Citations

The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous ) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Breast cancer is treated with a multidisciplinary approach involving surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget’s disease, Phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of systemic therapy (preoperative and adjuvant) options for nonmetastatic breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org .

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by multiple copy number alterations (CNAs) and somatic mutations that are central to disease prognosis, risk stratification, and mechanisms of therapy resistance. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panels are widely used in clinical applications as the gold standard for screening prognostic chromosomal abnormalities in CLL. DNA sequencing is an alternative approach to identifying CNAs but is not an established method for clinical CNA screening. We sequenced DNA from 509 individuals with CLL or monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), the precursor to CLL, using a targeted sequencing panel of 59 recurrently mutated genes in CLL and additional amplicons across regions affected by clinically relevant CNAs [i.e., del(17p), del(11q), del(13q), and trisomy 12]. We used the PatternCNV algorithm to call CNA and compared the concordance of calling clinically relevant CNAs by targeted sequencing to that of FISH. We found a high accuracy of calling CNAs via sequencing compared to FISH. With FISH as the gold standard, the specificity of targeted sequencing was >95%, sensitivity was >86%, positive predictive value was >90%, and negative predictive value was >84% across the clinically relevant CNAs. Using targeted sequencing, we were also able to identify other common CLL-associated CNAs, including del(6q), del(14q), and gain 8q, as well as complex karyotype, defined as the presence of 3 or more chromosomal abnormalities, in 26 patients. In a single and cost-effective assay that can be performed on stored DNA samples, targeted sequencing can simultaneously detect CNAs, somatic mutations, and complex karyotypes, which are all important prognostic features in CLL.

7011 Background: Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a precursor to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but also a risk factor for other lymphoid malignancies. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), originally defined as the presence of mutations in myeloid driver genes, is a precursor to myeloid malignancies. Recently, CH that includes genes associated with lymphoid malignancies has been reportedly associated with risk of lymphoid malignancies, and particularly CLL. Little is known about the association between CH and MBL and their joint effects on risk of hematological malignancies (HM). Methods: Study participants were from the Mayo Clinic Biobank, a large-scale biorepository of patients who provided a peripheral blood sample. CH at enrollment was determined using whole-exome sequencing (50x coverage). Myeloid-CH (M-CH) was based on mutations located in 56 genes associated with myeloid malignancies. Lymphoid-CH (L-CH) was based on 235 genes associated with lymphoid malignancies. Individuals were screened for MBL using eight-color flow cytometry in two different cohorts of Biobank participants. Cohort 1 (N=3883) included participants who had available sample for MBL screening at enrollment. Cohort 2 (N=5684) were participants recontacted to provide a sample for MBL screening. Incident HM were identified using ICD codes and confirmed via medical record review. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), with time defined as date between MBL sample and the first of incident HM, death, or 9/30/2023. Analyses were adjusted for age at MBL screening and sex. Results: In total, 9567 individuals (39% male, median age 66 years) were screened for MBL with available CH, of whom 17% were positive for MBL, 7% were positive for M-CH, and 2% were positive for L-CH. We found no evidence of an association between M-CH and MBL (OR=1.11, 95% CI:0.91-1.34) nor L-CH and MBL (OR=1.05, 95% CI:0.70-1.55). When subset to Cohort 1, where the same sample was used for both CH and MBL screening, the results held (M-CH OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.83-1.48; L-CH OR=0.82, 95% CI:0.40-1.53). Next, we investigated the effect of each of these precursors with incident HM. Median follow-up was 4 years, and 78 individuals developed incident HM (31 myeloid, 49 lymphoid overall, 8 CLL). When modeling both precursors, both L-CH (HR=6.23, 95% CI:2.46-15.79) and MBL (HR=3.89, 95% CI:2.17-6.99) were independently associated with incident lymphoid malignancy. When excluding CLL events, the association held (L-CH: HR=5.94, 95% CI:2.11-16.77; MBL: HR=2.95, 95% CI:1.54-5.66). Only M-CH was significantly associated with incident myeloid malignancies. Conclusions: In the largest cohort with MBL and CH precursors measured, we found no evidence of an association between them. However, both MBL and L-CH were strong independent risk factors for incident lymphoid malignancies.

