Citations

Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (DRE) poses an increasing therapeutic challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients and solid organ transplant recipients. Surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that approximately 6.5% of E. faecium isolates are daptomycin-resistant, underscoring the need for heightened clinical vigilance, particularly for prompt identification and treatment. In this case series, three patients with advanced liver disease, including two status post orthotopic liver transplantation, are described who developed DRE during treatment for bloodstream infection. These cases illustrate the dynamic nature of antimicrobial susceptibility under daptomycin exposure and highlight the contributions of persistent source control issues, intravascular infection, and altered host factors to treatment failure. All patients were successfully managed by escalating to combination therapy with high-dose daptomycin and ceftaroline, alongside appropriate source control. This series emphasizes the importance of periodic susceptibility reassessment during daptomycin therapy and cautions clinicians against assuming sustained susceptibility in patients with prolonged bacteremia or complex infections. Early recognition of evolving resistance and timely therapeutic adjustment may improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Background/Objectives: Streptococcus intermedius, a member of the Streptococcus anginosus group, is characterized by a marked propensity for abscess formation but only rarely causes native-joint septic arthritis. Involvement of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is particularly uncommon. We describe a case of native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius in a patient with multiple predisposing factors and highlight diagnostic and management considerations. Methods: We report the clinical course of a 72-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with progressive right shoulder pain, erythema, and swelling following recurrent minor skin abrasions from a newly adopted dog. Initial management for presumed inflammatory shoulder pathology included brief systemic corticosteroids and an ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac injection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed after symptom progression. The patient underwent operative irrigation and debridement with collection of synovial fluid and deep tissue cultures. Blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiography were obtained to evaluate for systemic involvement. Results: MRI demonstrated multiloculated periarticular abscesses and osteolysis centered on the AC joint. Operative cultures yielded high colony counts of S. intermedius from synovial fluid and deep tissues. Blood cultures and echocardiography were negative. The patient required multiple operative debridements with irrigation, adjunctive local antibiotic therapy, and prolonged targeted β-lactam treatment. Clinical and radiographic improvement was achieved following surgical source control and antimicrobial therapy. Conclusions: Native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius is rare. Older age, uncontrolled diabetes, recent intra-articular intervention, and possible zoonotic inoculation from canine wound licking may represent contributory risk factors. Early imaging, prompt surgical source control, and guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy are essential when bone and soft tissue involvement is present.

The expanding application of spinal stimulation therapies in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation necessitates a critical reexamination of cardiovascular (CV) responses to these interventions. A key question arises: How should blood pressure (BP) responses to stimulation be interpreted, and does the conventional definition of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) adequately capture these phenomena? Researchers remain divided—some classify BP elevations during stimulation as AD, while others attribute them to intentional neuromodulation targeting sympathetic preganglionic neurons. This review scrutinizes the various AD definitions in the literature, including the conventional threshold (systolic BP increase >20 mmHg), revealing substantial limitations in research contexts. While symptomatic AD occurs in only 4-7% of stimulation study participants, asymptomatic BP increases are considerably more frequent. This established threshold lacks robust physiological rationale and creates significant interpretive challenges, particularly when evaluating interventions designed to modulate BP responses. The current limitations of guideline-based definitions of AD challenge research interpretation and clinical translation. Although several publications describe AD as “unregulated” or “uncontrolled,” it has not yet been incorporated into formal guideline definitions. This review underscores the need for a collaborative effort to refine AD definitions in research, particularly in the context of spinal stimulation. Future consensus development should address whether uniform thresholds should apply across different contexts, how to integrate heart rate dynamics and absolute BP values alongside symptomatic status, and how to meaningfully distinguish therapeutic BP modulation from adverse autonomic responses. This is essential for standardizing research approaches, optimizing stimulation parameters, and ensuring efficacy and safety as spinal stimulation technologies advance clinically.

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a highly disease-focused environment where patients are often perceived primarily through their diagnoses rather than as individuals. The Get-To-Know-Me Board (GTKMB) was introduced as a humanizing tool to highlight patients’ personal attributes and foster person-centered care. Despite being found valuable in supporting humanized caring and fostering communication, completion rates at our institution remained low. Through a stakeholder-driven quality improvement initiative, we tested sequential interventions including reminders and checklists, visual magnets, and educational pamphlets to improve and increase the use of the GTKMB. These measures produced modest gains, with reminders and checklists yielding the most notable improvement. Barriers to using the GKTMB included unclear ownership, timing, and inconsistent integration into workflow. Our experience underscores both the promise and limitations of humanizing interventions in critical care. Sustainable implementation requires multidisciplinary buy-in and integration into daily routines. Whereas humanizing tools such as the GTKMB should be evaluated for their impact on meaningful patient outcomes, such outcomes are not clearly established; therefore, we embark on the necessary first step of a method of implementation.

