Citations

Objectives To develop an internationally validated, structured robot‐assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) training programme through expert consensus. Materials and Methods A RARNU‐specific questionnaire was developed/adapted from previously published, validated questionnaires for robot‐assisted urological procedures. This included five key domains and 11 surgical steps. In all, 30 upper tract urothelial carcinoma experts were invited to participate. A two‐stage modified Delphi approach was employed. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. Modifications and additional statements were proposed during the second round following qualitative/quantitative feedback from the initial round. Results Response rates for the first and second Delphi rounds were 80% (24/30) and 92% (22/24), respectively. All agreed that adoption of a standardised training curriculum can improve clinical outcomes during the RARNU learning curve. There was ≥92% agreement on all proposed RARNU steps. Five RARNU clinical modules of increasing complexity were defined using individual step difficulty and number of prior RARNU cases required, with ≥96% agreement among respondents. Respondents unanimously agreed that the final assessment should be based on a procedure‐specific scale focusing on the hilar dissection, ureteric dissection, and bladder cuff excision steps. No consensus was reached for the annual minimum RARNU volume required for eligibility as a RARNU curriculum host centre. Conclusion This is the first structured training curriculum for RARNU using international expert consensus. This will help guide surgical educators and trainees toward independent completion of a full RARNU.

Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are phospholipid‐encapsulated nanoparticles secreted by cells into their surrounding environment. EVs can transfer a variety of biomolecules that mediate intercellular communication and play a key role in physiological and pathological processes. Therefore, EVs are emerging as new biomarkers for diseases, therapeutic targets, and drug delivery vehicles. The isolation and detection of EVs requires time‐consuming and labor‐intensive processes, first to extract EVs from biological and physiological fluids and then to detect EV‐associated molecules with high sensitivity. The methodologies and instruments commonly used for EV analysis are not widely accessible outside of dedicated research laboratories, creating practical barriers for the study of EV‐associated molecules in biology research and clinical applications. To bridge this gap, we developed a proof‐of‐concept digital microfluidic device that can automatedly extract EVs from 20 µL of culture and human plasma samples within 25 min and detect EV‐bound proteins (e.g PD‐L1) on‐chip using an electrochemical sensor. This work serves as a framework for the development of streamlined EV analysis in both research and diagnostics.

Background: Proximal pole scaphoid fracture nonunions are challenging conditions to treat. When significant comminution of the proximal pole and avascular necrosis is present, scaphoid proximal pole reconstructive options are considered. The proximal pole of the hamate is a local autograft option; however, little has been described on the outcomes of this procedure. Methods: Patients who underwent proximal pole scaphoid reconstruction using proximal hamate autograft at 3 tertiary care centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic union was classified by greater than 50% bony trabeculae across the reconstruction site on computed tomography scan. Results: Ten patients were included. Average age at the time of surgery was 27.9 years, and 60% were men. Average length of proximal hamate autograft harvested was 10 mm. All patients healed at an average of 14.3 weeks following surgery. At final follow-up, 3 patients reported no pain, 3 reported mild occasional pain, 2 reported moderate tolerable pain (1 at the hamate graft site), and 2 had no reports on their pain level. Conclusions: In small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions with fragmentation and avascular necrosis, ipsilateral proximal hamate autograft reconstruction of the scaphoid proximal pole is a viable and reproducible option with high rates of union and patient satisfaction.

