Citations

Abstract Background and Objectives To assess the efficacy of a local volunteer program, delirium optimization with volunteer engagement (DOVE), in preventing in-hospital delirium. Research Design and Methods Between February 2023 and June 2024, volunteers provided structured interventions to patients at risk for delirium, as identified by the Delirium Risk Assessment (DRA) score. Interventions are humanities-based and included sensory aide assistance, completion of “get to know me” forms, and conversation. Data were retrospectively acquired from electronic health records and compared to a control cohort from another medical unit. Delirium occurrence was captured when the nursing confusion assessment method (CAM) documentation was positive, or a clinician documented delirium diagnoses. Cohorts were matched 1:2 (DOVE vs Control) by age, gender, DRA score, month/year of admission, and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 168 patients received interventions by DOVE volunteers, of which 139 were matched with 261 controls. In-hospital delirium occurrence was lower in the DOVE cohort compared to the control cohort (46.8% vs 56.7%; p = .015). Conditional logistic regressions demonstrated a lower odds ratio (OR) for delirium occurrence, 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.34–0.89; p = .015) associated with DOVE intervention. Subgroup analyses of delirium occurrence among patients with DRA score of 3–4 demonstrated an OR of 0.56 (95% CI; 0.31–1.01; p = .053) between the DOVE and control cohorts. Discussion and Implications In-hospital delirium occurrence was ∼10% lower among DOVE cohort patients. This humanities-based intervention offers a feasible strategy, particularly during times of staffing shortages, and should be considered for broader implementation across healthcare institutions.

Background: Patients with low gradient non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) at rest, in the context of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (less than 50%), occasionally undergo dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE). However, limited data is available in the literature regarding the utility of DSE in this context. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with non-severe AS and LVEF less than 50% at rest who underwent DSE after Institutional Review Board approval. Retrospective data was extracted including rest and DSE parameters using an internal database. Only patients greater than 18 years old, who had an LVEF less than 50%, mean gradient (MG) less than 40 mmHg, and valve area greater than or equal to 1 cm 2 at rest were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate regression methods were used to identify which resting variables were associated with severe AS (MG greater than 40 mm Hg and valve area less than 1 cm 2 ) with DSE. Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 78 years (±9) and 84% were male. The mean resting LVEF was 34% (±8%) while it was 40% (±12%) with DSE, mean stroke volume index at rest was 39 mL/m2 (±9) while it was 45 mL/m2 (±10) with DSE, MG at rest was 20 mmHg (±7) while it was 31 mmHg (±10) with DSE, and mean aortic valve area at rest was 1.27 cm 2 (±0.27) while it was 1.24 cm 2 (±0.29) with DSE. Of the 124 patients with non-severe AS at rest, 13 (10.5%) patients had severe AS with DSE. MG at rest was associated with severe AS (OR 1.3; 95% Cl: 1.1 - 1.5; p < 0.001) in a multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for age, sex, LVEF at rest, SV index at rest. Resting aortic valve mean gradient also showed the highest AUC in relation to likelihood of having severe AS (0.87) (figure 1). Conclusion: Our study indicated that DSE remains useful in identifying severe AS in certain patients (up to 10%) who exhibit non-severe AS at rest in the setting of reduced LVEF. Additionally, MG at rest is the most reliable parameter to determine those who may benefit from undergoing DSE. This is one of the first studies to our knowledge in the literature suggesting that DSE may still be useful in identifying severe AS patients despite non-severe AS (i.e., valve area greater than or equal to 1 cm 2 ) at rest with reduced LVEF. Further research is warranted to validate our findings.

