Kirshblum, Steven

Background: The National SCI Model Systems (SCIMS) Database was established in 1973 to study longitudinal data from persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI). The SCIMS provides an ideal platform to explore the feasibility of a parallel data collection effort to understand the characteristics of individuals with nontraumatic SCI (NTSCI). In the current data collection cycle (2021-2026), all SCIMS centers gathered data specific to NTSCI. Objectives: To (1) describe the demographic and injury-specific characteristics of participants with NTSCI and (2) assess neurological changes from admission to discharge. Methods: The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination data of participants with NTSCI who were enrolled at an SCIMS center were extracted from the medical records at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Data from 178 participants with NTSCI were analyzed. Results: Among the 93 participants who had adequate ISNCSCI data on admission, only 8.6% had neurological complete injuries. More participants had paraplegia ( n = 58, 62.4%) than tetraplegia ( n = 35, 37.6%). For participants with full ISNCSCI data at both admission and discharge ( n = 47), there were significant improvements in the lower extremity motor score and pinprick and light touch scores on discharge. Conclusion: On admission to acute rehabilitation, more people with NTSCI had paraplegia than tetraplegia, and neurological incomplete injuries were more common. People with NTSCI experienced significant improvement in ISNCSCI neurological variables by the time of discharge from rehabilitation.

Background: The Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) began studying traumatic SCI (TSCI) in 1970. The National Institute of Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) provided pilot funding during the 2021-2026 SCIMS funding cycle to perform an initial study of individuals with nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI). Objectives: To describe the demographic and etiological profiles and inpatient rehabilitation outcomes of the SCIMS NTSCI pilot cohort. Methods: This was a descriptive study of adults with NTSCI admitted to SCIMS centers who consented to medical records abstraction and completed survey questionnaires near the completion of inpatient rehabilitation. Results: One hundred eighty-seven people with NTSCI consented to participate and provided data. The etiology of patients’ NTSCI was degenerative vertebral causes ( n = 67), tumor-malignant ( n = 29), tumor-benign/unknown ( n = 16), vascular ( n = 28), infection ( n = 26), and other NTSCI causes ( n = 21). The average age was 59.2 years. Over 40% of the population was age 60-74 years. The population was 35% female, 59.5% non-Hispanic White, 21.6% non-Hispanic Black, and 11.4% Hispanic. Age, sex, race, and ethnicity distributions did not differ significantly across etiology groups. Only symptom onset time ( P = .002) and marital status ( P = .005) were significantly different between groups. Vascular disorders onset was less than a day in 60% of cases. Greater than 60% of tumor-malignant, vascular, and other NTSCI individuals were married or living with a partner. Conclusion: The US SCIMS program can recruit a population of NTSCI research participants that is consistent with previously published results. Ongoing study of NTSCI through the US SCIMS could provide important data akin to that available regarding TSCI.

The expanding application of spinal stimulation therapies in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation necessitates a critical reexamination of cardiovascular (CV) responses to these interventions. A key question arises: How should blood pressure (BP) responses to stimulation be interpreted, and does the conventional definition of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) adequately capture these phenomena? Researchers remain divided—some classify BP elevations during stimulation as AD, while others attribute them to intentional neuromodulation targeting sympathetic preganglionic neurons. This review scrutinizes the various AD definitions in the literature, including the conventional threshold (systolic BP increase >20 mmHg), revealing substantial limitations in research contexts. While symptomatic AD occurs in only 4-7% of stimulation study participants, asymptomatic BP increases are considerably more frequent. This established threshold lacks robust physiological rationale and creates significant interpretive challenges, particularly when evaluating interventions designed to modulate BP responses. The current limitations of guideline-based definitions of AD challenge research interpretation and clinical translation. Although several publications describe AD as “unregulated” or “uncontrolled,” it has not yet been incorporated into formal guideline definitions. This review underscores the need for a collaborative effort to refine AD definitions in research, particularly in the context of spinal stimulation. Future consensus development should address whether uniform thresholds should apply across different contexts, how to integrate heart rate dynamics and absolute BP values alongside symptomatic status, and how to meaningfully distinguish therapeutic BP modulation from adverse autonomic responses. This is essential for standardizing research approaches, optimizing stimulation parameters, and ensuring efficacy and safety as spinal stimulation technologies advance clinically.

