Moon, Joon Yong

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a highly disease-focused environment where patients are often perceived primarily through their diagnoses rather than as individuals. The Get-To-Know-Me Board (GTKMB) was introduced as a humanizing tool to highlight patients’ personal attributes and foster person-centered care. Despite being found valuable in supporting humanized caring and fostering communication, completion rates at our institution remained low. Through a stakeholder-driven quality improvement initiative, we tested sequential interventions including reminders and checklists, visual magnets, and educational pamphlets to improve and increase the use of the GTKMB. These measures produced modest gains, with reminders and checklists yielding the most notable improvement. Barriers to using the GKTMB included unclear ownership, timing, and inconsistent integration into workflow. Our experience underscores both the promise and limitations of humanizing interventions in critical care. Sustainable implementation requires multidisciplinary buy-in and integration into daily routines. Whereas humanizing tools such as the GTKMB should be evaluated for their impact on meaningful patient outcomes, such outcomes are not clearly established; therefore, we embark on the necessary first step of a method of implementation.

Background/Objectives: Individual and increasing numbers of comorbidities have been associated with worse outcomes in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD). The association and impact of medical comorbidities on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in f-ILD have yet to be reported. Methods: Analysis was conducted using data from a single-center prospective cohort involving 199 patients with f-ILD. All f-ILD diagnoses and severities were screened and enrolled over a three-year study period. Baseline demographics, pulmonary function test (PFT) measures, and survival status were collected. PROMs, including the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS-30), were assessed at baseline and serially. Thirteen medical comorbidities were evaluated for their prevalence and impact on PROMs and all-cause mortality. Results: Mean age was 69 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 61% vs. 39%. Dyslipidemia (74%) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (71%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Hypertension, diabetes, GERD, pulmonary hypertension (PH), depression, congestive heart failure (CHF), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), were independently associated with lower PROM scores along with increasing numbers of concomitant comorbidities. Increasing numbers of comorbidities, as well as specifically diabetes, PH, hypertension, CHF, and OSA, were associated with greater all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Medical comorbidities may independently impact respiratory-related PROMs in patients with f-ILD. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive comorbidity management in improving quality of life and survival outcomes in patients with f-ILD.

Background: Patient safety event reporting systems are essential for identifying potential risks and improving patient outcomes. However, traditional systems frequently face issues of under-reporting, particularly concerning near-miss and no-harm events, thereby limiting opportunities for organizational learning and harm prevention. This initiative used quality improvement principles to design a new reporting system at our institution to enhance safety culture. Methods: Following extensive stakeholder feedback and multidisciplinary collaboration, a new system was implemented on July 22, 2022. Key features included streamlined reporting, centralized data analysis, and enhanced transparency. Results: Overall event reporting as well as proportional reporting of near-miss and no-harm events increased significantly from around 60% preimplementation to 80% after implementation. Staff engagement also improved, as shown by a steady rise in the number of unique event reporters and reviewers. Conclusions: The new reporting system has improved reporting overall, with increases in near-miss and no-harm events, along with increased staff engagement with the reporting and review process. Our experience offers practical lessons for institutions seeking to strengthen the learning value of event reporting systems. The principles we identified with simplifying ease of use, integrating into the EHR, improving data transparency, and encouraging greater involvement with event review, along with clear oversight protocols, apply beyond our institution and are not limited to a specific PSRS product or system. These initial outcomes support a culture of safety and bolster organizational learning, with future study needed on long-term effects on patient safety outcomes, staff involvement, and increased trust.