Citations

OBJECTIVE Procedural reimbursement for spine surgery has changed drastically over the past 20 years. A comprehensive understanding of these trends is important as major changes in reimbursement models of spine surgery continue to evolve within various spine specialties as well as broader national healthcare policy. In this study the authors evaluated the monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 15 most common spinal surgery procedures from 2000 to 2021. METHODS The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project database (2019) was queried to determine the 15 most commonly performed spine surgery procedures. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for each of these procedures were obtained from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and comprehensive reimbursement data for each code were extracted. Changes in Medicare reimbursement rates were calculated and averaged for each procedure as both raw percent changes and percent changes adjusted for inflation to 2021 US dollars (USD) based on the consumer price index (CPI). The adjusted R2 value, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and both the average annual and the total percent change in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends for all included procedures. RESULTS After adjustment for inflation, average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 33.8% from 2000 to 2021. The greatest mean decrease was seen in anterior cervical arthrodesis (−38.7%), while the smallest mean decrease was in vertebral body excision (−17.1%). From 2000 to 2021, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 1.9% each year, with an average R2 value of 0.69. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to evaluate monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement for spine surgery procedures. After adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the 15 most commonly performed spine procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2021. Increased awareness of these trends and the forces driving them will be critical in the coming years as negotiations regarding reimbursement models continue to unfold. Greater understanding of spine surgery reimbursement among policy makers, hospitals, and surgeons will be important to ensure continued access to quality surgical spine care in the United States.

The treatment of calcaneus fractures has been a topic of ongoing debate with controversies regarding the best treatment options and algorithms. Sparse literature exists examining the role of external fixation in initial reduction and the maintenance of bony alignment. The authors describe a technique of a medially based 3-pin provisional external fixation for the treatment of a displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures with the review of 26 patients with an average follow-up of 26 months. A fourth pin utilized in the case of tongue-type fractures is introduced as an important adjunct to this treatment paradigm. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level IV—therapeutic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Conduction tissue in the ventricles is closely intertwined with myocardium. Owing to high velocity of conduction, there is near simultaneous activation , making it difficult to discern. Restricted sampling rates and limited dynamic range make real time signal processing challenging for these signals in routine recording systems. Objectives: We aimed to use novel signal processing techniques in a new system to isolate the conduction tissue signals from the rest of the myocardial activation. Methods: We used the PURE-EP™ (BioSig Technologies, MN) signal processing system to record endocardial and epicardial signals from 6 anesthetized canines in an acute study setting. A novel filter based on proprietary algorithms to isolate the high frequency signal was applied at sites where the electrogram signals were thought to have a conduction tissue component to them. . In addition, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced at the end of the experiment and signals were then recorded from the endocardium and the conduction system. Results: This filter was successfully able to isolate conduction tissue signals in the myocardium from those of the ventricular muscle. It did over sense atrial signals at the basal left ventricular septum owing to the high frequency components of the atrial signal at this location. When applied to epicardial signals, it did not pick up any conduction tissue signals. In VF, we could discern signals originating from the conduction system endocardially. (Figure 1) Conclusions: This filter can isolate conduction tissue signals from those of the myocardium and may prove to be a useful adjunct in mapping arrhythmias originating near the conduction system.

Background: Ablation in the sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) within the aorta is fraught with risk, owing to the proximity of the coronary arteries. Assessment of catheter tip position is not very easy at this location owing to complex local anatomy and poor images from available modalities. Objectives: We propose the use of novel local unipolar electrogram characteristics using a new signal recording system to guide the assessment of catheter tip position in this region. Methods: We recorded unipolar signals from above the SoV, within the coronaries and below the SoV using the PURE-EP™ (BioSig Technologies, MN) signal processing system in 4 anesthetized canines in the setting of an acute study. We used fluoroscopy, intracardiac echocardiography and angiography for confirmation of the position of the catheter tip. We recorded changes in the signals when transitioning between (1) the coronary arteries and the SoV and (2) the SoV and below the SoV. Results: The unipolar signal showed a negative current of injury (COI) when the catheter tip was present in the SoV, whereas within the coronary artery or below the SoV, the COI was positive. We propose that the difference in the distribution of ventricular muscle below and above the SoV is responsible for this phenomenon. These changes in the COI were noted immediately when transitioning from one location to another and were present reproducibly in all the dogs. ( Figure 1 ) Conclusions: Analysis of the changes on the local electrogram can provide information about the location of the catheter tip which could prove critical in saving lives.

