CODEL (Alliance-N0577; EORTC-26081/22086; NRG-1071; NCIC-CEC-2): Phase III Randomized Study of RT vs. RT+TMZ vs. TMZ for Newly Diagnosed 1p/19q-Codeleted Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors. Analysis of Patients Treated on the Original Protocol Design (PL02
Minimal Residual Disease-Negative Complete Remission at the End of Induction Is a Prognostic Indicator of Long-Term Survival in Adult Patients with Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving First-Line Therapy
Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an established, prognostic indicator for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between MRD and long-term outcomes (event-free survival [EFS] and overall survival [OS]) in adult patients with Ph+ ALL receiving first-line therapy. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify eligible studies, including interventional and observational studies reporting survival outcomes by MRD status in adults ≥18 years of age with Ph+ ALL receiving first-line therapy. Key outcomes and data elements of interest were EFS, OS, and MRD or MRD-negative complete remission (CR) at end of induction (EOI). Aggregate study-level and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses were conducted. The IPD approach included a log-level MRD analysis to evaluate the concordance of deepening levels of molecular response with long-term EFS or OS in patients with CR and an analysis evaluating the utility of MRD-negative CR over CR alone. The analyses were conducted using frequentist and Bayesian approaches with fixed-effects and random-effects models. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used for survival analysis. Where applicable, Cox regression method with and without adjustment for prognostic factors were applied. Results: The SLR identified 19 publications (18 unique studies), 10 (9 unique studies) of which had sufficient MRD and EFS/OS data. Nine studies (n=704) were included in the aggregate study-level analysis; 3 of the 9 studies (Phase II AP24534-11-001 [Jabbour et al. 2015], Phase II GIMEMAINCB 84344-201 [Martinelli et al. 2017], and Phase III GRAAPH-2005 RCT [Chalandon et al. 2015]) had IPD available. MRD was assessed by polymerase chain reaction in all 9 studies. Findings from the aggregate study-level meta-analysis demonstrated a significant long-term survival benefit (EFS and OS) in favor of patients with MRD-negative CR. This significant benefit was generally consistent across analysis types (base-case or sensitivity analyses), analytic models (fixed- or random-effects), and approaches (frequentist or Bayesian). Evidence from the IPD analysis, based on patients with CR, was mostly consistent with the aggregate study-level meta-analysis, supporting MRD-negative CR at the EOI as being predictive of EFS or OS. Log-level MRD analysis showed that patients who are in CR with deeper molecular response ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01%) at EOI have significantly better long-term EFS and OS compared with patients with other levels of MRD (ie, BCR::ABL1/ABL1 >0.01%). This significant long-term survival benefit was also demonstrated in patients with MRD-negative CR ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01%) at EOI compared with patients who were MRD-positive ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 >0.01%) ( Table 1) or based on achievement of CR alone (regardless of BCR::ABL1/ABL1 values). Results from the IPD analysis standardized for outcome definition, with and without adjustment for prognostic factors (age, gender, white blood cell count at baseline, and stem cell transplant), were consistent with the findings from the log-level MRD analysis. The analysis showed a significant association between MRD-negative/MRD-negative CR status (ie, BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01% threshold) at EOI with improved long-term EFS and OS. The results were significant for EFS in both the adjusted and unadjusted models. The OS results were significant only in the unadjusted model. Conclusions: These analyses indicate that a deeper molecular response at EOI results in better long-term EFS and OS; MRD-negative CR has a greater prognostic value than CR and is strongly associated with long-term EFS and OS in patients with Ph+ ALL. Acknowledgement: The authors acknowledge APHP, who provided the individualized patients data for the GRAAPH study.
