Citations

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the influence of stroke lesions in predefined highly interconnected (rich‐club) brain regions on functional outcome post‐stroke, determine their spatial specificity and explore the effects of biological sex on their relevance. We analyzed MRI data recorded at index stroke and ~3‐months modified Rankin Scale (mRS) data from patients with acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the multisite MRI‐GENIE study. Spatially normalized structural stroke lesions were parcellated into 108 atlas‐defined bilateral (sub)cortical brain regions. Unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2) was modeled in a Bayesian logistic regression framework. Effects of individual brain regions were captured as two compound effects for (i) six bilateral rich club and (ii) all further non‐rich club regions. In spatial specificity analyses, we randomized the split into “rich club” and “non‐rich club” regions and compared the effect of the actual rich club regions to the distribution of effects from 1000 combinations of six random regions. In sex‐specific analyses, we introduced an additional hierarchical level in our model structure to compare male and female‐specific rich club effects. A total of 822 patients (age: 64.7[15.0], 39% women) were analyzed. Rich club regions had substantial relevance in explaining unfavorable functional outcome (mean of posterior distribution: 0.08, area under the curve: 0.8). In particular, the rich club‐combination had a higher relevance than 98.4% of random constellations. Rich club regions were substantially more important in explaining long‐term outcome in women than in men. All in all, lesions in rich club regions were associated with increased odds of unfavorable outcome. These effects were spatially specific and more pronounced in women.

Abstract Background Obesity is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), but the evidence for the association is inconsistent across molecular subtypes of the disease. Methods We pooled data on body mass index (BMI), tumor microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, and Jass classification types for 11 872 CRC cases and 11 013 controls from 11 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for covariables. Results Higher BMI was associated with increased CRC risk (OR per 5 kg/m2 = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.22). The positive association was stronger for men than women but similar across tumor subtypes defined by individual molecular markers. In analyses by Jass type, higher BMI was associated with elevated CRC risk for types 1-4 cases but not for type 5 CRC cases (considered familial-like/Lynch syndrome microsatellite instability-H, CpG island methylator phenotype-low or negative, BRAF-wild type, KRAS-wild type, OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.20). This pattern of associations for BMI and Jass types was consistent by sex and design of contributing studies (cohort or case-control). Conclusions In contrast to previous reports with fewer study participants, we found limited evidence of heterogeneity for the association between BMI and CRC risk according to molecular subtype, suggesting that obesity influences nearly all major pathways involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. The null association observed for the Jass type 5 suggests that BMI is not a risk factor for the development of CRC for individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Abstract Background: Stool-based screening with fecal immunochemical (FIT) or multitarget-stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests is associated with increased colonoscopy polyp yield. mt-sDNA includes methylated markers, which improve detection of serrated polyps (SP) versus FIT. We compared SP detection in colonoscopies performed for positive FIT or mt-sDNA tests, as well as in colonoscopies without a preceding stool test, using the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, a comprehensive statewide population-based registry. Methods: Across the three groups, we compared the frequency of clinically relevant SPs (CRSP: sessile SPs, hyperplastic polyps ≥10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas). We also compared SP size, histology, number, and bulk (combined sizes). Results: Our sample included 560 mt-sDNA+ (age ± SD: 66.5 ± 7.9), 414 FIT+ (age ± SD: 66.3 ± 8.8), and 59,438 colonoscopy-only patients (age ± SD: 61.7 ± 8.0). mt-sDNA+ patients were more likely to have a higher yield of CRSPs and CRSP bulk than FIT+ (P < 0.0001) or colonoscopy-only patients (P < 0.0001). More mt-sDNA+ patients had CRSPs without large adenomas or colorectal cancers (17.9% vs. 9.9% of FIT+ and 8% of colonoscopy-only patients). After adjusting for synchronous large adenomas, colorectal cancers, and other risk factors, mt-sDNA+ patients were more likely (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.18–2.85) than FIT+ patients to have CRSPs. Conclusions: mt-sDNA+ patients had a higher SP yield than FIT+ or colonoscopy-only patients, particularly in the absence of synchronous large adenomas or colorectal cancer. Impact: Our results suggest that screening with mt-sDNA tests could improve colorectal cancer screening by identifying more patients at increased risk from the serrated pathway.