Introduction: Knee injuries constitute a significant proportion of sports-related injuries. Osseous oedema can present in specific patterns with certain injuries Objective: This study aims to analyse the patterns of bone marrow contusion in the lateral tibial condyle (LTC) post knee trauma, categorising the condyle into anterior, middle, and posterior thirds, and to evaluate the prevalence of associated ligamentous and meniscal injuries. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 patients (92 males, 58 females) with an average age of 16.9 years, who underwent MRI within one week following knee trauma. The LTC was divided into anterior, middle, and posterior thirds for analysis. The bone marrow contusion patterns, along with associated ACL, MCL, PCL, LCL, medial meniscus, and lateral meniscus injuries, were documented. Results and Analysis: Bone marrow oedema in the LTC was observed as follows: anterior one third in 6, middle third in 13, and posterior third in 31 cases. The analysis revealed the following injury associations: Anterior one-third osseous oedema was associated with ACL injuries in two cases, MCL injuries in 3, PCL in 1, and medial meniscus injuries in 1. Middle one-third osseous oedema was associated with ACL injuries in 11 cases, MCL injuries in 3, medial meniscus injuries in two cases, and lateral meniscus injuries in 2. Posterior third osseous oedema was associated with ACL injuries in 28 cases, MCL injuries in 9, and medial meniscus injuries in four cases. Conclusion: The study highlights a clear association between the location of LTC bone marrow oedema and specific patterns of ligamentous and meniscal injuries. The posterior third, with the highest incidence of oedema, showed a strong correlation with ACL and MCL injuries, while anterior and middle oedema also demonstrated significant associations with ACL and MCL, and varied involvement of meniscal injuries. These insights contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of knee injury mechanisms, advocating for precise diagnostic strategies and potentially guiding more effective treatment protocols in radiological and orthopaedic practice.

Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with a higher obliteration rate compared with embolization in patients with eloquent brain arteriovenous malformations, whereas there was no evidence of a difference in functional outcomes or complications after adjustment.

ABSTRACTSurgical biopsy of brainstem tumors carries a risk of neurological injury. We performed magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of 2‐hydroxyglutarate (2HG) and glycine in patients with brainstem tumors to assess the feasibility of detecting and quantifying 2HG in the brainstem to obviate the need for a diagnostic biopsy and to establish the clinical significance of glycine MRS in brainstem tumors in vivo. Twenty adult patients with radiographically identified presumed brainstem gliomas were prospectively enrolled in the study. Proton MRS was obtained at 3T with a protocol tailored for detection of 2HG and glycine (TE 97‐ms PRESS). Spectra were fit using LCModel software and in‐house basis signals of metabolites and lipids. The metabolite concentrations were quantified with reference to water and examined with respect to clinical outcomes, including postgadolinium MRI and overall survival time. MRS data from 19 patients were included in subsequent analysis, excluding suboptimal data from one patient. Tumors with elevated 2HG (> 1.9 mM, N = 8) and undetectable 2HG (< 0.3 mM, N = 11) were clearly distinguishable. Tumors with elevated glycine (> 1.5 mM, N = 4) showed rapid progression. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses with metabolite measures demonstrated that tumors with 2HG higher than 1.0 mM were significantly associated with a favorable prognosis (p = 0.01). In contrast, tumors with glycine higher than 2.5 mM showed a strong association with poor survival (p = 0.0005). The data confirm detection of 2HG in brainstem tumors at a concentration that is consistent with an IDH mutation and expected good prognosis, whereas elevated glycine in brainstem tumors portends rapid tumor progression and a worse prognosis.

Abstract Background Delirium is often underdiagnosed in clinical practice and is not routinely coded for billing. While manual chart review can identify delirium, it is labor-intensive and impractical for large-scale studies. Natural language processing (NLP) can analyze unstructured text in electronic health records (EHRs) to extract meaningful clinical information. Methods To support national integration of NLP for EHR-based delirium identification across different institutions, we launched the Delirium Interest Group within the national Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) NLP Working Group. This paper outlines our initial efforts to standardize, evaluate, and translate an NLP-based delirium detection model into the i2b2/ENACT platform. Results Multisite contextual inquiry identified several key challenges, including variations in local screening practices (eg, tools used, documentation frequency, and quality control), the need for harmonized definitions in the context of EHRs, and the complexity of modeling temporal logic. Multisite NLP evaluation revealed variable performance degradation driven by differences in delirium screening practices, clinical documentation patterns and semantics, and note syntactic structures. Conclusion Our work represents an important first step toward enabling scalable and standardized NLP-based delirium detection across institutions. By engaging diverse institutions through the ENACT NLP Working Group, we identified shared challenges and site-specific variations that impact model implementation and performance. Our collaborative approach enabled the development of a more robust framework for delirium identification across heterogeneous EHR systems. Future efforts will build on this foundation to enhance the validity, usability, and translational impact of delirium detection.

