Bagaria, Sanjay

Background: Automated discharge instructions are increasingly used to support post-discharge communication, patient education, and nursing follow-up, yet the current state remains unidentified. This systematic review explores the types of automated discharge instructions used and their effectiveness in enhancing patient engagement and reducing readmission, emergency department visits and reoperation rates. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on 15 April 2025, using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL, following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria required peer-reviewed original research evaluating the utilization of automated patient discharge instructions following hospital admission or surgical stay. Exclusion criteria included correspondence, reviews, educational materials, not peer-reviewed, retracted reports, not retrievable, and no English translation. Risk of bias was assessed independently using NIH, JBI, ROB-2, and ROBINS-I tools. Two investigators independently conducted the screening, extraction, and synthesis of results using Endnote and Microsoft Excel. Results: Of the 1252 records identified, 13 studies were selected for analysis. There was a total of 34,386 patients across a diverse range of healthcare settings and clinical contexts. The average sample size per study was approximately 4912, with study samples ranging from 16 to 13,188 patients. The modalities of discharge instructions included automated phone calls (23.1%) and/or text messages (53.8%), as well as printed out auto-generated summaries (15.4%). Patient engagement was generally high, with automated phone calls showing the most consistent interaction, with completion rates ranging from 44% to 56%, often prompting clinical follow-up. SMS tools demonstrated strong scalability and response rates up to 87%. Two studies reported on hospital readmission outcomes and only a single study reported on emergency department revisit rates, while none assessed reoperation outcomes. Among those reporting readmission, automated phone calls and SMS were associated with lower or proxy-reduced readmission rates. Included studies had low to moderate levels of bias. Conclusions: While evidence on clinical outcomes such as readmissions, emergency department revisits, and reoperations remains limited and inconclusive, automated discharge tools—particularly phone calls and SMS—consistently demonstrated high patient engagement. Automated discharge tools show promise for supporting transitional care, discharge education, and post-discharge monitoring, highlighting the future role of automated tools in nursing workflows to support follow-up, escalation, and continuity of care.

Abstract Therapies that activate the immune system through blocking the binding of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) present on tumors and PD-1 (programmed death 1) present on activated immune cells are revolutionizing the care for patients with cancer. These therapies work by inhibiting negative regulators of the immune system, thereby decreasing a tumor's ability to evade the immune system. The side effects of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are generally mild and as expected are related to autoimmune reactions. Two of the most common side effects of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are rash and pruritus occurring in approximately 20% of patients. Although the rash is generally recognized to be immune mediated, the exact mechanisms of the rash remain unclear. Herein, we report three cases of lichenoid dermatitis in three patients treated with MK-3475 (anti–PD-1) that were characterized with marked T-cell infiltrates with few PD-1–positive cells. The rashes in all three patients were relatively mild, allowing treatment to continue despite the rashes. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(1); 18–22. ©2014 AACR.