Candela, Ninfa

Abstract Background Vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin approved for intravenous (IV) treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), was evaluated as a subcutaneous (SC) formulation in maintenance therapy for UC and CD in phase 3 VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension studies, and recently approved in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IV and SC vedolizumab in clinically relevant UC and CD scenarios. Methods Post hoc data analyses from VISIBLE trials examined: (1) whether baseline characteristics predict clinical response to 2 vs 3 IV vedolizumab induction doses; (2) efficacy and safety of switching during maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC in patients with UC; (3) vedolizumab SC after treatment interruption of 1–46 weeks; (4) increasing dose frequency of vedolizumab SC from every 2 weeks (Q2W) to every week (QW) after disease worsening. Results No baseline characteristics were identified as strong predictors of response to 2 vs 3 vedolizumab infusions. Most patients achieved clinical response after 2 or 3 doses of IV vedolizumab maintained with SC treatment. Clinical remission and response rates were maintained in patients transitioned from maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC treatment. Of patients with UC, ≥75% achieved response following resumption after dose interruption. Escalation to QW dosing resulted in ≥45% of patients regaining response after loss while receiving vedolizumab Q2W. Conclusions Clinical real-world scenarios with vedolizumab SC were reviewed using VISIBLE studies data. Vedolizumab SC provides an additional dosing option for patients with UC and CD.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective α 4β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody approved for IV administration for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The phase 3 VISIBLE 1 study evaluated SC VDZ for UC maintenance therapy. After 2 IV doses, 56.1% patients had a clinical response at week 6; among patients who received a third induction infusion, clinical response rates were 79.7%. In this post hoc analysis, we examined baseline characteristics as predictors of clinical response to IV induction with VDZ. Methods In the VISIBLE 1 study (NCT02611830; EudraCT 2015-000480-14), patients (patients) received IV VDZ 300 mg at Weeks 0 and 2. At Week 6, clinical responders were randomised to maintenance SC therapy; nonresponders were given a third IV dose and reassessed at Week 14. As endoscopy was only available at Week 6, the clinical response at Week 6 was defined as ≥3 points and ≥30% reduction in complete Mayo score from Week 0 and at Week 14 as a ≥2 points and ≥25% reduction in partial Mayo score from Week 0. Both definitions also included an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or absolute subscore ≤1. Results Overall, 383 patients received ≥1 dose of IV VDZ. Of these, 56.1% responded at Week 6 after 2 VDZ doses. Of the 143 patients who received 3 IV doses, 79.7% responded at Week 14. No clinically meaningful differences in baseline demographic and disease characteristics were observed between patients who responded after 2 or 3 IV doses (Table). Differences in disease location and partial Mayo score (< or ≥6) were observed between the responders and nonresponders in the 3 IV dose group. Baseline characteristics were evaluated descriptively to assess predictors of clinical response after 2 or 3 IV VDZ doses. Conclusion Clinical response was achieved by most patients after either 2 or 3 IV VDZ infusions in the VISIBLE 1 trial. Post hoc analyses revealed no clinically meaningful differences in baseline characteristics or disease characteristics that could serve as predictors of response following 2 or 3 VDZ infusions. Further real-world experience may elucidate potential predictors of response to VDZ.