Introduction: Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a sudden cardiac death-predisposing genetic disorder that has a characteristic electrocardiographic signature. Specific LQTS genotypes have been associated classically with different qualitative electrocardiographic ST - T wave patterns; however, clinical recognition of these patterns could be improved by an automated and quantitative method. We therefore aimed to use a novel, quantitative T wave morphological analysis technique from 12-lead surface ECGs to identify genotype specific LQTS ECG patterns. Methods: We analyzed a genotyped cohort of 420 patients (22 ± 15.7years, 43% male) with either LQT1 (61%) or LQT2 (39%). ECG analysis was conducted using a custom T wave program to automatically detect subtle changes in T wave morphology across all 12 Leads. Classification was performed using the top three T wave features in a linear discriminant classifier by 10x10 cross-validation. Results: The top three discriminant features were (1) a steeper T wave left slope for LQT1 in lead II (2950 vs 1700 mV/ms, p < 0.0001), (2) a greater center of gravity in 1st segment of T wave in lead aVR in LQT1 (0.248 vs 0.209, p<0.0001) and (3) a smaller Tpeak - Tend/QT ratio in lead aVR in LQT1 (0.20 vs 0.24, p<0.0001). Using these top three features, we were able to successfully differentiate LQT1 and LQT2 in 79% of cases (figure 1). Conclusions: An automated morphological T wave analysis was able to discriminate between the two most common LQTS genotypes. This novel method enhances phenotypic characterization of LQT and could have a significant clinical impact on the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected LQTS.

Introduction: Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in select patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The occurrence of device therapies after ICD implantation in contemporary clinical practice is not well described, especially in patient subgroups designated in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2005 Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Methods: The Longitudinal Study of ICDs assessed rates and correlates of device therapies (overall and those requiring shock) up to 3 years post-implant among 2540 patients with LVSD receiving first-time primary prevention ICDs in 7 US health care systems from 2006-2009. Implant data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry were linked to electronic longitudinal health care system data and a novel centrally adjudicated repository of device therapies abstracted from medical records. Proportional hazard models evaluated associations with device therapies by appropriateness, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Subjects were 26% women, 35% <65 years old, and 59% non-Hispanic white. Over a mean 26 months, 738 (29.1%) received at least 1 therapy (median 2). Estimated 3-year risk of any device therapy was 36% (24% appropriate, 12% inappropriate); for therapy requiring shock, corresponding values were 24%, 14%, 9%. The rate of appropriate therapy was higher in men than women (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.43-2.35). The rate of inappropriate therapy was higher for subjects <65 than for those >=65 years (1.40, 1.04-1.88), and lower among 2009 implants compared to 2006 (0.66, 0.46-0.95). Regarding the 3 CMS CED patient subgroups, neither ejection fraction nor heart failure symptom severity was associated with device therapy; for LVSD etiology, the rate of inappropriate therapy was nominally but not significantly higher among subjects with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy of < 9 months duration (1.38, 0.88-2.18). Conclusions: In a representative cohort of primary prevention ICD patients in usual care, rates of device therapies were somewhat lower than in landmark trials, differed by some patient characteristics, but did not differ meaningfully for CMS CED subgroups.

AbstractWe conducted systematic reviews of predefined clinical questions and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach to develop recommendations for the periendoscopic management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs during acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and the elective endoscopic setting. The following recommendations target patients presenting with acute GI bleeding: For patients on warfarin, we suggest against giving fresh frozen plasma or vitamin K; if needed, we suggest prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) compared with fresh frozen plasma administration; for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), we suggest against PCC administration; if on dabigatran, we suggest against the administration of idarucizumab, and if on rivaroxaban or apixaban, we suggest against andexanet alfa administration; for patients on antiplatelet agents, we suggest against platelet transfusions; and for patients on cardiac acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for secondary prevention, we suggest against holding it, but if the ASA has been interrupted, we suggest resumption on the day hemostasis is endoscopically confirmed. The following recommendations target patients in the elective (planned) endoscopy setting: For patients on warfarin, we suggest continuation as opposed to temporary interruption (1–7 days), but if it is held for procedures with high risk of GI bleeding, we suggest against bridging anticoagulation unless the patient has a mechanical heart valve; for patients on DOACs, we suggest temporarily interrupting rather than continuing these; for patients on dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention, we suggest temporary interruption of the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor while continuing ASA; and if on cardiac ASA monotherapy for secondary prevention, we suggest against its interruption. Evidence was insufficient in the following settings to permit recommendations. With acute GI bleeding in patients on warfarin, we could not recommend for or against PCC administration when compared with placebo. In the elective periprocedural endoscopy setting, we could not recommend for or against temporary interruption of the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for patients on a single P2Y12 inhibiting agent. We were also unable to make a recommendation regarding same-day resumption of the drug vs 1–7 days after the procedure among patients prescribed anticoagulants (warfarin or DOACs) or P2Y12 receptor inhibitor drugs because of insufficient evidence.

