Citations

13 Background: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram predicts disease−specific survival (DSS) following R0 resection for gastric adenocarcinoma using patient and tumor factors, with predictive ability superior to that of the current AJCC staging system. However, validation has only been performed in high−volume, specialized institutions. The goal of this study is to compare nomogram-predicted survival with actual survival by using a population database with the largest sample size reported to date. Methods: A retrospective review of all gastric cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry data from 1988 to 2000 was conducted. Data for patient age, tumor size, gender, primary location of tumor, Lauren histology, depth of tumor invasion, and % (+) and (-) lymph nodes was entered into the nomogram calculator for each patient. Nomogram-derived 5−year DSS was compared with actual DSS survival using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: 4,700 patients were identified. Mean patient age was 68.7 years (SD 12.3), and mean tumor size was 4.8 cm (SD 2.7). The commonest tumor location was the body/middle third of stomach (1519, 32%), followed by the gastro−esophageal junction (1381, 29%) and the antrum (1376, 29%). The majority of patients (76%) had intestinal histology. The estimated proportion of patients surviving 5 years was 23%, 48%, 58%, and 82% for survival groups defined by nomogram likelihoods of 5−year DSS of 0−25%, 26−50%, 51−75%, and 76−100%, respectively. Relative to patients in the 76−100% 5−year nomogram group, patients in the 0−25%, 26−50%, and 51−75% group had significantly higher likelihood of death with hazard ratios of 7.0 (95% CI 6.1−8.0), 3.3 (95% CI 2.8−4.0), and 2.6 (95% CI 2.2−3.0), respectively (all p<0.001). Median follow-up was 9.1 years (range, 0−18). The concordance index (c−index) for the 5−year nomogram score was 0.68 (95% CI 0.67−0.69). Conclusions: There is good discrimination of survival between nomogram-predicted survival groups. Our results validate the use of the MSKCC nomogram in the setting of the general population, outside of specialized institutions, for predicting DSS following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma.

96 Background: In the last decade there has been an increase in the incidence of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral breast cancer. Although many factors have been proposed to explain this trend, the impact of breast reconstruction on the decision to undergo CPM has not been extensively studied. Methods: A retrospective review of breast cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry data (2004-2008) was conducted. Characteristics of patients undergoing CPM were evaluated. Results: 71,176 patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III infiltrating ductal or lobular breast cancer underwent mastectomy for their primary lesion. Among these, 10,558 patients (15%) underwent a CPM. A significantly higher proportion of women undergoing CPM had reconstruction performed (44%) than those patients not undergoing CPM (13%), p<0.001. On multivariate analysis (Table), significant variables predicting CPM included age <50 years (OR 10.12), breast reconstruction (OR 3.58), and lobular histology (OR 1.41), all p<0.001. Of the 12,466 patients (18%) who underwent reconstruction, 4,636 (37%) had implant reconstruction, 4,498 (36%) had tissue reconstruction, and 1,122 (9%) had combined tissue/implant reconstruction (no data for 18%). On multivariate analysis, predictors of reconstruction included age <50 years (OR 20.5; CI 18.5-22.7), year of surgery (2008 vs. 2004; OR 1.60; CI 1.49-1.71), low tumor grade (OR 1.19; CI 1.13-1.25) and ER+ status (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10-1.23). The use of radiation therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of pursuing reconstruction (OR 0.61; CI 0.58-0.65). Conclusions: Apart from age, the factor most strongly associated with CPM is the decision to have reconstructive surgery performed. This suggests that CPM may not be purely associated with risk-reduction but also with treatment factors such as cosmesis. [Table: see text]

Checkpoint blockade inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Despite the success of these agents in improving the overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, not all patients achieve clinical benefit, leaving room for improvement. The presence of cutaneous metastases in patients with metastatic melanoma provides the unique opportunity to treat the cutaneous lesions with a local modality while simultaneously treating systemic disease with systemic therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment of two patients with both in-transit and metastatic melanoma with the combination of the topical toll-like receptor 7 agonist imiquimod with systemic ipilimumab. Both patients appeared to have progressed and developed new cutaneous and systemic metastases while on single agent ipilimumab only to respond when started on topical imiquimod. Both patients tolerated the combination of imiquimod and ipilimumab without serious adverse events, and both patients had excellent clinical responses. These cases provide a proof of principle of the possibility of the combination of toll-like receptor 7 agonists with immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors.

