Fu, Sunyang

Abstract Background Delirium is often underdiagnosed in clinical practice and is not routinely coded for billing. While manual chart review can identify delirium, it is labor-intensive and impractical for large-scale studies. Natural language processing (NLP) can analyze unstructured text in electronic health records (EHRs) to extract meaningful clinical information. Methods To support national integration of NLP for EHR-based delirium identification across different institutions, we launched the Delirium Interest Group within the national Evolve to Next-Gen Accrual to Clinical Trials (ENACT) NLP Working Group. This paper outlines our initial efforts to standardize, evaluate, and translate an NLP-based delirium detection model into the i2b2/ENACT platform. Results Multisite contextual inquiry identified several key challenges, including variations in local screening practices (eg, tools used, documentation frequency, and quality control), the need for harmonized definitions in the context of EHRs, and the complexity of modeling temporal logic. Multisite NLP evaluation revealed variable performance degradation driven by differences in delirium screening practices, clinical documentation patterns and semantics, and note syntactic structures. Conclusion Our work represents an important first step toward enabling scalable and standardized NLP-based delirium detection across institutions. By engaging diverse institutions through the ENACT NLP Working Group, we identified shared challenges and site-specific variations that impact model implementation and performance. Our collaborative approach enabled the development of a more robust framework for delirium identification across heterogeneous EHR systems. Future efforts will build on this foundation to enhance the validity, usability, and translational impact of delirium detection.

Abstract Error analysis is a critical step in evaluating and improving clinical concept extraction models, the most common clinical natural language processing (NLP) task. Unlike corpus annotation, which follows standardized protocols for creating gold-standard datasets, error analysis requires nuanced judgment grounded in both clinical expertise and NLP knowledge. This is especially important given the heterogeneity of clinical text, where variations in documentation style, note structure, and terminology can substantially influence model behavior. Despite its importance, there is currently no standardized, user-level framework to support systematic error analysis in clinical concept extraction task. In this study, we developed and validated MedError, a machine-assisted, human-in-the-loop framework designed to standardize and enhance error analysis for clinical concept extraction tasks. We collected and manually curated a corpus of 1,187 unique errors from a total of 4,237 notes across three different distinct hospitals. The error categories were defined using our previously validated error taxonomy and included 480 false negatives and 707 false positives across 25 error types and 48 clinical concept categories. We evaluated the performance of three proprietary and three open-source large language models (LLMs) in automatically classifying these errors into 26 and 15 predefined categories. We further developed a machine-assisted framework, MedError, which integrates best practices in error analysis, LLM-assisted classification and reasoning, and a user-friendly interface to enable more efficient, reproducible, and context-aware error analysis. The framework supports both single-site and federated multisite error analysis, facilitating the effective translation of clinical NLP systems into real-world settings.

Abstract Objectives The surge in patient portal messages (PPMs) with increasing needs and workloads for efficient PPM triage in healthcare settings has spurred the exploration of AI-driven solutions to streamline the healthcare workflow processes, ensuring timely responses to patients to satisfy their healthcare needs. However, there has been less focus on isolating and understanding patient primary concerns in PPMs—a practice which holds the potential to yield more nuanced insights and enhances the quality of healthcare delivery and patient-centered care. Materials and Methods We propose a fusion framework to leverage pretrained language models (LMs) with different language advantages via a Convolution Neural Network for precise identification of patient primary concerns via multi-class classification. We examined 3 traditional machine learning models, 9 BERT-based language models, 6 fusion models, and 2 ensemble models. Results The outcomes of our experimentation underscore the superior performance achieved by BERT-based models in comparison to traditional machine learning models. Remarkably, our fusion model emerges as the top-performing solution, delivering a notably improved accuracy score of 77.67 ± 2.74% and an F1 score of 74.37 ± 3.70% in macro-average. Discussion This study highlights the feasibility and effectiveness of multi-class classification for patient primary concern detection and the proposed fusion framework for enhancing primary concern detection. Conclusions The use of multi-class classification enhanced by a fusion of multiple pretrained LMs not only improves the accuracy and efficiency of patient primary concern identification in PPMs but also aids in managing the rising volume of PPMs in healthcare, ensuring critical patient communications are addressed promptly and accurately.