PURPOSE Gender bias against girls may affect health-seeking behavior and outcomes of childhood cancer. This study aimed to study the nature and extent of gender bias in health care among caregivers of childhood patients with cancer and also in community. METHODS This cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital and an urban community between July 2021 and July 2023. Qualitative component included 26 in-depth interviews (IDI) and four focus group discussions (FGDs) with caregivers of children with cancer. IDIs and FGDs were conducted by a psychologist and continued until thematic saturation was reached. For quantitative part, a gender-bias questionnaire was finalized which was administered to 230 caregivers in hospital and 311 participants from the community, with children in family. RESULTS Most participants did not perceive personal gender bias; however, many acknowledged noticing gender bias in others. This bias was linked to girls being considered financial burdens and having reduced marital prospects due to illness. Reducing treatment costs, improving access, and education targeting societal mindsets were suggested measures to mitigate bias. In community, no significant difference was observed among the respondents based on sex of youngest child in family. However, in hospital, caregivers of male children were less likely to offer similar care to a child of opposite sex than that reported by caregivers of female children ( P = .01) for ailments like fever/diarrhea. Similar difference was not observed for other health care scenarios. CONCLUSION Gender bias against girls, including that in health care access, is influenced by societal norms. Even with little personal perception of bias, there was a significant perceived bias observed in others by the participants. This study identified the existence of gender bias affecting health care choices, including cancer care.

ImportancePatients with kidney failure (KF) receiving long-term dialysis have increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with KF and AF have increased risk of stroke, death, and bleeding compared with age-matched cohorts. In KF, the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) increases hemorrhage risk, offsetting potential benefits and making left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) a potentially promising solution for risk reduction in AF.ObjectivesTo compare the outcomes and safety of OACs and LAAO for risk reduction of AF in patients with KF.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study assessed patients with KF enrolled in the US Renal Data System registry between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, who were diagnosed with AF after initiation of long-term dialysis. On average, patients met inclusion criteria for 22 months. Data analysis was completed in May 2024.ExposureMedicare claims were used to identify patients who received OACs and LAAO after AF diagnosis. A propensity-matched cohort was created based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score and year of treatment.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDeath, nonfatal bleeds, and nonfatal strokes.ResultsThe final cohort included 2344 patients with KF and a new AF diagnosis (median [IQR] age, 66.0 [57.0-73.0] years; 1341 [57.2%] male). Of these patients, 293 received LAAO and 2051 received OACs. A total of 2194 patients (93.6%) were receiving hemodialysis, with the remaining 150 (6.4%) receiving peritoneal dialysis. In the LAAO group, 79 deaths (27.0%) and 21 nonfatal strokes (7.2%) occurred, and 117 patients (39.9%) experienced 234 bleeding events. In the OAC group, 729 deaths (35.5%) and 163 strokes (8.0%) occurred, and 687 patients (33.5%) experienced 1114 bleeding events. After accounting for correlation between bleeds and death, the joint frailty model showed evidence of a treatment association of LAAO compared with OACs on recurrent bleeding events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) and death (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.72). There was a reduced risk of nonfatal stroke in the LAAO group (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94), but this finding was not significant after adjustment (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.76-1.81).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, LAAO compared with OACs was associated with improved survival and reduced bleeding risk in patients with KF and AF. These findings suggest that these data should be considered in shared decision-making in consideration of LAAO for patients with KF and AF.

Background and objectives Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein are associated with an elevated risk of rupture and increased procedural complexity. The role of preoperative embolization in this high-risk anatomical subset remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microsurgery with preoperative embolization, compared with microsurgery alone in patients with such AVMs. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of an AVM registry from the MISTA (Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs) consortium and included AVMs with perinidal aneurysms and a single draining vein. Baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates were compared. Propensity score weighting (PSW) using the covariate balancing method was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results Out of a total of 1919 patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria; 45 patients underwent preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery, and 20 underwent microsurgery alone. After adjustment, complete obliteration rates were similar between groups (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.04 to 16.33, P=0.92), as were rates of functional independence at discharge and follow-up. Overall complication, symptomatic complication, and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. However, permanent complications were significantly lower in patients with preoperative embolization (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.84, P=0.03). Discussion In patients with AVMs featuring perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein, preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery was associated with fewer permanent complications and no increase in adverse outcomes compared with microsurgery alone. However, given the small number of events, this finding should be interpreted cautiously.