BackgroundA Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) nomogram predicts disease specific survival (DSS) for gastric adenocarcinoma. The goal of this study is to use a cancer registry to compare nomogram predicted survival with actual survival in the general population.MethodsAll patients undergoing surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988–2012) were studied.Results6954 patients were identified. Majority of cancers were in the antrum (30.2%), and had intestinal histology (73.7%). Median follow‐up was 8.2 years. Five year DSS for nomogram risk groups (0–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, and 76–100%) was 23%, 48%, 57%, and 81% respectively. Actual DSS was 7–15% lower than nomogram predicted DSS. Relative to patients in the 76–100% 5‐year DSS risk group, patients in the 0–25%, 26–50%, and 51–75% groups had significantly higher risks of death with hazard ratios of 6.84 (95%CI 6.12–7.65), 3.30 (95%CI 2.83–3.86), and 2.64 (95%CI 2.30–3.03), respectively (all P < 0.001). The concordance index for 5‐year nomogram predicted DSS was 0.68 (95%CI 0.67–0.69).ConclusionsThe MSKCC gastric cancer nomogram over‐estimates DSS from gastric cancer in the general population and has a moderate concordance index. Predictive tools generated at specialized institutions may not perform as well in the general population. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015; 112:377–380. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

We report a response to pazopanib in a 69-year-old man with heavily pre-treated metastatic extraosseous Ewing sarcoma in addition to molecular profiling of his tumor. To our knowledge, this case is the earliest to demonstrate activity of an oral multi-targeted kinase inhibitor in Ewing sarcoma. This case provides rationale for adding a Ewing sarcoma arm to SARC024, a phase II study of regorafenib, another multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, in patients with liposarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing and Ewing-like sarcomas (NCT02048371). This national multi-institutional study is ongoing.

BACKGROUNDBiomarkers are routinely used to predict responses to systemic therapies, but their utility for predicting responses to local therapy for breast cancer is not known. This study determined whether biomarkers could predict responses to breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy.METHODSA review of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database identified women diagnosed with early‐stage invasive ductal breast cancer and treated with BCT or mastectomy from 1998 to 2008. The estrogen receptor (ER) status and the histologic grade were used to construct 3 biomarker profiles: low risk (ER‐positive, low/intermediate grade), intermediate risk (ER‐positive, high grade), and high risk (ER‐negative, any grade). The primary measured outcome was disease‐specific survival (DSS).RESULTSBCT and mastectomy were performed in 114,486 patients (59.2%) and 79,035 patients (40.8%), respectively. There were 122,420 low‐risk patients (63.3%), 34,341 intermediate‐risk patients (17.7%), and 36,760 high‐risk patients (19.0%). Multivariate analyses were performed separately for patients with low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk tumors. The adjusted hazard ratios for DSS for patients who underwent mastectomy versus BCT for low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk tumors were 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54‐1.79; P < .001), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.29‐1.53; P < .001), and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19‐1.35; P < .001), respectively.CONCLUSIONSPatients with ER‐positive, low‐grade breast cancers who underwent mastectomy had a 66% increase in disease‐specific mortality versus those who underwent BCT. Biomarker profiles defined by the ER status and grade may improve the selection of local therapy for breast cancer. Cancer 2015;121:2705‐2712. © 2015 American Cancer Society

Abstract Therapies that activate the immune system through blocking the binding of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) present on tumors and PD-1 (programmed death 1) present on activated immune cells are revolutionizing the care for patients with cancer. These therapies work by inhibiting negative regulators of the immune system, thereby decreasing a tumor's ability to evade the immune system. The side effects of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are generally mild and as expected are related to autoimmune reactions. Two of the most common side effects of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are rash and pruritus occurring in approximately 20% of patients. Although the rash is generally recognized to be immune mediated, the exact mechanisms of the rash remain unclear. Herein, we report three cases of lichenoid dermatitis in three patients treated with MK-3475 (anti–PD-1) that were characterized with marked T-cell infiltrates with few PD-1–positive cells. The rashes in all three patients were relatively mild, allowing treatment to continue despite the rashes. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(1); 18–22. ©2014 AACR.

BackgroundWe sought to examine adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for use of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in the United States.MethodsThe surveillance, epidemiology, and end results cancer registry was queried to identify patients undergoing surgery for truncal and extremity STS from 2004 to 2009.ResultsOf 5,075 patients, 50% received RT. Although routine RT is not recommended for Stage I patients, 25% still underwent RT. Even though routine RT is recommended for Stage II and III tumors, only 60% underwent RT. On multivariate analysis predictors of RT included age <50 years (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.28–1.91), malignant fibrous histiocytoma histology (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.3–1.92), T2 classification (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.60–2.20), and G3 (OR 6.27, 95% CI 5.10–7.72). Patients with Stage III STS who received RT showed improved disease specific survival at 5 years compared to those who did not, 68% versus 46%, P <0.001.ConclusionsUnderuse of RT is seen for a significant proportion of patients undergoing treatment for STS in the United States. More effort needs to be directed towards compliance with appropriate treatment recommendations, perhaps by regionalizing sarcoma care or remote multidisciplinary tumor boards. J. Surg. Oncol 2014; 109:633–638. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.