Citations

Introduction Increasing publication of fraudulent clinical trials poses a serious threat to evidence-based medicine. In the VITALITY Study I, we demonstrated that contamination by retracted trials significantly distorts evidence synthesis. The upcoming VITALITY Study II will take a step further and investigate how such problematic evidence undermines the credibility of guideline recommendations. Methods and analyses The VITALITY Study II will adopt a retrospective cohort design and will be structured as three work packages (WPs). To start with, a cohort of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that were contaminated by retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that included retracted trials will be established based on forward citation searching (WP1). Then, recommendations from these CPGs that used evidence from retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that synthesised these retracted trials will be re-evaluated after removing such problematic evidence, in terms of both the direction and strength of effect sizes (WP2). Finally, the subsequent impact on patient outcomes attributable to distorted recommendations will be estimated on a hypothetical population, measured by the number of expected benefit loss and the number of expected harm increment per 100 000 patients (WP3). Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this study as it does not involve human or animal participants, nor does it involve the collection of primary data. We will disseminate the findings through publication in peer-reviewed journals and, whenever possible, presentations at academic conferences.

Abstract Women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC) remain at risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or a second primary tumor, with a cumulative incidence of 14.3% and reported annual risk of approximately 1–2%. Post-treatment changes can obscure imaging findings, making early recognition of recurrence a challenging, but critical skill for breast radiologists. Detection of early breast cancer recurrence, before it becomes symptomatic, is linked to improved survival, highlighting the need for multimodality surveillance imaging. This review summarizes key prognostic factors that influence recurrence risk and should inform imaging interpretation. Incorporating these prognostic factors into practice can aid imaging interpretation by heightening the attention to subtle changes that may reflect early recurrence. Illustrative cases are used to demonstrate the imaging spectrum of locoregional recurrence in post-lumpectomy and post-mastectomy patients. Recurrences often resemble the imaging features of the primary tumor but may also present subtly. The distinction between recurrence and benign post-treatment change is emphasized, with attention to imaging findings that warrant further evaluation. Finally, emerging evidence-based recommendations for risk-adapted surveillance incorporating tumor biology, receptor status, and stage are reviewed to support early detection and improved outcomes

Abstract Neuromodulatory subcortical systems (NSSs) are uniquely susceptible to dementia‐related pathology, leading to frequent molecular and behavioral impairments associated with altered function of these nuclei. Some of these systems display clear sex‐specific cytoarchitecture and signaling leading to distinct physiology and behavioral outputs in males and females, while other regions display nominal sex differences. However, the relevance of sex differences in modulating dysfunction of NSSs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias is not well understood. This review is a joint effort by the Neuromodulatory Subcortical Systems and Sex and Gender Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Professional Interest Areas of the Alzheimer's Association. We review sex differences in NSSs, both in non‐disease states and in AD models and patients. We highlight the possible role of NSSs in driving sex‐specific AD susceptibility and potential footholds for sex‐based interventions targeting these systems. We conclude by outlining immediate and long‐term actions to address the intersection of NSSs, sex, and AD.

Purpose Survivors of critical illness often acquire significant physical, cognitive, and psychological burdens following their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, termed “post-intensive care syndrome” (PICS). Screening for PICS is generally not performed outside of research settings largely due to lack of a simple assessment tool and time constraints. Methods This was a prospective cohort study at a single academic medical center in the USA. We included adults (18 years or older) who spent greater than 48 h in any ICU within the medical center. Following transfer out of the ICU and at 3 months, psychological, cognitive, and physical functioning were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-blind, and Barthel Index. We compared these validated questionnaires to a brief, 15-item PICS screening tool (5 questions/domain) that was developed by our multidisciplinary study team and administered to study participants after ICU discharge to general care. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the ability of validated screening tools administered at ICU discharge to predict PICS at 3 months and develop a novel screening tool for identifying patients at risk of PICS. Major Findings 191 participants completed the initial questionnaire, and 109 (56%) completed the 3-month follow-up. PICS tool scores were compared to 3-month follow-up data from validated questionnaires to evaluate predictive performance. Overall, the screening tool weakly-to-moderately correlated with continuous outcomes of the validated measures at 3-month follow-up. When evaluating sensitivity and specificity for individual domains, the screening tool had an area under curve of >0.7 for all three domains, indicating moderate-to-good sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions We developed a brief PICS screening tool that is feasible to use without prior training that modestly predicted the development of PICS following ICU stay.

