Back to Authors

Yuh, Bertram

Mayo Clinic

City Of Hope National Medical Center

Citations 5

International Delphi consensus on single‐port robotic radical prostatectomy: patient selection, surgical technique, and training
Soputro, Nicolas , Bjurlin, Marc, Srivastava, Abhishek , Umbreit, Eric, Eltemamy, Mohamed , Pak, Raymond, Gelikman, David G. , Hopson, Nicholas, Geskin, Albert , Mehrazin, Reza, VanDyke, Maia, Nguyen, Carvell, Ornstein, David, Billah, Mubashir , Russell, Christopher, Yuh, Bertram, Thong, Alan, Olivares, Ruben, Shetty, Sugandh, Shakuri‐Rad, Jaschar , Baccala, Angelo, Osinski, Thomas, Simone, Giuseppe, Lee, D Y , Baker, Mark, Ramadan, Mohammad, Mattei, Agostino , Jafri, Mohammad, Galfano, Antonio, Link, Richard E. , Lam, Po, Jones, Marklyn, Bassett, Jeffrey C. , Musi, Gennaro, Schwen, Zeyad , Beksaç, Alp Tuna , Eden, C, Miller, Scott, Gontero, P, Amparore, Daniele, Porpiglia, Francesco, Vourganti, Srinivas , Ahmed, Mutahar, Montorsi, Francesco, Perdona, Sisto, Izzo, Alessandro, Stifelman, Michael D., Crivellaro, Simone, Briganti, Alberto, Kaouk, Jihad, Autorino, Riccardo, Soputro, Nicolas A , Eltemamy, Mohamed , Gelikman, David G , Geskin, Albert , Palese, Michael , Link, Richard E , Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Bjurlin, Marc A. , Umbreit, Eric , Mehrazin, Reza , VanDyke, Maia , Yuh, Bertram, Thong, Alan Eih Chih , Olivares, Ruben , Baccala, Angelo A., Osinski, Thomas L. , Simone, Giuseppe , Crouzet, Sébastien , Ramadan, Mohammad Said , Porreca, Angelo , Jafri, Syed M., Galfano, Antonio , Amparore, Daniele , Ahmed, Mutahar, Montorsi, Francesco , Perdonà, Sisto , Izzo, Alessandro , STIFELMAN, MICHAEL D. , Crivellaro, Simone, Briganti, Alberto , Kaouk, Jihad , Autorino, Riccardo

BJU International | June 16, 2026 | Volume: 138 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 456-463

10.1111/bju.70346 Get It

Introduction The introduction of the purpose‐built single‐port (SP) robotic platform has allowed for the advent of regionalized minimally invasive surgical approaches for robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP), including the extraperitoneal and transvesical techniques. This study sought to develop a best practice consensus on the key principles, patient selection, surgical techniques, expected clinical outcomes, and learning curves pertaining to SP‐RARP. Methods A modified Delphi consensus was developed by a panel of experts, consisting of a 33‐item questionnaire, with each statement rated using a binary Likert scale (‘agree’ or ‘disagree’). The survey was distributed via email to all practicing SP‐RARP surgeons across the USA and Europe. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a given statement. Results A total of 53 surgeons participated in the Delphi Consensus across the two rounds. Of 33 statements, 28 (84.8%) reached agreement in the first round. The remaining consensus was achieved in the second round, involving 35 surgeons, and with one additional statement. The panel agreed that, although are no absolute contraindications to SP‐RARP, the preference towards specific SP‐RARP techniques should remain guided by the individual patients and surgical expertise. Although the SP extraperitoneal technique is recommended to pursue pelvic lymph node dissections, the panel agreed that transvesical SP‐RARP showed promise in promoting shorter hospital stay, faster recovery of urinary continence, and utility in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery. Consensus was also reached on the need for a structured training pathway, with most recommending beginning with extraperitoneal SP‐RARP before advancing to the transvesical approach. Conclusion This Delphi consensus demonstrates broad agreement among experienced SP surgeons in the USA and Europe, forming the foundation for future research on the clinical utility and necessary training pathways for SP‐RARP. Nevertheless, empirical validation based on clinical data from large cohort studies remains important.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023
Moses, Kelvin A. , Sprenkle, Preston C. , Box, Geoffrey N., Carlsson, Sigrid , Catàlona, William J. , Dahl, Douglas M. , Dall’Era, Marc , Davis, John W. , Epstein, Jonathan I. , Etzioni, Ruth B., Farrington, Thomas A., Garraway, Isla P. , Jarrard, David F. , Kauffman, Eric, Kaye, Deborah R. , Kibel, Adam S. , LaGrange, Chad A. , Maroni, Paul, Ponsky, Lee , Salami, Simpa S. , Shaneyfelt, Terrence, Smaldone, Marc C. , Sonn, Geoffrey A. , Tyson, Mark D. , Vapiwala, Neha , Wake, Robert, Washington, Samuel L. , Yu, Alice , Yuh, Bertram, Berardi, Ryan A., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Salami, Simpa S , Bahler, Clinton D. , Drake, Bettina F. , Etzioni, Ruth B., Reys, Brian D. , Sánchez, Alejandro , Seibert, Tyler M.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 10, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 236-246