Abstract Aberrant activation of GLI transcription factors has been implicated in the pathogenesis of different tumor types including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the mechanistic link with established drivers of this disease remains in part elusive. In this study, using a new genetically engineered mouse model overexpressing constitutively active mouse form of GLI2 and a combination of genome-wide assays, we provide evidence of a novel mechanism underlying the interplay between KRAS, a major driver of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma development, and GLI2 to control oncogenic gene expression. These mice, also expressing KrasG12D, show significantly reduced median survival rate and accelerated tumorigenesis compared with the KrasG12D only expressing mice. Analysis of the mechanism using RNA sequencing demonstrate higher levels of GLI2 targets, particularly tumor growth–promoting genes, including Ccnd1, N-Myc, and Bcl2, in KrasG12D mutant cells. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing studies showed that in these cells KrasG12D increases the levels of trimethylation of lysine 4 of the histone 3 (H3K4me3) at the promoter of GLI2 targets without affecting significantly the levels of other major active chromatin marks. Importantly, Gli2 knockdown reduces H3K4me3 enrichment and gene expression induced by mutant Kras. In summary, we demonstrate that Gli2 plays a significant role in pancreatic carcinogenesis by acting as a downstream effector of KrasG12D to control gene expression.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include common genetic variants and potentially heavy alcohol consumption. We assessed if genetic variants modify the association between heavy alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) by heavy alcohol consumption (more than three drinks per day) for pancreatic cancer in European ancestry populations from genome-wide association studies. Our analysis included 3,707 cases and 4,167 controls from case–control studies and 1,098 cases and 1,162 controls from cohort studies. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. Results: A potential novel region of association on 10p11.22, lead SNP rs7898449 (interaction P value (Pinteraction) = 5.1 × 10−8 in the meta-analysis; Pinteraction = 2.1 × 10−9 in the case–control studies; Pinteraction = 0.91 in the cohort studies), was identified. An SNP correlated with this lead SNP is an expression quantitative trait locus for the neuropilin 1 gene. Of the 17 genomic regions with genome-wide significant evidence of association with pancreatic cancer in prior studies, we observed suggestive evidence that heavy alcohol consumption modified the association for one SNP near LINC00673, rs11655237 on 17q25.1 (Pinteraction = 0.004). Conclusions: We identified a novel genomic region that may be associated with pancreatic cancer risk in conjunction with heavy alcohol consumption located near an expression quantitative trait locus for neuropilin 1, a protein that plays an important role in the development and progression of pancreatic cancer. Impact: This work can provide insights into the etiology of pancreatic cancer, particularly in heavy drinkers.

Importance Neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2–related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are common in hospitalized patients younger than 18 years and may increase risk of new neurocognitive or functional morbidity. Objective To assess the association of severe neurological manifestations during a SARS-CoV-2–related hospital admission with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities at discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study from 46 centers in 10 countries included patients younger than 18 years who were hospitalized for acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C between January 2, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Exposure Severe neurological manifestations, which included acute encephalopathy, seizures or status epilepticus, meningitis or encephalitis, sympathetic storming or dysautonomia, cardiac arrest, coma, delirium, and stroke. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was new neurocognitive (based on the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale) and/or functional (based on the Functional Status Scale) morbidity at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of severe neurological manifestations with new morbidity in each SARS-CoV-2–related condition. Results Overall, 3568 patients younger than 18 years (median age, 8 years [IQR, 1-14 years]; 54.3% male) were included in this study. Most (2980 [83.5%]) had acute SARS-CoV-2; the remainder (588 [16.5%]) had MIS-C. Among the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, 536 (18.0%) had a severe neurological manifestation during hospitalization, as did 146 patients with MIS-C (24.8%). Among survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (27.7% [n = 142] vs 14.6% [n = 356]; P < .001). For survivors with MIS-C, 28.0% (n = 39) with severe neurological manifestations had new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with 15.5% (n = 68) of those without severe neurological manifestations ( P = .002). When adjusting for risk factors in those with severe neurological manifestations, both patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.27-2.70]; P = .001) and those with MIS-C (odds ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.22-3.89]; P = .009) had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study suggest that children and adolescents with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C and severe neurological manifestations may be at high risk for long-term impairment and may benefit from screening and early intervention to assist recovery.