Purpose: Subcortical functional brain mapping is a valuable technique, especially involving lesions within or near white matter tracts. Motor and language deficits caused by intraoperative damage to these subcortical fibers are associated with worse outcomes. However, there are variable approaches to performing subcortical functional brain mapping. This systematic review was performed to better understand indications and optimal stimulation parameters. Methods: A systematic review was performed by PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Search dates ranged from inception to November 30th, 2024. Studies included adults who underwent subcortical electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping. Results: A total of 55 articles (249 patients, mean age 44.8 years, 114 female) were included. The most common pathology was brain tumor (96.3%), primarily gliomas and metastases, and 24.4% of all cases had a history of epilepsy. The most frequently mapped white matter tracts were the arcuate fasciculus, corticospinal/pyramidal tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, involving motor, language, and cognitive functions. Bipolar stimulation (50–60 Hz, 0.5–1 millisecond, 1–10 mA) was preferred over monopolar stimulation. Among 147 patients with outcome data, 89.1% did not suffer permanent adverse outcomes including neurologic deficits, although long-term outcomes were inconsistently reported. Conclusions: The methodologic variability of subcortical functional brain mapping and lack of long-term follow-up reported limits determination of optimal parameter selection for electrical stimulation although common trends are reported. Functional brain mapping approaches may be guided by the tract and network involved. Further studies are needed to develop a standardized approach and more definitive guideline to its performance.

Objective We sought to characterize factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair (CLR). Design The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database was queried to identify patients under 12 months old undergoing CLR using CPT codes. Multivariable analysis was conducted to characterize complications and associated comorbidities. Setting A multicenter sample. Patients/Participants A total of 11 957 cases (81.9% unilateral CLR and 18.1% bilateral CLR) were identified. Interventions None. Main Outcomes/Measures The postoperative outcomes of significance were surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, and unplanned reintubation within 30 days of CLR. Results The cohort had a mean age of 4.7 ± 2.0 months and a median American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 2. SSIs occurred in 0.6% of cases and were independently associated with bilateral cleft anatomy (OR 2.16, P = .003) and longer anesthesia time (OR per minute: 1.004, P = .009). Wound dehiscence occurred in 0.4% of patients and was independently associated with bilateral cleft anatomy (OR 4.03, P < .001) but was associated with shorter anesthesia duration (OR per minute: 0.991, P < .001). Unplanned reintubation occurred in 0.2% of cases, with these patients having significantly higher rates of multiple comorbidities. Conclusion Wound dehiscence, SSI, and unplanned reintubation were rare complications following CLR. Patients with a bilateral cleft lip had increased odds of both SSI and wound dehiscence.

Importance There is a need for greater recognition of clinical psychopharmacology endpoints, including instances where specific psychotropic medications may become unnecessary, redundant, contradictory, or otherwise inappropriate and therefore merit deprescribing. Objective To address circumstances warranting psychotropic medication deprescribing. Evidence Review The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a panel of 45 international psychopharmacology experts who developed and completed a multiround Delphi survey and conducted a focused literature review between January and May of 2025, in order to identify areas of consensus or disagreement on key aspects of the deprescribing of psychotropic medications. These included collaborative risk-benefit assessments with patients; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors; pharmacogenomics; distinguishing redundant or conflictual from complementary mechanisms of action; managing adverse effects; assuring medication adherence; drug tolerance or tachyphylaxis; medication misuse; and the psychological context and ramifications of deprescribing. Findings Consensus was achieved on 44 of 50 final Delphi statements (88%). Panelists unanimously agreed that components of a pharmacotherapy regimen should undergo periodic review to ensure that treatments target relevant symptoms and have favorable risk-benefit ratios. Key points of consensus were that deprescribing: (1) should not occur without first assessing medication adherence; (2) merits consideration if less than partial therapeutic response is apparent, or if treatment goals have been reached and relapse prevention is not a long-term objective; (3) involves psychological ramifications that warrant attention; (4) should be followed by close clinical monitoring; and (5) risk-benefit decisions should ideally involve active patient participation within a shared decision-making model. Conclusions and Relevance Through this Consensus Statement, the Task Force identified circumstances in which the selective elimination of certain psychotropic medications may be clinically indicated. Empirical trials are needed to assess the implementation of deprescribing protocols and gauge their safe, effective, and acceptable outcomes.

Introduction: Congenital preauricular lesions, including skin tags, accessory tragi, and pits, have long been associated with renal anomalies due to their shared embryologic origin. Despite the common practice of recommending routine renal ultrasound screening for these patients, the necessity of this protocol has not been conclusively validated. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single institution from 1996 to 2025. A total of 109 patients presenting with congenital preauricular lesions were identified. Data extracted included demographics, comorbidities, syndromic status, hearing assessments, external ear abnormalities, and renal imaging findings. Statistical analyses (chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and one-sample proportion z-tests) were employed to evaluate the prevalence of renal anomalies compared to the general population and explore associations with other clinical factors. Results: Of the 109 patients with congenital preauricular lesions, 69 underwent renal imaging, and 34.8% (24/69) were found to have abnormal findings, significantly higher ( P = .0011) than the estimated 1.5% prevalence among the general US population. Hydronephrosis was the most frequent abnormality, while no significant differences emerged across syndromic versus nonsyndromic patients, external ear anomalies, or documented hearing loss. Conclusion: These findings indicate a higher-than-expected rate of renal pathology in patients with congenital preauricular lesions and support a low threshold for imaging regardless of syndromic status or other risk factors. Prospective research is needed to further refine screening recommendations.