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0014 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Early Detection provide recommendations for individuals with a prostate who opt to participate in an early detection program after receiving the appropriate counseling on the pros and cons. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines with regard to the testing protocol, use of multiparametric MRI, and management of negative biopsy results to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and minimize the detection of indolent disease.
Feasibility of perioperative remote monitoring of patient‐generated health data in complex surgical oncology
Melstrom, Laleh G. , Zhou, Xiaoke , Kaiser, Andreas M. , Chan, Kevin , Lau, Clayton, Raoof, Mustafa , Zhumkhawala, Ali , Yuh, Bertram, Singh, Gagandeep , Fong, Yuman , Fong, Yuman , Melstrom, Laleh , Zhou, Xiaoke, Warner, Susanne G. , Sun, Virginia Chih-Yi

Journal of Surgical Oncology | September 28, 2022 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 192-202

10.1002/jso.27106 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe feasibility of remote perioperative telemonitoring of patient‐generated physiologic health data and patient‐reported outcomes in a high risk complex general and urologic oncology surgery population is evaluated.MethodsComplex general surgical/urologic oncology patients wore a pedometer, completed ePROs (electronic patient‐reported outcome surveys) and record their vitals (weight, pulse, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and temperature) via a telehealth app platform. Feasibility (% adherence) was assessed as the primary outcome measure.ResultsTwenty‐one patients with a median age 58 (32−82) years were included. The readmission rate was 33% and the incidence of ≥Grade 3a morbidity was 24%. Adherence to vital sign and ePRO measurements was 95% before surgery, 91% at discharge, and 82%, 68%, and 64% at postdischarge d2, 7, 14, and 30, respectively. There was significant worsening of mobility, self‐care and usual daily activity at postdischarge d2 compared to preoperative baseline (p < 0.05). Median daily preoperative steps taken by patients with <Grade 3a versus ≥Grade 3a postoperative morbidity was 6062 versus 4166 (p < 0.05). Of those interviewed, 87% (13/15) viewed vital sign devices as helpful in recovery.ConclusionsTelemonitoring is feasible in a general surgical and urologic oncology setting. Future studies will ascertain optimal patient selection, duration, and extent of perioperative monitoring.
A phase 2 study of 99m Tc-trofolastat chloride (MIP-1404) SPECT/CT to identify and localize prostate cancer (PCa) in high-risk patients (pts) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node (ePLN) dissection compared to hist
Slawin, Kevin M., Tenke, Péter , Joniau, Steven , Ellis, William J., Buzogány, István, Мишугин, С. В. , Stolz, Josef, Матвеев, В. Б. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Jarrard, David Frasier, Yuh, Bertram, Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Stambler, Nancy , Armor, Thomas, Israel, Robert J. , Joniau, Steven , Alekseev, B. Yа. , Klein, Eric A. , Študent, Vladimír , Scherr, Douglas S. , Babich, John W.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 3, 2019 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e16003-e16003

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e16003 Get It

A phase II study of 99mTc-trofolastat (MIP-1404) SPECT/CT to identify and localize prostate cancer in high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) compared to histopathology: An inter
Slawin, Kevin M., Ellis, William J., Tenke, Péter , Joniau, Steven , Buzogány, István, Мишугин, С. В. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Yuh, Bertram, Jarrard, David Frasier, Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Stolz, Josef, Youssoufian, Hagop , Stambler, Nancy , Armor, Thomas, Israel, Robert J. , Alekseev, B. Yа. , Klein, Eric A. , Scherr, Douglas S. , Babich, John W. , Joniau, Steven

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 94-94

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.94 Get It

94 Background: Technetium (Tc99m) trofolastat (USANC) is a novel urea-based small molecule SPECT radiotracer with utility in imaging overexpression of PSMA in prostate cancer (PCa). Unlike earlier agents targeting PSMA, this ligand is rapidly internalized and retained in tumors. We conducted an open-label, multicenter phase 2 study in the US and Europe (NCT01667536). An interim analysis was performed at approximately 50% accrual. Methods: Patients (pts) with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate scheduled for RP with EPLND at high risk for disease outside of the prostate gland were eligible. High risk pts were ≥cT3 or Kattan nomogram score ≥130. Within 30 days of screening, pts required a bone scan and pelvic MRI. After enrollment, pts received trofolastat followed by whole-body planar and SPECT/CT imaging 3 to 6 hrs later. Pts then underwent RP with EPLND within 21 days. SPECT/CT images were evaluated centrally by 3 readers blinded to clinical information and compared to on-site pathology assessments using a common scoring template. The primary endpoint was the ability of trofolastat to detect PCa within the gland. Secondary endpoints included detection of extent and location within the gland, pelvic lymph nodes and comparative performance against MRI. Results: 84 pts were enrolled to date from 16 centers. Interim data is available for 54 pts. A majority (≥2/3) of SPECT/CT readers correctly identified the presence or absence of primary PCa in 51/54 (94%, 85-98 95% CI) patients including 2 true-negative cases treated with neoadjuvant enzalutamide. Sensitivity and specificity were 94% (84-98 95% CI) and 100% (34-100 95% CI) respectively. Conclusions: Based on the interim data available, trofolastat has accurately detected primary prostate carcinoma within the gland with high sensitivity and specificity in high-risk pts prior to surgery. Updated results, analyses of secondary endpoints, pelvic lymph nodes, and comparative performance vs. MRI from this ongoing study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01667536. [Table: see text]