Human derived Gut Microbiota Modulates Colonic Secretion in Mice by Regulating 5‐HT
3
Receptor Expression
The human gastrointestinal (GI) tract is home to trillions of microorganisms. There is dynamic interaction between the gut microbiota and the human host, but how gut microbiota modulates GI physiology is largely unknown. A recent study from our laboratory showed that human gut microbiota increases host serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine, 5‐HT) biosynthesis. 5‐HT is an important neurotransmitter and a paracrine messenger in the GI tract that increases intestinal secretion primarily through 5‐HT 3 and 5‐HT 4 receptors. In this study we investigated whether gut microbiota modulate 5‐HT 3 R and 5‐HT 4 R expression and host secretory response to 5‐HT. Methods We used proximal colon mucosa‐submucosa preparations from germ free (GF) and humanized (ex‐GF colonized with human bacteria for 4–5 weeks; HM) male mice. The change in short circuit current (ΔIsc) was determined in response to increasing concentrations of 5‐HT (0.003–300μM) on the submucosal side either alone or in the presence of 5‐HT 3 R antagonist ondansetron (100nM) in an Ussing chamber. Receptor expression was quantified using rt‐PCR (normalized to L32) and western blot (normalized to GAPDH). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to determine localization of 5‐HT 3 R in the paraformaldehyde‐fixed 10μm sections from proximal colonic epithelium. Differences between groups were tested using Mann‐Whitney U (Mdn; IQ range) with P ‐value lower than 0.05 considered significant. Results 5‐HT induced ΔIsc was significantly higher in GF than HM mice (218; 184–274 vs 163; 132–182 μA/cm 2 , n=6, P = 0.04). To determine if this change was due to an alteration in 5‐HTR, we quantified receptor expression. We found significantly higher 5‐HT 3 R mRNA expression (1.82; 1.08–2.80 vs 1.00; 0.33–1.38, n=8–9, P = 0.046) in GF compared to HM mice, but no change in 5‐HT 4 R expression. 5‐HT 3 R protein expression was also significantly higher in GF mice compared to HM (4.62; 1.06–6.14 vs 1.00; 1–1.3, n= 11–12, P = 0.01) mice. There was a significantly higher ΔIsc in GF compared to HM (87.1; 51.7–149 vs 37.0; 19.5–44 μA/cm 2 , n=5, P = 0.02) mice, following application of 2‐methyl 5‐hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (selective 5‐HT 3 R agonist) suggesting increased receptor expression augments secretory response. Furthermore, ondansetron significantly blocked 5‐HT induced maximum ΔIsc in GF mice (201; 189–260 vs 117.6; 92–149 μA/cm 2 , n=6–8, P = 0.001) but not in HM mice (163; 132–182 vs 120; 107–150 μA/cm 2 , n=6, P = 0.24). To determine the expression of 5‐HT 3 R in mouse colon mucosa‐submucosa we used 5‐HT 3 –tagged GFP mice. IHC identified 5‐HT 3 R‐GFP positive cells in the mouse colonic epithelium. To ascertain if the significant difference in 5‐HT‐induced ΔIsc between GF and HM mice (188; 152–200 vs 125; 99–139 μA/cm 2 , n=5, P = 0.008) is driven by epithelial 5‐HT 3 R, we measured the response in the presence of TTX (block neuronal transmission). TTX (500 nM) had no effect of ondansetron inhibition of 5‐HT‐induced ΔIsc, suggesting a role for epithelial 5HT 3 R. Conclusion Gut microbial colonization decreases host secretory response to 5‐HT by downregulating 5‐HT 3 R expression. Epithelial 5‐HT 3 R may be important in gut microbiota modulation of intestinal secretion Support or Funding Information NIH K08 DK
Comparison of health care costs and resource utilization for commonly used proteasome inhibitor–immunomodulatory drug-based triplet regimens for the management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the United States
SummaryBackgroundAlpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is caused by mutations in SERPINA1, which encodes alpha‐1 antitrypsin, a protease inhibitor (Pi). Individuals with AATD and the homozygous Pi*ZZ genotype have variable risk of progressive liver disease but the influence of comorbid lung disease is poorly understood.AimsTo characterise patients with AATD Pi*ZZ and liver disease (AATD‐LD‐Pi*ZZ) with or without lung disease and describe liver disease‐related clinical events longitudinally.MethodsThis was an observational cohort study of patients in the Mayo Clinic Healthcare System (January 2000–September 2021). Patients were identified using diagnosis codes and natural language processing. Fibrosis stage (F0–F4) was assessed using a hierarchical approach at baseline (90 days before or after the index date) and follow‐up. Clinical events associated with liver disease progression were assessed.ResultsAATD‐LD‐Pi*ZZ patients with lung disease had a longer median time from AATD diagnosis to liver disease diagnosis versus those without lung disease (2.2 vs. 0.2 years, respectively). Compared to those without lung disease, patients with lung disease had a longer time to liver disease‐related clinical events (8.5 years and not reached, respectively). AATD‐LD‐Pi*ZZ patients without lung disease were more likely to undergo liver transplantation compared with those with lung disease.ConclusionIn patients with AATD and lung disease, there is a delay in the diagnosis of comorbid liver disease. Our findings suggest that liver disease may progress more rapidly in patients without comorbid lung disease.
Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT4 receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
SummaryBackgroundGastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction.AimTo evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT4 receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented delayed gastric emptying of solids.MethodsSingle‐centre, placebo‐controlled study of 36 participants receiving placebo, 0.1mg, 0.3mg or 1.0mg of felcisetrag I.V. infusion, daily, for 3 days. At baseline, each participant completed a 4h, 99mTc‐egg meal (300 kcal, 30% fat) gastric emptying test. Following infusion (Day 2), gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids were measured over 48h (same meal plus 111In‐charcoal delivered in methacrylate‐coated capsule). Samples were collected for pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was gastric emptying T1/2. Statistical analysis used baseline parameters as covariates (ANCOVA).ResultsPatients (22 idiopathic, 14 diabetic gastroparesis) were randomised to felcisetrag (0.1 mg, n = 10; 0.3 mg, n = 9; 1.0 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Compared to placebo, felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric emptying T1/2, colonic filling at 6h, and 10% small bowel transit time (overall P < 0.01; all three doses individually Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) for all three measurements. Ascending colon emptying (T1/2) was significantly accelerated (all doses), and colonic transit at 48 hours was accelerated with 0.1 mg and 0.3 mg felcisetrag compared to placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were dose proportional. Felcisetrag was well tolerated with no clinically significant findings from clinical laboratory, vital signs or ECG.ConclusionI.V. felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric, small bowel and colonic transit in patients with gastroparesis, and should be further evaluated for short‐term treatment of gastric and intestinal motility disorders.ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03281577
Practical Primer Addressing Real-World Use Scenarios of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease: Post Hoc Analyses of VISIBLE Studies
Abstract Background Vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin approved for intravenous (IV) treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), was evaluated as a subcutaneous (SC) formulation in maintenance therapy for UC and CD in phase 3 VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension studies, and recently approved in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IV and SC vedolizumab in clinically relevant UC and CD scenarios. Methods Post hoc data analyses from VISIBLE trials examined: (1) whether baseline characteristics predict clinical response to 2 vs 3 IV vedolizumab induction doses; (2) efficacy and safety of switching during maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC in patients with UC; (3) vedolizumab SC after treatment interruption of 1–46 weeks; (4) increasing dose frequency of vedolizumab SC from every 2 weeks (Q2W) to every week (QW) after disease worsening. Results No baseline characteristics were identified as strong predictors of response to 2 vs 3 vedolizumab infusions. Most patients achieved clinical response after 2 or 3 doses of IV vedolizumab maintained with SC treatment. Clinical remission and response rates were maintained in patients transitioned from maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC treatment. Of patients with UC, ≥75% achieved response following resumption after dose interruption. Escalation to QW dosing resulted in ≥45% of patients regaining response after loss while receiving vedolizumab Q2W. Conclusions Clinical real-world scenarios with vedolizumab SC were reviewed using VISIBLE studies data. Vedolizumab SC provides an additional dosing option for patients with UC and CD.
Late versus early response and depth of response are associated with improved outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in the TOURMALINE‐MM2 trial
AbstractDeeper responses are associated with longer survival in multiple myeloma (MM); however, limited data exist on the impact of response kinetics on outcomes. We investigated progression‐free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) by response depth and in early (best confirmed response 0–4 months; n = 424) versus late responders (best confirmed response >4 months; n = 281). Newly diagnosed patients enrolled in TOURMALINE‐MM2 receiving ixazomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (IRd) (n = 351) or placebo‐Rd (n = 354) were evaluated post hoc. Deeper responses were associated with longer PFS (complete response [CR] not reached [NR], very good partial response [VGPR] 37.2 months, partial response [PR] 16.4 months) and DOR (CR NR, VGPR 42.6 months, PR 15.4 months). Among patients with a PFS (n = 511) or DOR (n = 484) of ≥6 months who achieved ≥PR, median PFS was prolonged among late versus early responders receiving IRd (59.7 vs. 17.9 months) or placebo‐Rd (56.6 vs. 12.4 months), as was median DOR (IRd, NR vs. 20.9 months; placebo‐Rd, 58.2 vs. 11.7 months). While the treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed MM is treatment to progression, our findings suggest slowness of response to a proteasome inhibitor‐immunomodulatory drug‐steroid combination is not a negative predictor of outcome.
Transplantation Outcomes with Donor Hearts after Circulatory Death