We conducted systematic reviews of predefined clinical questions and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach to develop recommendations for the periendoscopic management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs during acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and the elective endoscopic setting. The following recommendations target patients presenting with acute GI bleeding: For patients on warfarin, we suggest against giving fresh frozen plasma or vitamin K; if needed, we suggest prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) compared with fresh frozen plasma administration; for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), we suggest against PCC administration; if on dabigatran, we suggest against the administration of idarucizumab, and if on rivaroxaban or apixaban, we suggest against andexanet alfa administration; for patients on antiplatelet agents, we suggest against platelet transfusions; and for patients on cardiac acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for secondary prevention, we suggest against holding it, but if the ASA has been interrupted, we suggest resumption on the day hemostasis is endoscopically confirmed. The following recommendations target patients in the elective (planned) endoscopy setting: For patients on warfarin, we suggest continuation as opposed to temporary interruption (1–7 days), but if it is held for procedures with high risk of GI bleeding, we suggest against bridging anticoagulation unless the patient has a mechanical heart valve; for patients on DOACs, we suggest temporarily interrupting rather than continuing these; for patients on dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention, we suggest temporary interruption of the P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor while continuing ASA; and if on cardiac ASA monotherapy for secondary prevention, we suggest against its interruption. Evidence was insufficient in the following settings to permit recommendations. With acute GI bleeding in patients on warfarin, we could not recommend for or against PCC administration when compared with placebo. In the elective periprocedural endoscopy setting, we could not recommend for or against temporary interruption of the P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor for patients on a single P2Y 12 inhibiting agent. We were also unable to make a recommendation regarding same-day resumption of the drug vs 1–7 days after the procedure among patients prescribed anticoagulants (warfarin or DOACs) or P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor drugs because of insufficient evidence.

Approximately one‐third of patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) exhibited primary abiraterone resistance. To identify alternative treatment for abiraterone nonresponders, we performed drug discovery analyses using the L1000 database using differentially expressed genes identified in tumor biopsies and patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) tumors between abiraterone responders and nonresponders enrolled in PROMOTE trial. This approach identified 3 drugs, including topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitor mitoxantrone, CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, and pan‐CDK inhibitor PHA‐793887. These drugs significantly suppressed the growth of abiraterone‐resistant cell lines and PDX models. Moreover, we identified 11 genes targeted by all 3 drugs that were associated with worse outcomes in both the PROMOTE and Stand Up To Cancer cohorts. This 11‐gene panel might also function as biomarkers to select the 3 alternative therapies for this subgroup of patients with CRPC, warranting further clinical investigation.

(1) Background: Cardiometabolic disease, including insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, are major contributors to adverse health outcomes. Fasting has gained interest as a nonpharmacological therapeutic adjunct for these disorders. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center study on the effects of prolonged water-only fasting followed by an exclusively whole-plant-food refeeding diet on accepted measures of cardiovascular risk and metabolic health. Participants were recruited from patients who had voluntarily elected to complete a water-only fast in order to improve their overall health according to an established protocol at an independent, residential medical center. Median fasting and refeed lengths were 17 and 8 days, respectively. The primary endpoint was to describe the mean glucose tolerance as indicated by Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) scores at baseline, end-of-fast (EOF), and end-of-refeed (EOR) visits. Secondary endpoints were to describe the mean weight, body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference (AC), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipid panel, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) at the same time points. (3) Results: The study enrolled 48 overweight/obese non-diabetic participants, of which 26 completed the full study protocol. At the EOF visit, the median SBP, AC, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and hsCRP were decreased and triglycerides (TG) and HOMA-IR scores were increased. Conclusion: Prolonged water-only fasting and whole-plant-food refeeding holds potential as a clinical therapy for cardiometabolic disease but increased TG and HOMA-IR values after refeeding necessitate further inquiry.