temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CER) with AD‐related neuropathologic measures (Braak, Thal, CAA) and brain biochemical levels of five proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, p‐tau).MethodsDNAm from neuropathologically‐confirmed AD cases was measured by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) from 471 TCX samples, 200 of which also had CER RRBS. TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three tissue fractions (buffer‐, detergent‐, and in‐soluble) were measured previously by ELISA (Liu 2020). CpG methylation (CpGm) was binned by a 15‐state chromatin model (Kundaje 2015) and averaged into CpGm clusters (rCpGm). rCpGms were tested for association with each AD endophenotype and expression levels of nearby genes through multi‐variable linear regression. Replication of significant rCpGms was performed in two independent datasets with AD‐related endophenotypes (Shireby 2022, De Jager 2014).ResultsOur innovative binning method demonstrated biologically relevant CpGm patterns. We found epigenome‐wide significant associations primarily with tau‐related endophenotypes including 93 that had significant and concordant associations in the replication datasets. These rCpGms also significantly associated with expression of nearby genes showing enrichment in oligodendrocyte marker genes including those related to myelination. In vitro validation of tau effects on oligodendrocyte gene expression through DNAm is ongoing.ConclusionsAlthough all endophenotypes tested are core to AD pathophysiology, our results suggest each has a distinct epigenetic architecture underlying their variability in the AD brain. In particular, we found evidence of DNAm variability associating with brain oligodendrocyte gene expression and TCX tau levels. By discovering AD brain endophenotype‐specific DNAm changes, we can identify core components of complex mechanisms revealing important biological insights into AD pathophysiology.

AbstractBackgroundNeuropathologic inclusions formed by hyperphosphorylated protein tau in the brain are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease and other human neurodegenerative disorders commonly referred to as tauopathies. Tau lesions differ in their disease‐specific morphological presentations, affected cell type, subcellular compartments and tau isoforms present in the inclusions. In addition, tau filaments isolated from different tauopathies have distinct fibrillar structures that potentially underlie the morphological diversity of tau lesions. The factors that govern the formation of disease‐specific tau lesions and distinct patterns of neurodegeneration and clinical presentations are unknown. To address this gap of knowledge, we performed profiling of proteomes associated with phospho‐tau aggregates in 4 major tauopathies.MethodWe utilized the in‐house developed Probe‐dependent Proximity Profiling (ProPPr) method combined with data‐independent acquisition mass spectrometry to profile phospho‐tau associate proteomes in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) frontal cortex tissue sections from the Mayo Clinic Florida Brain Bank. Selected candidates were validated by fluorescent co‐immunostaining of patient brains with corresponding antibodies.ResultIn situ proximity proteomic profiling revealed over 1300 protein associated with phospho‐tau pathology, including 229 proteins that were identified in all tauopathies. The most significantly enriched GO terms in this protein set common to all the tauopathies were related to chaperone activity, guanyl nucleotide binding, cadherin binding, cytoskeleton, and ion transporter activity, highlighting biological processes and pathways affected by tau aggregation regardless of the type of tau lesion. In addition, we identified 32 proteins with significantly different association with phospho‐tau between tauopathies. Immunostaining of post‐mortem patient frontal cortices confirmed some of the findings from proteomics and revealed differences in abundance and localization patterns of several tau‐associated proteins between tauopathies, uncovering a potential of using these proteins as biomarkers for antemortem diagnosis.ConclusionTau lesions in different tauopathies have differences in their associated proteomes that can be assessed by the ProPPr assay.

AbstractBackgroundLimbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a neuropathologically‐defined disease, and it is frequently comorbid with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC). However, the neurological syndrome associated with LATE neuropathological change (LATE‐NC) is not defined. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic‐predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS) that is highly associated with LATE‐NC. These criteria assess degree of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low) based on features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, a mild clinical syndrome, impaired semantic knowledge, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau. We operationalized these criteria using two large datasets with clinical and pathologic outcomes.MethodWe screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and ADNI cohorts and applied the LANS criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; ADNI, n = 53). We compared frequencies of neuropathological diagnoses across LANS likelihoods, compared longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories across LANS likelihoods, and stratified ADNC/LATE‐NC patients according to their LANS likelihood and compared their longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories to those with ADNC or LATE‐NC.ResultADNC, ADNC/LATE‐NC and LATE‐NC accounted for 35%, 37% and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30%, 22%, and 9% of cases in the ADNI cohort, respectively (Fig. 1). ADNC cases had the lowest LANS likelihoods, LATE‐NC patients had the highest likelihoods, and ADNC/LATE‐NC patients had intermediate likelihoods. Patients with high LANS likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo‐limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods (Fig. 2). ADNC/LATE‐NC patients with higher likelihoods had more temporo‐limbic degeneration and a slower rate of cognitive decline, and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo‐parietal degeneration and a faster rate of cognitive decline (Fig. 3).ConclusionThe implementation of LANS criteria has implications for disambiguating the different driving etiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age to guide prognosis, treatment, and clinical trial design and enrollment. The development of in vivo biomarkers specific to TDP‐43 pathology are needed to further refine molecular associations between LANS and LATE‐NC and precise antemortem diagnoses of LATE.

