Citations

Introduction The introduction of the purpose‐built single‐port (SP) robotic platform has allowed for the advent of regionalized minimally invasive surgical approaches for robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP), including the extraperitoneal and transvesical techniques. This study sought to develop a best practice consensus on the key principles, patient selection, surgical techniques, expected clinical outcomes, and learning curves pertaining to SP‐RARP. Methods A modified Delphi consensus was developed by a panel of experts, consisting of a 33‐item questionnaire, with each statement rated using a binary Likert scale (‘agree’ or ‘disagree’). The survey was distributed via email to all practicing SP‐RARP surgeons across the USA and Europe. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a given statement. Results A total of 53 surgeons participated in the Delphi Consensus across the two rounds. Of 33 statements, 28 (84.8%) reached agreement in the first round. The remaining consensus was achieved in the second round, involving 35 surgeons, and with one additional statement. The panel agreed that, although are no absolute contraindications to SP‐RARP, the preference towards specific SP‐RARP techniques should remain guided by the individual patients and surgical expertise. Although the SP extraperitoneal technique is recommended to pursue pelvic lymph node dissections, the panel agreed that transvesical SP‐RARP showed promise in promoting shorter hospital stay, faster recovery of urinary continence, and utility in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery. Consensus was also reached on the need for a structured training pathway, with most recommending beginning with extraperitoneal SP‐RARP before advancing to the transvesical approach. Conclusion This Delphi consensus demonstrates broad agreement among experienced SP surgeons in the USA and Europe, forming the foundation for future research on the clinical utility and necessary training pathways for SP‐RARP. Nevertheless, empirical validation based on clinical data from large cohort studies remains important.

The International Academy for Clinical Hematology (IACH) is a global, non-profit educational organization dedicated to advancing excellence, equity, and innovation in clinical hematology. Since its creation, the IACH has built an international community spanning more than 130 countries, leveraging digital-first education, scientific collaboration, and professional networking to improve patient care worldwide. This document presents the IACH Strategic Vision for 2026–2030, outlining a structured roadmap for the Academy’s next phase of growth and international leadership. The strategy is built upon six interdependent pillars: scientific excellence and credibility; digital leadership and intelligent learning; academic alliances and global footprint; innovation, visibility, and advocacy; transparency and sustainability; and brand positioning with global impact. By reinforcing scientific rigor, embracing digital transformation, and promoting innovation, the IACH aims to become the most trusted global reference for clinical hematology education and collaboration. This strategic vision positions the IACH as a unifying platform to unite the world hematology community under one banner of knowledge, collaboration, and compassion, for the benefit of every patient, everywhere.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses is essential for guiding revascularization and improving outcomes. Although invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the gold standard for functional lesion assessment, its use is limited by procedural invasiveness, cost, and complexity. CT-derived FFR (FFRct), based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), was the first major advance in noninvasive physiological assessment, but its adoption has been hindered by intensive off-site computation and dependence on high-quality imaging. This review summarizes the evolution from invasive FFR to AI-driven functional assessment of coronary lesions. We examine the principles and validation of CFD-based FFRct and then focus on the shift toward artificial intelligence, including both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches. These methods range from models using engineered geometric and plaque features trained on large synthetic datasets to end-to-end systems that learn directly from imaging data. We discuss key validation studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and clinical utility, with attention to performance in challenging settings such as intermediate stenoses, heavy calcification, and patients with comorbidities. We also highlight major barriers to widespread adoption, including dependence on input data quality, limited explainability, regulatory hurdles, and integration into clinical workflows. Finally, we outline future directions, including AI-enabled virtual PCI planning, multimodal risk stratification, and broader access to functional cardiac assessment. AI has the potential to transform noninvasive coronary imaging by enabling a single CCTA scan to provide rapid, integrated evaluation of anatomy, plaque characteristics, and physiological significance, supporting more personalized care and better clinical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Apheresis medicine is a continually evolving field with numerous studies published each year. To help apheresis practitioners stay up to date with the current literature, members of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee identified and summarized 10 seminal articles published in 2025, from the field of apheresis medicine. PubMed was used to identify articles published in four topics including donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis collection for cellular therapy. These articles met at least one of the following criteria: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th Special Issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included while case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.

Background: Resistant hypertension represents a significant clinical challenge, often driven by dysregulated aldosterone production. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) are a novel therapeutic class designed to directly suppress aldosterone biosynthesis. This study aimed to synthesize evidence regarding the comparative efficacy, optimal dosing, and dose–response relationships of three ASIs—baxdrostat, lorundrostat, and osilodrostat—for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to 31 October 2025. The primary outcome was the mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to placebo. We utilized a frequentist random-effects model, characterized dose–response relationships via meta-regression, and ranked treatments using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA). Results: The analysis included 8 RCTs comprising 3253 participants. Baxdrostat 2 mg once daily demonstrated the greatest antihypertensive efficacy with a mean SBP reduction of −13.8 mmHg (95% CI: −17.5 to −10.1) versus placebo, followed by Lorundrostat 100 mg (−12.5 mmHg) and Baxdrostat 1 mg (−11.5 mmHg). SUCRA analysis identified Baxdrostat as the highest-ranked treatment (83.0%), followed by Lorundrostat (67.8%) and Osilodrostat (55.5%). Dose–response meta-regression revealed strong linear correlations for Baxdrostat (R2 = 0.91), Osilodrostat (R2 = 0.81), and Lorundrostat (R2 = 0.80). Conclusions: ASIs, particularly Baxdrostat and Lorundrostat, offer robust blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension. The strong linear dose–response relationships suggest these agents have a favorable therapeutic window for titration. While effective, clinical implementation requires careful monitoring for adverse events.