Abstract Background Error analysis plays a crucial role in clinical concept extraction, a fundamental subtask within clinical natural language processing (NLP). The process typically involves a manual review of error types, such as contextual and linguistic factors contributing to their occurrence, and the identification of underlying causes to refine the NLP model and improve its performance. Conducting error analysis can be complex, requiring a combination of NLP expertise and domain-specific knowledge. Due to the high heterogeneity of electronic health record (EHR) settings across different institutions, challenges may arise when attempting to standardize and reproduce the error analysis process. Objectives This study aims to facilitate a collaborative effort to establish common definitions and taxonomies for capturing diverse error types, fostering community consensus on error analysis for clinical concept extraction tasks. Materials and Methods We iteratively developed and evaluated an error taxonomy based on existing literature, standards, real-world data, multisite case evaluations, and community feedback. The finalized taxonomy was released in both .dtd and .owl formats at the Open Health Natural Language Processing Consortium. The taxonomy is compatible with several different open-source annotation tools, including MAE, Brat, and MedTator. Results The resulting error taxonomy comprises 43 distinct error classes, organized into 6 error dimensions and 4 properties, including model type (symbolic and statistical machine learning), evaluation subject (model and human), evaluation level (patient, document, sentence, and concept), and annotation examples. Internal and external evaluations revealed strong variations in error types across methodological approaches, tasks, and EHR settings. Key points emerged from community feedback, including the need to enhancing clarity, generalizability, and usability of the taxonomy, along with dissemination strategies. Conclusion The proposed taxonomy can facilitate the acceleration and standardization of the error analysis process in multi-site settings, thus improving the provenance, interpretability, and portability of NLP models. Future researchers could explore the potential direction of developing automated or semi-automated methods to assist in the classification and standardization of error analysis.

Abstract Despite recent methodology advancements in clinical natural language processing (NLP), the adoption of clinical NLP models within the translational research community remains hindered by process heterogeneity and human factor variations. Concurrently, these factors also dramatically increase the difficulty in developing NLP models in multi-site settings, which is necessary for algorithm robustness and generalizability. Here, we reported on our experience developing an NLP solution for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) signs and symptom extraction in an open NLP framework from a subset of sites participating in the National COVID Cohort (N3C). We then empirically highlight the benefits of multi-site data for both symbolic and statistical methods, as well as highlight the need for federated annotation and evaluation to resolve several pitfalls encountered in the course of these efforts.

Abstract Objective Social determinants of health (SDoH) play critical roles in health outcomes and well-being. Understanding the interplay of SDoH and health outcomes is critical to reducing healthcare inequalities and transforming a “sick care” system into a “health-promoting” system. To address the SDOH terminology gap and better embed relevant elements in advanced biomedical informatics, we propose an SDoH ontology (SDoHO), which represents fundamental SDoH factors and their relationships in a standardized and measurable way. Material and Methods Drawing on the content of existing ontologies relevant to certain aspects of SDoH, we used a top-down approach to formally model classes, relationships, and constraints based on multiple SDoH-related resources. Expert review and coverage evaluation, using a bottom-up approach employing clinical notes data and a national survey, were performed. Results We constructed the SDoHO with 708 classes, 106 object properties, and 20 data properties, with 1,561 logical axioms and 976 declaration axioms in the current version. Three experts achieved 0.967 agreement in the semantic evaluation of the ontology. A comparison between the coverage of the ontology and SDOH concepts in 2 sets of clinical notes and a national survey instrument also showed satisfactory results. Discussion SDoHO could potentially play an essential role in providing a foundation for a comprehensive understanding of the associations between SDoH and health outcomes and paving the way for health equity across populations. Conclusion SDoHO has well-designed hierarchies, practical objective properties, and versatile functionalities, and the comprehensive semantic and coverage evaluation achieved promising performance compared to the existing ontologies relevant to SDoH.

