Wang, Xiao‐Jing

ABSTRACT Levator ani syndrome (LAS) explains up to 7.4% of anorectal pain cases. Classic symptoms include rectal pain or pressure with sitting. We present 2 patients, ages 32 and 25 years, presenting initially with “diarrhea” and perianal hyperhidrosis. History revealed rectal discomfort, tenesmus, urgency, and sensation of incomplete evacuation. Puborectalis tenderness was present on digital rectal examination. Therapies were tailored to each patient, including pelvic floor physical therapy with biofeedback, bowel regulation, rectal diazepam, and ileostomy. These presentations offer insights into potential pathophysiological mechanisms in LAS and highlight the importance of considering LAS in non-pain presentations.

Abstract Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder of gut-brain interaction that impacts a significant portion of the population and is associated with substantial morbidity, reduced quality of life, and economic impact globally. The pathophysiology of IBS is complex and incompletely understood, and the heterogeneity of IBS is reflected in the variety of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical therapies utilized for the management of IBS. Given limitations with pharmaceutical treatments, many patients with IBS seek non-pharmaceutical options. Several non-pharmaceutical treatments such as the low FODMAP diet and brain-gut behavior interventions such as gut directed hypnosis and cognitive behavioral therapy are now considered standard of care and are part of all major guidelines for the treatment of IBS. However, challenges with access to and optimal implementation of these therapies remain. This review focuses on the current evidence for common non-pharmaceutical treatments for IBS, including the latest advances in dietary and brain-gut behavioral care, in addition other complementary and integrative health practices and emerging therapies.

Abstract Endometriosis is a chronic painful condition affecting 10% of reproductive-aged women with a high prevalence of overlapping gastrointestinal symptoms. There is a significant diagnostic delay for endometriosis and current screening practices for endometriosis in gastroenterology clinic populations have not been evaluated. 112 gastroenterology providers (57.5% females, 64.3% physicians) completed an anonymized exploratory survey (40.1% response rate). Most respondents (59.4%) currently do not screen for endometriosis, but the majority (72.1%) reported they would be “extremely likely” or “somewhat likely” to screen for endometriosis after being presented with data on the high prevalence of chronic GI symptoms in patients with endometriosis.