Abstract Background After high‐level spinal cord injury (SCI), motor recovery of wrist extensors has significant functional consequences as it can facilitate grasp through tenodesis. A small seminal study from 1993 established widely used prognostic rules for wrist extensor recovery, though these have not been replicated with larger, real‐world samples since inception. Objective To determine the prognostic value of initial C5 sharp‐dull discrimination, C5 motor strength, and C6 motor strength on predicting 1‐year ipsilateral wrist extensor motor recovery for patients with SCI with neurological level of C4 or C5. Design Retrospective cohort replication study. Setting SCI Model Systems. Participants 35,675 total individuals with acute traumatic SCI with 219 cases of initial wrist extensor weakness (0/5–2/5) meeting inclusion criteria. Intervention Not applicable. Main outcome measure Recovery of wrist extensor strength to ≥3/5 at 1 year. Results The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 57% (95% CI, 47.4%–66.1%) and 66% (56.0%–75.1%) if initial C5 sharp‐dull discrimination was present, 61% (52.7%–69.3%) and 82% (71.4%–89.7%) if initial C5 myotome strength was at least antigravity, and 74% (63.7%–82.5%) and 74% (65.5%–81.4%) if initial C6 myotome strength was at least a 1/5 or 2/5. Synthesizing these three rules, an updated branched nomogram for functional wrist extensor recovery prediction was created. Conclusions In isolation, none of the previously established wrist extensor motor recovery predictive rules had as high of a prognostic value when using a larger dataset. As such, singular reliance on these prediction rules to identify who will gain 1‐year antigravity wrist extension should be approached with decreased certainty. The best positive and negative predictors were trace C6 strength and absent C5 strength, respectively. An updated nomogram provides more nuanced prognostic information to guide clinical care following acute SCI.

Defecation function is negatively impacted in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), who require effective bowel care for stool evacuation. NBD comprises fecal incontinence and/or constipation, which can reduce the quality of life and dignity. Transanal irrigation (TAI) is recommended by several clinical guidelines as the second-line treatment after conservative treatment and before surgical options are considered. As the only class in the second-line treatment with an established safety and efficacy profile, the mechanism of action of TAI has not fully been elucidated when administered through a rectal catheter with a balloon. This review examines the current understanding regarding the mechanism of action of TAI, with a focus on the pathophysiology of neurogenic bowel and irregular defecation. By understanding the functional implications of TAI, clinicians may be better able to integrate this modality into bowel care programs, especially for patients with NBD who have significant constipation due to delayed colonic motility and impaired stool emptying with loss of voluntary control of defecation, and those who are unresponsive to conservative treatment, including enemas.

Background Successful utilization of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) requires a comprehensive understanding of its rules, terminology, and several complex concepts. There have been no studies investigating classification accuracy since the newest ISNCSCI revision (2019). Objectives To evaluate classification accuracy of SCI professionals using the 2019 ISNCSCI edition, identify common mistakes and areas of confusion, and assess associations between experience in ISNCSCI classification and performance. Methods Members of the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and attendees of the ISCoS Annual Scientific Meeting 2021 were invited to complete an online survey that included six ISNCSCI cases to classify. Results A total of 107 persons completed the survey, with overall classification accuracy of 74.6%. Accuracy was highest for injury completeness (95.3%) and sensory level (91.1%) and lowest for motor zone of partial preservation (ZPP; 54.7%) and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade (57.3%). Newer concepts, including the appropriate documentation of non-SCI conditions and classification of ZPP in incomplete injuries, contributed to several common errors. There was a significant association between overall classification accuracy and self-rated experience in the ISNCSCI classification ( p = .017). Experience with the ISNCSCI examination, experience in SCI medicine, and occupation were not found to be significantly associated with overall classification accuracy. Conclusion Classification accuracy of an international cohort of SCI professionals was modest but greater than previous reports. Knowledge deficits about the 2019 ISNCSCI updates are prevalent and contribute to common classification errors. Further training in the utilization of the ISNCSCI is needed.

The predominant tool used to predict outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), in association with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS). These measures have evolved based on analyses of large amounts of longitudinal neurological recovery data published in numerous separate studies. This article reviews and synthesizes published data on neurological recovery from multiple sources, only utilizing data in which the sacral sparing definition was applied for determination of completeness. Conversion from a complete to incomplete injury is more common in tetraplegia than paraplegia. The majority of AIS conversion and motor recovery occurs within the first 6–9 months, with the most rapid rate of motor recovery occurring in the first three months after injury. Motor score changes, as well as recovery of motor levels, are described with the initial strength of muscles as well as the levels of the motor zone of partial preservation influencing the prognosis. Total motor recovery is greater for patients with initial AIS B than AIS A, and greater after initial AIS C than with motor complete injuries. Older age has a negative impact on neurological and functional recovery after SCI; however, the specific age (whether >50 or >65 years) and underlying reasons for this impact are unclear. Penetrating injury is more likely to lead to a classification of a neurological complete injury compared with blunt trauma and reduces the likelihood of AIS conversion at one year. There are insufficient data to support gender having a major effect on neurological recovery after SCI.