Background Covert cerebrovascular disease (CCD) has been shown to be associated with dementia in population‐based studies with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening, but dementia risk associated with incidentally discovered CCD is not known. Methods and Results Individuals aged ≥50 years enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system receiving head computed tomography (CT) or MRI for nonstroke indications from 2009 to 2019, without prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, dementia/Alzheimer disease, or visit reason/scan indication suggestive of cognitive decline or stroke were included. Natural language processing identified incidentally discovered covert brain infarction (id‐CBI) and white matter disease (id‐WMD) on the neuroimage report; white matter disease was characterized as mild, moderate, severe, or undetermined. We estimated risk of dementia associated with id‐CBI and id‐WMD. Among 241 050 qualified individuals, natural language processing identified 69 931 (29.0%) with id‐WMD and 11 328 (4.7%) with id‐CBI. Dementia incidence rates (per 1000 person‐years) were 23.5 (95% CI, 22.9–24.0) for patients with id‐WMD, 29.4 (95% CI, 27.9–31.0) with id‐CBI, and 6.0 (95% CI, 5.8–6.2) without id‐CCD. The association of id‐WMD with future dementia was stronger in younger (aged <70 years) versus older (aged ≥70 years) patients and for CT‐ versus MRI‐discovered lesions. For patients with versus without id‐WMD on CT, the adjusted HR was 2.87 (95% CI, 2.58–3.19) for younger and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.79–1.95) for older patients. For patients with versus without id‐WMD on MRI, the adjusted HR for dementia risk was 2.28 (95% CI, 1.99–2.62) for younger and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32–1.66) for older patients. The adjusted HR for id‐CBI was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.70–2.41) for younger and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.15–1.30) for older patients for either modality. Dementia risk was strongly correlated with id‐WMD severity; adjusted HRs compared with patients who were negative for id‐WMD by MRI ranged from 1.41 (95% CI, 1.25–1.60) for those with mild disease on MRI to 4.11 (95% CI, 3.58–4.72) for those with severe disease on CT. Conclusions Incidentally discovered CCD is common and associated with a high risk of dementia, representing an opportunity for prevention. The association is strengthened when discovered at younger age, by increasing id‐WMD severity, and when id‐WMD is detected by CT scan rather than MRI.

AbstractAn increasing number of studies have reported using natural language processing (NLP) to assist observational research by extracting clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs). Currently, no standardized reporting guidelines for NLP‐assisted observational studies exist. The absence of detailed reporting guidelines may create ambiguity in the use of NLP‐derived content, knowledge gaps in the current research reporting practices, and reproducibility challenges. To address these issues, we conducted a scoping review of NLP‐assisted observational clinical studies and examined their reporting practices, focusing on NLP methodology and evaluation. Through our investigation, we discovered a high variation regarding the reporting practices, such as inconsistent use of references for measurement studies, variation in the reporting location (reference, appendix, and manuscript), and different granularity of NLP methodology and evaluation details. To promote the wide adoption and utilization of NLP solutions in clinical research, we outline several perspectives that align with the six principles released by the World Health Organization (WHO) that guide the ethical use of artificial intelligence for health.

PURPOSEThe advancement of natural language processing (NLP) has promoted the use of detailed textual data in electronic health records (EHRs) to support cancer research and to facilitate patient care. In this review, we aim to assess EHR for cancer research and patient care by using the Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE), which is a community-driven effort to define a minimal set of data elements for cancer research and practice. Specifically, we aim to assess the alignment of NLP-extracted data elements with mCODE and review existing NLP methodologies for extracting said data elements.METHODSPublished literature studies were searched to retrieve cancer-related NLP articles that were written in English and published between January 2010 and September 2020 from main literature databases. After the retrieval, articles with EHRs as the data source were manually identified. A charting form was developed for relevant study analysis and used to categorize data including four main topics: metadata, EHR data and targeted cancer types, NLP methodology, and oncology data elements and standards.RESULTSA total of 123 publications were selected finally and included in our analysis. We found that cancer research and patient care require some data elements beyond mCODE as expected. Transparency and reproductivity are not sufficient in NLP methods, and inconsistency in NLP evaluation exists.CONCLUSIONWe conducted a comprehensive review of cancer NLP for research and patient care using EHRs data. Issues and barriers for wide adoption of cancer NLP were identified and discussed.

AbstractSummaryBuilding a high-quality annotation corpus requires expenditure of considerable time and expertise, particularly for biomedical and clinical research applications. Most existing annotation tools provide many advanced features to cover a variety of needs where the installation, integration and difficulty of use present a significant burden for actual annotation tasks. Here, we present MedTator, a serverless annotation tool, aiming to provide an intuitive and interactive user interface that focuses on the core steps related to corpus annotation, such as document annotation, corpus summarization, annotation export and annotation adjudication.Availability and implementationMedTator and its tutorial are freely available from https://ohnlp.github.io/MedTator. MedTator source code is available under the Apache 2.0 license: https://github.com/OHNLP/MedTator.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.