Abstract Front-line pharmaceutical interventions for treating acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are not uniformly effective and have toxic side effects. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells with potent in vitro and in vivo immunosuppressive functions. Clinical translation of in vitro–generated MDSCs has been limited because of requirements for multiple, high infusion doses, the relatively low yield from peripheral blood–sourced MDSCs (PB-MDSCs), and inconsistent product quality. To circumvent these obstacles, we developed a methodology to generate MDSCs using human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)–derived CD34+ cells. Compared with PB-MDSCs, iPSC-derived MDSCs (iMDSCs) shared similar morphology, phenotype, and suppressive function. We found that the CD14+ iMDSC subset possessed the highest suppressor function. In previous studies, we reported that MDSCs transferred into mice with GVHD lost suppressor function because of inflammasome activation and immature myeloid cell maturation. In striking contrast to human PB-MDSCs, we show herein that iMDSCs retained 95% of suppressor function in vitro despite exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plus adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which are stimuli that activate the inflammasome via danger-associated molecular patterns released during early posttransplant conditioning and GVHD-induced injury. In an in vivo xenogenic GVHD model with PB mononuclear cells, iMDSCs significantly increased recipient survival without loss of antileukemia effects. iMDSC RNA sequencing and gene knockdown studies revealed that the maintenance of the purine metabolizing enzyme, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, during LPS plus ATP treatment, was linked to iMDSC inflammasome resistance. Taken together, these findings provide a platform for translating in vitro–generated, off-the-shelf iMDSCs into the clinic for suppressing a spectrum of adverse immune responses, including GVHD.

1107 Background: Chronic stress-mediated β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) signaling promotes tumor growth via immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in preclinical models. Blockade of β2-AR has shown higher survival benefit in patients with TNBC in observational studies compared to other breast cancer (BC) subtypes. However, the molecular and immunological features associated with ADRB2 (gene for β2-AR) gene expression in TNBC are unknown, prompting this investigation. Methods: 3,038 TNBC samples were analyzed via NGS (592-gene panel, NextSeq; WES/WTS, NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Immune cell fractions were calculated by deconvolution of WTS: Quantiseq. TNBC ADRB2 -high(H) and ADRB2 -low(L) RNA expression were classified as above or below the 50 th percentile, respectively. Real-world overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection to last contact using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests with multiple comparison adjustments (q < 0.05). Results: ADRB2 gene expression was lowest in TNBC (median (TPM: 1.6) compared to N = 453 HR-HER2+ (1.9), N = 629 HR+HER2+ (2.0) and N = 4,918 HR+HER2- (2.2) BC (all q < 0.05). African American or Black patients (N = 670) had lower expression of ADRB2 compared to European American or White (N = 1,412) TNBC patients (1.3 vs 1.7, q < 0.05). ADRB2 -H TNBC had higher mutation frequency of PIK3CA (21% vs 15.4%), CDH1 (7% vs 3.5%), NF1 (8% vs 4%), AKT1 (3.5% vs 2.1%), but lower frequency of TP53 (81.6% vs 87.5%), NOTCH1 (2.5% vs 4.5%) and NOTCH3 (4.4% vs 11.7%) compared to ADRB2 -L, all q < 0.05. ADRB2 -H had greater PD-L1 (22C3) positivity (39.1% vs 30.2%, q < 0.05), higher % of B cells (4.5 vs 3.4), M1 Mφ (3.4 vs 2.8), M2 Mφ (3.9 vs 2.2), Tregs (2.2 vs 1.3), NK cells (3.1 vs 2.6), DC (3.1 vs 2.9), CD8 + T cells (0.9 vs 0.2), all q < 0.05. ADRB2 -H TNBC had higher T-cell inflamed score (95 vs -80), IFN γ score (-0.23 vs -0.37), MAPK activation score (-0.46 vs -1.7), all q < 0.05; and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes ( CD274, PDCD1, PDCD1LG2, CTLA4, LAG3, HAVCR2, FOXP3, IDO1, TNFSF14, TIGIT, BTLA, CEACAM1, CD47, CD274 ; fold change: 1.6-3.7, all q < 0.05). ADRB2 -H tumors had higher expression of genes related to inflammatory response, IFNγ response, IL6-JAK-STAT3 signaling (normalized enrichment score (NES): 1.9 – 2.1), while ADRB2 -L had enrichment of MYC targets V1, MYC targets V2, E2F targets and G2M checkpoint (NES: 2.5 – 4.2), all FDR < 0.01. ADRB2 -H TNBC had better OS (mOS: 23.6 vs 18.6 months; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.0001) compared to ADRB2 -L. Conclusions: High ADRB2 expression in TNBC is associated with better survival and an immune enriched TME, elevated immune checkpoints and other targetable vulnerabilities. Future studies are needed to investigate ADRB2 as a potential stress biomarker and therapeutic target.