Objective The radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) represents the earliest detectable pre‐clinical phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study evaluated the impact of therapeutic intervention in preventing first symptom manifestation at this stage in the disease spectrum. Methods We conducted a multi‐center, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study involving people with RIS. Individuals without clinical symptoms typical of MS but with incidental brain MRI anomalies consistent with central nervous system (CNS) demyelination were included. Within 12 MS centers in the United States, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the time to onset of clinical symptoms attributable to a CNS demyelinating event within a follow‐up period of 96 weeks. An intention‐to‐treat analysis was applied to all participating individuals in the primary and safety investigations. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02739542 (ARISE). Results Participants from 12 centers were recruited from March 9, 2016, to October 31, 2019, with 44 people randomized to dimethyl fumarate and 43 to placebo. Following DMF treatment, the risk of a first clinical demyelinating event during the 96‐week study period was highly reduced in the unadjusted Cox proportional‐hazards regression model (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05–0.63, p = 0.007). More moderate adverse reactions were present in the DMF (34 [32%]) than placebo groups (19 [21%]) but severe events were similar (DMF, 3 [5%]; placebo, 4 [9%]). Interpretation This is the first randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefit of a disease‐modifying therapy in preventing a first acute clinical event in people with RIS. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:604–614

Abstract BACKGROUND PCNSL is an aggressive brain tumor accounting for 3% of all CNS malignancies and is associated with poor prognosis. Standard of care treatment includes induction with high-dose methotrexate based chemoimmunotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant or whole brain radiation. However, more than half of PCNSL patients cannot tolerate this intensive therapeutic intervention. Novel treatments are urgently needed. Toll-like receptor signaling pathway via MyD88/IRAK-4 signalosome is constitutively active in PCNSL secondary to MYD88 L265P mutation and represents an excellent therapeutic target. Emavusertib (CA-4948) is an oral first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of IRAK-4 that demonstrates clinical activity in patients with systemic Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, however it has not been evaluated in the CNS space. HYPOTHESIS: Emavusertib has anti-tumor activity against preclinical PCNSL. METHODS Using multiparameter immunohistochemistry (IHC) and proteomics analysis, IRAK-1, IRAK-4, and NF-κB pathway activation were examined in patient PCNSL tissues as compared to normal controls. Plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain tissue were assessed via UPLC-MS/MS for emavusertib drug concentration following single oral high dose in a murine model. Survival responses in preclinical PCNSL models were measured in response emavusertib treatment, along with in vivo tumor proliferation and downstream biomarker expression by multi-parameter IHC. RESULTS Our data confirm elevated IRAK-1, IRAK-4, and NF-κB signaling in patient PCNSL. We show that emavusertib can achieve therapeutically relevant concentrations in the brain and CSF. Emavusertib impairs tumor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, and shows dose-dependent single-agent activity in preclinical PCNSL models. We confirm decreased ERK1/2, MAPK and NF-κB activation, indicative of downstream IRAK-4 inhibition. CONCLUSIONS Our data supports that emavusertib demonstrates anti-tumor activity in the CNS space, warranting further preclinical and clinical evaluation of this agent for the treatment of PCNSL.

Abstract Background Little is known about the strategies used by critical care leaders to implement new practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior studies have identified implementation factors, such as structured communication mechanisms and collaborative leadership styles, that facilitate implementation of new clinical practices. However, the association between differing implementation climates and COVID-19 clinical outcomes has not been examined. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to evaluate the relationship between implementation determinants and COVID-19 mortality rates. Methods We used mixed methods guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to assess implementation factors that were associated with COVID-19 mortality rates across diverse critical care settings. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with critical care leaders and analyzed using the CFIR to rate the influence of constructs on implementation of new care practices. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of CFIR construct ratings were performed between hospital groups with low versus high mortality rates. Results 31 clinical leaders were interviewed across 17 hospitals. Of the 13 relevant CFIR constructs, three constructs (implementation climate, leadership engagement, and engaging staff) had both qualitative and statistically significant quantitative correlations with mortality outcomes. An implementation climate governed by a trial-and-error approach was correlated with high COVID-19 mortality, while leadership engagement and engaging staff were correlated with low mortality. Another three constructs (needs of patient; organizational incentives and rewards; and engaging implementation leaders) were qualitatively different across mortality outcome groups, but these differences were not statistically significant. Seven constructs did not distinguish between low versus high mortality hospitals based on qualitative or quantitative comparison of CFIR construct ratings. Conclusions Application of the CFIR to identify and quantify constructs across critical care settings enabled us to characterize implementation barriers and facilitators at the practice, interpersonal, and provider level that were associated with COVID-19 mortality rates. Improving clinical outcomes during future public health emergencies will require reducing identified barriers associated with high mortality and harnessing salient facilitators associated with low mortality. Our findings suggest that clinical care implementation efforts should focus on avoiding trial-and-error approaches to adopting new practices, while promoting collaborative and engaged leadership styles.