Abstract Rapid developments in cancer genetics and hereditary cancer risk assessments have enabled the identification of individuals at elevated risk for hereditary malignancies to guide enhanced cancer screening and prevention efforts. Multigene panel testing has emerged as the standard approach as emphasized in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of other pathogenic mutations identified through multigene panel testing in individuals who previously tested negative for germline BRCA1/2 and assess the clinical impact of panel testing. Patients either previously diagnosed with breast cancer or with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer that had also been seen by Oncology Genetics at a single institution and tested negative for BRCA1/2 genes but had not undergone prior multigene panel testing were invited via a letter to return for an additional genetic counseling visit to discuss multigene panel testing. Patients were also able to opt-in to a survey component of the study and received an email to fill out the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) and Cancer Worry Scale (CWS). Surveys were completed prior to the initial genetic counseling appointment and repeated after discussion of the multigene panel test results. A total 24 women met with a genetic counselor of which 22 (92%) had a personal history of breast cancer, 1 (4%) had a family history of breast cancer, and 1 (4%) had a family history of ovarian cancer. The mean age was 52.6 years (range, 42-68) and 100% of women were Caucasian. Of the 24 women, 17 (71%) completed multigene panel testing. Of the women that underwent testing, 7 (41%) had negative results, 6 (35%) had variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 4 (24%) had a pathogenic mutation identified in another gene (CDKN2A, CHEK2, and CFTR). There was no significant change in MICRA or CWS scores after multigene panel results were reviewed in the 9 patients that completed both pre- and post-genetic testing surveys. The mean/median summary MICRA scores pre- and post-counselling were 30 (SD 12.4), median 26 (min 18, max 56), and 21.2 (SD 15.4), median 21 (min 3, max 43), respectively (p=0.19, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). The mean/median summary CWS scores pre- and post-counselling were 14.3 (SD 5), median 15 (min 7, max 24), and 13.6 (SD 2.59), median 14 (min 10, max 17), respectively (p=0.53, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Of the 4 patients with newly identified pathogenic mutations, 2 started new screening protocols and 1 underwent a prophylactic mastectomy. In conclusion, multigene panel testing identified pathogenic mutations in a subset of individuals who previously tested negative for BRCA1/2 genes leading to changes in clinical management. The completion of multigene panel testing did not lead to a significant increase in MICRA or CWS scores. Key limitations of this study include a small sample size and an all Caucasian population. Citation Format: Devon Miller, Stephanie Pritzl, Angela Tess, Jessica Gooding, Lisa Barroilhet, Lori Dubenske, Kari Wisinski. Clinical Impact of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients with a Personal or Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer Previously Negative for BRCA1/2 Genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-09-03.

Abstract Introduction Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with several medical conditions (e.g., heart failure, atrial fibrillation) and medications (e.g., opioids, ticagrelor, sodium oxybate and valproic acid). We report a case of a 31-year-old female with bipolar disorder treated with valproic acid diagnosed with central sleep apnea on polysomnography, which revealed an apnea-hypopnea index of 150/hour, central apnea index of 112/hour, nadir oxygen saturation of 78%, and 38.6 minutes with oxygen saturation ≤ 88%. Echocardiogram, electrocardiogram, brain magnetic resonance imaging, serum acylcarnitine and serum ammonia levels were unremarkable. Total and free serum valproic acid level was 33 and < 3 mcg/mL, respectively. Two cases of central sleep apnea associated with valproic acid use, both of which improved upon discontinuation of valproic acid, have been reported in the literature. We started the patient on positive airway pressure and suggested she taper off valproic acid and then repeat polysomnography. Given the possible association between central sleep apnea and valproic acid use, we retrospectively analyzed patients receiving valproic acid at time of polysomnography. Methods We retrospectively identified patients between 2005-2017 who were prescribed valproic acid (n=6,169), and of these 72 received valproic acid within 90 days of polysomnography. After chart review, we were able to confirm that 29 received valproic acid at time of polysomnography via blood levels or clear chart documentation. Results Four patients (13.8 %) demonstrated a central apnea index ≥ 5 per hour (mean apnea-hypopnea index 39.2/hour +/- 32.2/ hour including a central apnea index 11.7 +/- 6.6/hour) during polysomnography. Although one patient (3.4 %), a 2-year-old child with Dravet syndrome and refractory/drug resistant generalized epilepsy, was diagnosed clinically with central sleep apnea, the other three patients were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea and had other potential reason(s) for the elevated central apnea index (e.g., opioid use as needed for migraines). Conclusion Our case describes a third report of central sleep apnea possibly associated with valproic acid, and our retrospective study indicates that this association is rare. Prospective sleep studies on patients before and after receiving valproic acid are warranted to determine if valproic acid causes central sleep apnea. Support (if any)