Verma, Vasudha

PURPOSE Gender bias against girls may affect health-seeking behavior and outcomes of childhood cancer. This study aimed to study the nature and extent of gender bias in health care among caregivers of childhood patients with cancer and also in community. METHODS This cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital and an urban community between July 2021 and July 2023. Qualitative component included 26 in-depth interviews (IDI) and four focus group discussions (FGDs) with caregivers of children with cancer. IDIs and FGDs were conducted by a psychologist and continued until thematic saturation was reached. For quantitative part, a gender-bias questionnaire was finalized which was administered to 230 caregivers in hospital and 311 participants from the community, with children in family. RESULTS Most participants did not perceive personal gender bias; however, many acknowledged noticing gender bias in others. This bias was linked to girls being considered financial burdens and having reduced marital prospects due to illness. Reducing treatment costs, improving access, and education targeting societal mindsets were suggested measures to mitigate bias. In community, no significant difference was observed among the respondents based on sex of youngest child in family. However, in hospital, caregivers of male children were less likely to offer similar care to a child of opposite sex than that reported by caregivers of female children ( P = .01) for ailments like fever/diarrhea. Similar difference was not observed for other health care scenarios. CONCLUSION Gender bias against girls, including that in health care access, is influenced by societal norms. Even with little personal perception of bias, there was a significant perceived bias observed in others by the participants. This study identified the existence of gender bias affecting health care choices, including cancer care.

ABSTRACTBackgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage among childhood cancer patients remains understudied. Factors associated with CAM use and motivations of caregivers for using CAM remain poorly understood.MethodsThis cross‐sectional mixed‐methods study was conducted among caregivers of patients aged ≤18 years with confirmed cancer diagnoses. Caregivers were interviewed regarding CAM use, reasons for using/non‐using CAM, and views on CAM. Logistic regression identified factors associated with CAM use, whereas qualitative interviews explored motivations and barriers. The impact of CAM usage on 2‐year overall survival was explored.ResultsOut of 450 respondents, CAM usage was reported by 35.78% (n = 161), with home remedies (28.44%, n = 128) and AYUSH (Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, Yoga, Homeopathy) therapies (13.56%, n = 61) being most common. CAM use was associated with symptom duration ≥30 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.09–2.67; p = 0·019) and hematological malignancies (aOR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.33–3.17; p = 0·001). Major motivations for CAM use included belief in effectiveness (44.72%, n = 72) and family recommendations (34.16%, n = 55). Qualitative interviews highlighted cost, accessibility issues, and diagnostic delays as key drivers of CAM adoption. The 2‐year survival probabilities of CAM users and nonusers were comparable (0.88 [95% CI: 0.83–0.94] vs. 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83–0.92], log‐rank p = 0.75).ConclusionCAM is frequently used by pediatric cancer patients, driven by caregiver beliefs, family influence, and access barriers. Addressing caregiver practices and integrating CAM discussions into care may enhance supportive strategies without impacting survival outcomes.