Abstract Aims Although the neuroanatomical distribution of tau and amyloid‐β is well studied in Alzheimer's disease (AD) (non)‐amnestic clinical variants, that of neuroinflammation remains unexplored. We investigate the neuroanatomical distribution of activated myeloid cells, astrocytes, and complement alongside amyloid‐β and phosphorylated tau in a clinically well‐defined prospectively collected AD cohort. Methods Clinical variants were diagnosed antemortem, and brain tissue was collected post‐mortem. Typical AD ( n = 10), behavioural/dysexecutive AD ( n = 6), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) AD ( n = 3), and controls ( n = 10) were neuropathologically assessed for AD neuropathology, concurrent pathology including Lewy body disease, limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), and vascular pathology. For quantitative assessment, we analysed the corticolimbic distribution of phosphorylated tau, amyloid‐β, CD68, MHC‐II, C4b, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) using digital pathology. Results Phosphorylated tau was distinctly distributed in each variant. In all variants, amyloid‐β was neocortical‐dominant, with a notable increase in the middle frontal cortex of behavioural/dysexecutive AD. Typical AD and PCA AD had no concurrent Lewy body disease, whereas three out of six cases with behavioural/dysexecutive AD did. LATE‐NC stage >0 was observed in three AD cases, two typical AD (stage 1/3), and one behavioural/dysexecutive AD (stage 2/3). Vascular pathology was present in each variant. In typical AD, CD68 and MHC‐II were hippocampal‐dominant. In behavioural/dysexecutive AD, C4b was elevated in the middle frontal and inferior parietal cortex. In PCA AD, MHC‐II was increased in the fusiform gyrus, and GFAP in parietal cortices. Correlations between AD neuropathology and neuroinflammation were distinct within variants. Conclusions Our data suggests that different involvement of neuroinflammation may add to clinical heterogeneity in AD, which has implications for neuroinflammation‐based biomarkers and future therapeutics.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONUnderstanding the relationship between amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few population‐based or neuropathologic comparisons have been reported.METHODSParticipants 50+ years with Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers (phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181/Aβ42, n = 505, and Aβ42/40, n = 54) were included from the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging. From these participants, an autopsy subgroup was identified (n = 47). The relationships of Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers were assessed cross‐sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in autopsy data.RESULTSCross‐sectionally, more participants were Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− than Aβ PET− versus Aβ CSF+ with an incremental effect when using Aβ PET regions selected for early Aβ deposition. The sensitivity for the first detection of Thal phase ≥ 1 in longitudinal data was higher for Aβ PET (89%) than p‐tau181/Aβ42 (64%).DISCUSSIONAβ PET can detect earlier cortical Aβ deposition than Aβ CSF biomarkers. Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− findings are several‐fold greater using regional Aβ PET analyses and in peri‐threshold‐standardized uptake value ratio participants.Highlights Amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) has greater sensitivity for Aβ deposition than Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in early Aβ development. A population‐based sample of participants (n = 505) with PET and CSF tests was used. Cortical regions showing early Aβ on Aβ PET were also used in these analyses. Neuropathology was used to validate detection of Aβ by Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers.

AbstractAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by upper and lower motor neuron signs. There are, however, cases where upper motor neurons (UMNs) are predominantly affected, leading to clinical presentations of UMN‐dominant ALS or primary lateral sclerosis. Furthermore, cases exhibiting an UMN‐predominant pattern of motor neuron disease (MND) presenting with corticobasal syndrome (CBS) have been sparsely reported. This study aims to clarify the clinicopathological features of patients with UMN‐predominant MND. We reviewed 24 patients with UMN‐predominant MND with TDP‐43 pathology in the presence or absence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Additionally, we reviewed the medical records of patients with pathologically‐confirmed corticobasal degeneration (CBD) who received a final clinical diagnosis of CBS (n = 10) and patients with pathologically‐confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) who received a final clinical diagnosis of PSP syndrome (n = 10). Of 24 UMN‐predominant MND patients, 20 had a clinical diagnosis of an atypical parkinsonian disorder, including CBS (n = 11) and PSP syndrome (n = 8). Only two patients had antemortem diagnoses of motor neuron disease. UMN‐predominant MND patients with CBS less frequently exhibited apraxia than those with CBD, and they were less likely to meet clinical criteria for possible or probable CBS. Similarly, UMN‐predominant MND patients with PSP syndrome less often met clinical criteria for probable PSP than PSP patients with PSP syndrome. Our findings suggest that UMN‐predominant MND can mimic atypical parkinsonism, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CBS and PSP syndrome, in particular when criteria are not met.

Abstract Predominant limbic degeneration has been associated with various underlying aetiologies and an older age, predominant impairment of episodic memory and slow clinical progression. However, the neurological syndrome associated with predominant limbic degeneration is not defined. This endeavour is critical to distinguish such a syndrome from those originating from neocortical degeneration, which may differ in underlying aetiology, disease course and therapeutic needs. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome that is highly associated with limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy but also other pathologic entities. The criteria incorporate core, standard and advanced features, including older age at evaluation, mild clinical syndrome, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, impaired semantic memory, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration and low likelihood of neocortical tau, with degrees of certainty (highest, high, moderate and low). We operationalized this set of criteria using clinical, imaging and biomarker data to validate its associations with clinical and pathologic outcomes. We screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohorts and applied the criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, n = 53) and who had Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change, limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy or both pathologies at autopsy. These neuropathology-defined groups accounted for 35, 37 and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30, 22 and 9% of cases in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort, respectively. The criteria effectively categorized these cases, with Alzheimer’s disease having the lowest likelihoods, limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy patients having the highest likelihoods and patients with both pathologies having intermediate likelihoods. A logistic regression using the criteria features as predictors of TDP-43 achieved a balanced accuracy of 74.6% in the Mayo cohort, and out-of-sample predictions in an external cohort achieved a balanced accuracy of 73.3%. Patients with high likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo-limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods. Stratifying patients with both Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change and limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy from the Mayo cohort according to their likelihoods revealed that those with higher likelihoods had more temporo-limbic degeneration and a slower rate of decline and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo-parietal degeneration and a faster rate of decline. The implementation of criteria for a limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome has implications to disambiguate the different aetiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age and guide diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and clinical trials.