Abstract Background Dysphagia can lead to fatal aspiration pneumonia in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Little is known about the longitudinal progression of dysphagia or whether it differs across PSP clinical variants. Objectives To characterize longitudinal changes in dysphagia across PSP variants and determine relationships with disease severity and rate of atrophy in PSP‐related regions. Methods Sixty‐one PSP patients were recruited and underwent at least two serial evaluations, comprising neurological and videofluorographic exams, and MRI. Variables‐of‐interest were the oral and pharyngeal total sum scores (OTSS/PTSS) from the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and lingual pressure assessments. Rates of change were compared across PSP variants and related to baseline scores, PSP Rating Scale and regional brain atrophy rates. Results Dysphagia progressed longitudinally, particularly with worsening in OTSS and anterior and posterior lingual pressures. Rate of change in OTSS was fastest in PSP with predominant speech‐language disorder. Negative correlations were observed between rates of change and baseline scores for OTSS, PTSS and PAS. Rates of change in lingual pressure measures correlated with rates of change in the PSP Rating Scale. Rate of change in the FOIS correlated with rates of change in OTSS and lingual pressure. Rates of brain atrophy were associated with baseline OTSS, PTSS, and PAS. Conclusions Dysphagia and lingual pressure worsen over time in PSP, with variability in rates of change in the OTSS across PSP variants and evidence that dysphagia is related to rates of atrophy.

Abstract Background: Hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (HNP) is a highly lethal form of pancreatitis that lacks mechanism-based therapy. Intra-acinar enzyme activation is fundamental to pancreatitis initiation, yet it does not explain why only a subset of episodes progress to catastrophic hemorrhagic necrosis. Objective: To identify determinants of progression to lethal HNP and test a mechanism-based preventive intervention. Design: Using humanized trypsinogen mouse models and secretagogue regimens, we compared high-dose cerulein with low/moderate-dose cerulein and bombesin. We quantified pancreatic protease activity, performed blinded histopathologic scoring, assessed hemorrhage/vascular disruption, and evaluated enzyme localization and ductal injury by PRSS1 immunostaining. De-identified human pancreatic histology from HNP were examined. We tested a repurposed strategy using clinically approved agents for other indications: secretin to stimulate ductal fluid secretion and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) to promote ductal outflow via sphincter of Oddi relaxation. Results: High-dose cerulein induced robust intrapancreatic protease activation but predominantly caused edematous pancreatitis. Paradoxically, bombesin and low/moderate-dose cerulein elicited lower total pancreatic protease activity yet produced severe, frequently lethal HNP with vascular disruption and lobular ischemic necrosis. HNP was associated with intraductal enzyme accumulation and ductal injury. Secretin or ISMN alone showed limited protection, whereas combined secretin+ISMN prevented hemorrhagic necrotizing injury. Conclusion: Pancreatitis severity is determined not only by the magnitude of enzyme activation but also by where enzyme activity is exerted, implicating intraductal enzyme accumulation as a mechanistic determinant and therapeutic target in HNP. Coordinated enhancement of ductal secretion and outflow with clinically approved agents prevents HNP in vivo, supporting a translatable prevention strategy.

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, heterogeneous neoplasms associated with prolonged survival and substantial symptom burden. However, patient-reported outcomes across NET subtypes remain poorly characterized, particularly in real-world settings. This study describes baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and care experiences among patients with gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs, examining differences by tumor site and time since diagnosis. Methods The Neuroendocrine Tumors–Patient Reported Outcomes study is a prospective, multi-institutional US cohort of adults (aged 18 years and older) with incident small intestinal, pancreatic, gastroenteropancreatic, or lung NETs diagnosed from January 2018 through September 2024, identified via a validated electronic medical record–based computable phenotype. Baseline surveys assessed HRQoL, symptoms, care experiences, and clinical characteristics using validated instruments. Descriptive statistics and standardized mean differences compared responses by NET site and time since diagnosis. Results Among 2367 participants (mean age = 57.8 years; 57.3% female), 1974 had gastroenteropancreatic NETs (659 small intestinal NET, 555 pancreatic NET) and 393 had lung NETs. Fatigue (mean = 33.0), insomnia (mean = 32.5), and diarrhea (mean = 25.7) were the most burdensome symptoms. Lung NET patients reported worse dyspnea (standardized mean difference = 0.58, P < .001) and lower physical, role, and global QoL scores than those with gastroenteropancreatic NETs, while pancreatic NET patients reported better functioning. Diarrhea worsened over time, especially in small intestinal NETs. Most rated care highly (75.3%) but cited concerns about treatment side effects (80.4%), costs (60.7%), and travel burden (58.8%). Conclusions This large US cohort reveals persistent symptom burden and HRQoL variation by tumor site and disease duration, underscoring the need for longitudinal HRQoL assessment in NET care.